Vascular access specialist teams versus standard practice for catheter insertion and prevention of failure: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Billions of vascular access devices (VADs) are inserted annually for intravenous therapy worldwide. However, their use is not without challenges. Facilitating the process and enhancing results, hospital authorities have created vascular access specialist teams (VASTs) with advanced competencies in the evaluation, insertion, care and management of VADs. The objective is to compare the effectiveness of VASTs versus standard practice regarding cannulation success and vascular access maintenance in hospitalised adults.

DESIGN

Systematic review, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a structured data search on Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOhost up to 31 May 2023. We did not impose a time limit regarding the date of publication.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies were eligible for inclusion in the review if they were randomised and non-randomised trials and observational studies.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We included studies that described or evaluated the activity of VASTs compared with clinical practitioners. The outcomes analysed were the success of the cannulation and the incidence of associated adverse effects.

RESULTS

The search strategy produced 3053 papers published between 1984 and 2020, from which 12 were selected for analysis. VASTs are heterogeneously described among these studies, which mainly focus on insertions, frequently for patients with difficult intravenous access. Some patients presented with specific needs or requirement for specific insertion technique or catheter type. Compared with usual practice, these studies indicate that the involvement of a VAST is associated with a higher effectiveness in terms of first attempt insertions and insertion success rates, and a reduction in catheter-associated adverse events. However, meta-analyses confirming this trend are not currently possible.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems apparent that VASTS contribute to improving the health of patients during the administration of intravenous. VASTs seem to increase the effectiveness of VAD insertion and care and reduce complications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021231259.

Determinants of the optimal selection of vascular access devices: A systematic review underpinned by the COM-B behavioural model

BACKGROUND

Optimal selection of vascular access devices is based on multiple factors and is the first strategy to reduce vascular access device-related complications. This process is dependent on behavioural and human factors. The COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) model was used as a theoretical framework to organize the findings of this systematic review.

METHODS/AIMS

To synthesize the evidence on determinants shaping the optimal selection of vascular access devices, using the COM-B behavioural model as the theoretical framework.

DESIGN

Systematic review of studies which explore decision-making at the time of selecting vascular access devices.

DATA SOURCES

The Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and EbscoHost databases were interrogated to extract manuscripts published up to 31 December 2021, in English or Spanish.

RESULTS

Among 16 studies included in the review, 8/16 (50%) focused on physical capability, 8/16 (50%) psychological capability, 15/16 (94%) physical opportunity, 12/16 (75%) social opportunity, 1/16 (6%) reflective motivation and 0/16 (0%) automatic motivation. This distribution represents a large gap in terms of interpersonal and motivational influences and cultural and social environments. Specialist teams (teams created for the insertion or maintenance of vascular access devices) are core for the optimal selection of vascular access devices (75% physical capability, 62% psychological capability, 80% physical opportunity and 100% social opportunity).

CONCLUSION

Specialist teams predominantly lead all actions undertaken towards the optimal selection of vascular access devices. These actions primarily centre on assessing opportunity and capability, often overlooking motivational influences and social environments.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

A more implementation-focused professional approach could decrease inequity among patients and complications associated with vascular access devices.

IMPACT

Optimal selection of vascular access devices is the primary strategy in mitigating complications associated with these devices. There is a significant disparity between interpersonal and motivational influences and the cultural and social environments. Furthermore, specialized teams play a pivotal role in facilitating the optimal selection of vascular access devices. The study can benefit institutions concerned about vascular access devices and their complications.

REPORTING METHOD

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public Contribution. WHAT DOES THIS ARTICLE CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: Optimal selection of vascular devices remains a growing yet unresolved issue with costly clinical and patient experience impact. Interventions to improve the optimal selection of vascular devices have focused on training, education, algorithms and implementation of specialist vascular teams; alas, these approaches do not seem to have substantially addressed the problem. Specialist vascular teams should evolve and pivot towards leading the implementation of quality improvement interventions, optimizing resource use and enhancing their role.

Foundation for implementing a comprehensive vascular access excellence initiative organization-wide to improve vascular access device insertion and standardize care: best practice for an acute care hospital

INTRODUCTION

In 2016, a 263-bed public district hospital in California trialed a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) inserted using ultrasound, with the potential to increase first attempt success in difficult intravenous access (DIVA) patients. This led to the implementation of a hospital-wide initiative to improve nursing vascular access skills and expedite vascular access device (VAD) placement.

METHODS

To trial a PIVC and ultrasound-guided (USG) insertion, a training program was developed and led to a doctoral Capstone project piloting an evidence-based nurse-driven protocol for the identification of DIVA patients. A Vascular Access Committee was established to achieve vascular access excellence throughout the hospital by increasing the number of nurses with advanced skills in VAD placement and by developing a central venous access device (CVAD) insertion and maintenance bundle to decrease the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). With ongoing support of nursing leadership and achievement of ANCC Magnet Recognition® in 2021, the hospital developed a comprehensive initiative to provide patients with a consistent level of nursing expertise for VAD placement across all shifts.

RESULTS

Requests for USGPIVCs increased throughout the hospital, DIVA patients themselves requested ultrasound guidance be used for PIVC insertions, and there were fewer requests for Emergency Department (ED) physicians to insert CVADs. From the related Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Capstone project, there were higher first-attempt cannulation successes, longer PIVC dwell times, and a reduction in devices and supplies utilized. The CVAD bundles resulted in the number of central line-associated bloodstream infections decreasing from four in 2019 to one in 2020. Since the initiative's inception, a total of 92 nurses completed the USGPIVC insertion training, and patient access to advanced-skilled clinicians is now available around the clock.

DISCUSSION

This manuscript discusses the initiative implemented to standardize patient care through a collaborative multidisciplinary approach and has potential generalizability to other acute care hospitals to reduce associated healthcare costs and to prevent poor patient outcomes by expediting the arrival of a vascular access nurse for DIVA patients.

CONCLUSION

The vascular access excellence initiative implemented provided an effective strategy to enhance the skills and confidence of nurses in VAD placement and improved efficiency in processes to expedite the arrival of an advanced skilled nurse to place VADs on DIVA. Targeted educational initiatives improved patient outcomes by reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections.

A survey of paediatric difficult peripheral intravenous access in the emergency department and use of point-of-care ultrasound

Introduction/Purpose

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion can be challenging in children, with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) known to increase success rates. The objective of this study was to survey how emergency department (ED) clinicians identify and escalate paediatric patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA), specifically the use of POCUS.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in an Australian academic mixed ED that surveyed resident medical officers (RMOs), registrars, consultants and senior paediatric nurses. A 15 multiple-choice questionnaire evaluated clinicians experience with paediatric PIVC insertion, approach to identifying and managing DIVA and the use of POCUS or other adjuncts.

Results

Eighty clinicians (34.2% response rate) completed the survey. Poor vein palpability was rated the highest predictor of DIVA. Of the respondents, 19 consultants (86.4%), 28 registrars (90.3%) and 16 RMOs (64.0%) used POCUS as an adjunct for paediatric DIVA patients but 16 consultants (72.8%), 21 registrars (67.8%) and 20 RMOs (80.0%) would use this less than 25% of the time in clinical practice.

Discussion

This survey suggests more clinicians to prefer using objective factors when identifying paediatric DIVA patients, rather than subjectively using gestalt, which relies on clinician experience. Whilst clearly recognised as a useful tool in our study, POCUS was used infrequently for paediatric DIVA patients.

Conclusions

There is currently no consistent process for the identification and escalation of paediatric DIVA patients, including the use of adjuncts such as POCUS. Clinician awareness for these issues should be addressed, which should include the development of guidelines and clinician training in POCUS for PIVC insertion in children.

Educating health professionals in ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous cannulation: A systematic review of teaching methods, competence assessment, and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Peripheral intravenous cannula insertion is the most common invasive healthcare procedure, however failure rates remain unacceptably high, particularly in patients with difficult intravascular access. This leads to treatment delays and increased complication risk, causing poorer outcomes among this patient subset. Ultrasonographic guidance reduces these risks and is therefore becoming a competency required of health professionals. However, there is no consensus on how to design teaching sessions to achieve this competency.

METHODS

Systematic review was conducted to identify characteristics of effective teaching sessions for current and training health professions to achieve ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous cannulation competency. Secondary outcomes included defining competency and to assess benefits to patients and healthcare systems. Eligibility for inclusion required description of teaching of ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous cannulation to qualified or training health professionals who went on to perform it in human patients or volunteers with reported outcomes or success rates. Studies were excluded if not accessible in full, not peer-reviewed or presented research that had been presented elsewhere previously. Of the 1085 records identified on review of 6 databases, 35 were included for final review based on eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Almost all (97.1%) used mixed modality teaching comprising of didactic and simulation portions, although time allocated varied widely. A median of 5 proctored procedures was required for competency. Competency was independent of previous experience or staff seniority. Mean reported insertion attempts was 1.7, success rate was 82.5% and first-time success rate was 75.5%. All included studies described improvement in their participants or healthcare system including significantly reduced midline insertion rates, central venous catheter insertion rates and associated bacteremia and sepsis, self-reported cannulation difficulty, specialist input, therapy delays and premature catheter failure rates. Further, there was significantly improved procedural confidence, knowledge and competence.

CONCLUSION

Simple teaching interventions can lead to competent ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous cannula insertion by novices, resulting in numerous positive outcomes for patients and healthcare systems.

Vascular access teams: a global outlook on challenges, benefits, opportunities, and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Specialized vascular access training for medical professionals organized into vascular access teams (VATs) was shown to improve patient outcomes, clinical efficiency, and cost savings. Professional perspectives on VAT benefits, organization, challenges, and opportunities on a global scale remain inadequately explored. Using detailed perspectives, in this study, we explored the global VAT landscape, including challenges faced, clinical and clinico-economic impacts of VATs, with emphasis on underresearched facets of VAT initiation, data dissemination, and metrics or benchmarks for VAT success.

METHODS

Semistructured in-depth interviews of 14 VAT professionals from 9 countries and 5 continents were used to elicit qualitative and quantitative information.

RESULTS

Catheter insertions (100%) and training (86%) were the most performed VAT functions. Based on a 1-7 scale evaluating observed impacts of VATs, patient satisfaction (6.5) and institutional costs (6.2) were ranked the highest. VAT co-initiatives, advanced technology utilization (6.6), and ongoing member training (6.3) distinctly impacted VAT endeavors. Most institutions (64%) did not have routine mechanisms for recording VAT-related data; however, all participants (100%) stated the importance of sharing data to demonstrate VAT impacts. Time constraints (57%) emerged as one of the major deterrents to data collection or dissemination. The majority (64%) experienced an increased demand or workload for VAT services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the global variances in VATs and gaps in VAT-related data, all participants unanimously endorsed the benefits of VAT programs. Evaluating the impact of VATs, disseminating VAT-related data, and forging specialized institutional partnerships for data sharing and training are potential strategies to tackle the hurdles surrounding VAT formation and sustenance.

A narrative review of historic and current approaches for patients with difficult venous access: considerations for the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Timely placement of vascular access devices is critical during emergent clinical situations; however, challenges in peripheral access can be a common occurrence. Historically, emergency teams have used various approaches to gain peripheral vascular access in situations where traditional means were not feasible; these options have included peripheral venous cutdown, ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVs), longer PIVs, central catheters, and intraosseous devices. Each of these options have associated strengths and limitations depending on the clinical situation.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review reports on the burden of difficult venous access situations and discusses the evidence, and strengths and limitations of vascular access options to help address this challenge. Although first puncture success rates can be high when using alternative methods, significant challenges can include increased procedure time and greater risk of complications. The Easy-Internal Jugular (Easy-IJ) technique is a newer alternative option for patients with difficult venous access that is demonstrated to be safe and effective in emergency care.

EXPERT OPINION

Moving forward, additional clinical studies are required to fully characterize the outcomes associated with the Easy-IJ technique and guidewire-assisted intravenous catheters, as well as to inform guideline development for more comprehensive recommendations on managing challenging or difficult peripheral access situations.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Provide Timely Central Vascular Access in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Timely central venous access is essential in the care of critically ill neonates. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are the preferred form of central venous access when umbilical venous catheters cannot be placed or are discontinued. However, time delays increase risk for injury from peripheral intravenous lines and may contribute to inconsistent delivery of necessary fluids and medications.

PURPOSE

The aim of this quality improvement project was to decrease wait times for PICC placement in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

A unit-based PICC team was developed consisting of NICU nurses and attending neonatologists and implemented in 2 phases. Data were collected from chart reviews before, during, and after implementation of the team. We tracked time between PICC order and placement and number of attempts. Hospital metrics on peripheral intravenous line infiltrations and central line-associated blood stream infection were also monitored. At the end of the project, we continued tracking outcomes to determine whether gains would be sustained past the project period.

RESULTS

Implementation of a unit-based interdisciplinary specialty team led to a 50% reduction in mean PICC wait times from 1.2 days to 0.58 days. Benefits of the initiative were sustained past the initial project period.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The development of a dedicated, local team played a key role in improving vascular access in the NICU.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Proximity of specialized teams provides a solution to address gaps in care in the NICU.

A comparison of first-attempt cannulation success of peripheral venous catheter systems with and without wings and injection ports in surgical patients-a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

A peripheral venous catheter (PVC) is the most widely used device for obtaining vascular access, allowing the administration of fluids and medication. Up to 25% of adult patients, and 50% of pediatric patients experience a first-attempt cannulation failure. In addition to patient and clinician characteristics, device features might affect the handling and success rates. The objective of the study was to compare the first-attempt cannulation success rate between PVCs with wings and a port access (Vasofix® Safety, B. Braun, abbreviated hereon in as VS) with those without (Introcan® Safety, B. Braun, abbreviated hereon in as IS) in an anesthesiological cohort.

METHODS

An open label, multi-center, randomized trial was performed. First-attempt cannulation success rates were examined, along with relevant patient, clinician, and device characteristics with univariate and multivariate analyses. Information on handling and adherence to use instructions was gathered, and available catheters were assessed for damage.

RESULTS

Two thousand three hundred four patients were included in the intention to treat analysis. First-attempt success rate was significantly higher with winged and ported catheters (VS) than with the non-winged, non-ported design (IS) (87.5% with VS vs. 78.2% with IS; P_Chi < .001). Operators rated the handling of VS as superior (rating of "good" or "very good: 86.1% VS vs. 20.8% IS, P_Chi < .001). Reinsertion of the needle into the catheter after partial withdrawal-prior or during the catheterization attempt-was associated with an increased risk of cannulation failure (7.909, CI 5.989-10.443, P < .001 and 23.023, CI 10.372-51.105, P < .001, respectively) and a twofold risk of catheter damage (OR 1.999, CI 1.347-2.967, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

First-attempt cannulation success of peripheral, ported, winged catheters was higher compared to non-ported, non-winged devices. The handling of the winged and ported design was better rated by the clinicians. Needle reinsertions are related to an increase in rates of catheter damage and cannulation failure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02213965 , Date: 12/08/2014.

Standardized Nursing Approach to Acute Aortic Dissection Patient: A Practice Update

Background

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a rare condition but represents a time-sensitive disease for which a wrong and untimely identification in the triage phase could compromise the subsequent diagnostic, therapeutic path and patient's prognosis. The emergency nurse plays a crucial role in identifying and managing patients with possible AAD. The aim of this paper is to describe the emergency department nursing approach to critical patients with suspected hyperacute/acute AAD.

Purpose

It is crucial to examine the emergency departments nursing approach to patients with suspected AAD. It is fundamental to have a rapid and standardized approach related to life-saving procedures, practices, and management of critical patients during the triage phase, with the assessment of the most common presentation of clinical signs and symptoms and patient management during each step in the emergency department.

Conclusion

Early identification and diagnosis in ED allow prompt treatment that improves prognosis. The emergency nurse plays a crucial role in correctly identifying and managing patients with acute aortic dissection. High clinical suspicion from the triage stages, early diagnosis, monitoring, and initial clinical stabilization in the emergency department plays a key role while awaiting definitive treatment.

Management of difficult intravenous access: a qualitative review

BACKGROUND

A perennial challenge faced by clinicians and made even more relevant with the global obesity epidemic, difficult intravenous access (DIVA) adversely impacts patient outcomes by causing significant downstream delays with many aspects of diagnoses and therapy. As most published DIVA strategies are limited to various point-of-care ultrasound techniques while other "tricks-of-the-trade" and pearls for overcoming DIVA are mostly relegated to informal nonpublished material, this article seeks to provide a narrative qualitative review of the iterature on DIVA and consolidate these strategies into a practical algorithm.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search on PubMed using the keywords "difficult intravenous access", "peripheral vascular access" and "peripheral venous access" and searched emergency medicine and anaesthesiology resources for relevant material. These strategies were then categorized and incorporated into a DIVA algorithm.

RESULTS

We propose a Vortex approach to DIVA that is modelled after the Difficult Airway Vortex concept starting off with standard peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) techniques, progressing sequentially on to ultrasound-guided cannulation and central venous cannulation and finally escalating to the most invasive intraosseous access should the patient be in extremis or should best efforts with the other lifelines fail.

CONCLUSION

DIVA is a perennial problem that healthcare providers across various disciplines will be increasingly challenged with. It is crucial to have a systematic stepwise approach such as the DIVA Vortex when managing such patients and have at hand a wide repertoire of techniques to draw upon.

Qualitative interviews and supporting evidence to identify the positive impacts of multidisciplinary vascular access teams

BACKGROUND

Vascular access by means of intravenous catheters is essential for the safe, effective and cost-efficient delivery of intravenous fluids, antibiotics, nutrition and chemotherapy, but the use of these devices is not without complications.

PURPOSE

A faculty of multidisciplinary European vascular access team (VAT) Leads/Members and experts sought to reframe how the implementation of a VAT could have positive impacts on patients and hospitals.

METHODS

Interview data from a Faculty of nine VAT Leads/Members and experts from six European countries on the impact of multidisciplinary VATs in modern healthcare were assessed. A literature search was conducted that included Medline®-cited peer-reviewed articles published in the past 10 years in order to identify impact data and post-implementation of a multidisciplinary VAT that support the benefits to patient safety and satisfaction and to hospital efficiencies reported in the interview program.

RESULTS

While VATs vary in structure and function, clarity of purpose and supportive training and education are key. Barriers to the implementation of VATs show commonality across countries, such as lack of investment, insufficient training and lack of awareness. Proven markers of VAT success include rapid referrals, improved patient outcomes and improved organizational efficiency. Standardization of outcomes data capture, processing and reporting are key to monitoring performance against baseline. Awareness of the cost of complications arising from inappropriate choice and placement, and poor care and maintenance, of the vascular access device must be raised.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of VATs can positively impact patient safety and satisfaction, improve organizational efficiencies and cost-effectiveness, and could create new opportunities for in- and outpatient services, beneficial to both patients and institutions.