A survey of allergic conjunctivitis in children in China

To explore the risk factors for allergic conjunctivitis (AC) in Chinese children. We recruited 176 children who suffered from AC and a control group comprising 131 normal subjects in southern China. Each participant completed a questionnaire and underwent multiple eye examinations and a skin prick test (SPT). The data of the questionnaire, the scores of the symptoms/signs and the results of the SPT were analysed. The rate of parental allergic history in the case group was much higher than that in the control group (P < 0.01). Compared with the control group, the case group was more likely to have other concomitant diseases (P < 0.01). The scores of ocular symptoms/signs had a significant correlation with the clinical duration of AC in the case group (P < 0.01). Children with other concomitant diseases or a parental allergic history were more likely to have AC.

Executive summary: Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2021

Allergic conjunctival disease (ACD) is an inflammatory disease of the conjunctiva that is mainly caused by type I hypersensitivity response to allergens and accompanied by subjective symptoms and other findings induced by antigens. ACD is classified as allergic conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and giant papillary conjunctivitis. This article summarizes the third edition of the Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases published in 2021 and outlines the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of ACD. Since the introduction of immunosuppressive eye drops, the treatment strategies for severe ACDs have significantly changed. To clarify the recommended standard treatment protocols for ACD, the advantages and disadvantages of these treatments were assessed using clinical questions, with a focus on the use of steroids and immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge will assist healthcare providers and patients in taking an active role in medical decision making.

Iatrogenic corneal diseases or conditions

Any prescribed or self-administered therapy carries inherent risks of secondary adverse events. While the volume of treatments being administered through healthcare systems has been increasing, scientific advancements in our understanding of the mechanisms of pharmaceutical side effects and complications from procedures now allow us to reduce the risk of non-intentional damage to ocular health. This review summarizes the most common and leading causes of iatrogenic visual impairment, corneal diseases, and conditions that present in a general ophthalmologic practice, including a comprehensive analysis of their pathophysiology and recommendations for management and prophylaxis.Iatrogenic corneal diseases and conditions can arise from topical drugs, contact lens use, eye surgeries and procedures, systemic drugs, non-ophthalmological events, and cosmetic procedures. Topical and systemic drugs may disturb tear film homeostasis or result in ocular surface deposits. The use of ill-fitted contact lenses can trigger eye discomfort and poor hygiene conditions that can predispose to severe infections. Procedures to the eye may result in a variety of anatomical and functional complications that ophthalmologists should be aware of how to avoid or at least be prepared to manage if they occur. Even non-ophthalmological events such as non-invasive ventilation, radiation therapies and, immune-based conditions, or cosmetic procedures such as eyelash growth and fillers, can result in unwanted damage to the ocular surface.

Loteprednol etabonate in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was designed to assess the efficacy, as well as the safety of loteprednol etabonate (LE) ophthalmic suspension compared with placebo and other commonly used eye drops for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

METHODS

Comprehensive searches of randomized controlled trials were carried out in a database of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Eight qualified studies were included. This study assessed the reduction from baseline in scores of cardinal signs and symptoms, proportion of patients with improvement of allergic signs and symptoms, and incidence of clinically significant intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation (IOP elevation ≥10 mmHg).

RESULTS

The results showed that topical LE was significantly superior to placebo in reduction from baseline in signs scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.65 to -0.32) and symptoms scores (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.51; 95% CI = -0.64 to -0.38) of allergic conjunctivitis, and as effective as olopatadine and fluorometholone acetate. Topical LE was associated with a higher improvement rate of signs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.26-1.86; I (2 )= 57%) and symptoms (RR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.15-1.46; I (2 )= 54%) than placebo and the positive control treatment. Clinically significant IOP elevation was more frequent in the group of LE than the group of control treatment (pooled odds ratio = 3.03; 95% CI = 1.04-8.80), which was affected by the response to corticosteroid of the individual patient and the wearing of contact lenses.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical LE is effective in treating allergic conjunctivitis. However, it should be used with caution due to the higher incidence of IOP elevation compared with placebo and olopatadine. A large-scale trial would be required to confirm the effect of different concentrations of LE on IOP.

Comparing the effects of ketotifen fumarate eye drops and ketotifen oral pills on symptom severity and quality of life in patients with allergic rhinitis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of nasal mucosa. Previous studies have shown the therapeutic effects of ketotifen eye drops on allergic conjunctivitis and rhinitis patients. This study was designed to compare the effects of ketotifen drops and oral ketotifen pills on symptoms and quality of life in allergic rhinitis patients.

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, patients with mild allergic rhinitis who were referred to the allergy clinic of Baqiyatallah Hospital from March to April 2014 were randomly allocated to 2 groups; the first group received ketotifen drops (1 drop every 12 hours) with placebo pills (2 pills daily), and the second group received placebo eye drops with ketotifen pills for 4 weeks. Symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itching, and nasal obstruction) severity were examined and Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) scores were evaluated in the second and fourth weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients were evaluated in 2 groups. The mean age was 30.33 years. There were no significant differences in demographic data between the groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed a significant improvement in rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, coughing, sneezing, RQLQ, and nasal smear eosinophil percent compared to baseline amounts (p < 0.05). Improvements were significantly more in the drops group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Because of the absence of systemic complications in ketotifen eye drops in patients with allergic rhinitis and their easy availability in Iran, using this medication instead of systemic therapies is suggested. Nevertheless, more studies are required to evaluate the long-term effects of using this drug and the recurrence rate of symptoms.

The influence of pH on the stability of antazoline: kinetic analysis

Degradation of the drug antazoline was studied in aqueous solutions by means of pH-rate profiling (pH 0–7.4).

Emerging drugs for allergic conjunctivitis

INTRODUCTION

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a very common disease, especially in association with allergic rhinitis but may also occur in isolated presentation. The treatment of AC has long been based on antihistamines, cromones and topical corticosteroids, but none of these drugs completely abolishes the clinical expression of AC.

AREAS COVERED

The development of new drugs for AC is analyzed highlighting the recent insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. The major aim of development of drugs for AC is to have agents able to prevent the inflammatory effects of the interaction between the allergen and the specific IgE antibodies on mast cell surface. This may be obtained by blocking the effects of histamine (the main mediator of early allergic response) by H1-receptor antagonists, inhibiting the release of soluble factors able to recruit inflammatory cells (that sustain prolonged inflammation) by mast-cell stabilizers, inhibiting the effects of single mediators, inducing tolerance to the allergen by specific immunotherapy or even acting on factors related to activation and differentiation of T lymphocytes such as the toll-like receptors.

EXPERT OPINION

AC is an underestimated disease for which there is a search of more effective treatments. The availability of the drugs under current evaluation will allow more refined therapeutic strategies to apply according to the characteristics and the clinical severity of AC.

Targeting mast cells in inflammatory diseases

Although mast cells have long been known to play a critical role in anaphylaxis and other allergic diseases, they also participate in some innate immune responses and may even have some protective functions. Data from the study of mast cell-deficient mice have facilitated our understanding of some of the molecular mechanisms driving mast cell functions during both innate and adaptive immune responses. This review presents an overview of the biology of mast cells and their potential involvement in various inflammatory diseases. We then discuss some of the current pharmacological approaches used to target mast cells and their products in several diseases associated with mast cell activation.

Comparative evaluation of olopatadine 0.01% combined fluorometholone 0.1% treatment versus olopatadine 0.01% combined ketorolac 0.4% treatment in patients with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic effects of low-effective steroid fluorometholone 0.1% and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ketorolac 0.4% when concomitantly used with olopatadine 0.01% in relieving clinical signs and symptoms of acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC).

METHODS

In this randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center study, 104 eyes of 52 patients with the diagnosis of SAC were conducted. The patients were assigned into two groups to receive either olopatadine and fluorometholone one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye or olopatadine and ketorolac one eye and placebo in the contralateral. The clinical signs (chemosis, mucus secretion, eyelid edema) and symptoms (itching, redness, tearing, burning) of the patients were evaluated by summing up the scores using a 3-point scale. Results were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test, p values less than 0.05 were defined as significant.

RESULTS

All parameters were improved less amount on the first day of the treatment in both groups, however, significant reduction in clinical signs and symptoms were seen on the 10th day compared with those receiving placebo. Fluorometholone was found superior to ketorolac in reducing redness, mucus secretion, chemosis and eyelid edema (p = 0.032 for redness, p = 0.028 for mucus secretion, p = 0.030 for chemosis, p = 0.042 for eyelid edema) and both drugs were similar in alleviating the symptoms itching, burning and tearing (p = 0.074 for itching, p = 0.064 for burning, p = 0.072 for tearing).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorometholone was better than ketorolac in relieving redness, chemosis, mucus secretion and eyelid edema when concomitantly used with olopatadine, however, these two drugs were found equal in attenuating the symptoms itching, burning and tearing.

A review of non-pharmacological and pharmacological management of seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis

Allergic eye disease encompasses a group of hypersensitivity disorders which primarily affect the conjunctiva and its prevalence is increasing. It is estimated to affect 8% of patients attending optometric practice but is poorly managed and rarely involves ophthalmic assessment. Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) is the most common form of allergic eye disease (90%), followed by perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC; 5%). Both are type 1 IgE mediated hypersensitivity reactions where mast cells play an important role in pathophysiology. The signs and symptoms are similar but SAC occurs periodically whereas PAC occurs year round. Despite being a relatively mild condition, the effects on the quality of life can be profound and therefore they demand attention. Primary management of SAC and PAC involves avoidance strategies depending on the responsible allergen(s) to prevent the hypersensitivity reaction. Cooled tear supplements and cold compresses may help bring relief. Pharmacological agents may become necessary as it is not possible to completely avoid the allergen(s). There are a wide range of anti-allergic medications available, such as mast cell stabilisers, antihistamines and dual-action agents. Severe cases refractory to conventional treatment require anti-inflammatories, immunomodulators or immunotherapy. Additional qualifications are required to gain access to these medications, but entry-level optometrists must offer advice and supportive therapy. Based on current evidence, the efficacy of anti-allergic medications appears equivocal so prescribing should relate to patient preference, dosing and cost. More studies with standardised methodologies are necessary elicit the most effective anti-allergic medications but those with dual-actions are likely to be first line agents.