Complications of injectable fillers, part I

There Is no Universal Standard of Beauty

This article discusses the various factors that contribute to facial beauty and the different contexts in which they are significant. The authors examine the roles of the golden ratio, ideal proportions, symmetry, and specific facial features in what constitutes an attractive face. They also investigate the influence of cultural and evolutionary perspectives on facial beauty and the impact of social media on our perception of beauty. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the topic and emphasises the significance of facial beauty and its impact on our lives. The authors acknowledge that the concept of beauty is difficult to define with absolute precision, and that the objective-subjective argument regarding facial beauty remains unsolved. However, they argue that physical attributes undoubtedly influence perceptions of attractiveness, but beauty extends beyond surface-level features. They also suggest that embracing diversity in beauty standards fosters a more inclusive society that celebrates the unique qualities of every person.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Review of the Adverse Effects Associated with Dermal Filler Treatments: Part I Nodules, Granuloma, and Migration

The increase in the use of filler treatments within minimally invasive cosmetic surgery has correspondingly escalated the variety and frequency of associated side effects. Initially, unregulated procedures led to primary side effects such as infections, foreign body reactions, and granuloma formation. However, severe vascular complications like skin and tissue necrosis and blindness have emerged as recognized risks. Side effects from filler treatments can range from mild to life-threatening, including edema, pain, tenderness, numbness, bleeding, bruising, hematoma, redness, erythema, pigmentation, allergic reactions, itching, pruritus, the Tyndall effect, asymmetry, irregularity, migration, skin and soft tissue infections, nodules, granulomas, and vascular compromise. These side effects are categorized into early and delayed types. Many complications, particularly those related to vascular abnormalities, are frequently linked to procedural issues, emphasizing the importance of understanding filler properties, injection techniques, and facial anatomy. Preventing side effects is ideal, but early detection and treatment are crucial. Recognizing potential side effects based on their timing and understanding appropriate preemptive treatment methods is essential. This discussion addresses non-vascular side effects, highlighting their onset, symptoms, and management strategies. The comprehensive understanding and careful management of these side effects are vital for minimizing complications and ensuring patient safety in filler treatments.

Adverse Effects Associated with Dermal Filler Treatments: Part II Vascular Complication

Vascular complications arising from dermal filler treatments pose significant risks, including ischemia, tissue necrosis, and severe outcomes like blindness and pulmonary embolism. This study investigates the mechanisms of vascular complications, categorizing them into extravascular compression and intravascular emboli. Extravascular compression occurs when injected fillers compress adjacent blood vessels, leading to ischemia and potential necrosis, while intravascular emboli result from fillers entering blood vessels, causing blockages. The study emphasizes the importance of anatomical knowledge, careful injection techniques, and early intervention. Management strategies include the use of hyaluronidase to dissolve HA fillers, vasodilators to improve blood circulation, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The regions most susceptible to complications align with major arterial pathways, particularly the nasolabial folds and nasal region. The study also highlights the need for meticulous injection techniques, the use of cannulas over needles in high-risk areas, and the aspiration test to detect vessel penetration. Early detection and immediate intervention are crucial to mitigate adverse outcomes. Continuous education and training for practitioners, along with advancements in filler materials and injection methods, are essential for improving the safety of cosmetic procedures. This comprehensive understanding aids in preventing and managing vascular complications, ensuring better patient outcomes. The field of dermal filler treatments is advancing with new techniques and technologies, such as High-Resolution Ultrasound, Infrared Imaging, self-crossing hyaluronic acid filler, biodegradable microspheres, and microinjection.

Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers With or Without Lidocaine in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To update the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of hyaluronic acid gel combined with lidocaine for treating nasolabial folds.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science using subject headings and keywords associated with hyaluronic acid and lidocaine in the context of nasolabial folds. Inclusion criteria were met by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid gel with or without lidocaine. Outcomes measured included visual pain analog scale (VAS) scores, wrinkle severity scale scores, and adverse events. The quality of RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane Randomized Controlled Trials Scale, which encompasses criteria such as randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, dropout, and withdrawal rates, and was assessed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

No significant difference in overall wrinkle severity rating scale scores was observed between HA with lidocaine and HA without lidocaine [MD = 0.08, 95% CI (- 0.09, 0.24), P = 0.36]. However, there was a significant reduction in pain scale scores (VAS) [SMD = -2.47, 95% CI (- 4.15, - 0.79), P = 0.004]; no significant differences were noted in the ncidence of at least one adverse event [RR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.90, 1.05), P = 0.51]; and there were no significant differences in swelling [RR =  0.99, 95% CI (0.92, 1.06), P = 0.80], erythema [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.91, 1.11), P = 0.91], bruising [RR = 0.99, 95% CI (0.89, 1.13), P = 0.86], itching [RR = 1.03, the 95% CI (0.88, 1.21), P = 0.74], induration [RR = 1.04, 95% CI (0.92, 1.17), P = 0.55], and papules [RR = 0.77, 95% CI (0.58, 1.02), P = 0.07]. There was a significantly lower incidence of tenderness [RR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.86, 0.97), P = 0.002] only in the control group. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results across all outcome indicators with low sensitivity and high confidence. Subgroup analysis indicated higher wrinkle severity scores among East Asians compared to Europeans and Americans.

CONCLUSIONS

HA containing lidocaine significantly reduces pain and is comparable in effectiveness and safety of HA without lidocaine. The clinical effects appear more pronounced in East Asians. Due to the limited number of related studies, further research is necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Use of Minimal Amounts of Hyaluronidase in the Ultrasound-Guided Treatment of Acute Vascular Occlusion by Hyaluronic Acid: A Preliminary Report

Background

Complications from hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are increasingly frequent, given the very high number of treatments performed every day worldwide. They are routinely treated with high doses of hyaluronidase, which can cause significant local and general unwanted effects.

Objectives

The aim of our work is to demonstrate that when the origin of the complication is precisely identified and treated under ultrasound guidance, a few hyaluronidase units are enough to treat it effectively.

Methods

Five young female patients came to our observation for vascular lesions from injection of HA fillers performed in the immediately preceding days, in 4 cases, and a few weeks earlier in the fifth case. All lesions were accurately identified by ultrasound and treated with hyaluronidase.

Results

The 4 promptly treated patients fully recovered with a hyaluronidase dose of 87 ± 44 IU (range, 30-150 IU). The fifth patient, treated later, markedly improved regarding clinical picture and symptoms. No early or late side effects have been reported from this hyaluronidase dosage.

Conclusions

Our data confirm that if the lesion at the origin of the skin damage is precisely localized with ultrasound examination and treated under ultrasound guidance, a few units of hyaluronidase, injected directly into the HA accumulation, effectively resolve the skin damage. At the doses we used, which were much lower than those usually recommended, hyaluronidase proved to be not only effective but also free of any side effects.

Level of Evidence 5

Foreign body reactions related to orofacial esthetic fillers: A systematic review

The aim of this study was to systematically review the clinicopathological data regarding foreign body reactions (FBR) related to esthetic procedures in the orofacial region. Electronic searches were performed in six databases and in gray literature using PEO acronym for the review question. Case series and case reports describing FBR related to esthetic procedures in the orofacial region were included. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist-University of Adelaide tool was used for measuring the risk of bias. Eighty-six studies reporting 139 cases of FBR were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 54.12 years (14-85 years), with most of the cases reported in America, North America (n = 42/30.70%) and Latin America (n = 33/23.60%), mainly occurring in women (n = 131/94.40%). Asymptomatic (n = 60/43.40%) nodules (n = 71/50.60%) were the main clinical characteristics. The lower lip represented the most affected anatomical location (n = 28/22.20%), followed by the upper lip (n = 27/21.60%). Surgical removal was the treatment of choice (n = 53/35.70%). Twelve different dermal fillers were reported in the study, and the microscopic characteristics of the cases varied according to the material used. The results based on case series and case reports showed that nodule and swelling were the main clinical characteristics of FBR related to orofacial esthetic fillers. The histological characteristics depended on the type of the filler material used.

A treatment algorithm for hyaluronic acid filler related complications of the face

BACKGROUND

Throughout the last decade, a notable increase in HA-filler-related complications have been observed, owing to the increase in demand for filler injections and availability of multiple products.

OBJECTIVES

The aim is to provide practical advice on the best way to prevent and treat HA-filler-related complications.

METHODS

Thirty patients who experienced visible and/or symptomatic complications localized within the facial area were treated according to our algorithm. Patients with inflammatory lesions underwent antibiotic and anti-inflammatory therapy, followed by hyaluronidase injections. Patients with abscesses were treated with antibiotics, incision, and drainage. Each patient completed the dermatology-specific quality of life questionnaire (DLQI) at the first and last examinations.

RESULTS

Among the 29 patients who received antibiotic therapy, 3 healed without further treatment. However, 18 received hyaluronidase injections, 9 underwent incision and drainage, and 5 presented with fistulas and developed retracted scars. Moreover, 80% of the patients were completely healed, 13% significantly improved, and 3% did not show any improvement. The DLQI scores analysis showed a notable impact of patients' diseases on their quality of life, mainly in the terms of personal relationships and symptoms, with minor impacts on intimate relationships, ability to work, and study. We demonstrated that our algorithm resulted in a significant improvement in the overall quality of life at the last follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of filler injections requires caution and specific training because they can lead to serious complications. If these complications are recognized promptly, healing can be optimized. Our treatment algorithm demonstrated high rate of healing and significant improvement in the patients' quality of life.

A Scoping Review of Hyaluronidase Use in Managing the Complications of Aesthetic Interventions

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronidase is used as an adjunct or main treatment to manage complications associated with cosmetic hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injections such as necrosis, blindness, hypersensitivity, delayed nodules, and poor aesthetic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically map the available evidence and identify the gaps in knowledge on the effectiveness of hyaluronidase use in managing the aesthetic complications associated with HA injections (vascular occlusion, blindness, nodules, delayed hypersensivity, granuloma, poor aesthetic outcome).

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were used up to May 2022, to look for randomized clinical trials (RCTs), clinical trials, and retrospective case-control studies reporting on the use of hyaluronidase for managing the HA filler injection complications.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 395 studies; of those 5 RCTs (all carried out in the USA) were selected (53 subjects), indicating the effectiveness of hyaluronidase for removal of un-complicated injected HA nodules (forearm, upper arm, or back skin). The follow-ups ranged from 14 days to 4 years. The amount of HA filler injected into each site varied from 0.2 to 0.4 mL. A dose dependent response was observed for most HA fillers. No major adverse reactions were reported. Overall, for removal of every 0.1 mL of HA filler they injected 1.25-37.5 units of hyaluronidase (single injections). When 3 consecutive weekly hyaluronidase injection was used much lower doses of 0.375-2.25 unit was utilised. There was no evidence in a form of RCTs, clinical trials, and retrospective case-control studies on the removal/reversal of HA injections in the facial skin, or management of over-corrections, inflammatory nodules, or tissue ischemia/necrosis associated with HA filler injection.

CONCLUSION

Based on studies on the forearm, upper arm and back skin, hyaluronidase can be used for the reversal of uncomplicated HA filler injection nodule. However, further adequately powered studies are warranted to establish the ideal treatment protocol/dose of hyaluronidase for reversal of HA filler injections in the facial region or management of complications associated with aesthetic HA injection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Adverse Events Associated with Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection for Non-surgical Facial Aesthetics: A Systematic Review of High Level of Evidence Studies

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are widely used in aesthetic medicine. While generally safe, potential complications can arise.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify and classify potential complications linked to the use of HA dermal fillers, as informed by high-quality, low-risk-of-bias studies.

METHODS

This review follows the Cochrane review standards for clinical systematic reviews. This systematic review analyzed 48 high level of evidence studies on the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers in non-surgical facial aesthetics and the adverse events that occurred.The inclusion criteria were randomized control studies on HA dermal fillers and their complications. Excluded were case reports, case series, observational studies, and other non-randomized research due to their inability to provide generalized conclusions and their inherent publication bias.

RESULTS

Adverse events were classified into three categories: expected reactions, product or technique-related adverse events, and severe adverse events. Most adverse events were short-lived injection site reactions, which resolved spontaneously. Specific HA fillers and injection techniques influenced the occurrence of adverse events, which generally resolved within weeks without treatment. Severe adverse events were rare, persisting for months and requiring active medical intervention.

DISCUSSION

This classification system can enhance understanding, prevention, and treatment of HA filler complications, and support patient education. The common complications were injection site reactions, with persistent symptoms treated with topical steroids, NSAIDs, or hyaluronidase. Severe complications included severe edema, angioedema and others, often necessitating specific treatments.

CONCLUSION

HA dermal fillers are generally safe and effective, with most adverse events being transient and mild to moderate in severity. Severe adverse events, although rare, do occur and are generally non-treatment related. Informed consent, patient education, and professional training are crucial for safe and successful outcomes. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hyaluronidase for Dermal Filler Complications: Review of Applications and Dosage Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronidase (Hyal) can reverse complications of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, which has contributed substantially to the popularity of such procedures. Still, there are differing opinions regarding Hyal treatment, including dosage recommendations in filler complication management.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to address unanswered questions regarding Hyal treatment for HA filler complications, including timing and dosage, skin pretesting, properties of various Hyals and interactions with HA gels, and pitfalls of the treatment.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception for articles on Hyal therapy for filler complications. Articles were evaluated regarding their contribution to the field. The extensive literature review includes international leaders' suggestions and expert panels' recommendations.

RESULTS

There are limited controlled data but increasing clinical experience with Hyal treatment. The currently used Hyals provide good results and have an acceptable safety profile. Nonemergent complications such as the Tyndall effect, noninflamed nodules, and allergic or hypersensitivity reactions should be treated with low or moderate Hyal doses. Hyal should be considered with prior or simultaneous oral antibiotic treatment in managing inflammatory nodules. Hyal may be tried for granulomas that have not responded to intralesional steroids. Emergent complications such as vascular occlusion and blindness require immediate, high-dose Hyal treatment. Regarding blindness, the injection technique, retrobulbar versus supraorbital, remains controversial. Ultrasound guidance can increase the efficacy of the above interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyal is essential in aesthetic practice because it can safely treat most HA filler complications. Immediate Hyal treatment is required for emergent complications. Aesthetic practitioners should be versed in using Hyal and effective dosage protocols.

The Needle Versus Cannula Debate in Soft Tissue Augmentation

In recent years, injectables have become increasingly popular in cosmetic procedures. The choice between using a needle or a cannula depends on several factors, including the site of injection, the filler type, the patient's preferences, and the practitioner's skills. Although needles are easy to use, cost-effective, and best for treating superficial rhytids, they may cause tissue injury. Cannulas are safer, particularly when injecting deep to the bone, and can provide more even distribution of filler material when filling large zones. An in-depth understanding of the facial anatomy and ongoing training are crucial for practitioners to develop and improve technical abilities.

Etiology of Delayed Inflammatory Reaction Induced by Hyaluronic Acid Filler

The etiology and pathophysiology of delayed inflammatory reactions caused by hyaluronic acid fillers have not yet been elucidated. Previous studies have suggested that the etiology can be attributed to the hyaluronic acid filler itself, patient's immunological status, infection, and injection technique. Hyaluronic acid fillers are composed of high-molecular weight hyaluronic acids that are chemically cross-linked using substances such as 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE). The mechanism by which BDDE cross-links the two hyaluronic acid disaccharides is still unclear and it may exist as a fully reacted cross-linker, pendant cross-linker, deactivated cross-linker, and residual cross-linker. The hyaluronic acid filler also contains impurities such as silicone oil and aluminum during the manufacturing process. Impurities can induce a foreign body reaction when the hyaluronic acid filler is injected into the body. Aseptic hyaluronic acid filler injections should be performed while considering the possibility of biofilm formation or delayed inflammatory reaction. Delayed inflammatory reactions tend to occur when patients experience flu-like illnesses; thus, the patient's immunological status plays an important role in delayed inflammatory reactions. Large-bolus hyaluronic acid filler injections can induce foreign body reactions and carry a relatively high risk of granuloma formation.

Arterial Embolism After Facial Fat Grafting: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

While autologous fat grafting of the face is considered a generally safe procedure, severe complications such as arterial embolism (AE) have been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize data on injection-related visual compromise, stroke, and death caused by arterial embolism after facial fat transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plastic surgery societies were contacted for reports on AE after autologous facial fat injection. In addition, a systematic literature review was performed. Data extracted included study design, injection site/technique, symptoms, management, outcome, and etiology.

RESULTS

61 patients with a mean age of 33.56 ± 11.45 years were reported. Injections targeted the glabella or multiple facial regions (both n = 16/61, 26.2%) most commonly, followed by injections in the temples (n = 10/61, 16.4%) and the forehead (n = 9/61, 14.8%). The mean volume injected was 21.5 ± 21.5 ml. Visual symptoms were described most frequently (n = 24/58, 41.4%) followed by neurological symptoms (n = 20/58, 34.5%), or both (n = 13/58, 22.4%). Ophthalmic artery (OA, n = 26/60, 43.3%), anterior or middle cerebral artery (CA, n = 11/60, 18.3%) or both (n = 14/60, 23.3%) were most frequently occluded. Outcome analysis revealed permanent vision loss in all patients with OA occlusion (n = 26/26, 100%), neurological impairment in most patients with CA occlusion (n = 8/10, 80%), and vision loss in most patients suffering from both OA and CA occlusion (n = 7/11, 63.6%). Six patients died following embolisms.

CONCLUSIONS

AE causes severe complications such as blindness, stroke, and death. Due to a lack of high-quality data, no evidence-based treatment algorithms exist. To increase patient safety, a database collecting cases and complications should be established.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Periorbital venous stasis may be involved with filler induced malar edema-A duplex ultrasound-imaging-based case series

INTRODUCTION

Filler injections in the periocular region are regarded as a challenging and advanced maneuver in a high-risk area. Adverse events as malar edema due to filler treatment may occur. To evaluate the possible reasons, the ultrasound images, and medical data of patients that were prospectively referred with malar edema were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 patients (26 eyes) with malar edema after hyaluronic acid filler treatment were included. All cases were assessed with an 18 MHz linear ultrasound device. Exact location of the filler material was noted. Relations with clinical data were analyzed using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Onset of malar edema after treatment showed a wide range from immediate (0 days) to 3 years. Most patients had an early onset N = 13 (76%), a minority showed late onset N = 4 (24%). In 23 eyes, the filler material was found to be located inside the SMAS. In 3 cases filler material was located on the periosteum of the orbital rim. After duplex-ultrasound guided filler removal, restored venous flow could be seen in the superficial and/or deep fatty layer often accompanied by flow piercing through the SMAS. Minutes after treatment, clinical improvement of malar edema was observed.

CONCLUSION

Malar edema after by filler treatments in the periocular region may be caused by veno-lymphatic compression by filler deposits.

Multiple Cases of Facial Disfigurement From Filler Use and One Injector

PURPOSE

To present a case of facial disfigurement from an injectable permanent filler and describe the consequences to patients exposed to the same injector (common source outbreak).

METHODS

Case report and discussion of a common source outbreak after a group of persons developed complications years after permanent filler given by one injector.

RESULTS

A 39-year-old transgender model underwent polymethylmethacrylate (Artefill) facial filler injections to the lips, cheeks, and chin in 2018. A year later, the patient presented to the emergency room with severe facial swelling and difficulty breathing. Treatments have included 4 surgeries to remove filler and scar tissue and chronic low-dose oral steroid therapy. Upon questioning the patient, 6 additional people suffered from similar facial swelling years after injection by the same injector. The injector cannot be located.

CONCLUSIONS

Care must be taken in giving all facial fillers, particularly permanent ones. When one source patient is identified, questioning the patient's knowledge of others affected is critical to help manage an epidemic problem and to report a rogue injector. Physicians have a duty to investigate and report such cases.

Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection Guided by Doppler Ultrasound

Doppler ultrasound can be used to detect almost all arteries of the face before injecting the hyaluronic acid (HA) filler. The relatively more dangerous sites of filler injection are the glabellar wrinkle, forehead, temple, nose, and nasolabial fold area, and it is recommended to map the vasculature of these areas by Doppler ultrasound before performing filler injection. The Doppler ultrasound detection method is included as a video. Internal carotid arterial branches, the supratrochlear, supraorbital, and dorsal nasal arteries, and external carotid arterial branches, the superficial temporal and facial arteries, are very important arteries when injecting HA filler; thus, Doppler ultrasound detection is recommended.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of cosmetics on the ocular surface

In this report the use of eye cosmetic products and procedures and how this represents a lifestyle challenge that may exacerbate or promote the development of ocular surface and adnexal disease is discussed. Multiple aspects of eye cosmetics are addressed, including their history and market value, psychological and social impacts, possible problems associated with cosmetic ingredients, products, and procedures, and regulations for eye cosmetic use. In addition, a systematic review that critically appraises randomized controlled trial evidence concerning the ocular effects of eyelash growth products is included. The findings of this systematic review highlight the evidence gaps and indicate future directions for research to focus on ocular surface outcomes associated with eyelash growth products.

Advances in Nonsurgical Periocular Rejuvenation

Nonsurgical periocular rejuvenation presents varied options to the practitioner. The most common current inject modalities for rejuvenation include hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), calcium hydroxyapatite, and poly-L-lactic acid. This article provides a summary of recent publications regarding each injectable as well as the description of pertinent periocular anatomy. The modern injector should possess an understanding of each modality for a safe and rejuvenated result.

Thread Lifting of the Nose: Fully Comprehensive Approach to the Technique

Nose thread lifting is a relatively recent technique. It offers a chance to approach nose morphology defects without turning to surgery to obtain a temporary improvement. Nevertheless, it lacks standardization and it can therefore offer quite variable results and short durability. The authors’ experience is presented here along with a recommended methodological approach to deliver reliable techniques for predictable results. Thread lifting techniques for nose reshaping by means of insertion of poly-L-lactic/poly-caprolactone threads are presented, based on principles of graft-based techniques, to obtain temporary morphological correction of selected nose deformities.

Use of the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase protocol in the management of impending skin necrosis associated with hyaluronic acid fillers: a systematic review

Impending skin necrosis resulting from inadvertent intravascular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers can lead to tissue loss and significant scarring. In recent years, management trends have shifted from multimodal approaches to the sole use of high doses of hyaluronidase. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase management protocol in preventing skin necrosis and possible subsequent scarring. An online search of the bibliographic databases PubMed and Embase yielded 3039 articles. A total of 72 studies reporting 186 cases were found to be eligible for inclusion. The selection and evaluation process was done according to the PRISMA criteria. Included studies were assessed using the JBI and STROBE critical appraisal tools. The analysis of treatment outcomes was done according to the timing of treatment initiation and the type of intervention used. This review found that an immediate intervention using the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase management protocol provided predictable and satisfactory outcomes. Initiating the protocol within 24 h of filler injection halted the progression of necrosis and prevented permanent sequelae. The conclusions are limited by the lack of a high level of evidence, since the only available sources of data are case reports and case series.

Standards for aseptic techniques in medical aesthetic practices in the Benelux: Consensus recommendations

INTRODUCTION

While the demand for aesthetic procedures is rising, complications are rising alongside. Infection is a frequent complication, there is therefore an increased need for strict aseptic technique, particularly in procedures breaching the skin. The level of training of practitioners carrying out these procedures varies and there are no comprehensive guidelines on aseptic aesthetic practice in the Benelux region.

OBJECTIVE

Developing a step-by-step procedure for achieving and maintaining a high standard of aseptic conditions in a standard aesthetic practice in the Benelux region.

METHODS

A consensus group of 10 aesthetic medical practitioners (dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and cosmetic physicians) representing the Benelux region convened to discuss best practice for aseptic techniques in medical aesthetics. Step-by-step procedures were recommended to achieve optimal aseptic practice in private facilities and define important considerations for reducing infection risk. Recommendations were based on current evidence and extensive clinical experience.

RESULTS

Recommendations were made to achieve and maintain a high standard of asepsis and infection control. Guidance included maintaining high standard aseptic conditions of the injecting room, the injecting area on the patient, the injection procedure, the materials, and procedures commonly used to achieve aseptic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This expert consensus summary publication recommends aseptic procedures, setting a standard with the goal of minimizing rates of complications in aesthetic clinical practice in the Benelux region.

NOT SO "HAPPY BUMP": A complication due to hyaluronic acid

INTRODUCTION

The use of hyaluronic acid (HA) as a dermal filler is considered safe. However, as new brands come to the market, reports of adverse events are becoming more and more common.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a particular type of adverse effect that, unlike the erythematous, indurated, and painful nodules described in the literature as "angry red bumps," is characterized by noninflammatory, stony-like nodules that appear in sites previously treated with HA.

METHODS

The report of four patients who presented this complication, and the occurrence of two HA syringes from the same batch that had hardened the product inside at the time of filling.

CONCLUSION

The authors propose the nomenclature "happy bump" to group adverse reactions to HA that translate into noninflammatory nodules, with a stony consistency, appearing up to 4 weeks (recent) or after one month (late) in sites previously treated with AH.

Unravelling the Complex Anatomy of the Tear Trough and Lower Eyelid Folds: A Review of Cadaveric Studies in the Literature

The lower eyelid tear trough deformity is a common cosmetic concern which is the result of multiple anatomic changes in the lower eyelid, usually resulting from age. A sound understanding of the underlying anatomy is vital to inform surgeons about the ideal treatment options for rejuvenation of this region and to minimize the risk of complications. Cadaveric studies provide unique insight into underlying anatomic changes. Here we review the relevant published cadaveric studies relating to the tear trough deformity and its treatment.

Vasculature of the Nasal Cartilage Region Related to Filler Injection

BACKGROUND

A filler injection in the nose can be essential but is also dangerous, especially in the nasal cartilage region. To safely and accurately perform a filler injection, surgeons must have detailed knowledge of nasal anatomy.

OBJECTIVES

Associated the vessel branches and the characteristics of different nasal regions to provide suggestions for more suitable injection sites.

METHODS

Fifty specimens underwent computed tomography (CT) after contrast infusion. Qualified specimens were selected for 3D CT reconstruction. Dissection was performed to confirm the accuracy of the CT data.

RESULTS

The branches of arteries with large diameters, the dorsal nasal artery (DNA) and the lateral nasal artery (LNA) were distributed within the superficial musculoaponeurotic system layer. The DNA was seen in only 58% of specimens. The artery crossed the midline over the upper lateral cartilage in 16% of specimens. The LNA was a constant branch that traversed the nasal tip. The LNA crossed the midline to the contralateral side in 18% of patients. We divided the nasal cartilage dorsum into two regions for easy handling: the supratip region (STR) and the nasal tip region (NTR). The branches distributed in the STR mostly originated from the DNA (81.6%, 40/49), while those in the NTR mostly originated from the LNA.

CONCLUSIONS

The vasculature of the nasal cartilage region observed in this study is similar to that observed in previous studies. However, we found that the STR was an advantageous area for filler injection. At the same time, we provided suggestions for more suitable injection methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Fat Grafting: Basic Science, Techniques, and Patient Management

In this review, a summary of the rich history of autologous fat grafting is provided, and a comprehensive summary of the science and theory behind autologous adipocyte transplantation, as well as the techniques commonly used is described. These include recipient site preparation, harvesting, processing, and engraftment. In addition, important considerations for preoperative and postoperative management are discussed to maximize graft retention. Special considerations in grafting to the breast, face, and buttocks are also summarized.

Postmarket Safety Surveillance of Delayed Complications for Recent FDA-Approved Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers

OBJECTIVE

To review postmarketing data for delayed (≥14 days post-treatment) adverse events (AEs) of interest (inflammatory and noninflammatory nodules, hypersensitivity, granulomas) for newer hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers FDA-approved within the last 5 years (2016-2020).

METHODS

Reports from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database were extracted for HAREF, HADEF, HAKYS, HAVER, HAVLR, HAVOB, HARH2, HARH3, and HARH4 from January 2016 to January 2021. Keywords from event narratives were used to identify and categorize AEs and then verified through inclusion/exclusion criteria. Percentages are based on the total combined events of interest to provide an overall perspective of the events reported during the search period.

RESULTS

Of 585 MAUDE reports, there were 195 (33.3%) delayed AEs of interest. Of those, 71.8% were nodules (42.1% inflammatory and 29.7% noninflammatory), 21.5% hypersensitivity, and 6.7% granulomas. The combined total events of interest, ordered by frequency reported, were HAVLR (74.4%), HAVOB (12.3%), HADEF (5.1%), HARH4 (3.6%), HAREF (2.6%), and HARH2 (2.1%), with no reports for HARH3, HAVER, and HAKYS.

CONCLUSION

Although delayed nodules and inflammatory events are rare, reports for these events were extracted from the MAUDE database from 2016 to 2020 for HAVLR, HAVOB, HADEF, HARH4, HAREF, and HARH2 (most to least frequent).

Injection Guidelines for Treating Midface Volume Deficiency With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: The ATP Approach (Anatomy, Techniques, Products)

Midface rejuvenation is among the most valuable indications of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers, because malar projection and full upper cheeks significantly contribute to a youthful appearance. Hyaluronic acid fillers have evolved over the past 2 decades to meet specific clinical needs such as strong projection capacity and adaptability to facial dynamism. As a result, they now represent the treatment of choice for midface rejuvenation throughout age ranges by offering the potential for noninvasive treatment, immediate results, and minimal downtime. Because the 5-layered structure of the midface plays a central role in the human face, injecting the midface area may also indirectly improve other aesthetic concerns such as infraorbital hollowing and nasolabial folds. Nonetheless, midface rejuvenation requires a tailored treatment approach and a thorough knowledge of anatomy to minimize procedural risks and achieve natural-looking results. This article provides an extensive anatomical description of the midface and of the usual course and depth of vascular structures circulating nearby to delineate a treatment area and minimize procedural risks. Furthermore, considering the differential mobility and mechanical constraints of each layer of the midface, a multilayer treatment algorithm is proposed for adapting the treatment strategy to patient specificities (including age, gender, skin type, and morphology). Emphasis is also placed on desirable filler properties to create deep structural support on the one hand and accompany facial movement on the other hand.

Delayed Onset Nodules After Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Case Series

Non-surgical techniques with hyaluronic acid fillers to rejuvenate face are very popular treatment due to ease of administration and achievement of faster improvement. Although they are considered to be safe procedures, few rare adverse effects have been reported in literatures. The number of these cosmetic procedures being performed is increasing every year. Simultaneously, the rate of filler complications has also increased. This case series presents three clinical cases of delayed onset nodules after hyaluronic acid fillers after 1-5 months post-procedure. Juvederm Volift was used in all the mentioned patients. Granulomatous reactions can occur with any of the hyaluronic acid fillers. These are generally localized immunological reactions. An awareness about these rare side effects helps us in the assessment and ensurance of accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Infected Facial Tissue Fillers Caused by Dental Infection

Injectable dermal fillers are widely used for facial rejuvenation; they help reshape the facial contours by treating volume loss due to aging changes. Facial fillers may become infected following a dental infection. In this report, we present a case of a 44-year-old female patient who presented with a swelling in her upper right buccal region following dental treatment of her second maxillary right premolar. After a thorough history, clinical, and radiological examinations, the diagnosis of infected dermal filler was made. The lesion was treated by association of two antibiotics (ciprofloxacin IM and clindamycin tablets 300 mg), and a complete healing was observed two months after the end of the dental treatments.

Hyaluronic Acid Embolism Treated with Subcutaneous High and Low Hyaluronidase Doses: Efficacy and Surrounding Tissue Effect

BACKGROUND

The use of hyaluronidase in hyaluronic acid vascular occlusion has been evaluated; however, the models used do not accurately assimilate the facial morphologic characteristics or study the effects on adjacent tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine an effective concentration of subcutaneous hyaluronidase to dissolve a hyaluronic acid embolism and its effect on surrounding tissue.

METHODS

Fifteen rabbits were divided into six groups. An inguinal incision was performed on the femoral artery to create a hyaluronic acid embolism in the control and treatment groups (low-, medium-, and high-hyaluronidase groups). Hyaluronidase was injected subcutaneously. Photographic follow-up, histologic analysis, and quantification of hyaluronic acid were performed. Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05) was used to compare the presence of hyaluronic acid in the arterial lumen between groups.

RESULTS

Despite the persistence of intravascular hyaluronic acid, macroscopic and microscopic differences were found between the embolism control group and embolism hyaluronidase high-dose group. Histologic analysis demonstrated thrombosis throughout groups. Skeletal muscle was least affected in the embolism hyaluronidase 500 IU group with less lysis and inflammatory infiltrate.

CONCLUSIONS

A 500 IU hyaluronidase dose partially prevents the damage caused by the embolism, and does not affect the surrounding tissue. The use of thrombolytic therapy combined with higher doses of hyaluronidase subcutaneously in this model is proposed.

Periorbital Filling With The MD Codes™ Algorithm: A Narrative Review and a Practical Guide

INTRODUCTION

The hyaluronic acid dermal fillers are employed to bring balance and facial harmony, improving the proportions and asymmetries of the structures, besides acting to reverse the signs of facial aging. The periorbital region is one of the first to show the signs of aging with periocular wrinkles, deepening of the nasojugal and palpebromalar folds, prolapse of the fat bags, excess palpebral skin, ptosis of the eyelashes, disappearance of the upper eyelid crease due to excess skin and hollowing of the upper eyelid.

AIMS

To describe the lines and grooves of the periorbital region and present a practical guide to the MD CODES™ algorithm for filling this region based on a narrative review of the literature.

METHODS

The literature research considered published journal articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews). Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) and reference lists of respective articles.

RESULTS

MD CODES™ algorithm maps anatomical points of the face (anatomical codes) that, when treated with fillers, promote instantaneous lifting and rejuvenation. In addition to defining the points for treatment, this method identified the order of the points to be treated, that is, which points should be prioritized to cause greater aesthetic impact. The MD CODES aim to standardize facial rejuvenation and is of particular interest for young as well as more experienced physicians.

CONCLUSION

Was presented in detail the regions, the aesthetic effects of the application, the technique, the volume, and the target structure undertaken in the remodeling of the tear trough, periorbital, temporal, brow, and frontal regions.

Laser Doppler Imaging for Treating Vascular Complications from Procedures Involving Dermal Fillers: Case Series and Literature Review

Vascular occlusion is a rare but severe complication of dermal filler injections. Early treatment of this complication produces better outcomes. Current diagnostic methods for vascular occlusion in the skin are subjective and imprecise; these include capillary refill time, skin color, and reports of pain. This study aimed to assess the use of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in the evaluation and treatment of vascular complications caused by dermal filler injections. This retrospective study used laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in 13 patients who developed vascular occlusion after facial dermal filler injections, with subsequent follow-up. The precise areas of perfusion observed on LDI were compared with the findings of clinical and photographic evaluation. The results showed that LDI accurately identified areas of vascular occlusion and improved treatment precision among these thirteen patients. The procedure was more precise than visual inspection or photographic evidence. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved for all patients, and no procedure-related complications were reported. Collectively, LDI provides fast, noninvasive, and accurate delineation of areas of vascular occlusion caused by complications of dermal filler injections and avoids several subjective shortcomings of visual and photographic evaluations. Thus, LDI effectively tracks treatment outcomes. However, large-scale studies are required to confirm the present findings.

Innovative approach for tear trough deformity correction using higher G prime fillers for safe, efficacious, and long-lasting results: A prospective interventional study

BACKGROUND

One of the most challenging areas for facial rejuvenation is the lower eyelid. Apart from the protruding orbital fat causing lower lid bags, a discrete entity called the "tear trough deformity" is distinguishable in this area.

AIM

The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the standard technique of tear trough deformity correction with the lateral injection technique using a high G prime filler to establish a guideline for the safe and effective correction of tear trough deformity.

METHODS

A prospective, double-blind, study was carried out from Dec 2017 to 2019 including 30 participants in the age range of 35-60 years. The participants were divided into two groups of 15 patients each. In group A patients, conventional technique with a low G Prime filler was used, whereas in group B, lateral injection technique with a high G Prime filler was used.

RESULTS

Marked improvement was seen in appearance and skin quality on both the sides in all the patients. As compared to our technique (lateral injections) where a mean of 0.5 ml of filler was used to lift the cheek and reduce the tear trough, the standard technique (Mauricio de Maio's 3-point tear trough reshape technique) required a mean of 1.2 ml of filler for the same. Post-procedure complications including bruising and Tyndall effect were much higher (statistically significant) using the standard medial technique for the correction tear trough.

CONCLUSION

Aesthetically satisfying results for the tear trough correction are possible, without actually injecting the tear trough directly, based on the knowledge of the underlying anatomy.

The Aetiopathogenesis of Late Inflammatory Reactions (LIRs) After Soft Tissue Filler Use: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

Late inflammatory reactions (LIRs) are the most challenging complications after filler use. The immune system plays a prominent role in its etiology, albeit to an unknown extent. Bacterial contamination in situ has been hypothesized to be causative for LIRs. How this relates to the immunological processes involved is unknown. This article aims to provide an overview of immunological and bacterial factors involved in development of LIRs.

Methods

We undertook a systematic literature review focused on immunological factors and microbiota in relation to LIRs after filler use. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception up to August 2019. Included studies were assessed for the following variables: subject characteristics, number of patients, primary indication for filler injection, implant type/amount and injection site, type of complication, follow-up or injection duration, study methods, type of antibiotics or medical therapies and outcomes related to microbiota and immunological factors.

Results

Data on immunological factors and bacterial contamination were retrieved from 21 included studies. Notably, the presence of histocytes, giant cells and Staphylococcus epidermidis within biopsies were often associated with LIRs.

Conclusion

This review provides a clear overview of the immunological factors associated with LIRs and provides a hypothetical immunological model for development of the disease. Furthermore, an overview of bacterial contamination and associations with LIRs has been provided. Follow-up research may result in clinical recommendations to prevent LIRs.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors-www.springer.com/00266..

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02306-3.

Enhancing the Lateral Orbital "C-Angle" With Calcium Hydroxylapatite: An Anatomic and Clinical Study

BACKGROUND

Deliberate injection of specific facial subunits may improve aesthetic outcomes in facial rejuvenation. We contend that the lateral orbital area (LOA) is a key anatomic subunit in the perception of eye attractiveness, with a C-shaped distribution of fat contributing to the formation of a distinct angle in the lateral orbit.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the anatomy of the LOA that constitutes the C-shaped angle and to investigate the safety and cosmetic outcomes of nonsurgical enhancement of that area with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA).

METHODS

Four injected fresh-frozen cadaver heads were dissected. Twenty patients were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. Participants were seen on the day of injection, and at 2 weeks and 3 months postinjection. Two-dimensional and 3D photographs were analyzed to quantify the volumetric changes between pretreatment and postinjection time points. Secondary outcomes included Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale score and subject satisfaction at 3 months.

RESULTS

Cadaver dissections revealed distinct fat compartments and a zone of adhesion forming the C-shaped area around the lateral orbit. In the clinical study, a mean of 1.88 mL of CaHA was injected into each lateral periorbital region. There was 97% and 76% volume retention at 2 weeks and 3 months, respectively, with 70% of patients being "very satisfied" at 3 months. The average Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale rating at 3 months was 3.95. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The LOA is a distinct facial subunit that can be enhanced safely by CaHA injection with good cosmetic outcomes. Focusing on the C-angle can improve periorbital aesthetics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Hyaluronidase: what is your fear?

INTRODUCTION

The aesthetic treatment based on fillers with hyaluronic acid presents an increasing demand in the present day because it is considered a safe and minimally invasive procedure. In the management of adverse effects or more severe complications of hyaluronic acid-based fillers, hyaluronidase is the treatment of choice.

OBJECTIVE

To demostrate efficacy in reversibility and safety in the treatment of HA complications.

METHODS

It is a retrospective study article that reports the use of hyaluronidase in the main undesirable effects of fillers in 114 patients in a private dermatological clinic from 2015 to 2018.

RESULTS

The target of the application was 51 cases of overcorrection (45%), 50 cases of Tyndall efect (44%), and 13 late nodules (11%). When we evaluated the areas where HYAL was injected, we found that the area with the most indication of application of the product was the eyelid region (58 injections).

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that HYAL is a safe and effective drug in the management of mild adverse events of HA applications with no severe side effects in our protocol of use.

Immediate nor Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Plays a Role in Late Inflammatory Reactions After Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections

Purpose

The exact etiology of late inflammatory reactions (LIRs) to hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is currently unknown. Some argue that these result from a hypersensitivity reaction, although evidence to support this is very scarce. Most reports on such reactions are not substantiated by positive skin tests. The purpose of our study was to determine whether immediate or delayed type hypersensitivity reaction follows hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injections.

Patients and Methods

Twelve patients were referred for general allergic screening (patch tests), as well as specific intradermal testing (injection of 0.1cc boluses) on the medial upper arm with a selection of several currently available hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers on the market. A positive allergic reaction was defined as erythema, firmness or swelling.

Results

During the 4 month follow-up, no reactions to any of the tested HA fillers were reported. No correlation was found between results from the general allergic screening and a history with LIRs to HA fillers.

Conclusion

The results suggest that neither type I nor type IV hypersensitivity plays a role in late inflammatory reactions (LIRs) to hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/ldw2cZOftOw

Quantifying the Digestion of Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Fillers With Hyaluronidase

BACKGROUND

Adverse events due to hyaluronic acid fillers (HAFs) may be treated with hyaluronidase, an enzyme that cleaves bonds within hyaluronic acid. This study reviews the efficacy of currently available hyaluronidase preparations in breaking down commercial, cross-linked HAFs.

METHODS

Three HAFs were used in this study (Restylane, Juvederm Voluma, and Belotero [BEL] Balance). A laser-based particle size analyzer (Malvern Mastersizer 3000) was used to calculate particle sizes in untreated HAFs (controls) and those treated with 450 units of hyaluronidase (Hylenex) for 5 and 30 minutes.

RESULTS

Particle size analysis revealed that when Restylane was treated with hyaluronidase for 5 minutes, the average particle size reduced modestly, from 472 to 440 μm. At 30 minutes, the average particle size was 419 μm. For Juvederm, the average size of particles reduced from 703 μm in controls to 676 μm after treatment with hyaluronidase for 5 minutes and 635 μm after treatment for 30 minutes. For Belotero, the average size of control particles was 410 μm, reducing to 376 μm after treatment with hyaluronidase for 5 minutes and 345 μm after treatment for 30 minutes.

CONCLUSION

After treatment with hyaluronidase for up to 30 minutes, there was only a modest breakdown of all 3 HAFs used. The results of this study raise questions regarding the efficacy of hyaluronidase in degrading cross-linked HAFs.

Doppler Ultrasonographic Anatomy of the Midline Nasal Dorsum

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to identify a safe method for filler injection to prevent blood vessel damage, by means of checking the location and depth of the blood vessels on the midline of the nose using Doppler ultrasonographic imaging.

METHODS

Ultrasonographic images of the nasal areas of patients for filler injection rhinoplasty were reviewed. The location and depth of the dorsal nasal arteries and the intercanthal vein in each part on the midline of the nose were checked.

RESULTS

The intercanthal vein was detected in the midline of the radix in 22 patients and the midline of the rhinion region in two patients. There were no patients in whom the intercanthal vein was observed in the midline of the supratip region. The dorsal nasal artery was detected in the rhinion region in six patients and in the supratip region in two patients. There were no patients in whom the dorsal nasal artery was observed in the midline of the radix. The dorsal nasal artery was located within 1.2 mm from the perichondrium or periosteum in three patients in whom it was detected in the rhinion.

CONCLUSIONS

When performing dorsal augmentation, the injection of filler into the preperiosteal layer in the rhinion region should be avoided for the prevention of vascular embolism. During dorsal augmentation in patients with a nasal hump, the filler can be injected into the preperiosteal space in the radix by introducing a needle perpendicular to the periosteum from the skin.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

A Randomized, Blinded, Prospective Clinical Study Comparing Small-Particle Versus Cohesive Polydensified Matrix Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids

BACKGROUND

Perioral rhytids are a bothersome sign of aging for many patients. Although multiple treatments exist, choosing an optimal modality may be difficult considering that rhytids in this region are fine and the anatomy dynamic.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to compare the efficacy and safety as well as patient satisfaction of a small-particle hyaluronic acid filler with 0.3% lidocaine (SP-HAL, Restylane Silk) and cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid filler (CPM-HA, Belotero Balance) in reducing superficial perioral rhytids.

METHODS

The study was double-blinded, and 48 patients with moderate to severe superficial perioral rhytids were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either CPM-HA in the left perioral region and SPHAL in the right or vice versa. Rhytid severity was measured by patients utilizing a linear analog scale, and by investigators utilizing a validated 5-point scale, for 180 days following treatment.

RESULTS

Both SP-HAL and CPM-HA achieved a reduction in rhytid severity, and neither treatment group returned to baseline after 180 days. Investigator-reported scores for rhytid severity were significantly better for SP-HAL than CPM-HA and remained so at 180 days (P < .05). SP-HAL also proved significantly better for reducing rhytids according to patient scores, although this difference occurred between 120 and 180 days only. Adverse events included rash and mild acne for CPM-HA, and SP-HAL was associated with 1 postinflammatory nodule and 2 occurrences of Tyndall effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both SP-HAL and CPM-HA are effective at reducing perioral rhytid severity and have similar safety profiles, SP-HAL possesses a longer duration of effect.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Filler Migration to the Orbit

BACKGROUND

Dermal filler injections continue to grow in popularity as a method of facial rejuvenation. This increase in the number of injections performed has resulted in an increasing number of types of filler-related complications.

OBJECTIVES

We report a series of cases where dermal filler injected in the face migrated to the orbit. Treatment methods and possible mechanisms of this newly reported complication are discussed.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter analysis was performed on patients with dermal filler migration to the orbit after facial filler injections.

RESULTS

Seven patients (6 females, 1 male; age range, 42-67 years) presented with orbital symptoms after filler injection and were subsequently found to have dermal filler in the orbit. Four out of 7 patients underwent orbitotomy surgery, 1 patient underwent lacrimal surgery, 1 patient had strabismus surgery, and 1 patient was treated with hyalurodinase injections. All patients have remained stable postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Orbital complications secondary to migrated filler may occur long after the initial procedure. Because the site of the complication is distant from the injection site, patients and physicians may not immediately make the connection. Furthermore, this may lead to unnecessary examinations and a delay in diagnosis while looking for standard orbital masses. Dermal fillers should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with new-onset orbital masses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Inflammatory complications of vocal fold injection with hyaluronic acid: a multiinstitutional study

Background/aim

This study aimed to assess the inflammatory adverse reactions of vocal fold injection laryngoplasty with hyaluronic acid.

Materials and methods

This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent vocal fold injection augmentation with HA injection from January 2005 to September 2016 in nine different institutions. Demographic data, indication for injection, injection techniques, types of injection material, settings of procedure, and complications were reviewed. The types of complication, onset time, and management of complications were also noted.

Results

In all, 467 patients were identified. The majority of patients had been injected under general anesthesia (n = 382, 84.7%). For injection material, two different types of hyaluronic acid were used: hyaluronic acid alone or hyaluronic acid with dextranomer. Complications occurred in nine patients (1.9%). The majority of complications were inflammatory reactions (n = 7, 1.47%). Main symptoms were dysphonia and/or dyspnea with an onset of 0 h to 3 weeks after the hyaluronic acid injection. Three patients were hospitalized, one of which was also intubated and observed in the intensive care unit for 24 h. Systemic steroids and antibiotics were the main medical treatment in the majority of cases. There was no statistical difference in complication rates between patients who received hyaluronic acid and those who received hyaluronic acid with dextranomer (P = 0.220).

Conclusion

Hyaluronic acid can be considered as a safe substance for the injection of vocal folds with a low risk of inflammatory reaction.

MD Codes™: A Methodological Approach to Facial Aesthetic Treatment with Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Fillers

Background

Patients often seek aesthetic correction of facial deficiencies (e.g., lines and folds) that are rarely the underlying cause of dissatisfaction with their appearance. Use of a more holistic approach focused on improving the emotional messages of the face (e.g., looking less sad) may improve patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes. The MD Codes™ system was developed to increase clinician success rates by reducing variability in the technical aspects of hyaluronic acid (HA) filler treatment and focusing on addressing unfavorable emotional attributes of the face.

Methods

The MD Codes, or medical codes, represent specific anatomical subunits for injection of HA fillers. Each MD Code includes information regarding the target depth of injection, the proper delivery tool (needle or cannula) and delivery technique (e.g., aliquot, bolus, fanning), and the minimum product volume recommended to achieve visible, reproducible results (active number). During treatment planning, the appropriate MD Codes are selected using algorithms focused on lessening unfavorable facial attributes (a saggy, tired, sad, or angry look) and enhancing positive attributes (an attractive, younger, more contoured, or feminine [soft] or masculine look).

Results

Three case studies are presented to illustrate how the MD Codes and their algorithms were used to address sagginess, tiredness, and sadness in two women and one man.

Conclusions

MD Codes provide a universal symbolic language for reducing variability in injection technique. The platform provides user-friendly algorithms to help clinicians increase patient satisfaction by going beyond treatment of lines and folds and to focus on reducing unfavorable facial attributes.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00266-020-01762-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Lip Augmentation

A heightened cultural emphasis on youth and beauty has resulted in an increase in cosmetic surgery in the Western world. Lip augmentation is one of the most popular cosmetic procedures done because full lips are considered youthful and voluptuous. With reliable and improved techniques, it is possible to change the appearance of the lips utilizing injectable materials and surgical techniques. This article focuses on popular materials and techniques utilized to augment the size and volume of the lips-the most common are dermal fillers. Lip augmentation requires a thorough understanding of anatomy and managing patient expectations, available materials, and techniques.