Comparison of the Effect of Sodium Hyaluronate (Ophthalin®) and Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC-Ophtal®) on Corneal Endothelium, Central Corneal Thickness, and Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: Physicochemical properties and ocular drug delivery formulations

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is a cellulose ether widely used in drug formulations due to its biocompatibility, uncharged nature, solubility in water and thermoplastic behavior. Particularly for ocular and ophthalmic formulations, HPMC is applied as viscosity enhancer agent in eye drops, gelling agent in injections, and polymeric matrix in films, filaments and inserts. The different therapeutic approaches are necessary due to the complex anatomic structure of the eye. The natural ocular barriers and the low drug permeation into the circulatory system make the drug administration challenging. This review presents the eye anatomy and the usual local routes of drugs administration, which are facilitated by the physicochemical properties of HPMC. The relationship between chemical structure and physicochemical properties of HPMC is displayed. The different types of formulations (local application) including HPMC for ocular drug delivery are discussed with basis on recent literature reports and patents.

Impact of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Cataract Surgery

Background

Ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) used during small-incision cataract surgery have numerous advantages. However, OVDs have longer retention time in an eye after surgery resulting in intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes. The purpose of this study is to analyze and quantify the effect of various OVDs on both IOP and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by systematically reviewing the literature and performing meta-analysis.

Methods

Numerous databases from January 1, 1985, to present were systematically searched. Thirty-six (3893 subjects) of 3313 studies identified were included for analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was computed, and meta-analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 3313 records were retrieved including 1114 from database search and 2199 from grey literature search. Significant increase in postoperative IOP in 1-day follow-up with Healon (SMD = 0.37, CI: [0.07, 0.67]), Viscoat (SMD = 0.29, CI: [0.13, 0.45]), Provisc (SMD = 0.46, CI: [0.17, 0.76]), and Soft Shell (SMD = 0.58, CI: [0.30, 0.86]) was computed. On the other hand, results implied a nonsignificant increase in postoperative IOP with Healon GV (SMD = 0.07, CI: [−0.28, 0.41]), Healon5 (SMD = 0.15, CI: [−0.33, 0.64]), 2% HPMC (SMD = 0.32, CI: [−0.0, 0.64]), and OcuCoat (SMD = 0.26, CI: [−0.37, 0.9]). Additionally, a nonsignificant reduction in postoperative IOP was inferred with Viscoat + Provisc (SMD = −0.28, CI: [−2.23, 1.68]).

Conclusion

Improvement in IOP was shown with Viscoat + Provisc. Additionally, IOP nonsignificant upsurge was observed with Healon GV, Healon5, 2% HPMC, and OcuCoat compared to significant upsurge with Healon, Viscoat, and Soft Shell.

The use of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during donor's corneal harvesting

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the protective effect of Biolon (sodium-hyaluronate 1%) use on corneal endothelium, during donor's corneal harvesting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double blind, comparative study was performed on 120 corneas donated from 60 donors. One cornea from each donor (n = 60) was harvested using intracameral injection of ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD), and the fellow cornea with no use of OVD (n = 60, control group). Endothelial cell density (ECD) values were obtained at the center of each corneal graft with a specular microscope one day after harvesting.

RESULTS

ECD in the OVD group were 2839 ± 412.5 cells/mm(2) and in the control group 2748 ± 429.7 cells/mm(2). (p = 0.03). Distribution curve of the difference in ECD between the OVD and no OVD eyes showed that 47% of the donors had > 100 cells/mm2 difference, and 32% of donors had >200 cells/mm(2) difference in favor of the OVD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracameral OVD injection during corneal graft harvesting may protect the endothelium from the mechanical damage induced during the procedure. Further investigation is needed before routine the use of intracameral OVD should be considered in this setting.