Systematic literature review of long-term efficacy data for topical psoriasis treatments

OBJECTIVE

To identify long-term efficacy evidence that supports use of topical therapies as regular maintenance therapy in the prevention of psoriasis relapse.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified clinical trials and observational studies that reported efficacy outcomes for topical psoriasis therapies with treatment durations of at least 12 weeks. For therapies with long-term data, the approved treatment schedules in product labels were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies with at least 12-week efficacy outcomes were identified. Eight randomized controlled trials and six observational studies or single-arm open-label studies reported efficacy data for >12-week treatment periods. Most studies used treatment regimens that reflect current standard of care of repeated treatment of relapses. The PSO-LONG study is the only identified randomized controlled trial to have compared regular proactive maintenance use of a topical treatment (calcipotriol/betamethasone foam) with reactive management in response to psoriasis relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited high-quality long-term efficacy data are available for topical psoriasis therapies. While some product labels mention clinical experience of up to 12 months, they do not provide specific recommendations on the optimal long-term regimen. Calcipotriol/betamethasone foam is the only treatment for which the approved label allows either reactive treatment of relapse or regular (twice weekly) maintenance use.

Joint AAD-NPF Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with topical therapy and alternative medicine modalities for psoriasis severity measures

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the United States population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care and provides recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with topical agents and with alternative medicine will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of dermatologists in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as risks that may be associated. This guideline will also address the severity assessment methods of psoriasis in adults.

Psoriasis patient preferences for topical drugs: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Topical drugs are recommended first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis. However, patient preferences for the topical drugs differ, since a wide variety of topical drugs and topical drug formulations are available.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate psoriasis patient preferences for topical drugs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for English-language articles in Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Cinahl, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

Four surveys, six randomized controlled trials, and two prospective studies of mainly good quality were included. Seven of the studies investigated patient preferences for topical drug formulations, while five studies investigated their preferences for different topical drugs. Overall, patients preferred drugs that are easy to apply, less messy, and have a pleasant scent.

CONCLUSION

Psoriasis patient preferences for topical drugs differ. There is no one topical drug or topical drug formulation that suits everyone, which shows the importance of individualized prescriptions for topical drugs that are based on shared decision-making between the prescriber and patient.

Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for plaque psoriasis - Brazilian Society of Dermatology

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects 1.3% of the Brazilian population. The most common clinical manifestations are erythematous, scaling lesions that affect both genders and can occur on any anatomical site, preferentially involving the knees, elbows, scalp and genitals. Besides the impact on the quality of life, the systemic nature of the disease makes psoriasis an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, especially in young patients with severe disease. By an initiative of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology, dermatologists with renowned clinical experience in the management of psoriasis were invited to form a work group that, in a partnership with the Brazilian Medical Association, dedicated themselves to create the Plaque Psoriasis Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines. The relevant issues for the diagnosis (evaluation of severity and comorbidities) and treatment of plaque psoriasis were defined. The issues generated a search strategy in the Medline-PubMed database up to July 2018. Subsequently, the answers to the questions of the recommendations were devised, and each reference selected presented the respective level of recommendation and strength of scientific evidence. The final recommendations for making up the final text were worded by the coordinators.

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate Foam 0.05% in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque-Type Psoriasis of Nonscalp Regions

Background:

Clobetasol propionate foam 0.05% (Connetics Corporation, Palo Alto, CA) is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of corticosteroid-responsive scalp dermatoses, but there is only limited data available for its efficacy and tolerability in treating dermatoses which affect nonscalp sites.

Objective:

The efficacy and tolerability of clobetasol propionate foam (clobetasol foam) in treating psoriatic lesions at nonscalp sites was evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of 279 patients with mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis.

Methods:

The patients applied clobetasol foam or placebo to the psoriatic lesions twice daily for two weeks. In addition to receiving clinical evaluations, the study patients completed a questionnaire evaluating various characteristics of the foam formulation, including their preference for its use and their projected likelihood to comply with similar therapy in a nonstudy environment.

Results:

At Week 2 (or end of treatment), 68% (94/139) of patients who received clobetasol foam had a Physician's Static Global Assessment score of 0 (clear, except for minor residual discoloration) or 1 (majority of lesions have individual scores for plaque thickness, erythema, and scaling that averages 1). This was significantly more than the 21% (30/140) observed in the placebo group ( P < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for the Patient's Global Assessment score at Week 2 and in changes (from Baseline to Week 2) in the scores for the signs of psoriasis at a target lesion and for pruritus. Adverse effects were generally limited to mild and transient burning or other application site reactions in only a few patients in each treatment group. In the patient's poststudy questionnaire (completed at Week 2, or end of treatment) a majority of patients rated the characteristics of the foam formulation very highly. The patients ranked the foam formulation as superior to other topical formulations based on factors impacting their quality of life and indicated they would be more likely to comply with a recommended course of therapy with the foam formulation than with other topical formulations.

Conclusion:

Clobetasol propionate foam 0.05% is safe and effective for the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis on scalp and nonscalp areas, when applied twice daily for two weeks. As it is understood that patient dissatisfaction with select topical formulations affects their compliance with therapy, which necessarily affects the effectiveness of the therapy, the results of the patient's poststudy questionnaire suggest that there are multiple and integrated benefits for the use of clobetasol foam in the treatment of psoriasis of nonscalp sites.

Topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Chronic plaque psoriasis is the most common type of psoriasis, and it is characterised by redness, thickness, and scaling. First-line management of chronic plaque psoriasis is with topical treatments, including vitamin D analogues, topical corticosteroids, tar-based preparations, dithranol, salicylic acid, and topical retinoids.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis, relative to placebo, and to similarly compare vitamin D analogues (used alone or in combination) with other topical treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to February 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 2), MEDLINE (from 1948), EMBASE (from 1980), Science Citation Index (from 2008), Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (from 2008), BIOSIS (from 1993), Dissertation Abstracts via DialogClassic (all publication years), and Inside Conferences (all publication years).We identified ongoing and unpublished studies from the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials. We checked the bibliographies of published studies and reviews for further references to relevant trials, and we contacted trialists and companies for information about newly published studies.A separate search for adverse effects was undertaken in February 2011 using MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 2005).Final update searches for both RCTs and adverse effects were undertaken in August 2012. Although it has not been possible to incorporate RCTs and adverse effects studies identified through these final searches within this review, we will incorporate these into the next update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing active topical treatments against placebo or against vitamin D analogues (used alone or in combination) in people with chronic plaque psoriasis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author extracted study data and assessed study quality. A second author checked these data. We routinely contacted trialists and companies for missing data. We also extracted data on withdrawals and on local and systemic adverse events. We defined long-term trials as those with a duration of at least 24 weeks.

MAIN RESULTS

This update added 48 trials and provided evidence on 7 new active treatments. In total, the review included 177 randomised controlled trials, with 34,808 participants, including 26 trials of scalp psoriasis and 6 trials of inverse psoriasis, facial psoriasis, or both. The number of included studies counted by Review Manager (RevMan) is higher than these figures (190) because we entered each study reporting a placebo and an active comparison into the 'Characteristics of included studies' table as 2 studies.When used on the body, most vitamin D analogues were significantly more effective than placebo, with the standardised mean difference (SMD) ranging from -0.67 (95% CI -1.04 to -0.30; 1 study, 119 participants) for twice-daily becocalcidiol to SMD -1.66 (95% CI -2.66 to -0.67; 1 study, 11 participants) for once-daily paricalcitol. On a 6-point global improvement scale, these effects translate into 0.8 and 1.9 points, respectively. Most corticosteroids also performed better than placebo; potent corticosteroids (SMD -0.89; 95% CI -1.06 to -0.72; I² statistic = 65.1%; 14 studies, 2011 participants) had smaller benefits than very potent corticosteroids (SMD -1.56; 95% CI -1.87 to -1.26); I² statistic = 81.7%; 10 studies, 1264 participants). On a 6-point improvement scale, these benefits equate to 1.0 and 1.8 points, respectively. Dithranol, combined treatment with vitamin D/corticosteroid, and tazarotene all performed significantly better than placebo.Head-to-head comparisons of vitamin D for psoriasis of the body against potent or very potent corticosteroids had mixed findings. For both body and scalp psoriasis, combined treatment with vitamin D and corticosteroid performed significantly better than vitamin D alone or corticosteroid alone. Vitamin D generally performed better than coal tar, but findings relative to dithranol were mixed. When applied to psoriasis of the scalp, vitamin D was significantly less effective than both potent corticosteroids and very potent corticosteroids. Indirect evidence from placebo-controlled trials supported these findings.For both body and scalp psoriasis, potent corticosteroids were less likely than vitamin D to cause local adverse events, such as burning or irritation. Combined treatment with vitamin D/corticosteroid on either the body or the scalp was tolerated as well as potent corticosteroids, and significantly better than vitamin D alone. Only 25 trials assessed clinical cutaneous dermal atrophy; few cases were detected, but trials reported insufficient information to determine whether assessment methods were robust. Clinical measurements of dermal atrophy are insensitive and detect only the most severe cases. No comparison of topical agents found a significant difference in systemic adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids perform at least as well as vitamin D analogues, and they are associated with a lower incidence of local adverse events. However, for people with chronic plaque psoriasis receiving long-term treatment with corticosteroids, there remains a lack of evidence about the risk of skin dermal atrophy. Further research is required to inform long-term maintenance treatment and provide appropriate safety data.

Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1 to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed lack of satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. These resulting Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaquetype psoriasis in adults. The Guidelines include evidence-based evaluation of the efficacy of all currently available therapeutic options in Germany. In addition, they offer detailed information on how best to administer the various treatments and give information on contraindications, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions as well as estimates of practicability and cost. The Guidelines were developed following the recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft wissenschaftlicher medizinischer Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). The therapeutic recommendations were developed by an expert group and finalized during interdisciplinary consensus conferences.

Patients' vehicle preference for corticosteroid treatments of scalp psoriasis

Topical therapy is one of the foundations of dermatology. The vehicles used to deliver topical therapy have considerable impact on efficacy. The vehicle can have direct effects on disease; it can impact the delivery of the active drug, and its characteristics affect patient compliance. While the physical chemistry of vehicles has been studied in great detail, there has been very little study of patients' preferences for different vehicles and even less on the effect of these preferences on patient compliance. Such study is essential, as noncompliance with topical therapy is very common, and likely impacts the response to topical therapy observed in clinical practice. This manuscript discusses information on patients' preferences for different vehicles, focussing on the treatment of scalp psoriasis. Significant vehicle characteristics such as ease or difficulty of use, messiness, odors, and staining are recognized to affect patients' preferences. An instrument based on these characteristics has been used to compare patients' preferences for different vehicles. Patients with psoriasis generally prefer less messy vehicles, such as foam and solution preparations, to traditional cream and ointment vehicles. These preferences have the potential to impact patient compliance. Studies directly measuring patient compliance have not yet been performed. In conclusion, the choice of vehicles impacts both the potency of the medication and patients' acceptance of the treatment. Actual effects of different vehicles on compliance are important but have not yet been adequately studied.