Scleral fixation of Carlevale intraocular lens: A new tool in correcting aphakia with no capsular support

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Aphakic, Aniridic, and Vitrectomized Eyes: A Review

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to examine the techniques, complications, and outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in aphakic, aniridic, and vitrectomized eyes.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database (via PubMed), using as keywords "(DMEK) AND (aphakia OR aniridia OR vitrectomy OR vitrectomized)." The research was limited to 10 years (January 2014-March 2024), in view of lack of literature before 2014. Articles, including case reports and case series, were included.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included. No randomized controlled trials were found nor comparative studies with more than 1 technique used. Mean rebubbling rate in complex eyes was 29%, whereas mean endothelial cell loss at 6 months was 37%. The mean postoperative visual acuity improved from 1.47 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution to 0.7 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being more challenging, compared with the techniques reported in literature, DMEK can be considered a valid option for the management of endothelial decompensation in complex eyes, with rebubbling rate and endothelial cell loss at 6 months, which are similar to non-complex eyes.

A New Technique with Scleral Grooves for Sutureless Scleral Fixation of the Carlevale Intraocular Lens

INTRODUCTION

A novel technique is described employing scleral grooves to facilitate sutureless scleral fixation of the Carlevale intraocular lens (CIL). We describe its use in a series of 47 patients with aphakia.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients with aphakia who underwent CIL implantation with the new technique by a single surgeon during 1 year. The novelty of this technique consists in the creation of two partial-thickness linear sclerotomies (grooves), 180° apart, 2 mm from and parallel to the limbus. In the middle of each groove a full-thickness sclerotomy is performed to facilitate externalization of the CIL anchors. The groove allows the anchor to plug the full-thickness sclerotomy and to rest within the sclera without protrusion. Reported outcomes include pre-operative/post-operative visual acuity, post-operative spherical equivalent and surgical complications. Follow-up was a minimum of 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty-eight eyes of 47 patients with aphakia with a mean age of 74 years (range 31-90 years) are included. The commonest causes of aphakia were intraocular lens (IOL) subluxation,with or without exfoliation (54.2%), complicated cataract surgery (29.2%), crystalline lens luxation (6.3%) and trauma (4.1%). All CILs inserted with the new technique stayed successfully in situ during follow-up. Median pre-operative best-corrected visual acuity (0.75 logMAR; range 0.1-2.7) significantly improved to 0.5 logMAR post-operatively (p < 0.001). Moreover, 78% and 65% of the operated cases were within 1.0 and 0.5 diopters, respectively, from intended refraction. The most common complications were transient cystoid macular oedema (8.3%) and transient intraocular pressure rise (8.3%), all of which resolved within 2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed modification of sutureless scleral fixation of the CIL appears safe and effective. In our experience it is less time consuming and easier to perform than previous techniques and may therefore offer a useful future option.

Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Scleral Flap versus Scleral Pocket Technique for Sutureless Intrascleral One-Piece Lens Fixation

Objectives: This study compared long-term surgical outcomes of the scleral flap versus scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece intraocular lens (IOL) fixation. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at a single center, involving consecutive patients undergoing sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL implantation, between January 2020 and May 2022. Eyes were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: group 1 underwent scleral flap (n = 64), and group 2 received scleral pocket technique (n = 59). Visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and complications were assessed over a minimum 24-month follow-up period. Results: Both groups showed improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), increasing from 0.84 ± 0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.39 ± 0.23 logMAR (p = 0.042) at 24 months in group 1 and from 0.91 ± 0.63 logMAR at baseline to 0.45 ± 0.38 logMAR (p = 0.039) at 24 months in group 2. No significant differences in BCVA were observed between the groups at baseline (p = 0.991), 12 (p = 0.496) and 24 months (p = 0.557). Mean spherical equivalent (-0.73 ± 1.32 D in group 1 and -0.92 ± 0.99 D in group 2, p = 0.447), refractive prediction error (-0.21 ± 1.1 D in group 1 and -0.35 ± 1.8 D in group 2, p = 0.377), and surgically induced astigmatism (0.74 ± 0.89 D in group 1 and 0.85 ± 0.76 in group 2, p = 0.651) were comparable between the two groups. An IOL tilt of 5.5 ± 1.8 and 5.8 ± 2.0 degrees (p = 0.867) and an IOL decentration of 0.41 ± 0.21 mm and 0.29 ± 0.11 mm (p = 0.955) were obtained, respectively, in group 1 and group 2 at 24 months. Mean endothelial cell density remained stable at 24 months in both groups (p = 0.832 in group 1 and p = 0.443 in group 2), and it was 1747.20 ± 588.03 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1883.71 ± 621.29 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.327) at baseline, 1545.36 ± 442.3 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1417.44 ± 623.40 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.483) at 24 months. No cases of endophthalmitis were observed. Conclusions: The scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL fixation is comparable to the traditional scleral flap technique in terms of long-term visual outcomes and safety. The scleral pocket technique offers a simplified approach and a viable option even for less experienced surgeons.

Current Evidence for a New Surgical Technique for Scleral Fixation: The Implantation of a Carlevale Lens, a Systematic Review

Background: The Carlevale lens (FIL SSF, Soleko IOL Division, Italy) is a new lens for suture-less scleral fixation. This paper aimed to systematically review articles on this lens, the surgical techniques used for its implantation, complications and outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. The search string used was "Carlevale" AND "scleral fixation" from inception until March 2024. For completeness, either case-control studies, case reports or case series written in English were included. The authors used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the case-control studies and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for case reports and case series. Results: Twenty-nine articles were included. Scleral fixation with Carlevale lens can be performed by creating scleral flaps or, alternatively, by using scleral pockets. The two sclerotomies must be diametrically opposed, and are preferably created by 25-gauge trocars. A pars plana vitrectomy should be performed every time, and the design of the lens should be suitable for self-anchoring to the sclera; the most accredited strategy to achieve this is to avoid scleral sutures. There were only a few intraoperative and postoperative complications reported; vitreous hemorrhages were the most frequent intraoperative events, while the most relevant postoperative complications were vitreous hemorrhages, cystoid macular oedema and transient variations in the intraocular pressure. Excellent results have been obtained in terms of BCVA, IOL centration and stability, mean intraocular pressure, postoperative spherical equivalent, separation between anterior and posterior chamber and the distance of the IOL from anterior chamber structures. Conclusions: The foldable hydrophilic design of the Carlevale lens has shown good effectiveness, IOL stability and few intra and post-operative complications.

UGH Syndrome Resolution after IOL Explantation and Concomitant Carlevale IOL Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use of Carlevale IOL placement in patients with UGH, and to evaluate surgical outcomes.

DESIGN

In this retrospective study, 28 patients with UGH syndrome that were subjected to IOL explantation and concomitant Carlevale IOL implantation were included in the study.

METHODS

Information about VA, IOP, number of glaucoma medication, need for glaucoma surgery, presence of hemorrhage and inflammation were recorded up to 6 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

We found a statistically significant increase in mean visual acuity and complete resolution of uveitis in all patients. Mean IOP and the mean number of glaucoma medications were significantly decreased postoperatively, while 14% of patients required additional glaucoma surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

IOL explantation and concomitant Carlevale IOL implantation may provide a viable solution for UGH syndrome resolution, increases visual acuity, and decreases the need for glaucoma medication.

SCLERAL FIXATION OF CARLEVALE INTRAOCULAR LENS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, and endothelial cell counts after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and the incidence rate of postoperative complications were estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the surgical and refractive outcomes of the sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale IOL.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to present the mean change in BCVA, intraocular pressure, and endothelial cell count after IOL implantation, whereas a proportional meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled incidence rate of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In the meta-analysis of 13 studies involving 550 eyes, the pooled WMD of the mean change in BCVA showed a significant improvement in BCVA in patients who underwent Carlevale IOL implantation (WMD = 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.46, P < 0.001; heterogeneity [I 2 ] = 52.02%). The subgroup analyses indicated that the mean change in BCVA was not significantly higher according to the last follow-up visit, with no statistically significant subgroup effect ( P = 0.21) (WMD up to 6 months: 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.45, I 2 = 58.32%, WMD up to 24 months: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.51, I 2 = 38.08%). In the meta-analysis of 16 studies involving 608 eyes, the pooled incidence rate of postoperative complications was equal to 0.22 (95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.32, I 2 = 84.87, P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Carlevale IOL implantation represents a reliable method of restoring vision in eyes with missing capsular or zonular support.

Explantation of a sutureless scleral fixated Carlevale intraocular lens due to calcification: a clinical and laboratory report

BACKGROUND

Hydrophilic intraocular lens opacification is a rare complication due to calcification. With current new surgical techniques, including lamellar endothelial keratoplasty and vitrectomies, this irreversible complication is becoming more common. In this case study, we present clinical and laboratory features of a case of Carlevale hydrophilic acrylic IOL calcification.

CASE PRESENTATION

Observational case report of a single incident case. An 83-year-old man was referred to our ophthalmic department complaining of right eye vision blurring for six months. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy revealed IOL opacification. Deposits of calcium phosphate were found both on the IOL's surface and inside it, according to thorough investigation using optical, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case to describe the laboratory evidence of Carlevale hydrophilic IOL calcification, suggesting possible explanation mechanisms based on underlying pathology and surgical technique. It reminds us that these findings suggest that physicians should be aware of possible hydrophilic IOL calcification.

Aetiology and Management of IOL Dislocations

Early (< 3 months) intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation occurs due to insufficient fixation in the capsular bag, while late dislocation (≥ 3 months) is due to increasing insufficiency of the zonular apparatus. Iris-fixated IOL (IFIOL) and suture- or sutureless-fixated scleral IOL (SFIOL) are currently the most commonly used methods when IOL exchange is indicated. Different methods of scleral fixation with or without sutures have been described. The most important techniques are summarised in this paper. IFIOL and SFIOL allow comparable visual outcomes but differ in their risk profile. The decision of which method to use should be made case by case and in accordance with the surgeon's preference.

Trans-Scleral Plugs Fixated FIL SSF IOL: A Review of the Literature and Comparison with Other Secondary IOL Implants

Purpose. To revise the current literature on FIL SSF (Carlevale) intraocular lens, previously known as Carlevale lens, and to compare their outcomes with those from other secondary IOL implants. Methods. We performed a peer review of the literature regarding FIL SSF IOLs until April 2021 and analyzed the results only of articles with a minimum of 25 cases and a follow-up of at least 6 months. The searches yielded 36 citations, 11 of which were abstracts of meeting presentations that were not included in the analysis because of their limited data. The authors reviewed 25 abstracts and selected six articles of possible clinical relevance to review in full text. Of these, four were considered to be sufficiently clinically relevant. Particularly, we extrapolated data regarding the pre- and postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) and the complications related to the procedure. The complication rates were then compared with those from a recently published Ophthalmic Technology Assessment by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) on secondary IOL implants. Results. Four studies with a total of 333 cases were included for results analysis. The BCVA improved in all cases after surgery, as expected. Cystoid macular edema (CME) and increased intraocular pressure were the most common complications, with an incidence of up to 7.4% and 16.5%, respectively. Other IOL types from the AAO report included anterior chamber IOLs, iris fixation IOLs, sutured iris fixation IOLs, sutured scleral fixation IOLs, and sutureless scleral fixation IOLs. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of postoperative CME (p = 0.20), and vitreous hemorrhage (p = 0.89) between other secondary implants and the FIL SSF IOL, whereas the rate of retinal detachment was significantly less with FIL SSF IOLs (p = 0.04). Conclusion. The results of our study suggest the implantation of FIL SSF IOLs is an effective and safe surgical strategy in cases where there is a lack of capsular support. In fact, their outcomes seem to be comparable to those obtained with the other available secondary IOL implants. According to published literature, the FIL SSF (Carlevale) IOL provides favorable functional results with a low rate of postoperative complications.

Sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale IOL: a review on the novel designed lens

Background: Complicated cataract surgery is the main cause of secondary lens implantation surgery. Several approaches have been introduced to face those circumstances. As it concerns scleral-fixated IOLs for the posterior chamber, many types of IOL can be implanted. The aim of article is to review the single piece sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale lens; Methods: Narrative review; Results: Several works described as safe the IOL implantation utilizing the handshake approach, without tactile manipulation, which allows for self-centration and lens firm fixation in uncomplicated surgery. This allows to reduce high order aberration such as astigmatism and coma, with a very good postoperative BCVA Conclusions: Carlevale lens is one of the best option to manage insufficient capsular support.

Surgical Management of Paediatric Aphakia in the Absence of Sufficient Capsular Support

There are several available options for the demanding surgical correction of paediatric aphakia without sufficient capsular support. The literature suggests the implantation of a transscleral fixated posterior chamber-intraocular lens (PCIOL), an intrascleral fixated PCIOL, an iris-sutured intraocular lens (IOL), or an anterior chamber iris-claw IOL. We searched for reports on the management of paediatric aphakia in case of inadequate capsular support that delineated the diverse surgical approaches and their postoperative results. Analysis demonstrated that different complications can be encountered depending on IOL placement technique, such as suture rupture, IOL dislocation, secondary glaucoma, endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, and endothelial cell loss. However, it was shown that various IOL designs have similar visual outcomes. Taking into consideration the advantages and disadvantages of each surgical technique, ophthalmic surgeons can determine the safest and most efficient approach for paediatric aphakic patients.