Prevalence of use of anticoagulants in 502 elderly hospitalized patients at increased risk for systemic embolism or venous thromboembolism without contraindications to anticoagulants in a university hospital

We investigated, in a university hospital, the prevalence of use of anticoagulants in 502 elderly hospitalized patients at increased risk for systemic embolism or venous thromboembolism without contraindications to anticoagulants. The 502 patients included 291 men and 211 women with a mean age of 77 +/- 7 years (range, 65-98 years). Anticoagulants were used to treat 479 of 502 hospitalized patients (95%) at increased risk for systemic embolism or venous thromboembolism. Of the 479 patients treated with anticoagulants, 317 (66%) were treated with unfractionated heparin, 203 (42%) with warfarin, 81 (17%) with low-molecular-weight heparin, two (<1%) with fondaparinux, and two (<1%) with argatroban.

The prevention of venous thromboembolism in older adults: guidelines

The rationale for thromboprophylaxis is based on the high prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a disorder involving deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), among hospitalized patients, the clinically silent nature of VTE in most patients, and the morbidity, cost, and potential mortality associated with unprevented thromboembolism. Both DVT and PE cause few specific symptoms, and the clinical diagnosis is unreliable. Since the first clinical manifestation of VTE may be fatal PE, it is inappropriate to wait for symptoms before treatment. Unrecognized and untreated DVT may also cause the postphlebitic syndrome and predispose patients to subsequent episodes of recurrent VTE. Routine screening for VTE has also not been shown to reduce the incidence of symptomatic VTE or fatal PE. Use of effective methods of prophylaxis is more cost effective and is safer than selective, intensive screening for VTE. This article reviews current recommendations for the prevention of VTE as they apply to older adults. The recommendations discussed are based on the Sixth American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy reported in Chest. 2001;119:132S-175S.

Introduction to thrombosis proficient and cost-effective approaches to thrombosis

Thrombosis is the most common single cause of death in the United States. More than 2 million people die each year of arterial or venous thrombosis or its consequences, and a similar number experience nonfatal thrombosis-deep vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolus, nonfatal cerebrovascular thrombosis, transient cerebral ischemic attacks (40% of patients will have a fatal or nonfatal cerebrovascular thrombosis within 1 year), nonfatal coronary artery thrombosis, retinal vascular thrombosis, and other nonfatal thrombotic episodes. Yet many, if not most, episodes of thrombosis can be prevented by appropriate primary antithrombotic therapy, and most recurrences can be prevented by the appropriate choice of secondary therapy.

Prothrombin G20210A mutation, antithrombin, heparin cofactor II, protein C, and protein S defects

These defects are not as common as factor V Leiden, but they are more common than many other hereditary procoagulant defects. The incidence of the prothrombin gene (G20210A) mutation is not yet known with certainty, but it may approach or even exceed that of factor V Leiden. These defects also seem less common than hereditary sticky platelet syndrome; however, they are all common enough that they always should be considered in any individual with unexplained thrombosis and should be part of the work-up for patients with thrombotic disorders. Of the defects discussed herein, prothrombin G20210A mutation seems, thus far, to be more common than AT, protein C, protein S, or HC-II defects. Assessment of prothrombin gene mutation should be part of the primary evaluation of patients with unexplained thrombosis.

Thromboprophylaxis and thrombosis in medical, surgical, trauma, and obstetric/gynecologic patients

The International Consensus and the ACCP Sixth Consensus had a great impact on the clinical acceptance of LMWHs. These recommendations have been instrumental in initiating further clinical trial to answer key questions regarding thromboprophylaxis and in setting a new standard for patient care. Also, the key to cost containment in management of DVT/PE is to (1) define the etiology (blood coagulation protein or platelet defect), institute appropriate long-term therapy as indicated, and assess appropriate family members as indicated if a hereditary defect is found and (2) use LMWH as inpatient management. saving a minimum of 210,000.00 dollars per 1000 patients simply from cost savings of recurrence, saving 17 lives per 1000 patients, and saving exorbitant costs of care for patients with recurrence and development of chronic venous insufficiency. The use of outpatient LMWH will save 4,900,000.00 dollars per 1000 patients if applied to the 70% of patients with DVT who fit the criteria of no comorbid condition requiring hospitalization and who arrive early enough to allow a diagnosis to be sent home or hospitalized for 24 hours or less. The simple defining of defects leading to unexplained thrombosis will add another 3,000,000.00 dollars in savings per 1000 patients with DVT and approximately 350,000.00 dollars per 100 patients with thrombotic stroke. In those with transient ischemic attacks, defining the defect and instituting appropriate antithrombotic therapy, thereby potentially saving approximately 30% from developing a thrombotic stroke, amounts to approximately 350,500.00 dollars (= 30% of 1,168,500.00 dollars) in savings per 100 patients.

Proficient and cost-effective approaches for the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis and thromboembolism

Thrombosis is clearly a common cause of death in the US. It is obviously of major importance to define the aetiology of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as (i) many of these events are preventable if appropriate therapy, dependent upon the risk factors known is utilised; (ii) appropriate antithrombotic therapy will decrease risks of recurrence; (iii) the type of defect(s) and risk(s) will determine length of time the patient should remain on therapy for secondary prevention and (iv) if the defect is hereditary appropriate family members can be assessed. Aside from mortality, significant additional morbidity occurs from DVT including, but not limited to, stasis ulcers and other sequelae of post-phlebitic syndrome. Numerous studies have provided evidence that medical patients and patients undergoing surgery or trauma are at significant risk for developing DVT, including pulmonary embolism (PE). Thus, an important task for the clinician is to prevent DVT and its complications. It is important to define risk groups where prophylaxis must be considered. The attitudes and beliefs towards prophylaxis show great regional variations. This is true for the definition of risk groups, the proportion of patients receiving prophylaxis and prophylactic modalities used. For this reason, various 'consensus conference' groups have attempted to alleviate these problems; the primary mission of consensus guidelines is to provide optimal direction to the clinician in the setting of clinical practice. If the practice guidelines generated are successful they will assist clinicians in decision-making for their patients, and they will also provide protection against unjustified malpractice actions. Therapy may be complex, as clinical studies continue to identify more effective treatments. This review includes currently accepted approaches to the treatment of DVT. The clinical course of DVT is highly dynamic. When the response to therapy is not as expected, more than one cause of DVT may be present in a patient. Treatment must address the primary coagulopathy as well as any precipitating factors. The risk of pharmacological intervention must be balanced against potential benefit. If the incidence of DVT in a given disorder is low and if the mortality rate is similarly low, therapy with an agent known to be associated with a high risk for complications, such as warfarin, would not be indicated. If DVT is seen primarily after surgery or in other high-risk situations, therapy might be limited to a fixed time period. However, if the ongoing risk of DVT remains high or if a history of recurrent DVT dictates, lifelong therapy might be indicated. The recommendations presented are based upon published controlled trials; however, indications for therapy and therapeutic agents of choice will continually evolve. By applying the principles outlined in this review, substantial cost savings, reduction in morbidity and reductions in mortality should occur.