Safety Assessment of Trimellitic Anhydride Copolymers as Used in Cosmetics

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) assessed the safety of 6 trimellitic anhydride copolymers as used in cosmetics. These ingredients are related as copolymers in that they all share trimellitic anhydride (ie, 1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic acid anhydride) as a monomer, are reported to function as film formers in cosmetics, and are reported to be primarily used in nail products. Very limited safety data were available or submitted. The Panel concluded that Adipic Acid/Neopentyl Glycol/Trimellitic Anhydride Copolymer and Phthalic Anhydride/Trimellitic Anhydride/Glycols Copolymer are safe in nail product formulations in the present practices of use and concentration, but the data are insufficient to make a determination of safety on the use of these 2 ingredients in all other types of cosmetic formulations. The Panel also concluded that the available data are insufficient to make a determination that the remaining trimellitic anhydride copolymers are safe for use in cosmetic formulations.

Safety Assessment of Polyether Lanolins as Used in Cosmetics

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) assessed the safety of 39 polyether lanolin ingredients as used in cosmetics. These ingredients function mostly as hair conditioning agents, skin conditioning agent-emollients, and surfactant-emulsifying agents. The Panel reviewed available animal and clinical data, from previous CIR safety assessments of related ingredients and components. The similar structure, properties, functions, and uses of these ingredients enabled grouping them and using the available toxicological data to assess the safety of the entire group. The Panel concluded that these polyether lanolin ingredients are safe in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.

The Impact of Glaucoma Medications on Corneal Wound Healing

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of antiglaucoma drugs on the corneal healing process and corneal toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four eye drops to treat glaucoma--Xalatan (latanoprost 50 μg/mL; Pfizer), Monoprost (latanoprost 50 μg/mL; Théa Pharma), Taflotan Sine (tafluprost 15 μg/mL; Santen Pharmaceutical Co.), Travatan (travoprost 40 μg/mL; Alcon), and 0.02% benzalkonium chloride (BAC) solution and HyloComod (1 mg/mL sodium hyaluronate; Ursapharm) as positive and negative control were tested regarding corneal irritability and effect on corneal healing. Formulas were tested over 3 days and administered 6 times daily on rabbit corneas cultured on an artificial anterior chamber (the Ex Vivo Eye Irritation Test system). Initially, 4 corneal abrasions (2.5 to 5.7 mm2) were applied. All defects were monitored during drug application by fluorescein stains and photographs. Glucose/lactate concentrations were monitored for corneal metabolic activity evaluation.

RESULTS

For Xalatan and BAC, the corneal erosion size increased from 14.65 to 66.57 mm2 and 14.80 to 87.26 mm2. Travatan and Taflotan Sine did not interfere with corneal healing. Monoprost delayed corneal healing. For Xalatan and BAC, histology showed severe alteration of the superficial cornea. An increase in anterior chamber lactate concentration indicates corneal toxicity for Xalatan, BAC, and Monoprost.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal toxicity of Xalatan is most probably caused by BAC. Monoprost delays corneal healing, which is not well understood. The Monoprost effects could be caused by its additive, macrogolglycerolhydroxystearate 40. This excipient is a known skin irritant, and its concentration is relatively elevated in Monoprost, 50 mg/mL, compared with its active ingredient, latanoprost (0.05 mg/mL).

Safety Assessment of Alkyl PEG Ethers as Used in Cosmetics

The CIR Expert Panel assessed the safety of Alkyl PEG Ethers as used in cosmetics. These ingredients primarily function in cosmetics as surfactants, and some have additional functions as skin-conditioning agents, fragrance ingredients, and emulsion stabilizers. The Panel reviewed available relevant animal and clinical data, as well as information from previous CIR reports; when data were not available for individual ingredients, the Panel extrapolated from the existing data to support safety. The Panel concluded that the Alkyl PEG ethers are safe as used when formulated to be nonirritating, and the same applies to future alkyl PEG ether cosmetic ingredients that vary from those ingredients recited herein only by the number of ethylene glycol repeat units.

Final Report of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel on the Safety Assessment of Pelargonic Acid (Nonanoic Acid) and Nonanoate Esters

Pelargonic acid and its esters function as skin-conditioning agents in cosmetics. Molecular weight (mw) and octanol–water partition coefficient data suggest that dermal penetration is possible. The biohandling of branched-chain fatty acids is not the same as for straight-chain fatty acids, but the differences are not significant to the conclusion that they all are readily metabolized to nontoxic moieties. Limited data suggested that the penetration of other ingredients may be enhanced if these ingredients are present in the same formulation. These ingredients are not significant oral or dermal toxicants in animal studies. They are not reproductive/developmental toxicants or genotoxic/carcinogenic in animal studies. The available data suggested that product formulations containing these ingredients would be nonirritating and nonsensitizing to human skin, but formulators were cautioned to consider the penetration enhancement potential. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel concluded that these ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration.