Zyoptix wavefront-guided versus standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in low and moderate myopia: randomized controlled 6-month study

Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors

BACKGROUND

Refractive errors (conditions in which the eye fails to focus objects accurately on the retina due to defects in the refractive system), are the most common cause of visual impairment. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are low-order aberrations, usually corrected with spectacles, contact lenses, or conventional refractive surgery. Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) can be quantified with wavefront aberration instruments and corrected using wavefront-guided or wavefront-optimized laser surgery. Wavefront-guided ablations are based on preoperative measurements of HOAs; wavefront-optimized ablations are designed to minimize induction of new HOAs while preserving naturally occurring aberrations. Two wavefront procedures are expected to produce better visual acuity than conventional procedures.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare effectiveness and safety of wavefront procedures, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) versus corresponding conventional procedures, for correcting refractive errors in adults for postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, residual refractive errors, and residual HOAs. The secondary objective was to compare two wavefront procedures.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2019, Issue 8); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS); the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. The date of the search was 6 August 2019. We imposed no restrictions by language or year of publication. We used the Science Citation Index (September 2013) and searched the reference lists of included trials to identify additional relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing either wavefront modified with conventional refractive surgery or wavefront-optimized with wavefront-guided refractive surgery in participants aged ⪰ 18 years with refractive errors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 33 RCTs conducted in Asia, Europe and United States, totaling 1499 participants (2797 eyes). Participants had refractive errors ranging from high myopia to low hyperopia. Studies reported at least one of the following review-specific outcomes based on proportions of eyes: with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, without loss of one or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction, with HOAs and adverse events. Study characteristics and risk of bias Participants were mostly women, mean age 29 and 53 years, and without previous refractive surgery, ocular pathology or systemic comorbidity. We could not judge risks of bias for most domains of most studies. Most studies in which both eyes of a participant were analyzed failed to account for correlations between two eyes in the analysis and reporting of outcomes. Findings For the primary comparison between wavefront (PRK or LASIK or LASEK) and corresponding conventional procedures, 12-month outcome data were available from only one study of PRK with 70 participants. No evidence of more favorable outcomes of wavefront PRK on proportion of eyes: with UCVA of 20/20 or better (risk ratio [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.24); without loss of one or more lines of BSCVA (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.09); within ± 0.5 D of target refraction (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.24); and mean spherical equivalent (mean difference [MD] 0.04, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.18). The evidence for each effect estimate was of low certainty. No study reported HOAs at 12 months. At six months, the findings of two to eight studies showed that overall effect estimates and estimates by subgroup of PRK or LASIK or LASEK were consistent with those for PRK at 12 month, and suggest no difference in all outcomes. The certainty of evidence for each outcome was low. For the comparison between wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided procedures at 12 months, the overall effect estimates for proportion of eyes: with UCVA of 20/20 or better (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02; 5 studies, 618 participants); without loss of one or more lines of BSCVA (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.02; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 622 participants); within ± 0.5 diopters of target refraction (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09; I² = 33%; 4 studies, 480 participants) and mean HOAs (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.07; I² = 41%; 5 studies, 622 participants) showed no evidence of a difference between the two groups. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, we did not calculate an overall effect estimate for mean spherical equivalent at 12 months, but point estimates consistently suggested no difference between wavefront-optimized PRK versus wavefront-guided PRK. However, wavefront-optimized LASIK compared with wavefront-guided LASIK may improve mean spherical equivalent (MD -0.14 D, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.09; 4 studies, 472 participants). All effect estimates were of low certainty of evidence. At six months, the results were consistent with those at 12 months based on two to six studies. The findings suggest no difference between two wavefront procedures for any of the outcomes assessed, except for the subgroup of wavefront-optimized LASIK which showed probable improvement in mean spherical equivalent (MD -0.12 D, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.05; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 280 participants; low certainty of evidence) relative to wavefront-guided LASIK. We found a single study comparing wavefront-guided LASIK versus wavefront-guided PRK at six and 12 months. At both time points, effect estimates consistently supported no difference between two procedures. The certain of evidence was very low for all estimates. Adverse events Significant visual loss or optical side effects that were reported were similar between groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that at 12 months and six months postoperatively, there was no important difference between wavefront versus conventional refractive surgery or between wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided surgery in the clinical outcomes analyzed. The low certainty of the cumulative evidence reported to date suggests that further randomized comparisons of these surgical approaches would provide more precise estimates of effects but are unlikely to modify our conclusions. Future trials may elect to focus on participant-reported outcomes such as satisfaction with vision before and after surgery and effects of remaining visual aberrations, in addition to contrast sensitivity and clinical outcomes analyzed in this review.

Aspheric versus wavefront-guided aspheric photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with significant astigmatism

PURPOSE

To compare the refractive and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients with significant astigmatism using aspheric versus wavefront-guided aspheric profiles.

SETTING

Ophthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Negah Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized case series.

METHODS

One eye of each patient with a refractive astigmatism more than 2.00 diopters (D) randomly received aspheric PRK. In the other eye, wavefront-guided and aspheric treatment was performed using a personalized treatment advanced algorithm. Visual acuity, refractive errors, and HOAs were compared between the 2 groups preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study comprised 32 patients (64 eyes). The mean preoperative refractive astigmatism was -4.07 D ± 1.64 (SD) and -4.02 ± 1.55 D in the aspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P = .2). The mean postoperative astigmatism was -0.46 ± 0.37 D and -0.82 ± 0.53 D in the aspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P = .02). Postoperatively, the root mean square of total HOAs was significantly increased in both groups. However, compared with wavefront-guided aspheric PRK, aspheric PRK induced fewer HOAs (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In eyes with high astigmatism, post-PRK residual astigmatism was lower in the aspheric group than in the wavefront-guided aspheric group. The increase in HOAs was significantly higher in the wavefront-guided aspheric group than in the aspheric group.

Femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia correction: Long-term follow-up outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Report the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for high myopia correction after long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective, consecutive, clinical study including 70 eyes that underwent LASIK using a 500 Hertz (Hz) repetition rate excimer laser and femtosecond technology for flap creation. Visual, refractive, corneal aberrations, and correlation among the variables were evaluated during 3 years. In addition, 34 eyes were followed during 5 years.

RESULTS

Significant improvement of 17 logMAR lines was observed in uncorrected vision at 5 years (p < 0.01). This was consistent with spherical equivalent reduction that came from mean preoperative -7.79 diopters (D) to 5 years postoperative -0.24 D (p < 0.01). Significant induction of primary spherical aberration and coma aberration was also found (p < 0.01) at 3 months with levels of 0.61 µm and 0.47 µm, respectively, with no further changes at 5 years (p > 0.05). Pearson correlation showed that the amount of high-order aberrations at 3 months postoperativeley was significantly correlated with the changes in the keratometry throughout the 5 years (delta K) (R2 0.242 p = 0.05). Finally, preoperative corneal asphericity showed an inverse correlation with the delta K (R2 -308 p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study suggests that LASIK for high myopia correction using 500 Hz repetition rate excimer laser provides stable visual, refractive and aberrometric results after 5 years of follow-up. A more prolate cornea and the amount of higher-order aberrations induced after LASIK are factors that negatively impact in the long-term stability of the procedure.

The Characteristics of Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery Candidates

PURPOSE

To determine the demographic and refractive characteristics of excimer laser refractive surgery candidates in Iran.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study between 2010 and 2014. All information was collected from 28 centers randomly selected from 12 provinces. Then, for each season of the year, one week was chosen through simple random selection, and within each week, 3 days were again chosen randomly. All excimer laser surgical procedures performed during these 3 days were identified by training staff, and data were extracted from patient charts.

RESULTS

A total of 14,569 charts were reviewed; 67.5% of the subjects were female and the rest were male. Of the total surgeries, 18.6% had been done in 2010 which reached to 19.1% in 2014. The mean age of people receiving refractive surgery showed an upward trend (P<0.001) and female patients were significantly younger than male patients (P<0.001). The 25 to 39 years age group received the highest number of surgeries (31.9% of the total) and there was a significant association with gender (P<0.001). The most common refractive error was compound myopic astigmatism with a prevalence of 79.3%. In 2010, 33.3% of the performed surgeries were covered by insurance policies, and this decreased to 30.2% in 2014 (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Women with compound myopic astigmatism in the age range of 25 and 35 years are the most frequent users of excimer laser refractive surgery. Less than one-third of laser refractive surgeries are covered by insurance policies. Therefore, proper planning for improving services to this group must be given priority.

Effectiveness of Technolas torsional eye tracking system on visual outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of Technolas 217Z eye tracking system (torsional component) in corneal surface irregularity and high order aberrations (HOAs) after photorefractive keratectomy

Methods

Patients with compound myopic astigmatism among persons demanding refractive surgery in Khatam-al-Anbia Eye Hospital with the mean age of 29 years were enrolled in this double-blind randomized interventional study. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) of refractive error was −4.75 diopters(D) (range: −1.5 to −7.0), and the mean astigmatism was 3 D (range:1.0–4). Many studies were performed for each patient including: A complete eye examination, visual acuity and Monocular contrast sensitivity evaluation, and refraction. Corneal topography, Orbscan II, and wavefront aberrometry were conducted. One eye was randomly assigned for aspheric treatment and applying eye tracking system. The other eye was treated without torsional eye tracking system. The outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, corneal irregularity index in 3 mm and 5 mm optical zones in Orbscan II, and mean total HOAs at the 6-monthvisit.

Results

Fifty eyes of 25 patients were enrolled. Mean UCVA was improved significantly in both the study and control groups in the 6-month post-operative follow-up. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in UCVA and BCVA (P = 0.185 and P = 0.176, respectively). Total HOAs increased in both groups after PRK. However, they were lower in eyes treated with the eye tracking system (P < 0.001). Corneal irregularity index in 3 mm and 5 mm central zones in Orbscan II was significantly lower in the study group (P = 0.045 and P = 0.031 respectively). Contrast sensitivity function was not different in the 2 groups (P = 0.15).

Conclusion

Our study findings suggest that applying ‘Technolas 217z’ eye tracker system (Bausch and Lomb Advanced) results in a more regular anterior surface of cornea. Therefore, we recommend it for surface laser refractive surgery.

Aspheric versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy: contralateral eye study

PURPOSE

To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric outcomes between wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and aspheric PRK in myopic patients.

SETTING

Khatam-al-Anbia Eye Hospital, Mashhad, Iran.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

One eye of each patient was randomly assigned to excimer laser wavefront-guided PRK (Zyoptix) and the other eye to excimer laser aspheric PRK (Technolas 217z). The preoperative and 3-month and 6-month postoperative refractive errors, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Ninety-six eyes (48 patients) were enrolled. At the last postoperative visit, there were no between-group differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (P = .987) or corrected distance visual acuity (P = .416). The mean spherical equivalent was -0.076 diopter (D) ± 0.029 (SD) in the wavefront-guided group and -0.077 ± 0.075 D in the aspheric PRK group (P = .684). Postoperatively, the mean area under the log of contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) with and without glare testing improved over preoperative values (both P < .001). There was no statistically significant between-group difference in the AULCSF with glare (P = .903) or without glare (P = .978). Total HOAs increased after PRK in both groups, although aspheric PRK induced fewer HOAs than wavefront-guided PRK (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PRK methods equally improved postoperative UDVA and contrast sensitivity. The HOAs increased after treatment with both methods; however, aspheric ablation induced statistically fewer HOAs than wavefront-guided ablation.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Wavefront-guided versus non-wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

To compare the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials. Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and data was extracted by 2 independent authors. Measures of association were pooled quantitatively using meta-analytical methods. Comparisons between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations were made as pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences. The pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for efficacy, safety, and predictability. The weighted mean differences and 95% CIs were used to compare induced HOAs.

Results

The study covered five trials involving 298 eyes. After wavefront-guided PRK, the pooled OR of achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 (efficacy) was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.53–2.60; p = 0.69), the pooled OR of achieving a result within ±0.50 diopter of the intended target (predictability) was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.40–1.84; p = 0.70). No study reported a loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen acuity (safety) with either modality. In eyes with wavefront-guided PRK, the postoperative trefoil aberrations (mean difference −0.02; 95% CI, −0.03 to −0.00; p = 0.03) were significantly lower. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative total HOAs (mean difference −0.04; 95% CI, −0.23 to 0.14; p = 0.63), spherical (mean difference 0.00; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.09; p = 0.93), and coma (mean difference −0.06; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.03; p = 0.20) aberrations.

Conclusions

According to the meta-analysis, wavefront-guided PRK offered no advantage in efficacy, predictability, or safety measures over non-wavefront-guided PRK, although it may have induced fewer trefoil aberrations.

Indications for and outcomes of tertiary referrals in refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To review the spectrum of disease, symptomatology, and management offered to patients referred for a second opinion after refractive surgery.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was done on all patients referred from October 1, 2006, to September 30, 2011, to a tertiary eye clinic after refractive surgery of any kind (ie, corneal laser surgery, conductive keratoplasty, radial keratotomy, phakic implants, refractive lens exchanges, or any combination thereof). Data analysis was performed on all demographic and clinical aspects of this cohort, including the initial complaint, type of referral, number of complaints, procedure previously performed, diagnosis at our center, type of advice given, and rate and type of surgical intervention.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one eyes (69 patients) were included. Corneal refractive surgery was performed in 82% (108 eyes), and 11% (14 eyes) were seen after phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation and 7% (9 eyes) after refractive lens exchange. The most common diagnoses were tear film dysfunction (30 eyes, 23%), residual refractive error (25 eyes, 19%), and cataract (20 eyes, 15%). Most patients (42 patients, 61%) were treated conservatively. In 27 patients (39%), 36 eyes (28%) were managed surgically. Severe visual loss was seen in 1 eye.

CONCLUSIONS

No major problems were found in most second opinions after refractive surgery referral. Dry eyes, small residual refractive error, or higher-order aberrations were the most common complaints. Surgical intervention was needed in 36 eyes (28%), almost half of which were cataract extractions. Severe visual loss was seen in 1 eye with a PIOL. There was no incidence of severe visual loss in keratorefractive and refractive lens exchange procedures.

Corneal higher order aberrations after LASIK for high myopia with a fast repetition rate excimer laser, optimized ablation profile, and femtosecond laser-assisted flap

PURPOSE

To evaluate corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) after LASIK for the correction of high myopia using a new generation of excimer laser (500-Hz repetition rate) and optimized ablation profiles.

METHODS

Retrospective consecutive study including 29 eyes from 17 patients (age range: 24 to 61 years) with high levels of myopia (spherical equivalent refraction ≥8.50 diopters). All cases underwent LASIK using the sixth-generation Amaris (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) excimer laser and flap creation with the IntraLase (Abbott Medical Optics) femtosecond laser. Postoperative changes in corneal HOAs and corneal asphericity were analyzed during 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Significant improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity and spherical equivalent was observed (P<.01). Corrected distance visual acuity did not change after surgery (P=.37). Significant increases in corneal root-mean-square (RMS) HOA, RMS spherical aberration (SA), and RMS coma were observed 6 months after surgery (P<.01). Corneal asphericity for the 4.5-mm (Q45) and 8-mm (Q8) corneal diameter also increased significantly during the postoperative period (P<.01). Significant correlations were found between postoperative RMS HOA and RMS SA and RMS coma (r(2)=0.375, P=0.000 and r(2)=0.596, P=.000, respectively). Linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between postoperative Q45 and preoperative pachymetry and treatment optical zone (R(2)=0.24, P<.05). A correlation was also found between postoperative Q8 and preoperative sphere and treatment ablation zone (R(2)=0.459, P<.006).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant induction of corneal HOAs still exists with the latest generation Schwind excimer laser. Linear regression analysis will help predict postoperative asphericity obtained when using LASIK for the correction of high myopia.

Wavefront-guided and aspheric ablation for myopia -- one-year results of the zyoptix personalized treatment advanced algorithm

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual outcome and change in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) 1 year post simultaneous wavefront-guided and aspheric photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Consecutive myopic patients undergoing PRK (38 eyes of 23 patients) and LASIK (42 eyes of 25 patients) using the Technolas 217z100 excimer laser (Technolas Perfect Vision) in a private laser clinic were included. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction (MRSE), HOAs, and spherical aberration (Z(4)(0)).

RESULTS

At 1 year, 87% (32/37) of PRK eyes and 81% (30/37) of LASIK eyes had UDVA of 20/20 or better (P = .75). Mean ± SD MRSE was -0.26 ± 0.31 diopters (D) in the PRK and -0.16 ± 0.34 D in the LASIK group (P = .222). There was no significant increase in total HOA root mean square (RMS) in the PRK group. Mean ± SD total HOA RMS increased from 0.402 ± 0.14 μm to 0.496 ± 0.17 μm (P = .013) in the LASIK group at 1 year. Z(4)(0) increased from mean ± SD -0.045 ± 0.12 μm to -0.109 ± 0.15 μm (P = .006, factor 2.42) in the PRK group and did not significantly increase in the LASIK group (mean ± SD -0.16 ± 0.17 μm to -0.17 ± 0.15 μm (P = .469, factor 1.08) at 6 mm pupil.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual outcome was excellent in both treatment groups. HOAs were still increased following LASIK by a factor of 1.23 but not PRK. Z(4)(0) was not induced by LASIK with the treatment algorithm but was negatively induced in PRK eyes.

Custom vs conventional PRK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of postoperative visual function

PURPOSE

To determine whether VISX S4 (VISX Inc) custom photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) results in better visual outcomes than VISX S4 conventional PRK.

METHODS

Photorefractive keratectomy was performed on 80 eyes from 40 patients in this randomized, prospective, contralateral eye study. Dominant eyes were randomized to one group with the fellow eye receiving the alternate treatment. Primary outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, and root-mean-square (RMS) higher order aberrations.

RESULTS

Mean UDVA was -0.023±0.099 (20/19) in the custom group and -0.044±0.080 (20/18) in the conventional group 6 months after surgery (P=.293). Mean CDVA was -0.073±0.067 (20/17) in the custom group and -0.079±0.071 (20/17) in the conventional group 6 months after surgery (P=.659). Total higher order aberration RMS and spherical aberration increased in both groups compared to preoperative values (P<.05). Coma increased in the conventional group (P<.05) whereas it was similar to preoperative values in the custom group. No significant differences were noted in induction of trefoil.

CONCLUSIONS

Custom and conventional PRK were shown to be safe and effective with excellent visual acuity and contrast sensitivity performance at 6 and 12 months. Conventional PRK induced more coma than custom PRK; however, this did not seem to correlate with clinical outcomes.

Wavefront-optimized surface ablation with the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q excimer laser platform: 12-month visual and refractive results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the wavefront-optimized algorithm of the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q (Wavelight AG) 400-Hz excimer laser platform.

METHODS

Three hundred three eyes of 303 patients treated with advanced surface ablation were evaluated prospectively. Topical mitomycin C (MMC) was used when ablation was ≥80 μm. Efficacy, safety, and predictability at 12 months were quantified with subjective refraction, visual acuity (logMAR), and slit-lamp examination.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/20.5 (0.01±0.05 logMAR). Postoperative UDVA was equal or better than preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in 94.7% of eyes. Efficacy index was 1.05. Corrected distance visual acuity was maintained (93.7%) or improved (5.9%) in 99.6% of treated eyes. No patient lost ≥2 lines. Safety index was 1.05. Haze at 12 months was grade ≤0.5 in 98% of treated eyes and grade ≤1 in 100% of treated eyes. Mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.03±0.15 diopters (D). Postoperative MRSE was within ±0.50 D in 99% of eyes. Overcorrection was documented in 0.66% and undercorrection in 0.33% of eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The wavefront-optimized algorithm of the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q excimer laser platform showed good efficacy, safety, and predictability in advanced surface ablation, with or without MMC intraoperative use.

Conventional versus custom ablation in photorefractive keratectomy: randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes and changes in total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and custom PRK SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Negah Eye Center, Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

This clinical trial comprised eyes having bilateral myopic PRK with the Technolas 217z excimer machine. One eye had conventional ablation (conventional group) and the other eye, wavefront-guided custom treatment (custom group). Changes in postoperative visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, contrast sensitivity function, and root mean square higher-order aberrations (RMS HOAs) were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 28 patients (56 eyes) was 26.7 years. The mean preoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was -4.92 diopters (D) +/- 1.6 (SD) and the mean refractive astigmatism, 0.91 +/- 1.0 D. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in preoperative cycloplegic refractive error, HOAs, or contrast sensitivity function. The mean follow-up was 8.1 +/- 3.3 months. The increase in RMS HOAs from preoperatively to postoperatively was statistically significantly higher in the custom group in the 6.0 mm zone (P = .03) but not in the 4.0 mm zone (P = .26). The decrease in low mesopic contrast sensitivity function was statistically significant in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMS HOAs significantly increased after PRK with both methods. The results suggest that custom ablation is more sensitive to optical zone (OZ) size and may yield more aberrations with an OZ smaller than 6.0 mm.

Effect of NIDEK optimized aspheric transition zone ablation profile on higher order aberrations during LASIK for myopia

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of the Optimized Aspheric Transition zone profile (OATz) that was devised to minimize the "red ring" in corneal topography on ocular higher order aberrations following LASIK for myopia.

METHODS

Laser in situ keratomileusis with OATz using the Nidek Advanced Vision Excimer Laser Platform (NAVEX) was performed on 22 eyes with a 4.5-mm optical zone and 8.0-mm transition zone (OATz group). Conventional LASIK was performed on 11 eyes with a 6.0-mm optical zone and 7.0-mm transition zone as a control (conventional group). The higher order aberrations for the central 6-mm diameter were measured at 1 month postoperatively using a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. In addition to the spherical aberration, the magnitude and orientation of trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, and secondary astigmatism were compared between two groups using Zernike vector analysis.

RESULTS

The mean magnitude (root-mean-square) of the total higher order aberrations in the conventional group (0.70 +/- 0.28 microm) was significantly higher than that in the OATz group (0.51 +/- 0.15 microm, P < .05, unpaired t test). For spherical aberration, the OATz group had significantly lower values (0.22 +/- 0.17 microm) than the conventional group (0.38 +/- 0.23 pm, P < .05). The magnitude of coma in the conventional group was also higher than that in the OATz group (P < .05), and the mean axis of coma was 8.6 degrees in the conventional group and 64.3 degrees in the OATz group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the magnitude and axes of trefoil, tetrafoil, or secondary astigmatism between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The OATz profile may decrease the surgically induced increase of higher order aberrations, especially spherical aberration, following LASIK. However, a study with equivalent treatment groups and larger sample sizes is required for a definitive conclusion.

Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform

PURPOSE

To examine changes in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after PlanoScan laser in situ keratomileusis and (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative study.

METHODS

Myopic patients undergoing LASIK (65 eyes of 36 patients) and LASEK (50 eyes of 28 patients) at a private practice were selected randomly. Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb, Surrey, United Kingdom). Main outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and aberrometry (Zywave; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) and were recorded before surgery and at three and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between both groups in terms of MRSE (P = .91), ablation depth (P = .47), scotopic pupil size (P = .38), or optical zone (P = .07). Before surgery, there was no statistical difference in root mean square (RMS) of total (P = .70), third- (P = .79), fourth- (P = .23), and fifth- (P = .33) order aberrations and individual terms. Three months after surgery, RMS of total HOA was raised significantly more (P = .03) after LASIK (1.46-factor increase) than LASEK (1.25-factor increase). One year after surgery, a reduction in total HOAs was observed in 13.8% of LASIK- and 48.5% of LASEK-treated eyes compared with preoperative levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative increases in total HOA and vertical coma were significantly greater in LASIK- than in LASEK-treated eyes. Postoperative reduction in total HOAs was observed in a number of eyes with high preoperative levels and occurred more frequently in LASEK-treated eyes.

Operator-induced errors in Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensing: Model eye study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of instrument realignment and angular misalignment during the clinical determination of wavefront aberrations by simulation in model eyes.

SETTING

Aston Academy of Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

METHODS

Six model eyes were examined with wavefront-aberration-supported cornea ablation (WASCA) (Carl Zeiss Meditec) in 4 sessions of 10 measurements each: sessions 1 and 2, consecutive repeated measures without realignment; session 3, realignment of the instrument between readings; session 4, measurements without realignment but with the model eye shifted 6 degrees angularly. Intersession repeatability and the effects of realignment and misalignment were obtained by comparing the measurements in the various sessions for coma, spherical aberration, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

RESULTS

The mean differences between the 2 sessions without realignment of the instrument were 0.020 microm +/- 0.076 (SD) for Z(3)(-1)(P = .551), 0.009 +/- 0.139 microm for Z(3)(1)(P = .877), 0.004 +/- 0.037 microm for Z(4)(0) (P = .820), and 0.005 +/- 0.01 microm for HO root mean square (RMS) (P = .301). Differences between the nonrealigned and realigned instruments were -0.017 +/- 0.026 microm for Z(3)(-1)(P = .159), 0.009 +/- 0.028 microm for Z(3)(1) (P = .475), 0.007 +/- 0.014 microm for Z(4)(0)(P = .296), and 0.002 +/- 0.007 microm for HO RMS (P = 0.529; differences between centered and misaligned instruments were -0.355 +/- 0.149 microm for Z(3)(-1) (P = .002), 0.007 +/- 0.034 microm for Z(3)(1)(P = .620), -0.005 +/- 0.081 microm for Z(4)(0)(P = .885), and 0.012 +/- 0.020 microm for HO RMS (P = .195). Realignment increased the standard deviation by a factor of 3 compared with the first session without realignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeatability of the WASCA was excellent in all situations tested. Realignment substantially increased the variance of the measurements. Angular misalignment can result in significant errors, particularly in the determination of coma. These findings are important when assessing highly aberrated eyes during follow-up or before surgery.