Pre-fracture medication use as a predictor of 30-day mortality in hip fracture patients: an analysis of 141,201 patients

Incidence of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Related Risk Factors among Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery for Major Limb Fractures: An Analytical Cohort Study

(1) Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), a major postoperative complication after surgical fixation of major limb fractures, can be fatal but is often neglected. This study determined the incidence rates of and related risk factors for perioperative UGIB among older patients with major upper limb fractures but without a history of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). (2) Methods: We collected the data of patients aged more than 65 years who underwent surgery for major limb fracture between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2017, from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and excluded those with a history of UGIB and PUD before the date of surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of UGIB requiring panendoscopy during hospitalization. A multiple logistic regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of UGIB, with adjustment for confounding factors. The final model included variables that were either statistically significant in univariate analyses or deemed clinically important. (3) Results: The incidence of UGIB was 2.8% among patients with major limb fractures. Male sex, older age, major lower limb fracture, and a history of chronic renal disease were significant risk factors for the increased incidence of perioperative UGIB. (4) Conclusions: Patients with major limb fractures who underwent surgery exhibited a higher rate of stress ulceration with UGIB, even when they had no history of PUD. Perioperative preventive protocols (e.g., protocols for the administration of proton-pump inhibitors) may be necessary for patients with these major risk factors.

Morbidity and Mortality Analysis in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture with Two Fixation Systems: Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advance (TFNA)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, complications, and mortality of patients with intertrochanteric hip fracture treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) vs. trochanteric fixation nail advance (TFNA).

METHODS

We evaluated 152 patients with intertrochanteric fractures concerning age, sex, comorbidity, Charlson Index, preoperative gait, OTA/AO classification, time from fracture to surgery, blood loss, amount of blood replacement, changes in gait, full weight-bearing at hospital discharge, complications, and mortality. The final indicators encompassed the adverse effects linked to implants, postoperative complications, clinical healing or bone healing duration, and functional score.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 152 patients, out of which 78 (51%) received DHS treatment and 74 (49%) received TFNA treatment. The results of this study show that the TFNA group demonstrated superiority (p < 0.001). However, it should be noted that the TFNA group had a higher frequency of the most unstable fractures (AO 31 A3, p < 0.005). Full weight-bearing at discharge also decreased in patients with more unstable fractures (p = 0.005) and severe dementia (p = 0.027). Mortality was higher in the DHS group; however, a longer time from diagnosis to surgery was also observed in this group (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The TFNA group has shown a higher success rate in achieving full weight-bearing at hospital discharge when treating trochanteric hip fractures. This makes it the preferred choice for treating unstable fractures in this region of the hip. Additionally, it is important to note that a longer time to surgery is associated with increased mortality in patients with hip fractures.

Comparison of Prognostic Value of 10 Biochemical Indices at Admission for Prediction Postoperative Myocardial Injury and Hospital Mortality in Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture

Aim: To evaluate the prognostic impact at admission of 10 biochemical indices for prediction postoperative myocardial injury (PMI) and/or hospital death in hip fracture (HF) patients. Methods: In 1273 consecutive patients with HF (mean age 82.9 ± 8.7 years, 73.5% women), clinical and laboratory parameters were collected prospectively, and outcomes were recorded. Multiple logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic analyses (the area under the curve, AUC) were preformed, the number needed to predict (NNP) outcome was calculated. Results: Age ≥ 80 years and IHD were the most prominent clinical factors associated with both PMI (with cardiac troponin I rise) and in-hospital death. PMI occurred in 555 (43.6%) patients and contributed to 80.3% (49/61) of all deaths (mortality rate 8.8% vs. 1.9% in non-PMI patients). The most accurate biochemical predictive markers were parathyroid hormone > 6.8 pmol/L, urea > 7.5 mmol/L, 25(OH)vitamin D < 25 nmol/L, albumin < 33 g/L, and ratios gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) to alanine aminotransferase > 2.5, urea/albumin ≥ 2.0 and GGT/albumin ≥ 7.0; the AUC for developing PMI ranged between 0.782 and 0.742 (NNP: 1.84−2.13), the AUC for fatal outcome ranged from 0.803 to 0.722, (NNP: 3.77−9.52). Conclusions: In HF patients, easily accessible biochemical indices at admission substantially improve prediction of hospital outcomes, especially in the aged >80 years with IHD.

Usefulness of nutritional assessment using Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery

INTRODUCTION

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is an objective nutritional status assessment tool used for predicting mortality risk in hospitalized patients. However, it is unclear whether GNRI reflects short-term mortality for hip fracture patients after surgery. We examined the usefulness of the nutritional status assessed by the GNRI and identified cutoff scores that predict mortality risk. Does GNRI on admission predict the mortality after surgery for hip fracture?

HYPOTHESIS

Evaluation of GNRI could help identify patients at higher risk of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study used data from 1040 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery. Fatalities within 30 days after hip fracture surgery were investigated. The GNRI was calculated on admission in all patients as follows: 14.89×serum albumin (g/dL)+41.7×body mass index/22. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and the optimal cutoff score that could predict 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery. This cutoff score was used for comparing the mortality rates between patient groups with a GNRI higher and lower than the cutoff score using Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors of 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

There were 17 fatalities (1.6%) in the cohort. The ROC-AUC value was 0.811, and the cutoff GNRI was 75.4. Mortality was significantly higher in the group with a GNRI<75.4 compared with the group with a GNRI≥75.4 (odds ratio [OR], 22.99; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 7.55-78.05; p=0.00000004). A GNRI<75.4 was a significant predictor of mortality within 30-days after hip fracture surgery (OR, 27.1; 95% CI, 8.57-85.9; p≤0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Our results show that nutritional status assessment using GNRI can help predict 30-day mortality among geriatric patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. The GNRI is a simple and accurate tool for predicting the risk of mortality after hip fracture surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; case series study.

Determinants of Higher Mortality at Six Months in Patients with Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: Hip fracture is a pathology with high mortality, but the lack of a universal adaptation of the factors associated with death makes it difficult to predict risk and implement prevention in this group. This study aimed to identify the factors that determine a higher mortality at six months following hip fracture. (2) Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study, whose study population consisted of patients over 65 years of age. The main variable was mortality at 6 months of fracture. Relevant data related to sociodemographic and clinical variables for subsequent bivariate (χ²) and multivariate analysis were obtained. (3) Results: In all, 665 people participated in the study, 128 of whom died within 6 months of the fracture. The multivariate adjusted analysis demonstrated significant relationships between the main variable and aspects such as institutionalization at discharge (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.501), a worse overall functional capacity (OR = 2.453) and cognitive capacity (OR = 3.040) at admission, and complications such as heart failure (OR = 5.767) or respiratory infection (OR = 5.308), in addition to the taking of certain drugs and the presence of a greater number of comorbidities. (4) Conclusions: There are certain factors related to higher mortality at six months in patients with hip fracture who are aged 65 years or older.

Should we routinely prescribe proton pump inhibitors peri-operatively in elderly patients with hip fractures? A review of the literature

Elderly hip fracture patients are at risk of stress-related gastric mucosal damage, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the underrecognized but devastating complications.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) offer effective prophylaxis against stress-related gastric mucosal damage.

Systematic analysis of the literature revealed numerous articles on PPIs and hip fractures, but only three articles dedicated to the analysis of prophylactic use of PPIs in patients with a hip fracture.

There is significant reduction in upper gastrointestinal bleeding following PPI prophylaxis and reduced 90-day mortality in elderly hip fracture patients on prophylaxis.

PPIs are generally safe, cost-effective and based on available evidence. Their prophylactic use is justifiable in elderly patients with hip fractures.

We suggest that PPIs be prescribed routinely peri-operatively in elderly hip fracture patients. Further level-one studies on the subject will allow for firmer recommendations.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:686-691. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200053

Preadmission Statin Prescription and Inpatient Myocardial Infarction in Geriatric Hip Fracture

Statins have been shown to reduce myocardial infarction (MI) in cardiac and vascular surgery. MI is common in hip fracture. This study aims to investigate whether statins decrease MI in hip fracture surgery and reduce mortality resulting from MI. Patients aged 65 years and above with a low-energy hip fracture were identified between January 2015 and December 2017. Demographics, comorbidities, predictive scores, medications and outcomes were assessed retrospectively. The primary outcome was inpatient MI. The secondary outcome was inpatient mortality resulting from MI, for which fatal and non-fatal MI were modelled. Regression analysis was conducted with propensity score weighting. Hip fracture occurred in 1166 patients, of which 391 (34%) were actively taking statins. Thirty-one (2.7%) patients were clinically diagnosed with MI. They had a higher inpatient mortality than those who did not sustain an MI (35% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.0001). No reduction was seen between statin use and the occurrence of MI (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.45-2.11; p = 0.942) including Fluvastatin-equivalent dosage (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.03, p = 0.207). Statins were not associated with having a non-fatal MI (OR 1.47, 95% CI: 0.58-3.71; p = 0.416) or preventing fatal MI (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.08-1.93; p = 0.255). Preadmission statin use and associations with clinically diagnosed inpatient MI or survival after inpatient MI were not able to be established.

Effect of pharmacological treatment prior to admission on the outcome of older hip fracture patients

PURPOSE

We aim to relate the pharmacological treatment at admission of hip fracture patients with their prognosis.

METHODS

We designed a prospective study including 436 hip fracture patients. We classified all the pharmacological treatment prior to admission of each patient into 25 groups according to their active agent and indications. We followed-up patients for one year for survival, emergency department visits (EDV), and in-hospital re-admissions (RAD). Differential analysis was performed by chi-square test, U-Mann Whitney test, and logistic regression. In all cases, p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

At 30-day follow-up, 14.9% patients noted EDV, 9.2% RAD, and 3.2% dead. Patients taking beta-blockers (p = 0.046), loop diuretics (p = 0.018) or antiparkinsonian (p = 0.009) showed an increased 30-day EDV; patients taking benzodiazepines (p = 0.014), loop diuretics (p = 0.009) or antiparkinsonian (p = 0.009), an increased 30-day RAD. At one-year follow-up, 50.7% patients noted EDV, 30.7% RAD, and 22.7% dead. Patients taking oral antidiabetics (p = 0.006) noted a greater one-year EDV; patients taking major opioids (p = 0.001), benzodiazepines (p = 0.016), cardiac agents (p = 0.046), loop diuretics (p = 0.042), beta-blockers (p = 0.018), oral anticoagulants (p = 0.013) or gastric prophylaxis (p = 0.020), greater RAD; patients taking cardiac agents (p = 0.024), loop diuretics (p = 0.006) or oral anticoagulants (p = 0.015), increased 1-year mortality rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacological treatment noted at admission for hip fracture patients is related to the outcome, in a dose-independent way. The pharmacological treatment could be an additional parameter that could help us to improve the decision-making process and the resource assignation of hip fracture patients. A proper medication review upon admission because of a hip fracture is warranted.

Disentangling the contribution of hospitals and municipalities for understanding patient level differences in one-year mortality risk after hip-fracture: A cross-classified multilevel analysis in Sweden

Background

One-year mortality after hip-fracture is a widely used outcome measure when comparing hospital care performance. However, traditional analyses do not explicitly consider the referral of patients to municipality care after just a few days of hospitalization. Furthermore, traditional analyses investigates hospital (or municipality) variation in patient outcomes in isolation rather than as a component of the underlying patient variation. We therefore aimed to extend the traditional approach to simultaneously estimate both case-mix adjusted hospital and municipality comparisons in order to disentangle the amount of the total patient variation in clinical outcomes that was attributable to the hospital and municipality level, respectively.

Methods

We determined 1-year mortality risk in patients aged 65 or above with hip fractures registered in Sweden between 2011 and 2014. We performed cross-classified multilevel analysis with 54,999 patients nested within 54 hospitals and 290 municipalities. We adjusted for individual demographic, socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. To quantify the size of the hospital and municipality variation we calculated the variance partition coefficient (VPC) and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

The overall 1-year mortality rate was 25.1%. The case-mix adjusted rates varied from 21.7% to 26.5% for the 54 hospitals, and from 18.9% to 29.5% for the 290 municipalities. The VPC was just 0.2% for the hospital and just 0.1% for the municipality level. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were strong predictors of 1-year mortality (AUC = 0.716), but adding the hospital and municipality levels in the cross-classified model had a minor influence (AUC = 0.718).

Conclusions

Overall in Sweden, one-year mortality after hip-fracture is rather high. However, only a minor part of the patient variation is explained by the hospital and municipality levels. Therefore, a possible intervention should be nation-wide rather than directed to specific hospitals or municipalities.

Prevalence of medication-related falls in 200 consecutive elderly patients with hip fractures: a cross-sectional study

Background

Hip fractures constitute a major health problem in elderly people and are often fall-related. Several factors can contribute to a fall episode leading to hip fracture, including fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs), which are often used by elderly people.

We aimed to investigate the prevalence of medication-related falls and to assess the role of FRIDs and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in a population of elderly patients hospitalized for a hip fracture.

Methods

We reviewed the patient records of 200 consecutive patients, aged ≥65 years, who were admitted for a hip fracture and evaluated whether medications were likely to have contributed to the fall episode. PIMs were identified using the Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions version 2 (STOPP) and by evaluating indications, contra-indications and interactions of the prescribed medications for each patient.

Results

FRIDs were used by 175 patients (87.5%). Medications were considered a likely contributor to the fall in 82 patients (41%). These were most often psychotropic medications alone or in combination with antihypertensives and/or diuretics. The 82 patients with suspected medication-related falls used more medications, FRIDs and PIMs than the rest of the patients, and in 74 (90%) of the 82 patients, at least one medication considered to be a contributor to the fall was also a PIM.

Conclusions

The prevalence of suspected medication-related falls was 41%. It seems likely that a medication review could have reduced, though not eliminated, the risk of falling in this group of patients.