Alternate dosage formulations of oral targeted anticancer agents

Alternatives for the administration of oral antineoplastics in patients with swallowing difficulties

Oncology patients often experience swallowing difficulties, which can compromise adherence to treatment and consequently reduce its effectiveness. Improper handling of these hazardous drugs can lead to the risk of inhalation of particles or other exposures endangering the health of the persons involved such as nurses and pharmacists. The aim of this review is to analyse and update the recommendations for the manipulation of oral antineoplastic drugs in patients with swallowing difficulties. A literature review of articles, websites, guidelines and other documents published up to about the conditions of handling and administration of oral antineoplastic agents in oncology and oncohaematology was carried out. A table of 110 active principles was compiled. The information was grouped according to the name of the drug, instructions for oral and nasogastric tube administration and suggested recommendations. Among the drugs reviewed, 66.4% were suitable for dissolution. Although there is a lot of information in the literature, the nonstop development of new oncological drugs requires continuous updating. Therefore, we have collected the most recent data to provide a consultation tool for healthcare professionals and patients with swallowing difficulties.

Evaluation of the type and frequency of extemporaneous formulations dispensed in hospital and community pharmacies

Background

Extemporaneous compounding is practiced globally by pharmacists to allow for dispensing of personalised doses of medicinal products not commercially available. Extemporaneous compounding must result in a product which is safe and effective. However, data on formulation and expiry of extemporaneous products may not be readily available. Pharmacists access various resources including compounding databases to obtain information on composition, preparation, and expiry of extemporaneous preparations.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the type and frequency of extemporaneous compounding in hospital and community pharmacies in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and to obtain contemporary information on compounding practices and resources used.

Methods

All community and hospital pharmacists registered with the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland, were invited to participate in an on-line survey. The study was approved by the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) research ethics committee.

Results

A total of 202 pharmacists responded to the survey, of which 145 were community-based, 52 hospital-based, and 5 practicing in both. On average, hospital and community pharmacists (n = 138) dispensed <2-10 prescriptions for extemporaneous products per month. Pharmacists reported compounding 13 different types of extemporaneous preparations. Of these, dermatological preparations and oral liquid formulations (OLFs) were most commonly compounded. Extemp.ie, an Irish compounding database, was the most frequently used resource for compounding guidance and product expiry.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that extemporaneous compounding is still practiced in hospital and community pharmacies in the ROI. The limited response of 4.6% obtained may reflect that extemporaneous compounding is concentrated in a relatively small number of pharmacies. There remains a clinical need for extemporaneous products in the ROI and extemporaneous compounding continues to be an invaluable skillset for pharmacists.

Practical Recommendations for the Manipulation of Kinase Inhibitor Formulations to Age-Appropriate Dosage Forms

Over 75 kinase inhibitors (KIs) have been approved for the treatment of various cancers. KIs are orally administrated but mostly lack pediatric age-appropriate dosage forms or instructions for dose manipulation. This is highly problematic for clinical practice in pediatric oncology, as flexible oral formulations are essential to individually set dosages and to adjust it to a child's swallowability. Most KIs are poorly soluble, categorized in Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II or IV, and improperly manipulating the KI formulation can alter pharmacokinetics and jeopardize KI drug safety and efficacy. Therefore, the goals of this review were to provide practical recommendations for manipulating the formulation of the 15 most frequently used KIs in pediatric oncology (i.e., bosutinib, cabozantinib, cobimetinib, crizotinib, dabrafenib, dasatinib, entrectinib, imatinib, larotrectinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, ruxolitinib, selumetinib, sunitinib and trametinib) based on available literature studies and fundamental drug characteristics and to establish a decision tool that supports decisions regarding formulation manipulation of solid oral dosages of KIs that have been or will be licensed (for adult and/or pediatric cancers) but are not included in this review.

Efficacy and toxicity of vemurafenib and cobimetinib in relation to plasma concentrations, after administration via feeding tube in patients with BRAF-mutated thyroid cancer: a case series and review of literature

Introduction

The combination of vemurafenib, a proto-oncogene B-Raf inhibitor (BRAFi) and cobimetinib, an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEKi) has shown to improve survival in patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. BRAF mutations are also frequently detected driver mutations in other tumor types, including thyroid carcinoma. Since thyroid carcinoma is not a labeled indication for BRAF/MEKi, a cohort for patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid carcinoma was opened within the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), a national ongoing pan-cancer multi-drug trial, in which patients receive off-label treatment with approved drugs based on their molecular tumor profile.

Results

Here, we present two patients with BRAF-mutated thyroid carcinoma, who were successfully treated with vemurafenib/cobimetinib administered via a feeding tube. Plasma concentrations of vemurafenib and cobimetinib were determined. A partial response was observed in both patients, but they experienced significant toxicity.

Conclusion

Our cases show that vemurafenib/cobimetinib treatment is effective in BRAF V600-mutated thyroid carcinoma, also when administered via a feeding tube. Although serious side effects occurred in both patients, we hypothesize that this was not attributable to the administration route. Therefore, administration of vemurafenib/cobimetinib by feeding tube is feasible and effective.

Trial registration

Clinical trial identification: NCT02925234.