1
|
Martínez-Puig D, Costa-Larrión E, Rubio-Rodríguez N, Gálvez-Martín P. Collagen Supplementation for Joint Health: The Link between Composition and Scientific Knowledge. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15061332. [PMID: 36986062 PMCID: PMC10058045 DOI: 10.3390/nu15061332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease, generating pain, disability, and socioeconomic costs worldwide. Currently there are no approved disease-modifying drugs for OA, and safety concerns have been identified with the chronic use of symptomatic drugs. In this context, nutritional supplements and nutraceuticals have emerged as potential alternatives. Among them, collagen is being a focus of particular interest, but under the same term different types of collagens coexist with different structures, compositions, and origins, leading to different properties and potential effects. The aim of this narrative review is to generally describe the main types of collagens currently available in marketplace, focusing on those related to joint health, describing their mechanism of action, preclinical, and clinical evidence. Native and hydrolyzed collagen are the most studied collagen types for joint health. Native collagen has a specific immune-mediated mechanism that requires the recognition of its epitopes to inhibit inflammation and tissue catabolism at articular level. Hydrolyzed collagen may contain biologically active peptides that are able to reach joint tissues and exert chondroprotective effects. Although there are preclinical and clinical studies showing the safety and efficacy of food ingredients containing both types of collagens, available research suggests a clear link between collagen chemical structure and mechanism of action.
Collapse
|
2
|
Gwinnutt JM, Wieczorek M, Rodríguez-Carrio J, Balanescu A, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Boonen A, Cavalli G, de Souza S, de Thurah A, Dorner TE, Moe RH, Putrik P, Silva-Fernández L, Stamm T, Walker-Bone K, Welling J, Zlatković-Švenda M, Guillemin F, Verstappen SMM. Effects of diet on the outcomes of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs): systematic review and meta-analyses informing the 2021 EULAR recommendations for lifestyle improvements in people with RMDs. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2021-002167. [PMID: 35654458 PMCID: PMC9096533 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A EULAR taskforce was convened to develop recommendations for lifestyle behaviours in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). In this paper, the literature on the effect of diet on the progression of RMDs is reviewed. METHODS Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed of studies related to diet and disease outcomes in seven RMDs: osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus, axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis and gout. In the first phase, existing relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published from 2013 to 2018, were identified. In the second phase, the review was expanded to include published original studies on diet in RMDs, with no restriction on publication date. Systematic reviews or original studies were included if they assessed a dietary exposure in one of the above RMDs, and reported results regarding progression of disease (eg, pain, function, joint damage). RESULTS In total, 24 systematic reviews and 150 original articles were included. Many dietary exposures have been studied (n=83), although the majority of studies addressed people with OA and RA. Most dietary exposures were assessed by relatively few studies. Exposures that have been assessed by multiple, well conducted studies (eg, OA: vitamin D, chondroitin, glucosamine; RA: omega-3) were classified as moderate evidence of small effects on disease progression. CONCLUSION The current literature suggests that there is moderate evidence for a small benefit for certain dietary components. High-level evidence of clinically meaningful effect sizes from individual dietary exposures on outcomes in RMDs is missing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Gwinnutt
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maud Wieczorek
- EA 4360 Apemac, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France,Center on Aging and Mobility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Javier Rodríguez-Carrio
- Area of Immunology, Department of Functional Biology, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain,Department of Metabolism, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Andra Balanescu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, ‘Sf Maria’ Hospital, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari
- Center on Aging and Mobility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of Aging Medicine and Aging Research, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,University Clinic for Aging Medicine, City Hospital Zurich - Waid, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Giulio Cavalli
- Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Savia de Souza
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark,Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Thomas E Dorner
- Centre for Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Social Insurance Fund for Public Service, Railway and Mining Industries, Sitzenberg-Reidling, Austria,Karl-Landsteiner Institute for Health Promotion Research, Sitzenberg-Reidling, Austria
| | - Rikke Helene Moe
- National Advisory Unit for Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Polina Putrik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucía Silva-Fernández
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karen Walker-Bone
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Joep Welling
- NVLE Dutch Patient Organization for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjana Zlatković-Švenda
- Institute of Rheumatology, University of Belgrade School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia,Department of Internal Medicine, University of East Sarajevo Faculty of Medicine Foča, Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Francis Guillemin
- EA 4360 Apemac, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France,Inserm, CHRU Nancy, CIC-1433 Epidémiologie Clinique, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Suzanne M M Verstappen
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK .,MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bourdon B, Contentin R, Cassé F, Maspimby C, Oddoux S, Noël A, Legendre F, Gruchy N, Galéra P. Marine Collagen Hydrolysates Downregulate the Synthesis of Pro-Catabolic and Pro-Inflammatory Markers of Osteoarthritis and Favor Collagen Production and Metabolic Activity in Equine Articular Chondrocyte Organoids. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22020580. [PMID: 33430111 PMCID: PMC7826754 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Articular cartilage experiences mechanical constraints leading to chondral defects that inevitably evolve into osteoarthritis (OA), because cartilage has poor intrinsic repair capacity. Although OA is an incurable degenerative disease, several dietary supplements may help improve OA outcomes. In this study, we investigated the effects of Dielen® hydrolyzed fish collagens from skin (Promerim®30 and Promerim®60) and cartilage (Promerim®40) to analyze the phenotype and metabolism of equine articular chondrocytes (eACs) cultured as organoids. Here, our findings demonstrated the absence of cytotoxicity and the beneficial effect of Promerim® hydrolysates on eAC metabolic activity under physioxia; further, Promerim®30 also delayed eAC senescence. To assess the effect of Promerim® in a cartilage-like tissue, eACs were cultured as organoids under hypoxia with or without BMP-2 and/or IL-1β. In some instances, alone or in the presence of IL-1β, Promerim®30 and Promerim®40 increased protein synthesis of collagen types I and II, while decreasing transcript levels of proteases involved in OA pathogenesis, namely Htra1, and the metalloproteinases Mmp1-3, Adamts5, and Cox2. Both Promerim® hydrolysates also decreased Htra1 protein amounts, particularly in inflammatory conditions. The effect of Promerim® was enhanced under inflammatory conditions, possibly due to a decrease in the synthesis of inflammation-associated molecules. Finally, Promerim® favored in vitro repair in a scratch wound assay through an increase in cell proliferation or migration. Altogether, these data show that Promerim®30 and 40 hold promise as dietary supplements to relieve OA symptoms in patients and to delay OA progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastien Bourdon
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, BIOTARGEN, 14000 Caen, France; (B.B.); (R.C.); (F.C.); (C.M.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
- Dielen Laboratory, 50110 Tourlaville, France; (S.O.); (A.N.)
| | - Romain Contentin
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, BIOTARGEN, 14000 Caen, France; (B.B.); (R.C.); (F.C.); (C.M.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Frédéric Cassé
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, BIOTARGEN, 14000 Caen, France; (B.B.); (R.C.); (F.C.); (C.M.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Chloé Maspimby
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, BIOTARGEN, 14000 Caen, France; (B.B.); (R.C.); (F.C.); (C.M.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Sarah Oddoux
- Dielen Laboratory, 50110 Tourlaville, France; (S.O.); (A.N.)
| | - Antoine Noël
- Dielen Laboratory, 50110 Tourlaville, France; (S.O.); (A.N.)
| | - Florence Legendre
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, BIOTARGEN, 14000 Caen, France; (B.B.); (R.C.); (F.C.); (C.M.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Nicolas Gruchy
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, BIOTARGEN, 14000 Caen, France; (B.B.); (R.C.); (F.C.); (C.M.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
- Department of Genetics, Normandy Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Caen University Hospital, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Philippe Galéra
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, BIOTARGEN, 14000 Caen, France; (B.B.); (R.C.); (F.C.); (C.M.); (F.L.); (N.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Role of Collagen Derivatives in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Scoping Review With Evidence Mapping. Rheumatol Ther 2020; 7:703-740. [PMID: 33068290 PMCID: PMC7695755 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00240-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is currently no disease-modifying drug for osteoarthritis (OA), and some safety concerns have been identified about the leading traditional drugs. Therefore, research efforts have focused on alternatives such as supplementation with collagen derivatives. The objective of this scoping review is to examine the extent, range, and nature of research, and to summarize and disseminate research findings on the effects of collagen derivatives in OA and cartilage repair. The purpose is to identify gaps in the current body of evidence in order to further help progress research in this setting. Methods The databases Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, TOXLINE, and CDSR were comprehensively searched from inception to search date. After studies selection against eligibility criteria, following recommended methods, data were charted from the retrieved articles and these were subsequently synthesized. Numerical and graphical descriptive statistical methods were used to show trends in publications and geographical distribution of studies. Results The systematic literature search identified a total of 10,834 records. Forty-one published studies were ultimately included in the review, 16 of which were preclinical studies and 25 were clinical studies (including four systematic reviews/meta-analyses). Collagen hydrolysate (CH) and undenatured collagen (UC) were the two types of collagen derivatives studied, with a total of 28 individual studies on CH and nine on UC. More than a third of studies originated from Asia, and most of them have been published after 2008. Oral forms of collagen derivatives were mainly studied; three in vivo preclinical studies and three clinical trials investigated intra-articularly injected CH. In most of the clinical trials, treatment durations varied between 3 and 6 months, with the shortest being 1.4 months and the longest 11 months. All in vivo preclinical studies and clinical trials, regardless of their quality, concluded on beneficial effects of collagen derivatives in OA and cartilage repair, whether used as nutritional supplement or delivered intra-articularly, and whatever the manufacturers of the products, the doses and the outcomes considered in each study. Conclusions Although current evidence shows some potential for the use of CH and UC as an option for management of patients with OA, there is still room for progress in terms of laboratory and clinical research before any definitive conclusion can be made. Harmonization of outcomes in preclinical studies and longer randomized placebo-controlled trials in larger populations with the use of recommended and validated endpoints are warranted before collagen derivatives can be recommended by large scientific societies. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00240-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|