Comparative effects of fluconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole upon tacrolimus and cyclosporine serum concentrations

Diagnosing and Managing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients

In the article, the authors review antibiotic treatment options for both acute uncomplicated UTI and complicated UTI. In addition, they review alternative regimens which are needed in the setting of drug-resistant pathogens including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, -extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas, which are encountered with more frequency.

Lower blood levels of isavuconazole in critically ill patients compared with other populations: possible need for therapeutic drug monitoring

BACKGROUND

Isavuconazole is first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is deemed not necessary, since most patients reached therapeutic levels (>1 mg/L) in large studies. Low levels were reported in some critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. The aim was to compare isavuconazole levels between critically ill and non-critically ill patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data from all patients treated with standard-dose isavuconazole between 1 January 2019 and 26 October 2022 was performed. The following data were collected: TDM results from the first 30 days of therapy; ward of admission; demographic and clinical characteristics; continuous renal replacement therapy; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; and co-administered drugs.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients (median age 65 years) and 188 TDM measurements (mean number of samples per patient 2.6 ± 1.7) were included; 33 (45.8%) were ICU patients (3 also had haematological disorders); 39 (54.2%) were non-ICU patients, of whom 31 had haematological disorders. In all patients, the mean isavuconazole blood level was 3.33 ± 2.26 mg/L. Significantly lower levels were observed in the ICU versus the non-ICU population: mean 2.02 ± 1.22 versus 4.15 ± 2.31 mg/L (P < 0.001). Significantly higher rates of subtherapeutic levels were observed in ICU patients compared with the non-ICU population: all determinations <2 mg/L in 33.3% versus 7.7%, and all determinations <1 mg/L in 12.1% versus 0%, respectively. Predictors of lower isavuconazole levels were admission to the ICU, BMI > 25 kg/m2, bilirubin > 1.2 mg/dL and the absence of haematological disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU patients had significantly lower isavuconazole blood levels compared to non-ICU population. The TDM of isavuconazole for efficacy should be performed in ICU.

Safety of fluconazole in kidney transplant recipients for prevention of coccidioidomycosis

Coccidioides is an endemic fungus that causes infections ranging from mild respiratory illness to life-threatening disease, and immunocompromised hosts such as solid organ transplant recipients are at higher risk for disseminated infection and mortality. Our center administers fluconazole prophylaxis to kidney transplant recipients residing in geographic areas with higher incidences of coccidioidomycosis. However, because drug-drug interactions occur between triazoles and immunosuppressants used in transplant medicine, we undertook a study to ascertain whether fluconazole prophylaxis was associated with any important safety outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. This retrospective study evaluated patients who had undergone kidney transplantation between 2016 and 2019. Data on patient demographics, transplant-related clinical information, use of fluconazole prophylaxis (200 mg daily for 6-12 months post-transplant), and patient outcomes were obtained. The primary outcome was mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months, comparing those who received fluconazole prophylaxis to those who did not. Secondary outcomes included mean eGFR at 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months post-transplant, patient survival, biopsy-proven graft rejection, graft loss, or a new requirement for post-transplant dialysis, all within 12 months post-transplant. The mean eGFR at 12 months was similar between both groups, with 66.4 ml/min/1.73 m² in the fluconazole prophylaxis group vs. 64.3 ml/min/1.73 m² in the non-fluconazole prophylaxis group (P = 0.55). Secondary outcomes were similar across both groups. Multivariable linear regression found no significant association between fluconazole use and graft function. Fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of coccidioidomycosis was not associated with adverse graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

Low-dose fluconazole as a useful and safe prophylactic option in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) represent a potentially fatal complication in patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) if the initiation of therapy is delayed. Some guidelines recommend antifungal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for these patients depending on the risk of IFIs following allogeneic HSCT. This retrospective study aimed to identify the group of patients who safely undergo allogeneic HSCT with low-dose fluconazole (FLCZ) prophylaxis (100 mg/day).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 107 patients who underwent their first allogeneic HSCT at Nagoya City University Hospital from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. We analyzed the efficacy of low-dose FLCZ prophylaxis and investigated the relationship between major risk factors and antifungal prophylaxis failure (APF) within 100 days post-transplant.

RESULTS

Of the 107 patients, 70 received low-dose FLCZ prophylaxis, showing a cumulative incidence of APF of 37.1% and a proven/probable IFI rate of 4.3%. There were no fungal infection-related deaths, including Aspergillus infections, in the FLCZ prophylaxis group. In a multivariable analysis, cord blood transplantation (CBT) (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR), 3.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44-8.77; p = 0.006) and abnormal findings on lung CT before transplantation (SHR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.02-4.92; p = 0.044) were independent risk factors for APF in the FLCZ prophylaxis group.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose FLCZ prophylaxis is a useful and safe option for patients receiving allogeneic HSCT, except in those undergoing CBT or having any fungal risk features including history of fungal infections, positive fungal markers, and abnormal findings on lung CT before transplantation.

Pharmacological management of invasive mold infections in solid organ transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients face an increased susceptibility to invasive fungal infection (IFI) due to filamentous fungi. Post-transplant invasive aspergillosis (IA) and mucormycosis are related to exceedingly high mortality rates and graft loss risk, and its management involve a unique range of clinical challenges.

AREAS COVERED

First, the current treatment recommendations for IA and mucormycosis among SOT recipients are critically reviewed, including the supporting evidence. Next, we discussed particular concerns in this patient population, such as drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between triazoles and post-transplant immunosuppression or treatment-related toxicity. The role for immunomodulatory and host-targeted therapies is also considered, as well as the theoretical impact of the intrinsic antifungal activity of calcineurin inhibitors. Finally, a personal opinion is made on future directions in the pharmacological approach to post-transplant IFI.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite relevant advances in the treatment of mold IFIs in the SOT setting, such as the incorporation of isavuconazole (with lower incidence of DDIs and better tolerability than voriconazole), there remains a large room for improvement in areas such as the position of combination therapy or the optimal strategy for the reduction of baseline immunosuppression. Importantly, future studies should define the specific contribution of newer antifungal agents and classes.

Difference in immunosuppressant dose requirement when transitioning to isavuconazole from other azoles in thoracic transplant recipients

The triazole antifungal isavuconazole (ISAVU) is used for prevention and treatment of fungal infections in solid organ transplant (SOT). SOT recipients commonly need to transition from one azole to another due to breakthrough infection, toxicity, or other reasons. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of ISAVU on immunosuppressant concentrations in thoracic transplant recipients when ISAVU was started de novo or transitioned from another azole. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including 68 patients (51 lung, 14 heart, and 3 heart/lung transplant). Concentration to dosage ratios (C/D) of immunosuppressants were assessed at baseline, day 3, and weekly for 9 weeks. When starting ISAVU de novo, we observed a temporary doubling of tacrolimus exposure. Cyclosporine and sirolimus required dose decreases. Tacrolimus C/D increased by 110% at day 3 in patients started on ISAVU de novo then returned to baseline C/D ± 17% weeks 2-9 (n = 8). One cyclosporine patient started on ISAVU de novo had variable C/D, and C/D increased by 219% ± 72% in 2 sirolimus patients. When transitioning from other azoles, tacrolimus and cyclosporine required about twice the initial dose. After week 1, tacrolimus C/D decreased by 53% ± 6% in patients transitioned from posaconazole (n = 33), voriconazole (n = 14), or fluconazole (n = 2). Cyclosporine C/D decreased by 45% ± 16% in patients transitioning from other azoles (posaconazole [n = 2], voriconazole [n = 2], fluconazole [n = 1]). Sirolimus C/D decreased by 73% ± 13% in patients transitioned from posaconazole (n = 7). Aside from the initial loading phase, ISAVU had a lesser degree of interaction with immunosuppressants than other azoles in loading phase, ISAVU had a lesser degree of interaction with immunosuppressants than other azoles in adjustments for the 4-week period after initiating antifungal therapy with ISAVU or switching from another agent.

Isavuconazole-tacrolimus drug-drug interactions in HSCT patients

OBJECTIVES

Because tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and exhibits both intraindividual and interindividual variability, we attempted to establish the percentage of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dose reduction to prevent toxicity and ensure stem cell engraftment when using this immunosuppressant with the antifungal isavuconazole (ISA). By calculating the tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratio, we expected to demonstrate the magnitude of change in the C/D ratio from baseline after ISA administration.

METHODS

We evaluated the interaction between ISA, a new triazole antifungal used in prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections, and the CNI class of immunosuppressive drugs, specifically tacrolimus, in 11 blood samples from HSCT recipients.

RESULTS

The mean tacrolimus C/D ratio increased 1.44-fold from baseline 48 h after ISA administration (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although further investigation is needed, the results of this study suggest that a reduction of 18% in tacrolimus may be recommended.

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics are influenced by CYP3A5, age, and concomitant fluconazole in pediatric kidney transplant patients

Tacrolimus, the most common immunosuppressant for organ transplant, has a narrow therapeutic range and is metabolized by CYP3A4/5. Trough concentration monitoring and dosing adjustments are used to reach a therapeutic range. CYP3A5 intermediate and normal metabolizers (*1 allele carriers; IM/NM) demonstrate faster tacrolimus metabolism than poor metabolizers (PM). We analyzed the electronic health records of 93 patients aged <21 years for the first 8 weeks after a kidney transplant between January 2010 and December 2021. The target tacrolimus trough was 10-15 ng/mL in the first 4 weeks and 7-10 ng/mL in the next 4 weeks. Banked DNA was collected and genotyped for CYP3A5*3, *6, *7, and *8 alleles. We found that CYP3A5 IM/NM (n = 21) took longer than PM (n = 72) to reach the therapeutic range (7 vs. 4 days, p = 0.048). IM/NM had more dose adjustments (8 vs. 6, p = 0.025) and needed >150% of the required daily dose compared with PM. The concentration/dose ratio was influenced by age and concomitant fluconazole (p = 0.0003, p = 0.034, respectively) and the average daily dose decreases with age in CYP3A5 PM (p = 0.001). Tremors were more common in patients who ever had a trough concentration >15 ng/mL compared with those who never had a trough concentration >15 ng/mL (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.03-8.98, p = 0.038). Using standard dosing, CYP3A5 IM/NM took longer to reach the goal range and require more dose adjustments and higher doses than PM. Preemptive genotyping could decrease the number of dose changes necessary to reach a therapeutic dose. We have implemented pre-transplant CYP3A5 testing at our institution.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

Fungal infections are a significant source of morbidity in the lung transplant population via direct allograft damage and predisposing patients to the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are imperative to limit allograft damage. This review article discusses incidence, risk factors, and symptoms with a specific focus on diagnostic and treatment strategies in the lung transplant population for fungal infections caused by Aspergillus, Candida, Coccidioides, Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Scedosporium/Lomentospora, Fusarium, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. Evidence for the use of newer triazole and inhaled antifungals to treat isolated pulmonary fungal infections in lung transplant recipients is also discussed.

Risk factors for early onset acute kidney injury after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the role of drug-drug interactions

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important and life-threatening complication following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This is therefore an active research area with studies aiming to understand the factors that cause this complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to identify the factors that caused AKI in 100 patients who underwent allo-HSCT in the first 100 days after transplantation using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean time of onset of AKI was 45.58 days (range 13-97) and the mean±SD maximum serum creatinine value was 1.53±0.78 mg/dL. In 47 patients, level 1 or higher AKI occurred in the first month of transplantation and 38 of these patients were diagnosed with a higher level of AKI 31-100 days after transplantation. According to multivariate analysis, use of cyclophosphamide (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.01, p=0.012), mean ciclosporin blood levels ≥250 ng/mL (AOR 2.81, p=0.022) and ciclosporin blood levels ≥450 ng/mL in the first month of transplantation (AOR 3.30, p=0.007) were found to be potential factors for early onset AKI. Ciclosporin blood levels exceeded 450 ng/mL in 35% of those using posaconazole and voriconazole during administration route change of ciclosporin. Use of ≥2 nephrotoxic anti-infective drugs (AOR 3, p=0.026) and developing AKI in the first month of transplantation (AOR 4.14, p=0.002) were found to be potential factors in the development of advanced AKI.

CONCLUSION

Nephrotoxic drugs, cyclophosphamide use and ciclosporin blood levels are factors to be considered to prevent the development of AKI in patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Adaptation of a population pharmacokinetic model to inform tacrolimus therapy in heart transplant recipients

AIM

Existing tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic models are unsuitable for guiding tacrolimus dosing in heart transplant recipients. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a population pharmacokinetic model for tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients that considers the tacrolimus-azole antifungal interaction.

METHODS

Data from heart transplant recipients (n = 87) administered the oral immediate-release formulation of tacrolimus (Prograf®) were collected. Routine drug monitoring data, principally trough concentrations, were used for model building (n = 1099). A published tacrolimus model was used to inform the estimation of Ka , V2 /F, Q/F and V3 /F. The effect of concomitant azole antifungal use on tacrolimus CL/F was quantified. Fat-free mass was implemented as a covariate on CL/F, V2 /F, V3 /F and Q/F on an allometry scale. Subsequently, stepwise covariate modelling was performed. Significant covariates influencing tacrolimus CL/F were included in the final model. Robustness of the final model was confirmed using prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC). The final model was externally evaluated for prediction of tacrolimus concentrations of the fourth dosing occasion (n = 87) from one to three prior dosing occasions.

RESULTS

Concomitant azole antifungal therapy reduced tacrolimus CL/F by 80%. Haematocrit (∆OFV = -44, P < .001) was included in the final model. The pcVPC of the final model displayed good model adequacy. One recent drug concentration is sufficient for the model to guide tacrolimus dosing.

CONCLUSION

A population pharmacokinetic model that adequately describes tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in heart transplant recipients, considering the tacrolimus-azole antifungal interaction was developed. Prospective evaluation is required to assess its clinical utility to improve patient outcomes.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Isavuconazole

Isavuconazole is the newest of the clinically available advanced generation triazole antifungals and is active against a variety of yeasts, molds, and dimorphic fungi. Its current FDA-approved indications include the management of invasive aspergillosis as well as mucormycosis, though the latter indication is supported by limited clinical data. Isavuconazole did not achieve noninferiority to caspofungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and therefore lacks an FDA-approved indication for this invasive disease. Significant advantages of isavuconazole, primarily over voriconazole but in some circumstances posaconazole as well, make it an appealing option for the management of complex patients with invasive fungal infections. These potential advantages include lack of QTc interval prolongation, more predictable pharmacokinetics, a less complicated drug interaction profile, and improved tolerability, particularly when compared to voriconazole. This review discusses these topics in addition to addressing the in vitro activity of the compound against a variety of fungi and provides insight into other distinguishing factors among isavuconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The review concludes with an opinion section in which the authors provide the reader with a framework for the current role of isavuconazole in the antifungal armamentarium and where further data are required.

Effect of posaconazole on the concentration of intravenous and oral cyclosporine in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the interactions between posaconazole (POS) and intravenously/orally administered cyclosporine A (CsA) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

METHODS

We included 118 allogeneic HSCT patients who received CsA and POS simultaneously between January 2017 and June 2020 in this study. The ratio of CsA blood concentration (ng/mL) to dosage (mg/day) (C/D) before and after POS initiation was compared.

RESULTS

After the initiation of POS, the level of CsA increased 1 to 2 times in 66% (78/118) of patients compared to those without POS. However, the CsA C/D ratio increased by more than threefold in 6% (7/118) of patients after POS initiation, with an increase of more than fourfold in two patients. The median C/D ratio of CsA increased from 0.89 to 1.23 (P < 0.001) and 0.78 to 1.22 (P < 0.001) after POS initiation when CsA was administered intravenously and orally, respectively. In patients who received POS at the time of transition from intravenous to oral CsA, the value increased from 1.01 to 1.38 (P = 0.001). The route of administration had no significant effect on the change in the CsA C/D ratio (P = 0.615). Additionally, we observed the time required for the C/D ratio to reach a plateau after POS initiation was similar on days 13, 8, and 15 under various scenarios.

CONCLUSION

POS treatment increased blood CsA levels. A large variability was found in the fold-change in the CsA C/D ratio. Therefore, CsA doses should be adjusted by closely monitoring the blood levels of CsA after POS initiation.

Evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models to inform tacrolimus dosing in adult heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Identification of the most appropriate population pharmacokinetic model-based Bayesian estimation is required prior to its implementation in routine clinical practice to inform tacrolimus dosing decisions. This study aimed to determine the predictive performances of relevant population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus developed from various solid organ transplant recipient populations in adult heart transplant recipients, stratified based on concomitant azole antifungal use. Concomitant azole antifungal therapy alters tacrolimus pharmacokinetics substantially, necessitating dose adjustments.

METHODS

Population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus were selected (n = 17) for evaluation from a recent systematic review. The models were transcribed and implemented in NONMEM version 7.4.3. Data from 85 heart transplant recipients (2387 tacrolimus concentrations) administered the oral immediate-release formulation of tacrolimus (Prograf) were obtained up to 391 days post-transplant. The performance of each model was evaluated using: (i) prediction-based assessment (bias and imprecision) of the individual predicted tacrolimus concentration of the fourth dosing occasion (MAXEVAL = 0, FOCE-I) from 1-3 prior dosing occasions; and (ii) simulation-based assessment (prediction-corrected visual predictive check). Both assessments were stratified based on concomitant azole antifungal use.

RESULTS

Regardless of the number of prior dosing occasions (1-3) and concomitant azole antifungal use, all models demonstrated unacceptable individual predicted tacrolimus concentration of the fourth dosing occasion (n = 152). The prediction-corrected visual predictive check graphics indicated that these models inadequately predicted observed tacrolimus concentrations.

CONCLUSION

All models evaluated were unable to adequately describe tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in adult heart transplant recipients included in this study. Further work is required to describe tacrolimus pharmacokinetics for our heart transplant recipient cohort.