Validating vascular access data in the Swedish Renal Registry SRR

Vascular Access Outcomes in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Key Points

More patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease received their first intervention to re-establish vascular access patency. Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease do not require differential monitoring and treatment of hemodialysis vascular access.

Background

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a leading hereditary cause of ESKD, often using hemodialysis as a form of RRT. Patients with ADPKD may also present with extrarenal manifestations, including arterial aneurysms. The gold standard for hemodialysis access is an arteriovenous vascular access (VA), such as arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). However, limitations, such as low VA flow and inadequate AVF outward remodeling, affect VA utilization. This study aimed to explore whether ADPKD affects patency rates of AVFs/AVGs in comparison with other underlying ESKD causes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Swedish Renal Registry from 2011 to 2020, with follow-up until 2022. We included 496 patients with ADPKD and 4321 propensity score–matched controls. VA patency rates of patients with ADPKD were compared with those of non-ADPKD patients using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Mantel–Cox log-rank test. Interventions to maintain or restore patency were also analyzed.

Results

Patients with ADPKD constituted 8.0% of all patients, with a higher proportion in the pre-ESKD phase during VA creation (51.6% versus 40.6%). No significant differences were observed in primary, postcannulation primary, secondary, or functional patency between patients with ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients. However, more VAs were ligated in patients with ADPKD (10.5% versus 7.7%, P = 0.03), and they underwent more first interventions to re-establish flow (49.4% versus 41.9%, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that AVF/AVG patency remains comparable in patients with ESKD with or without ADPKD, and VA monitoring and treatment strategies for patients with ADPKD should align with those for individuals with other ESKD causes.

Causes of nephrotic syndrome in Sweden: The relevance of clinical presentation and demographics

Background

Many pathological processes can disrupt the integrity of the glomerular capillary wall and cause a massive leakage of protein, resulting in nephrotic syndrome (NS). Clinical parameters such as age, sex, renal function, presence of diabetes, and how NS is defined influence the spectrum of underlying diseases. In this study, we examine how these parameters interact.

Methods

Age, sex, hematuria, proteinuria, plasma creatinine plasma albumin levels, and final diagnosis were retrieved for all adult patients with NS as an indication for biopsy and/or massive albuminuria in conjunction with low plasma albumin from the biopsy module of the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR) between 2014 and 2019. A basic calculator was developed to demonstrate the importance of clinical presentation in relation to the likelihood of having a specific diagnosis.

Results

A total of 913 unique patients were included in the study. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) and membranous nephropathy (MN) (both found in 17% of patients) were the most common diagnoses. With a stringent definition of NS, MN and minimal change nephropathy (MCN) increased in proportion. Among the cohort as a whole, MCN was the most frequent diagnosis in women and those < 50 years of age (found in 21% and 17%, respectively). In the case of patients aged between 50 and 70 years, those with chronic kidney disease stage 4, and those with negative dipstick tests for hematuria, the most common underlying disease was DN (in 23%, 30%, and 21% of cases, respectively). Among those with high-grade hematuria (dipstick grade 3 or 4), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis was the most common diagnosis (14%), closely followed by IgA nephropathy (13%). Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (9.7%) was less common than in many comparable studies.

Conclusion

Clinical parameters have a profound impact on the likelihood of different diagnoses in adult patients with NS. Differences in clinical practice and study inclusion criteria may be more important than genetic background and environmental factors when explaining differences between studies in different parts of the world.

Cannulation technique and complications in arteriovenous fistulas: a Swedish Renal Registry-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The four cannulation techniques, rope ladder (RL), area puncture (AP), buttonhole with blunt needles (BHb), and buttonhole with sharp needles (BHs), affects the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in different ways. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between the different cannulation techniques and the occurrence of AVF complications.

METHODS

The study was performed as a national registry-based cohort study using data from the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR). Data were collected from January 2014 to October 2019. Seventy of Sweden's dialysis units participate in the registry. We analyzed a total of 1328 AVFs in this study. The risk of complications was compared between the four different cannulation techniques. The risk of AVF complications was measured by the incidence and incidence rate ratio (IRR). We compared the IRRs of complications between different cannulation techniques.

RESULTS

BHs is the most common cannulation technique in Sweden. It has been used in 55% of the AVFs at some point during their functional patency. BHb (29%), RL (13%), and AP (3%) has been used less. BHb had the lowest risk of complications compared to the other techniques, and a significantly lower risk of stenosis, infiltration, cannulation difficulties, compared to RL and BHs. Cannulation difficulties were significantly more common using AP compared to BHs, and BHb. Infections were not significantly increased using the buttonhole technique.

CONCLUSIONS

BHb had the lowest risk of complications. Infections were not significantly increased using the buttonhole technique. Dialysis units with a low infection rate may continue to use the buttonhole technique, as the risk of complications is lower.