Sarcoma Subgrouping by Detection of Fusion Transcripts Using NanoString nCounter Technology

Rapid gene fusion testing using the NanoString nCounter platform to improve pediatric leukemia diagnoses in Sub-Saharan Africa

Risk stratification and molecular targeting have been key to increasing cure rates for pediatric cancers in high-income countries. In contrast, precise diagnosis in low-resource settings is hindered by insufficient pathology infrastructure. The Global HOPE program aims to improve outcomes for pediatric cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) by building local clinical care and diagnostic capacity. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing molecular assays to improve leukemia diagnoses in SSA. Custom NanoString nCounter gene fusion assays, previously validated in the US, were used to test samples from suspected leukemia patients. The NanoString platform was chosen due to relatively low cost, minimal technical and bioinformatics expertise required, ability to test sub-optimal RNA, and rapid turnaround time. Fusion results were analyzed blindly, then compared to morphology and flow cytometry results. Of 117 leukemia samples, 74 were fusion-positive, 30 were negative, 7 were not interpretable, and 6 failed RNA quality. Nine additional samples were negative for leukemia by flow cytometry and negative for gene fusions. All 74 gene fusions aligned with the immunophenotype determined by flow cytometry. Fourteen samples had additional information available to further confirm the accuracy of the gene fusion results. The testing provided a more precise diagnosis in >60% of cases, and 9 cases were identified that could be treated with an available tyrosine kinase inhibitor, if detected at diagnosis. As risk-stratified and targeted therapies become more available in SSA, implementing this testing in real-time will enable the treatment of pediatric cancer to move toward incorporating risk stratification for optimized therapy.

Exploring the Potential of Nanotechnology in Pediatric Healthcare: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions

The utilization of nanotechnology has brought about notable advancements in the field of pediatric medicine, providing novel approaches for drug delivery, disease diagnosis, and tissue engineering. Nanotechnology involves the manipulation of materials at the nanoscale, resulting in improved drug effectiveness and decreased toxicity. Numerous nanosystems, including nanoparticles, nanocapsules, and nanotubes, have been explored for their therapeutic potential in addressing pediatric diseases such as HIV, leukemia, and neuroblastoma. Nanotechnology has also shown promise in enhancing disease diagnosis accuracy, drug availability, and overcoming the blood-brain barrier obstacle in treating medulloblastoma. It is important to acknowledge that while nanotechnology offers significant opportunities, there are inherent risks and limitations associated with the use of nanoparticles. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the existing literature on nanotechnology in pediatric medicine, highlighting its potential to revolutionize pediatric healthcare while also recognizing the challenges and limitations that need to be addressed.

Diagnostic Utility of Gene Fusion Panel to Detect Gene Fusions in Fresh and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Cancer Specimens

Somatic gene fusions are common in leukemias/lymphomas and solid tumors. The detection of gene fusions is crucial for diagnosis. NanoString fusion technology is a multiplexed hybridization method that interrogates hundreds of gene fusions in a single reaction. This study's objective was to determine the performance characteristics and diagnostic utility of NanoString fusion assay in a clinical diagnostics laboratory. Validation using 100 positive specimens and 15 negative specimens by a combined reference standard of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)/RT-PCR/next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays achieved 100% sensitivity in leukemias/lymphomas and 95.0% sensitivity and 100% specificity in solid tumors. Subsequently, 214 consecutive clinical cases, including 73 leukemia/lymphoma specimens and 141 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded solid tumor specimens, were analyzed by gene fusion panels across 638 unique gene fusion transcripts. A variety of comparator tests, including FISH panels, conventional karyotyping, a DNA-based targeted NGS assay, and custom RT-PCR testing, were performed in parallel. The gene fusion assay detected 31 gene fusions, including 16 in leukemia/lymphoma specimens and 15 in solid tumor specimens. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of gene fusions detected by the gene fusion panel in all 329 specimens (validation and consecutive clinical specimens) tested in this study were 94.8%, 100%, and 97.9%, respectively, compared with FISH/RT-PCR/NGS assays. The gene fusion panel is a reliable approach that maximizes molecular detection of fusions among both fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cancer specimens.

Non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas diagnosed in patients at a young age. An overview of clinical, pathological, and molecular findings

OBJECTIVE

Disease spectrum in pediatric sarcoma differs substantially from adults. We report a cohort of very young children with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) detailing their molecular features, treatment, and outcome.

METHODS

We report features of consecutive children (age <2 years) with NRSTS (2000-2017). Archival pathological material was re-reviewed, with additional molecular techniques applied where indicated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (16 females, 55%) were identified (median age 6 months; range 0-23). Most common diagnoses included infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS, n = 14, 48%), malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT, n = 4, 14%), and undifferentiated sarcoma (n = 4, 14%). Twenty-seven of 29 (93%) had tumor molecular characterization to confirm diagnosis. Clinical presentation included a swelling/mass (n = 23, 79%). Disease extent was localized (n = 20, 69%), locoregional (n = 6, 21%), or metastatic (n = 3, 10%). Seventeen of 29 (59%) who underwent surgery achieved complete resection (R0). Other treatments included conventional chemotherapy (n = 26, 90%), molecularly targeted therapies (n = 3, 10%), and radiation (n = 5, 17%). At last follow-up (median 3 years; range 0.3-16.4), 23 (79%) were alive, disease-free and six (21%) had died of disease. All patients with IFS were alive and all those with MRT died. A cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) was confirmed in three of 10 (30%) genetically tested patients.

CONCLUSION

We recommend tumor molecular characterization in all young patients including evaluation for CPS to optimize treatment options and prognostication.

Current Status of Management and Outcome for Patients with Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone sarcoma in children after osteosarcoma. It is a very aggressive malignancy for which systemic treatment has greatly improved outcome for patients with localized disease, who now see survival rates of over 70%. However, for the quarter of patients presenting with metastatic disease, survival is still dismal with less than 30% of patients surviving past 5 years. Patients with disease relapse, local or distant, face an even poorer prognosis with an event-free 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Unfortunately, Ewing sarcoma patients have not yet seen the benefit of recent years' technical achievements such as next-generation sequencing, which have enabled researchers to study biological systems at a level never seen before. In spite of large multinational studies, treatment of Ewing sarcoma relies entirely on chemotherapeutic agents that have been largely unchanged for decades. As many promising modern therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and immunotherapy, have been disappointing to date, there is no clear candidate as to which drug should be investigated in the next large-scale clinical trial. However, the mechanisms driving tumor development in Ewing sarcoma are slowly unfolding. New entities of Ewing-like tumors, with fusion transcripts that are related to the oncogenic EWSR1-FLI1 fusion seen in the majority of Ewing tumors, are being mapped. These tumors, although sharing much of the same morphologic features as classic Ewing sarcoma, behave differently and may require a different treatment. There are also controversies regarding local treatment of Ewing sarcoma. The radiosensitive nature of the disease and the tendency for Ewing sarcoma to arise in the axial skeleton make local treatment very challenging. Surgical treatment and radiotherapy have their pros and cons, which may give rise to different treatment strategies in different centers around the world. This review article discusses some of these controversies and reproduces the highlights from recent publications with regard to diagnostics, systemic treatment, and surgical treatment of Ewing sarcoma.

Round Cell Sarcomas: Newcomers and Diagnostic Approaches

Undifferentiated sarcomas of soft tissue and bone have been defined as tumors with no identifiable morphologic, immunohistochemical, or molecular features indicating tumor cell origin. In young patients, these tumors frequently have a round or spindle cell morphology. Recently described recurrent translocations within this category have led to the recognition of new molecular subtypes of round cell sarcomas, and several of them have a more aggressive clinical course and less chemosensitivity. Because these "newcomers" are diagnosed based on their molecular characteristics, molecular investigation is key in the diagnosis and optimal treatment of these challenging tumors.

Breakthrough Technologies Reshape the Ewing Sarcoma Molecular Landscape

Ewing sarcoma is a highly aggressive round cell mesenchymal neoplasm, most often occurring in children and young adults. At the molecular level, it is characterized by the presence of recurrent chromosomal translocations. In the last years, next-generation technologies have contributed to a more accurate diagnosis and a refined classification. Moreover, the application of these novel technologies has highlighted the relevance of intertumoral and intratumoral molecular heterogeneity and secondary genetic alterations. Furthermore, they have shown evidence that genomic features can change as the tumor disseminates and are influenced by treatment as well. Similarly, next-generation technologies applied to liquid biopsies will significantly impact patient management by allowing the early detection of relapse and monitoring response to treatment. Finally, the use of these novel technologies has provided data of great value in order to discover new druggable pathways. Thus, this review provides concise updates on the latest progress of these breakthrough technologies, underscoring their importance in the generation of key knowledge, prognosis, and potential treatment of Ewing Sarcoma.

Diagnostic yield of NanoString nCounter FusionPlex profiling in soft tissue tumors

Diagnostic histopathology of soft tissue tumors can be troublesome as many entities are quite rare and have overlapping morphologic features. Many soft tissue tumors harbor tumor‐defining gene translocations, which may provide an important ancillary tool for tumor diagnosis. The NanoString nCounter platform enables multiplex detection of pre‐defined gene fusion transcripts in formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded tissue. A cohort of 104 soft tissue tumors representing 20 different histological types was analyzed for the expression of 174 unique gene fusion transcripts. A tumor‐defining gene fusion transcript was detected in 60 cases (58%). Sensitivity and specificity of the NanoString assay calculated against the result of an alternative molecular method were 85% and 100%, respectively. Highest diagnostic coverage was obtained for Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, and desmoplastic small round cell tumor. For these tumor types, the NanoString assay is a rapid, cost‐effective, sensitive, and specific ancillary screening tool for molecular diagnosis. For other sarcomas, additional molecular testing may be required when a translocation transcript is not identified with the current 174 gene fusion panel.