Selection of X-chromosome Inactivation Model

An X Chromosome Transcriptome Wide Association Study Implicates ARMCX6 in Alzheimer's Disease

Background

The X chromosome is often omitted in disease association studies despite containing thousands of genes that may provide insight into well-known sex differences in the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Objective

To model the expression of X chromosome genes and evaluate their impact on AD risk in a sex-stratified manner.

Methods

Using elastic net, we evaluated multiple modeling strategies in a set of 175 whole blood samples and 126 brain cortex samples, with whole genome sequencing and RNA-seq data. SNPs (MAF > 0.05) within the cis-regulatory window were used to train tissue-specific models of each gene. We apply the best models in both tissues to sex-stratified summary statistics from a meta-analysis of Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC) studies to identify AD-related genes on the X chromosome.

Results

Across different model parameters, sample sex, and tissue types, we modeled the expression of 217 genes (95 genes in blood and 135 genes in brain cortex). The average model R2 was 0.12 (range from 0.03 to 0.34). We also compared sex-stratified and sex-combined models on the X chromosome. We further investigated genes that escaped X chromosome inactivation (XCI) to determine if their genetic regulation patterns were distinct. We found ten genes associated with AD at p < 0.05, with only ARMCX6 in female brain cortex (p = 0.008) nearing the significance threshold after adjusting for multiple testing (α = 0.002).

Conclusions

We optimized the expression prediction of X chromosome genes, applied these models to sex-stratified AD GWAS summary statistics, and identified one putative AD risk gene, ARMCX6.

An X Chromosome Transcriptome Wide Association Study Implicates ARMCX6 in Alzheimer's Disease

Background

The X chromosome is often omitted in disease association studies despite containing thousands of genes which may provide insight into well-known sex differences in the risk of Alzheimer's Disease.

Objective

To model the expression of X chromosome genes and evaluate their impact on Alzheimer's Disease risk in a sex-stratified manner.

Methods

Using elastic net, we evaluated multiple modeling strategies in a set of 175 whole blood samples and 126 brain cortex samples, with whole genome sequencing and RNA-seq data. SNPs (MAF>0.05) within the cis-regulatory window were used to train tissue-specific models of each gene. We apply the best models in both tissues to sex-stratified summary statistics from a meta-analysis of Alzheimer's disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC) studies to identify AD-related genes on the X chromosome.

Results

Across different model parameters, sample sex, and tissue types, we modeled the expression of 217 genes (95 genes in blood and 135 genes in brain cortex). The average model R2 was 0.12 (range from 0.03 to 0.34). We also compared sex-stratified and sex-combined models on the X chromosome. We further investigated genes that escaped X chromosome inactivation (XCI) to determine if their genetic regulation patterns were distinct. We found ten genes associated with AD at p 0.05, with only ARMCX6 in female brain cortex (p = 0.008) nearing the significance threshold after adjusting for multiple testing (α = 0.002).

Conclusions

We optimized the expression prediction of X chromosome genes, applied these models to sex-stratified AD GWAS summary statistics, and identified one putative AD risk gene, ARMCX6.

eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?

10 years ago, a detailed analysis showed that only 33% of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results included the X chromosome. Multiple recommendations were made to combat such exclusion. Here, we re-surveyed the research landscape to determine whether these earlier recommendations had been translated. Unfortunately, among the genome-wide summary statistics reported in 2021 in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, only 25% provided results for the X chromosome and 3% for the Y chromosome, suggesting that the exclusion phenomenon not only persists but has also expanded into an exclusionary problem. Normalizing by physical length of the chromosome, the average number of studies published through November 2022 with genome-wide-significant findings on the X chromosome is ∼1 study/Mb. By contrast, it ranges from ∼6 to ∼16 studies/Mb for chromosomes 4 and 19, respectively. Compared with the autosomal growth rate of ∼0.086 studies/Mb/year over the last decade, studies of the X chromosome grew at less than one-seventh that rate, only ∼0.012 studies/Mb/year. Among the studies that reported significant associations on the X chromosome, we noted extreme heterogeneities in data analysis and reporting of results, suggesting the need for clear guidelines. Unsurprisingly, among the 430 scores sampled from the PolyGenic Score Catalog, 0% contained weights for sex chromosomal SNPs. To overcome the dearth of sex chromosome analyses, we provide five sets of recommendations and future directions. Finally, until the sex chromosomes are included in a whole-genome study, instead of GWASs, we propose such studies would more properly be referred to as "AWASs," meaning "autosome-wide scans."

HostSeq: a Canadian whole genome sequencing and clinical data resource

HostSeq was launched in April 2020 as a national initiative to integrate whole genome sequencing data from 10,000 Canadians infected with SARS-CoV-2 with clinical information related to their disease experience. The mandate of HostSeq is to support the Canadian and international research communities in their efforts to understand the risk factors for disease and associated health outcomes and support the development of interventions such as vaccines and therapeutics. HostSeq is a collaboration among 13 independent epidemiological studies of SARS-CoV-2 across five provinces in Canada. Aggregated data collected by HostSeq are made available to the public through two data portals: a phenotype portal showing summaries of major variables and their distributions, and a variant search portal enabling queries in a genomic region. Individual-level data is available to the global research community for health research through a Data Access Agreement and Data Access Compliance Office approval. Here we provide an overview of the collective project design along with summary level information for HostSeq. We highlight several statistical considerations for researchers using the HostSeq platform regarding data aggregation, sampling mechanism, covariate adjustment, and X chromosome analysis. In addition to serving as a rich data source, the diversity of study designs, sample sizes, and research objectives among the participating studies provides unique opportunities for the research community.

A systematic review of analytical methods used in genetic association analysis of the X-chromosome

Genetic association studies have been very successful at elucidating the genetic background of many complex diseases/traits. However, the X-chromosome is often neglected in these studies because of technical difficulties and the fact that most tools only utilize genetic data from autosomes. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of different practical approaches that are followed to incorporate the X-chromosome in association analysis, such as Genome-Wide Association Studies and Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis. In general, the choice of which test statistics is most appropriate will depend on three main criteria: (1) the underlying X-inactivation model, (2) if Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium holds and sex-specific allele frequencies are expected and (3) whether adjustment for confounding variables is required. All in all, it is recommended that a combination of different association tests should be used for the analysis of X-chromosome.

Major sex differences in allele frequencies for X chromosomal variants in both the 1000 Genomes Project and gnomAD

An unexpectedly high proportion of SNPs on the X chromosome in the 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 data were identified with significant sex differences in minor allele frequencies (sdMAF). sdMAF persisted for many of these SNPs in the recently released high coverage whole genome sequence of the 1000 Genomes Project that was aligned to GRCh38, and it was consistent between the five super-populations. Among the 245,825 common (MAF>5%) biallelic X-chromosomal SNPs in the phase 3 data presumed to be of high quality, 2,039 have genome-wide significant sdMAF (p-value <5e-8). sdMAF varied by location: non-pseudo-autosomal region (NPR) = 0.83%, pseudo-autosomal regions (PAR1) = 0.29%, PAR2 = 13.1%, and X-transposed region (XTR)/PAR3 = 0.85% of SNPs had sdMAF, and they were clustered at the NPR-PAR boundaries, among others. sdMAF at the NPR-PAR boundaries are biologically expected due to sex-linkage, but have generally been ignored in association studies. For comparison, similar analyses found only 6, 1 and 0 SNPs with significant sdMAF on chromosomes 1, 7 and 22, respectively. Similar sdMAF results for the X chromosome were obtained from the high coverage whole genome sequence data from gnomAD V 3.1.2 for both the non-Finnish European and African/African American samples. Future X chromosome analyses need to take sdMAF into account.

Computational Genomics in the Era of Precision Medicine: Applications to Variant Analysis and Gene Therapy

Rapid methodological advances in statistical and computational genomics have enabled researchers to better identify and interpret both rare and common variants responsible for complex human diseases. As we continue to see an expansion of these advances in the field, it is now imperative for researchers to understand the resources and methodologies available for various data types and study designs. In this review, we provide an overview of recent methods for identifying rare and common variants and understanding their roles in disease etiology. Additionally, we discuss the strategy, challenge, and promise of gene therapy. As computational and statistical approaches continue to improve, we will have an opportunity to translate human genetic findings into personalized health care.

The X factor: A robust and powerful approach to X-chromosome-inclusive whole-genome association studies

The X‐chromosome is often excluded from genome‐wide association studies because of analytical challenges. Some of the problems, such as the random, skewed, or no X‐inactivation model uncertainty, have been investigated. Other considerations have received little to no attention, such as the value in considering nonadditive and gene–sex interaction effects, and the inferential consequence of choosing different baseline alleles (i.e., the reference vs. the alternative allele). Here we propose a unified and flexible regression‐based association test for X‐chromosomal variants. We provide theoretical justifications for its robustness in the presence of various model uncertainties, as well as for its improved power when compared with the existing approaches under certain scenarios. For completeness, we also revisit the autosomes and show that the proposed framework leads to a more robust approach than the standard method. Finally, we provide supporting evidence by revisiting several published association studies. Supporting Information for this article are available online.

Testing and estimation of X-chromosome SNP effects: Impact of model assumptions

Interest in analyzing X chromosome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is growing and several approaches have been proposed. Prior studies have compared power of different approaches, but bias and interpretation of coefficients have received less attention. We performed simulations to demonstrate the impact of X chromosome model assumptions on effect estimates. We investigated the coefficient biases of SNP and sex effects with commonly used models for X chromosome SNPs, including models with and without assumptions of X chromosome inactivation (XCI), and with and without SNP–sex interaction terms. Sex and SNP coefficient biases were observed when assumptions made about XCI and sex differences in SNP effect in the analysis model were inconsistent with the data‐generating model. However, including a SNP–sex interaction term often eliminated these biases. To illustrate these findings, estimates under different genetic model assumptions are compared and interpreted in a real data example. Models to analyze X chromosome SNPs make assumptions beyond those made in autosomal variant analysis. Assumptions made about X chromosome SNP effects should be stated clearly when reporting and interpreting X chromosome associations. Fitting models with SNP × Sex interaction terms can avoid reliance on assumptions, eliminating coefficient bias even in the absence of sex differences in SNP effect.

The role of sex in the genomics of human complex traits

Nearly all human complex traits and disease phenotypes exhibit some degree of sex differences, including differences in prevalence, age of onset, severity or disease progression. Until recently, the underlying genetic mechanisms of such sex differences have been largely unexplored. Advances in genomic technologies and analytical approaches are now enabling a deeper investigation into the effect of sex on human health traits. In this Review, we discuss recent insights into the genetic models and mechanisms that lead to sex differences in complex traits. This knowledge is critical for developing deeper insight into the fundamental biology of sex differences and disease processes, thus facilitating precision medicine.

A robust and powerful test for case-control genetic association study on X chromosome

Hundreds of genome-wide association studies were conducted to map the disease genes on autosomes in human beings. It is known that many complex diseases are sex-determined and X chromosome is expected to play an important role. However, only a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms on X chromosome were found to be significantly associated with the diseases under study. On the other hand, to balance the genetic effect between two sexes, X chromosome inactivation occurs in most of X-linked genes by silencing one copy of two X chromosomes in females and dosage compensation is achieved. A few association studies on X chromosome incorporated the information on dosage compensation. However, some of them require the assumption of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and some need to specify the underlying genetic model. Therefore, in this article, we propose a novel method for association by taking account of different dosage compensation patterns. The proposed test is a robust approach because it requires neither specifying the underlying genetic models nor the assumption of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Further, the proposed method allows for different deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium between cases and controls. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed method generally outperforms the existing methods in terms of controlling the size and the test power. Finally, we apply the proposed test to the meta-analysis of the Graves' disease data for its practical use.