Clinic- and Community-Based National Diabetes Prevention Programs in Los Angeles

A systematic review of the mechanisms influencing engagement in diabetes prevention programmes for people with pre-diabetes

AIMS

To identify barriers and enablers that influence engagement in and acceptability of diabetes prevention programmes for people with pre-diabetes. The results will provide insights for developing strategies and recommendations to improve design and delivery of diabetes prevention programmes with enhanced engagement and acceptability for people with pre-diabetes.

METHODS

This review used a critical realist approach to examine context and mechanisms of diabetes prevention programmes. Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Web of Science, Scopus and Pre-Medline were searched for English language studies published between 2000 and 2023. A quality assessment was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

A total of 90 papers met inclusion criteria. The included studies used a variety of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Data extracted focused on barriers and enablers to engagement in and acceptability of diabetes prevention programmes, with seven key mechanisms identified. These included financial, environmental, personal, healthcare, social and cultural, demographic and programme mechanisms. Findings highlighted diverse factors that influenced engagement in preventive programmes and the importance of considering these factors when planning, developing and implementing future diabetes prevention programmes.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanisms identified in this review can inform design and development of diabetes prevention programmes for people with pre-diabetes and provide guidance for healthcare professionals and policymakers. This will facilitate increased participation and engagement in preventive programmes, potentially reducing progression and/or incidence of pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes and improving health outcomes.

Factors Influencing the Referral of Patients with Prediabetes to a Diabetes Prevention Program in the Bronx, New York

INTRODUCTION

Disparate engagement in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) may occur as early as the point of referral for certain subgroups, including Black and Hispanic men. We aimed to determine patient demographic and provider characteristics associated with referrals to a health system DPP in the Bronx, New York.

METHODS

Patient and health system characteristics for DPP-eligible patients seen in primary care between July 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, were obtained through the electronic health record. Generalized mixed-effects modeling was used to test the association between referral rate and clinical and sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

Of 26,727 eligible patients, 66% were female, 46% were Hispanic, and 39% were non-Hispanic Black. Only 10% (n = 2,785) of eligible patients were referred to DPP. In the adjusted analyses, lower odds of referral were observed for men versus women (OR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.66), for non-Hispanic White versus Hispanic patients (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.71), and for uninsured patients versus Medicaid patients (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.80). The odds were higher for patients in the highest versus lowest hemoglobin A1c (OR = 2.49; 95% CI, 2.27-2.72) category; for those in the highest versus lowest body mass index categories (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45-1.79); for middle-aged patients (aged 45-64 y) versus those aged 18-26 y (OR =1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-2.00); and for patients being seen by a family versus an internal medicine physician (OR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.22-2.22).

CONCLUSION

We identified under-referral for men and highlighted other patient and health system factors associated with referral rates. Interventions to address bias in referrals and increase referrals for men at high risk for diabetes, not typically represented in DPP, are recommended.

Project UPLIFT: Adoption and implementation experiences of an epilepsy self-management program

RATIONALE

Project UPLIFT is an evidence-based epilepsy self-management program shown to prevent and treat depression through an 8-session, group telehealth intervention. Since 2012, the program has been disseminated by training community-based providers to deliver UPLIFT to people with epilepsy (PWE). Limited research has described the adoption, implementation, and practice-based maintenance of self-management programs like UPLIFT. We sought to gain a better understanding of this process from trained program adopters.

METHODS

A cross-sectional evaluation of adoption and implementation experiences was conducted. An online survey with closed- and open-ended questions was distributed to 120 UPLIFT program adopters to collect information about reasons for being trained and experiences implementing the program. Survey items were developed based on the RE-AIM model to assess program reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. For closed-ended responses, frequencies and cross-tabs were calculated. Open-ended responses were reviewed and grouped by theme.

RESULTS

41 respondents completed the survey (34% response rate). Respondents were from a variety of organizations including clinical (39%, n = 16), educational/research (17%, n = 7), and Epilepsy Foundation affiliates/chapters (12%, n = 5), among others. The most frequently endorsed reason for training in UPLIFT was an interest in supporting PWE (73%, n = 30). Most respondents rated delivering UPLIFT as very important (49%, n = 20) or important (32%, n = 13) to the organization. Sixty-one percent (n = 25) of respondents reported implementing (implementors) UPLIFT. Of those who had not yet implemented UPLIFT, 50% (n = 8) planned on implementing it at some point. Among program implementors, the most frequently reported implementation facilitators included participant interest (68%, n = 17), training (68%, n = 17), and organizational support (64%, n = 16). Program implementors indicated having program champions (80%, n = 20). The most frequently reported implementation challenge reported was recruitment (72%, n = 18). In open-ended responses, funding was a key theme that would facilitate continued implementation, but 48% (n = 12) responded that did not have access to resources and/or funding to help continue offering UPLIFT. Developing partnerships was recommended to improve the reach and maintenance of the program. Despite challenges, implementors agreed (44%, n = 11) or strongly agreed (36%, n = 9) that UPLIFT was effective in addressing mental health problems among program participants, and 76% (n = 19) plan on continuing to offer UPLIFT.

CONCLUSION

Implementation surveys increase understanding of program adoption and impact for dissemination trainees. Implementation benefits from program champions, strong partnerships, and sustained funding. Continued refinement of implementation support, such as developing a sustained referral system, maintaining relationships with trainees, supporting evaluation activities, and exploring opportunities for program updates to further enhance adoption, implementation, and maintenance.

Three Cooperative Extension initiatives funded to address Michigan's opioid crisis

People living with opioid use disorder and those experiencing other types of substance misuse are part of a public health crisis in the United States. Rates of opioid misuse, overdose, and opioid-related deaths within different subpopulations show where prevention efforts must focus. Through concerted efforts, aligned with common goals, a statewide community-based educational organization (Michigan State University Extension) has demonstrated ability to acquire multi-year funding from varied sources of state and federal funds that has produced robust support for statewide projects and collaborations. Researchers, educators, public health program managers, and other practitioners can benefit from learning how three funded initiatives in one state resulted in improved awareness and access for individuals and healthcare organizations. By sharing our implementation of health educational programs and presentations, other states' can adopt these evidence-based strategies for similar outreach. Cooperative Extension in Michigan delivers program series and one-time education to the public on the self-management of chronic conditions and pain, mindfulness for stress reduction, anger management, and opioid misuse prevention, treatment, and recovery. These evidence- and research-based health programs implemented by Extension staff teach participants common aspects of prevention such as self-management care, communication skills, self-efficacy, and goal setting or personal health action plans. Education aims to reduce dependency on opioids, prevent opioid misuse and share non-pharmacological solutions to pain management for those living with chronic conditions or at risk for developing dependence. The funded initiatives targeted rural residents, older adults, health care providers, and people living with chronic pain who may have access to prescription opioids. In addition to direct education, projects supported local communities with the development of coalitions, including the training of community partners to become program facilitators thereby increasing community capacity for prevention programs, and through the creation of patient referrals from healthcare settings to community-based education. In rural areas, Cooperative Extension plays a crucial role in connecting community resources to address healthy aging, and chronic disease or chronic pain self-management education. Community partners engaged in public health education and promotion, and healthcare providers alike may not be aware that Cooperative Extension plays a vital role in providing community-based health education.

Delivering the Same Intervention to Hispanic/Latinos With Pre-diabetes and Diabetes. Early Evidence of Success in a Longitudinal Mixed Method Study

BACKGROUND

Despite nationwide efforts to address the diabetes epidemic and reduce prevalence disparities, higher rates persist among the poor, especially those with limited literacy. Currently, individuals with abnormal glycemia who have pre-diabetes and diabetes qualify for different programs. However, evidence suggests that, for low-income Hispanic/Latinos, offering a single intervention to all those with abnormal glycemia may provide a more culturally acceptable and effective approach. Our objective was to explore the feasibility of such an intervention led by community health workers (CHWs) among low-income Hispanic/Latinos with diabetes and at risk for diabetes.

METHODS

Using a quasi-experimental mixed method design, we assessed weight, glycosylated hemoglobin, diabetes knowledge, and behavior changes of Hispanic/Latinos participants with pre-diabetes and diabetes living in Southern California. Biometric measurements, blood tests, and surveys were collected at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. Interviews and focus group discussions provided qualitative data.

RESULTS

Although the program was less costly, results exceeded those reported for low-income H/L attending the National Diabetes Prevention Program and did not differ between pre-diabetes and diabetes groups. Instead, including individuals at different stages of the dysglycemic spectrum seemed to have enhanced the intervention. Physician referral and attendance of family/friends were associated with better outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that a joint prevention/self-management intervention led by CHWs for low-income Hispanic/Latinos with diabetes and with pre-diabetes is feasible and cost-effective, providing results that could help reduce the success gap. Incorporating suggestions and replicating this study on a larger scale could help determine whether or not results are reproducible.