Combination of Empagliflozin and Metformin Therapy: A Consideration of its Place in Type 2 Diabetes Therapy

SGLT2-independent effects of canagliflozin on NHE3 and mitochondrial complex I activity inhibit proximal tubule fluid transport and albumin uptake

Beyond glycemic control, SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have protective effects on cardiorenal function. Renoprotection has been suggested to involve inhibition of NHE3 leading to reduced ATP-dependent tubular workload and mitochondrial oxygen consumption. NHE3 activity is also important for regulation of endosomal pH, but the effects of SGLT2i on endocytosis are unknown. We used a highly differentiated cell culture model of proximal tubule (PT) cells to determine the direct effects of SGLT2i on Na+-dependent fluid transport and endocytic uptake in this nephron segment. Strikingly, canagliflozin but not empagliflozin reduced fluid transport across cell monolayers and dramatically inhibited endocytic uptake of albumin. These effects were independent of glucose and occurred at clinically relevant concentrations of drug. Canagliflozin acutely inhibited surface NHE3 activity, consistent with a direct effect, but did not affect endosomal pH or NHE3 phosphorylation. In addition, canagliflozin rapidly and selectively inhibited mitochondrial complex I activity. Inhibition of mitochondrial complex I by metformin recapitulated the effects of canagliflozin on endocytosis and fluid transport, whereas modulation of downstream effectors AMPK and mTOR did not. Mice given a single dose of canagliflozin excreted twice as much urine over 24 h compared with empagliflozin-treated mice despite similar water intake. We conclude that canagliflozin selectively suppresses Na+-dependent fluid transport and albumin uptake in PT cells via direct inhibition of NHE3 and of mitochondrial function upstream of the AMPK/mTOR axis. These additional targets of canagliflozin contribute significantly to reduced PT Na+-dependent fluid transport in vivo.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Reduced NHE3-mediated Na+ transport has been suggested to underlie the cardiorenal protection provided by SGLT2 inhibitors. We found that canagliflozin, but not empagliflozin, reduced NHE3-dependent fluid transport and endocytic uptake in cultured proximal tubule cells. These effects were independent of SGLT2 activity and resulted from inhibition of mitochondrial complex I and NHE3. Studies in mice are consistent with greater effects of canagliflozin versus empagliflozin on fluid transport. Our data suggest that these selective effects of canagliflozin contribute to reduced Na+-dependent transport in proximal tubule cells.

Comparative Study on Efficacy of Empagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin, as an Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Introduction

More than 28.7 million individuals throughout the globe suffer from diabetes mellitus, with an estimated 11 percent of the population living with the condition in India. Changes in lifestyle and a variety of treatment plans are used in management. Metformin is a key drug for glycemic control, both when used alone and in combination. Our research compares the effectiveness of glycemic control achieved by empagliflozin plus sitagliptin.

Methods

This study took place from November 2022 to April 2023 at the tertiary care hospital. The study did not begin until the ethical review was completed. There were two groups of patients, A and B. Everyone received a daily dose of Metformin 1,000 milligrams. Sitagliptin (50 mg twice daily) was administered to individuals in Group A, whereas Empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) was given to those in Group B. After three months of therapy, HbA1c was used to compare the two groups' levels of glycemic control to those at the start of treatment. To do this, we employed a proforma. Version 25 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) was used for the analysis.

Results

The average age of the 300 patients that participated in the trial was 42.33. There were 57.67% men and 42.33% females. "The mean reduction in HbA1c from baseline in Group A was -0.65 ± 0.11% and in Group B was -1.34 ± 0.13% with statistically significant P-value (P-value = 0.000)."

Conclusion

The combination of Empagliflozin and Metformin is superior to that of Sitagliptin and Metformin for the maintenance of glycemic control.

Benefits and risks of drug combination therapy for diabetes mellitus and its complications: a comprehensive review

Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease, and its therapeutic goals focus on the effective management of blood glucose and various complications. Drug combination therapy has emerged as a comprehensive treatment approach for diabetes. An increasing number of studies have shown that, compared with monotherapy, combination therapy can bring significant clinical benefits while controlling blood glucose, weight, and blood pressure, as well as mitigating damage from certain complications and delaying their progression in diabetes, including both type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related complications. This evidence provides strong support for the recommendation of combination therapy for diabetes and highlights the importance of combined treatment. In this review, we first provided a brief overview of the phenotype and pathogenesis of diabetes and discussed several conventional anti-diabetic medications currently used for the treatment of diabetes. We then reviewed several clinical trials and pre-clinical animal experiments on T1D, T2D, and their common complications to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different classes of drug combinations. In general, combination therapy plays a pivotal role in the management of diabetes. Integrating the effectiveness of multiple drugs enables more comprehensive and effective control of blood glucose without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia or other serious adverse events. However, specific treatment regimens should be tailored to individual patients and implemented under the guidance of healthcare professionals.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between a Fixed-Dose Combination of Empagliflozin L-Proline/Metformin and Empagliflozin/Metformin in Healthy Korean Subjects

Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed-dose combination of 5-mg empagliflozin L-proline and 1000-mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 1.03 (0.99-1.08) and 1.03 (1.00-1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for Cmax  and AUClast were 0.99 (0.92-1.06) and 1.00 (0.94-1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin L-proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.

Assessment of the Safety, Efficacy, and Benefit of Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) at High Risk for Cardiovascular Events

Background Since the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), heart failure coexisting with it has had a significant impact on clinical management and prognosis. Patients with T2DM and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have increased mortality and morbidity. Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, is widely acknowledged to reduce cardiovascular risk in T2DM patients. We wanted to assess the composite outcomes of heart failure, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization following the start of empagliflozin therapy in the Saudi population. Methods This is a retrospective observational study conducted at King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital-Jeddah. We included patients aged 18 or older, male or female, with T2DM with HFrEF <40% and with a risk of cardiovascular events who were treated with empagliflozin 25 mg once daily as combination therapy and patients using other diabetic agents without empagliflozin as the comparative group. Results A total of 195 patients with T2DM and HFrEF who were at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events were included in the study. Regarding gender, most of the patients (82.1%) were male with an average age of 61.28 ± 9.92. The patients were divided into 71 individuals who received empagliflozin and 124 who did not. When comparing the surgical procedure and comorbid status of the patients, coronary artery bypass graft (1.4%), coronary artery disease (5.6%), dyslipidemia (5.6%), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (0%) were found compared to the non-empagliflozin group. Meanwhile, hypertension was found to be 71.8% and ischemic heart disease was 50.7% in empagliflozin patients. Furthermore, only dyslipidemia differed significantly (p <0.001) between the empagliflozin and non-empagliflozin groups of patients. However, no significant differences were observed between the average low-density lipoprotein (p = 0.990) and high-density lipoprotein (p = 0.399). There was no significant difference observed in the primary outcome of CV deaths or hospital admission of patients between empagliflozin and non-empagliflozin. No deaths were reported in either of the comparative groups in our study. Conclusion In this study, there was no significant difference observed in hospital admission of the patients between the empagliflozin and non-empagliflozin groups. No cardiovascular mortality was reported in the study population. Further matched group comparative studies or placebo-controlled studies are required to compare the existing evidence of the impact of empagliflozin on T2DM patients with HFrEF and at high risk for CV deaths or hospital admission.

Randomized Clinical Trial on Efficacy of Empagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin, In Addition to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Introduction Diabetes mellitus is a syndrome affecting more than 28.7 million people worldwide and its prevalence in Pakistan is reported to be about 11%. Management includes lifestyle changes and varied therapeutic regimens. Metformin (MET) alone and in combinations is considered as an important agent for glycemic control. Our study is based on MET combination therapy with empagliflozin versus sitagliptin in order to achieve glycemic control. Methods This randomized clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Medicine and Allied of Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad, from January 2022 till June 2022. The ethical approval letter numbered FGPC. 1-1/2022/Ethical Committee was taken before the commencement of the trial. The patients were divided into group A and group B. All patients were given MET 1000mg twice a day. Group A patients were additionally given sitagliptin 50mg twice daily whereas Group B patients were additionally given empagliflozin 10mg once daily. Glycemic control was documented with HbA1c at the start of treatment and after three months of treatment in both groups. A proforma was used to collect data. Analysis of the data was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Results A total of 126 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 53.53 ± 6.49. 81.7% were males while 18.3% were females. The mean reduction in HbA1c from baseline in group A was -0.81 ± 0.19% and in group B was -1.13 ± 0.24% with statistically significant p-value (p-value = 0.000). Conclusion Empagliflozin in combination with metformin is more efficacious in maintaining glycemic control as compared to sitagliptin in combination with metformin.

[Management of hyperglycaemia with non-insulin drugs in adult patients with type 2 diabetes]

Treatment of diabetes mellitus type2 (DM2) includes healthy eating and exercise (150minutes/week) as basic pillars. For pharmacological treatment, metformin is the initial drug except contraindication or intolerance; in case of poor control, 8 therapeutic families are available (6 oral and 2 injectable) as possible combinations. An algorithm and some recommendations for the treatment of DM2 are presented. In secondary cardiovascular prevention, it is recommended to associate an inhibitor of the sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (iSGLT2) or a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (arGLP1) in patients with obesity. In primary prevention if the patient is obese or overweight metformin should be combined with iSGLT2, arGLP1, or inhibitors of type4 dipeptidylpeptidase (iDPP4). If the patient does not present obesity, iDPP4, iSGLT2 or gliclazide, sulfonylurea, recommended due to its lower tendency to hypoglycaemia, may be used.

Natural products with SGLT2 inhibitory activity: Possibilities of application for the treatment of diabetes

Diabetes mellitus currently affects as many as 400 million people worldwide, creating a heavy economic burden and stretching health care resources. A dysfunction of glucose homeostasis underlies the disease. Despite advances in the treatment of diabetes, many patients still suffer from complications and side effects; hence, development of more effective treatments for diabetes is still desirable. SGLT2 is the principle cotransporter involved in glucose reabsorption in the kidney. SGLT2 inhibition reduces glucose reabsorption by the kidney and ameliorates plasma glucose concentration. The interest in natural products that can be used for the inhibition of SGLT2 is growing. The flavonoid phlorizin, which can be isolated from the bark of apple trees, has been used as lead structure due to its inhibitory activity of SGLT1 and SGLT2. Some phlorizin-derived synthetic compounds, including canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, and ertugliflozin, are approved by the food and drug administration to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), whereas others are under clinical trials investigation. In addition, other natural product-derived compounds have been investigated for their ability to improve blood glucose control. The present review summarizes the natural products with SGLT2 inhibitory activity, and the synthetic compounds obtained from them, and discusses their application for the treatment of diabetes.