Managing Patients With Psoriasis in the Busy Clinic: Practical Tips for Health Care Practitioners

Methotrexate Dosing Regimen for Plaque-type Psoriasis: An Update of a Systematic Review

Background Methotrexate (MTX) is a systemic treatment for plaque-type psoriasis. At the time of approval, no dose-ranging studies were performed. Nowadays, a uniform dosing regimen is lacking. This might contribute to suboptimal treatment with the drug.Objective To summarize the literature involving the MTX dosing regimens in psoriasis patients.Methods In this SR, RCTs and documents with aggregated evidence (AgEv) on the MTX dosing regimen in psoriasis were summarized. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which oral, subcutaneous or intramuscular MTX was used in patients with psoriasis and AgEv, were included. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched up to June 20, 2022. This SR was registered in PROSPERO.Results Thirty-nine RCTs had a high risk of bias. Test dosages were given in only 3 RCTs. In the RCTs, MTX was usually prescribed in a start dose of 7.5 mg/week (n = 13). MTX was mostly given in a start dose of 15 mg/week, in the AgEv (n = 5). One guideline recommended a test dose, in other aggregated evidence a test dose was not mentioned or even discouraged.Conclusions There is a lack of high-quality evidence and available data for dosing MTX in psoriasis is heterogeneous.

International eDelphi Study to Reach Consensus on the Methotrexate Dosing Regimen in Patients With Psoriasis

Importance

A clear dosing regimen for methotrexate in psoriasis is lacking, and this might lead to a suboptimal treatment. Because methotrexate is affordable and globally available, a uniform dosing regimen could potentially optimize the treatment of patients with psoriasis worldwide.

Objective

To reach international consensus among psoriasis experts on a uniform dosing regimen for treatment with methotrexate in adult and pediatric patients with psoriasis and identify potential future research topics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Between September 2020 and March 2021, a survey study with a modified eDelphi procedure that was developed and distributed by the Amsterdam University Medical Center and completed by 180 participants worldwide (55 [30.6%] resided in non-Western countries) was conducted in 3 rounds. The proposals on which no consensus was reached were discussed in a conference meeting (June 2021). Participants voted on 21 proposals with a 9-point scale (1-3 disagree, 4-6 neither agree nor disagree, 7-9 agree) and were recruited through the Skin Inflammation and Psoriasis International Network and European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in June 2020. Apart from being a dermatologist/dermatology resident, there were no specific criteria for participation in the survey. The participants worked mainly at a university hospital (97 [53.9%]) and were experienced in treating patients with psoriasis with methotrexate (163 [91.6%] had more than 10 years of experience).

Main Outcomes and Measures

In a survey with eDelphi procedure, we tried to reach consensus on 21 proposals. Consensus was defined as less than 15% voting disagree (1-3). For the consensus meeting, consensus was defined as less than 30% voting disagree.

Results

Of 251 participants, 180 (71.7%) completed all 3 survey rounds, and 58 participants (23.1%) joined the conference meeting. Consensus was achieved on 11 proposals in round 1, 3 proposals in round 2, and 2 proposals in round 3. In the consensus meeting, consensus was achieved on 4 proposals. More research is needed, especially for the proposals on folic acid and the dosing of methotrexate for treating subpopulations such as children and vulnerable patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this eDelphi consensus study, consensus was reached on 20 of 21 proposals involving methotrexate dosing in patients with psoriasis. This consensus may potentially be used to harmonize the treatment with methotrexate in patients with psoriasis.

Systemic Management of Psoriasis Patients in Indian Scenario: An Expert Consensus

Background:

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease with significant comorbidities, and regardless of its extent, it affects the patients' quality of life. The various modalities of treating psoriasis comprise topical or systemic medications, phototherapy, and an array of biologic agents. There is a lack of Indian recommendations on the management of psoriasis with these different modalities and challenges faced by the clinicians in day-to-day practice.

Aim:

To develop India-specific consensus for systemic management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Method and Results:

A panel of dermatology experts, based on the evidence and international recommendations, coupled with their own clinical experience, developed recommendations for systemic management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Conclusion:

These recommendations are meant to provide guidance in terms of choice of systemic therapies, dosing, effectiveness, and safety. It also addresses clinical challenges that may be experienced during psoriasis management.

An updated guide in the management of psoriasis for every practitioner

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is one of the most common chronic cutaneous skin disorders, having genetic and immunological components. It is currently unknown what exactly triggers it, or how far reaching are the etiological factors, although great strides have been made in uncovering the pathophysiological cascade. Presently, there is a wide diversity of treatment methods for psoriasis, yet not all are applicable for each patient. Selection of both drug and dosage depends on both the knowledge and experience of the treating dermatologist and also on the specific characteristics of each patient. Therefore, the treating physicians should be made aware of the management possibilities, their advantages and their side effects.

METHODS

We have performed a non-systematic literature review on the current treatment methods for psoriasis. We have included the studies, articles, and prescription information that provided the most relevant information regarding each therapeutic agent. Afterward, we divided the treatment methods according to delivery and illustrated the management protocols for adult, paediatric, and pregnant patients.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Current therapies are divided into topical drugs, phototherapy, systemic and biological agents. Topical therapies and phototherapy are generally the first and second line of management respectively, being typically effective in treating mild to moderate forms of psoriasis. On the other hand, the chronic moderate to severe forms usually benefit from systemic drugs, whereas biologic agents are reserved for severe or unremitting cases, especially those suffering from psoriatic arthritis. Also of importance is the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms in psoriasis and how the selected drugs interfere in the pathological cascade. Furthermore, physicians should be able to recommend the appropriate therapy not only for adults but also for paediatric and pregnant patients as well. In the following manuscript, we present an updated version of these management options, alongside their indications, posology and most common side effects, a guide that may be useful for every practitioner in this field.

Recommendations for Initiating Systemic Therapy in Patients with Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disease that is often associated with serious comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes. Many patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receive either no treatment or receive topical therapy only and report dissatisfaction with treatment, poorly managed symptoms, and continued impact of the disease on quality of life. Patients currently receiving topical monotherapy can benefit from systemic therapies, which are more effective in reducing clinical symptoms, achieving treatment efficacy targets, and improving quality of life. An array of systemic treatment options with varying mechanisms of action are available, including conventional and newer oral systemic agents and biologics. Each option presents a unique set of benefits, safety risks, dosing schedules, and monitoring requirements. The aim of the current review is to better optimize treatment outcomes in patients with psoriasis by presenting a rationale for when to consider systemic therapy in this patient population. The authors discuss the barriers to use of systemic agents and highlight the central importance of each patient's perspective when assessing disease severity. Additionally, practical strategies for selecting and safely initiating systemic therapy to optimize the treatment of patients with psoriasis are identified.

Variances in the mRNA expression profile of TGF-β1-3 isoforms and its TGF-βRI-III receptors during cyclosporin a treatment of psoriatic patients

Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic, immunologic, multi-factor inflammatory skin disease, strongly associated with a higher level of a number of cytokines, such as isoforms of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β1–3) and its receptors (TGF-βRI–III). One of the most popular and important drugs used to treat this disease is cyclosporin A (CsA).

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of genes encoding the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β isoforms and receptors of the cytokine TGF-βRs in psoriatic patients during an 84-day long observation of the effects of cyclosporin A therapy. It made an attempt to determine the usefulness of testing mRNA expression of TGF-β1–3 and its receptors TGF-βRI–III as the supplementary molecular markers of lost sensitivity to the medicine.

Material and methods

The study group consisted of 32 patients with psoriasis (20 men and 12 women) treated with cyclosporin A. The changes in expression patterns of TGF-β1-3 and TGF-βRI-III were performed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RTqPCR).

Results

The expression of TGF-β1-3 and TGF-βRI-III were detected in the whole period of therapy with CsA. Changes in transcriptional activities of TGF-β1–3 and TGF-βRI–III during pharmacotherapy were observed. Differences in the expression of these genes were found before and after 42 and 84 days of using CsA.

Conclusions

The changes in expression profiles of TGF-β1-3 and TGF-βRI-III during CsA therapy can be a useful molecular marker of lost sensitivity to the medicine.