Association of sleep disturbance with diabetic retinopathy

Association between rest-activity rhythm and diabetic retinopathy among US middle-age and older diabetic adults

Background

The disruption of circadian rhythm has been reported to aggravate the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Rest-activity rhythm (RAR) is a widely used method for measuring individual circadian time influencing behavior. In this study, we sought to explore the potential association between RAR and the risk of DR.

Methods

Diabetic participants aged over 40 from 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were enrolled. Data from the wearable device ActiGraph GT3X was used to generate RAR metrics, including interdaily stability (IS), intradaily variability (IV), most active 10-hour period (M10), least active 5-hour period (L5), and Relative amplitude (RA). Weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic spline analysis were conducted to examine the association between RAR metrics and DR risk. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to examine the robustness of the findings. An unsupervised K-means clustering analysis was conducted to identify patterns in IV and M10.

Results

A total of 1,096 diabetic participants were enrolled, with a DR prevalence of 20.53%. The mean age of participants was 62.3 years, with 49.57% being male. After adjusting covariates, IV was positively associated with DR (β: 3.527, 95%CI: 1.371-9.073). Compared with the lowest quintile of IV, the highest quintile of IV had 136% higher odds of DR. In contrast, M10 was negatively associated with DR (β: 0.902, 95%CI: 0.828-0.982), with participants in the highest M10 quintile showing 48.8% lower odds of DR. Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed that these associations were linear. Meanwhile, sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness. K-means clustering identified three distinct clusters, with participants in Cluster C (high-IV, low-M10) had a significantly higher risk of DR comparing with Cluster A (low-IV, high-M10).

Conclusion

A more fragmented rhythm and lower peak activity level might be associated with an increased risk of DR. These findings indicate that maintaining a more rhythmic sleep-activity behavior might mitigate the development of DR. Further research is necessary to establish causality and understand the underlying mechanisms, and focus on whether interventions designed to enhance daily rhythm stability and increase diurnal activity level can effectively mitigate the risk of progression of DR.

Multidimensional sleep health and diabetic retinopathy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most prevalent microvascular diabetic complications. Poor sleep health and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are risk factors for diabetes and poor glycemic control. Recent studies have suggested associations between poor sleep health/OSA and DR. Furthermore, there have been suggestions of melatonin dysregulation in the context of DR. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the associations between multidimensional sleep health (duration, satisfaction, efficiency, timing/regularity and alertness), OSA and melatonin with DR. Forty-two studies were included. Long, but not short sleep, was significantly associated with DR, OR 1.41 (95%CI 1.21, 1.64). Poor sleep satisfaction was also significantly associated with DR, OR 2.04 (1.41, 2.94). Sleep efficiency and alertness were not associated with DR, while the evidence on timing/regularity was scant. Having OSA was significantly associated with having DR, OR 1.34 (1.07, 1.69). Further, those with DR had significantly lower melatonin/melatonin metabolite levels than those without DR, standardized mean difference -0.94 (-1.44, -0.44). We explored whether treating OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) led to improvement in DR (five studies). The results were mixed among studies, but potential benefits were observed in some. This review highlights the association between poor multidimensional sleep health and DR.

Identification of key genes modules linking diabetic retinopathy and circadian rhythm

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss worldwide. Recent studies highlighted the crucial impact of circadian rhythms (CR) on normal retinopathy in response to the external light cues. However, the role of circadian rhythms in DR pathogenesis and potential investigational drugs remains unclear.

Methods

To investigate the weather CR affects DR, differential expression analysis was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the GEO database (GSE160306). Functional enrichment analysis was conducted to identify relevant signaling pathways. LASSO regression was utilized to screen pivotal genes. Weighted gene co-expression network anlaysis (WGCNA) was applied to identify different modules. Additionally, we use the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) database to search key genes related to drugs or molecular compounds. The diabetic mouse model received three consecutive intraperitoneal injections of streptozotocin (STZ) during 3 successive days.

Results

We initially identified six key genes associated with circadian rhythm in DR, including COL6A3, IGFBP2, IGHG4, KLHDC7A, RPL26P30, and MYL6P4. Compared to normal tissue, the expression levels of COL6A3 and IGFB2 were significantly increased in DR model. Furthermore, we identified several signaling pathways, including death domain binding, insulin-like growth factor I binding, and proteasome binding. We also observed that COL6A3 was positively correlated with macrophages (cor=0.628296895, p=9.96E-08) and Th17 cells (cor=0.665120835, p=9.14E-09), while IGFBP2 showed a negatively correlated with Tgd (cor=-0.459953045, p=0.000247284) and Th2 cells (cor=-0.442269719, p=0.000452875). Finally, we identified four drugs associated with key genes: Resveratrol, Vitamin E, Streptozocin, and Sulindac.

Conclusion

Our findings revealed several key genes related to circadian rhythms and several relevant drugs in DR, providing a novel insight into the mechanism of DR and potential implications for future DR treatment. This study contributes to a better understanding of CR in DR and its implications for future therapeutic interventions.

Association Between Diabetic Retinopathy and Insomnia Risk: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested a close link between sleep disturbances and diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, to date, no confirmatory findings have been reported. We aimed to explore the risk of insomnia in DR by considering demographic factors and diabetes mellitus (DM)-related variables.

METHODS

A nationwide population-based cohort of 2,206,619 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Korean National Insurance Service Database was followed up for insomnia incidence. DR, non-proliferative DR (NPDR), and proliferative DR (PDR) were defined according to ICD-10 codes. The interactive effects of sex, age, and DM-related variables were analyzed to evaluate their impact on insomnia risk in DR.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-DR group, insomnia risk was increased in the DR [(adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.125, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.108-1.142), NPDR (aHR:1.117, 95% CI:1.099-1.134), and PDR (aHR:1.205, 95% CI: 1.156-1.256), even after controlling for comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and DM-related variables. The men and youngest age groups (<40 years) were most vulnerable to insomnia risk. Sex, age, DM duration, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) status exerted interactive effects with DR status in increasing the insomnia risk. In the PDR group, sex, age, DM duration, insulin therapy status, and CKD status exerted interactive effects that increased the risk of insomnia.

CONCLUSION

Insomnia risk is significantly higher in patients with DR, and clinical attention is warranted.

Meta-Analysis of Relationship of Sleep Quality and Duration With Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis is used to explore the relationship of sleep quality and duration with the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHOD

Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and other databases are searched from their establishment to April 2022. Literature on the relationship of sleep quality and duration with DR risk published in various databases is collected, and two researchers independently screen the literature, extract data, and evaluate the quality of the included articles. The meta-analysis is performed with Review Manage 5.4.1 software.

RESULTS

A total of 7 articles are selected, including 4,626 subjects. The results show a strong correlation between sleep quality and DR risk. When comparing the sleep quality scores of "DR" (experimental group) and "NO DR" (control group), the Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI) score of the DR group is significantly higher than that of the NO DR group (MD = 2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92, 3.78, P<0.001), while the ESS score of the DR group is also significantly higher than that of the NO DR group (MD = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14 to 2.30, P=0.04), so the sleep quality score of the DR group is higher than that of the NO DR group in both the PSQI and ESS scores, which confirms that low sleep quality is a risk factor for DR. Long sleep duration is also associated with the risk of developing DR; the number of adverse events (DR prevalence) is higher for "long sleep duration" than "normal sleep duration" [OR = 1.83, 95%CI 1.36-2.47, P < 0.001], suggesting that long sleep duration can cause increased DR risk. Short sleep duration is also associated with the occurrence of DR [OR = 1.49, 95%CI 1.15-1.94), P = 0.003] and can increase DR risk.

CONCLUSION

Sleep quality and duration (including long and short sleep duration) are significantly associated with DR. To reduce DR risk, sleep intervention should be actively carried out, lifestyle changes should be made, and attention should be paid to the role of DR management.

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea, Other Sleep Parameters and Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarise the association between obstructive sleep apnoea and diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. To examine the effects of other sleep parameters on diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. To discuss the pathophysiology of diabetic eye changes and how it is related to obstructive sleep apnoea.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conflicting data exists in terms of the association of diabetic eye changes with sleep apnoea and/or other sleep parameters. Various cross-sectional studies show PDR to be associated with the prevalence of OSA. Patients who underwent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment were significantly less likely to develop pre/proliferative DR. Secondary sleep parameters generally are not associated with DR except for long duration of sleep. Differences in reporting could be due to the different thresholds set to define OSA/ODI and severity of DR/DME, in addition to factors used in multivariate analysis. There is a need for further studies with long-term follow-up and to assess the impact of CPAP on the development and progression of diabetic eye change(s).

Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in a diabetic retinopathy clinic in a tertiary care center

Purpose:

To screen for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients presenting to diabetic retinopathy (DR) clinic and to correlate its presence with the severity of DR.

Methods:

A prospective, cross-sectional study of diabetes mellitus patients in retina clinic of a tertiary care referral center, North India (January 2019–March 2020). All were subjected to STOP-Bang Questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. Patients at high OSA risk (STOP-Bang score ≥5 and ESS score ≥10) were referred to Department of Otorhinolaryngology (sleep clinic) for polysomnography. Based on Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), OSA was graded as mild (AHI = 5–14/h), moderate (AHI = 15–30/h), and severe (AHI >30/h). Statistical analysis was done using three models of outcome measures: (1) “No DR” versus “any DR,” (2) “Less severe DR” versus “More severe DR,” and (3) “No diabetic macular edema (DME)” versus “DME.”

Results:

Of 362 patients screened, 18 (4.97%) had OSA (11 mild, 5 moderate, and 2 severe). Though OSA did not show a significant association with various outcome measures, patients with moderate–severe OSA had higher odds in developing “any DR” (OR = 7.408; 95% CI = 0.533–102.898), “more severe DR” (OR = 1.961; 95% CI = 0.153–25.215), and “DME” (OR = 2.263; 95% CI = 0.357–14.355), on multiple logistic regression.

Conclusion:

Ours is the first screening study of OSA in DR patients in India, the diabetes capital of the world. We detected OSA in 4.97% of patients in a DR clinic, with an increased risk of “any DR,” “more severe DR,” and “DME” in the presence of moderate–severe OSA.