1
|
Bardel B, Ayache SS, Lefaucheur JP. The contribution of EEG to assess and treat motor disorders in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 162:174-200. [PMID: 38643612 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electroencephalography (EEG) can highlight significant changes in spontaneous electrical activity of the brain produced by altered brain network connectivity linked to inflammatory demyelinating lesions and neuronal loss occurring in multiple sclerosis (MS). In this review, we describe the main EEG findings reported in the literature to characterize motor network alteration in term of local activity or functional connectivity changes in patients with MS (pwMS). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted to include articles with quantitative analyses of resting-state EEG recordings (spectrograms or advanced methods for assessing spatial and temporal dynamics, such as coherence, theory of graphs, recurrent quantification, microstates) or dynamic EEG recordings during a motor task, with or without connectivity analyses. RESULTS In this systematic review, we identified 26 original articles using EEG in the evaluation of MS-related motor disorders. Various resting or dynamic EEG parameters could serve as diagnostic biomarkers of motor control impairment to differentiate pwMS from healthy subjects or be related to a specific clinical condition (fatigue) or neuroradiological aspects (lesion load). CONCLUSIONS We highlight some key EEG patterns in pwMS at rest and during movement, both suggesting an alteration or disruption of brain connectivity, more specifically involving sensorimotor networks. SIGNIFICANCE Some of these EEG biomarkers of motor disturbance could be used to design future therapeutic strategies in MS based on neuromodulation approaches, or to predict the effects of motor training and rehabilitation in pwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Bardel
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Excitabilité Nerveuse et Thérapeutique (ENT), EA 4391, F-94010 Creteil, France; AP-HP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, DMU FIxIT, F-94010 Creteil, France
| | - Samar S Ayache
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Excitabilité Nerveuse et Thérapeutique (ENT), EA 4391, F-94010 Creteil, France; AP-HP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, DMU FIxIT, F-94010 Creteil, France; Gilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 4504 Byblos, Lebanon; Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS), Centre Médico-Chirurgical Bizet, F-75116 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Excitabilité Nerveuse et Thérapeutique (ENT), EA 4391, F-94010 Creteil, France; AP-HP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, DMU FIxIT, F-94010 Creteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reeve K, On BI, Havla J, Burns J, Gosteli-Peter MA, Alabsawi A, Alayash Z, Götschi A, Seibold H, Mansmann U, Held U. Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 9:CD013606. [PMID: 37681561 PMCID: PMC10486189 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013606.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that affects millions of people worldwide. The disease course varies greatly across individuals and many disease-modifying treatments with different safety and efficacy profiles have been developed recently. Prognostic models evaluated and shown to be valid in different settings have the potential to support people with MS and their physicians during the decision-making process for treatment or disease/life management, allow stratified and more precise interpretation of interventional trials, and provide insights into disease mechanisms. Many researchers have turned to prognostic models to help predict clinical outcomes in people with MS; however, to our knowledge, no widely accepted prognostic model for MS is being used in clinical practice yet. OBJECTIVES To identify and summarise multivariable prognostic models, and their validation studies for quantifying the risk of clinical disease progression, worsening, and activity in adults with MS. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from January 1996 until July 2021. We also screened the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews, and references citing the included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all statistically developed multivariable prognostic models aiming to predict clinical disease progression, worsening, and activity, as measured by disability, relapse, conversion to definite MS, conversion to progressive MS, or a composite of these in adult individuals with MS. We also included any studies evaluating the performance of (i.e. validating) these models. There were no restrictions based on language, data source, timing of prognostication, or timing of outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, extracted data using a piloted form based on the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS), assessed risk of bias using the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST), and assessed reporting deficiencies based on the checklist items in Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD). The characteristics of the included models and their validations are described narratively. We planned to meta-analyse the discrimination and calibration of models with at least three external validations outside the model development study but no model met this criterion. We summarised between-study heterogeneity narratively but again could not perform the planned meta-regression. MAIN RESULTS We included 57 studies, from which we identified 75 model developments, 15 external validations corresponding to only 12 (16%) of the models, and six author-reported validations. Only two models were externally validated multiple times. None of the identified external validations were performed by researchers independent of those that developed the model. The outcome was related to disease progression in 39 (41%), relapses in 8 (8%), conversion to definite MS in 17 (18%), and conversion to progressive MS in 27 (28%) of the 96 models or validations. The disease and treatment-related characteristics of included participants, and definitions of considered predictors and outcome, were highly heterogeneous amongst the studies. Based on the publication year, we observed an increase in the percent of participants on treatment, diversification of the diagnostic criteria used, an increase in consideration of biomarkers or treatment as predictors, and increased use of machine learning methods over time. Usability and reproducibility All identified models contained at least one predictor requiring the skills of a medical specialist for measurement or assessment. Most of the models (44; 59%) contained predictors that require specialist equipment likely to be absent from primary care or standard hospital settings. Over half (52%) of the developed models were not accompanied by model coefficients, tools, or instructions, which hinders their application, independent validation or reproduction. The data used in model developments were made publicly available or reported to be available on request only in a few studies (two and six, respectively). Risk of bias We rated all but one of the model developments or validations as having high overall risk of bias. The main reason for this was the statistical methods used for the development or evaluation of prognostic models; we rated all but two of the included model developments or validations as having high risk of bias in the analysis domain. None of the model developments that were externally validated or these models' external validations had low risk of bias. There were concerns related to applicability of the models to our research question in over one-third (38%) of the models or their validations. Reporting deficiencies Reporting was poor overall and there was no observable increase in the quality of reporting over time. The items that were unclearly reported or not reported at all for most of the included models or validations were related to sample size justification, blinding of outcome assessors, details of the full model or how to obtain predictions from it, amount of missing data, and treatments received by the participants. Reporting of preferred model performance measures of discrimination and calibration was suboptimal. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The current evidence is not sufficient for recommending the use of any of the published prognostic prediction models for people with MS in clinical routine today due to lack of independent external validations. The MS prognostic research community should adhere to the current reporting and methodological guidelines and conduct many more state-of-the-art external validation studies for the existing or newly developed models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Reeve
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Begum Irmak On
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Joachim Havla
- lnstitute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jacob Burns
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Albraa Alabsawi
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Zoheir Alayash
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Health Services Research in Dentistry, University of Münster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Andrea Götschi
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Held
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vucic S, Stanley Chen KH, Kiernan MC, Hallett M, Benninger DH, Di Lazzaro V, Rossini PM, Benussi A, Berardelli A, Currà A, Krieg SM, Lefaucheur JP, Long Lo Y, Macdonell RA, Massimini M, Rosanova M, Picht T, Stinear CM, Paulus W, Ugawa Y, Ziemann U, Chen R. Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 150:131-175. [PMID: 37068329 PMCID: PMC10192339 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
The review provides a comprehensive update (previous report: Chen R, Cros D, Curra A, Di Lazzaro V, Lefaucheur JP, Magistris MR, et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119(3):504-32) on clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in neurological diseases. Most TMS measures rely on stimulation of motor cortex and recording of motor evoked potentials. Paired-pulse TMS techniques, incorporating conventional amplitude-based and threshold tracking, have established clinical utility in neurodegenerative, movement, episodic (epilepsy, migraines), chronic pain and functional diseases. Cortical hyperexcitability has emerged as a diagnostic aid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Single-pulse TMS measures are of utility in stroke, and myelopathy even in the absence of radiological changes. Short-latency afferent inhibition, related to central cholinergic transmission, is reduced in Alzheimer's disease. The triple stimulation technique (TST) may enhance diagnostic utility of conventional TMS measures to detect upper motor neuron involvement. The recording of motor evoked potentials can be used to perform functional mapping of the motor cortex or in preoperative assessment of eloquent brain regions before surgical resection of brain tumors. TMS exhibits utility in assessing lumbosacral/cervical nerve root function, especially in demyelinating neuropathies, and may be of utility in localizing the site of facial nerve palsies. TMS measures also have high sensitivity in detecting subclinical corticospinal lesions in multiple sclerosis. Abnormalities in central motor conduction time or TST correlate with motor impairment and disability in MS. Cerebellar stimulation may detect lesions in the cerebellum or cerebello-dentato-thalamo-motor cortical pathways. Combining TMS with electroencephalography, provides a novel method to measure parameters altered in neurological disorders, including cortical excitability, effective connectivity, and response complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Vucic
- Brain, Nerve Research Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Matthew C Kiernan
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney; and Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - David H Benninger
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Switzerland
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo M Rossini
- Department of Neurosci & Neurorehab IRCCS San Raffaele-Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Benussi
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Currà
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Alfredo Fiorini Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, LT, Italy
| | - Sandro M Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, EA4391, ENT, Créteil, France; Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Yew Long Lo
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Marcello Massimini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Rosanova
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Picht
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Cluster of Excellence: "Matters of Activity. Image Space Material," Humboldt University, Berlin Simulation and Training Center (BeST), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Cathy M Stinear
- Department of Medicine Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Japan
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Robert Chen
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital-UHN, Division of Neurology-University of Toronto, Toronto Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oertel FC, Krämer J, Motamedi S, Keihani A, Zimmermann HG, Dimitriou NG, Condor-Montes S, Bereuter C, Cordano C, Abdelhak A, Trip A, Aktas O, Meuth SG, Wiendl H, Ruprecht K, Bellmann-Strobl J, Paul F, Petzold A, Brandt AU, Albrecht P, Green AJ. Visually Evoked Potential as Prognostic Biomarker for Neuroaxonal Damage in Multiple Sclerosis From a Multicenter Longitudinal Cohort. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2023; 10:e200092. [PMID: 36878713 PMCID: PMC10026703 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000200092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES With the increasing use of visually evoked potentials (VEPs) as quantitative outcome parameters for myelin in clinical trials, an in-depth understanding of longitudinal VEP latency changes and their prognostic potential for subsequent neuronal loss will be required. In this longitudinal multicenter study, we evaluated the association and prognostic potential of VEP latency for retinal neurodegeneration, measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS We included 293 eyes of 147 patients with RRMS (age [years, median ± SD] 36 ± 10, male sex 35%, F/U [years, median {IQR} 2.1 {1.5-3.9}]): 41 eyes had a history of optic neuritis (ON) ≥6 months before baseline (CHRONIC-ON), and 252 eyes had no history of ON (CHRONIC-NON). P100 latency (VEP), macular combined ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer volume (GCIPL), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFL) (OCT) were quantified. RESULTS P100 latency change over the first year predicted subsequent GCIPL loss (36 months) across the entire chronic cohort (p = 0.001) and in (and driven by) the CHRONIC-NON subset (p = 0.019) but not in the CHRONIC-ON subset (p = 0.680). P100 latency and pRNFL were correlated at baseline (CHRONIC-NON p = 0.004, CHRONIC-ON p < 0.001), but change in P100 latency and pRNFL were not correlated. P100 latency did not differ longitudinally between protocols or centers. DISCUSSION VEP in non-ON eyes seems to be a promising marker of demyelination in RRMS and of potential prognostic value for subsequent retinal ganglion cell loss. This study also provides evidence that VEP may be a useful and reliable biomarker for multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike Cosima Oertel
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Julia Krämer
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Seyedamirhosein Motamedi
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Azeen Keihani
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Hanna G Zimmermann
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Nikolaos G Dimitriou
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Shivany Condor-Montes
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Charlotte Bereuter
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Christian Cordano
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Ahmed Abdelhak
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Anand Trip
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Orhan Aktas
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Sven G Meuth
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Klemens Ruprecht
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Friedemann Paul
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Axel Petzold
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Alexander U Brandt
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Philipp Albrecht
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
| | - Ari J Green
- From the Weill Institute for Neurosciences (F.C.C.O., A.K., S.C.-M., C.C., A.A., A.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF); Experimental and Clinical Research Center (F.C.C.O., S.M., H.G.Z., C.B., J.B.-S., F.P., A.U.B.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (J.K., H.W.), University Hospital Münster, Germany; University of California Berkeley (A.K.); Department of Neurology (N.G.D., O.A., S.G.M., P.A.), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology (P.A.), Maria Hilf Clinic Moenchengladbach, Germany; Queen Square MS Centre (A.T., A.P.), University College London, UK; Department of Neurology (K.R., F.P.),-Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Moorfield's Eye Hospital & The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (A.P.); Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Dutch Neuro-ophthalmology Expertise Centre, Amsterdam, NL; Department of Neurology (A.U.B.), University of California Irvine (UCI); and Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California San Francisco (UCSF).
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mohy AB, Hatem AK, Kadoori HG, Hamdan FB. Motor disability in patients with multiple sclerosis: transcranial magnetic stimulation study. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s41983-020-00255-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive procedure used in a small targeted region of the brain via electromagnetic induction and used diagnostically to measure the connection between the central nervous system (CNS) and skeletal muscle to evaluate the damage that occurs in MS.
Objectives
The study aims to investigate whether single-pulse TMS measures differ between patients with MS and healthy controls and to consider if these measures are associated with clinical disability.
Patients and methods
Single-pulse TMS was performed in 26 patients with MS who hand an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 0 and 9.5 and in 26 normal subjects. Different TMS parameters from upper and lower limbs were investigated.
Results
TMS disclosed no difference in all MEP parameters between the right and left side of the upper and lower limbs in patients with MS and controls. In all patients, TMS parameters were different from the control group. Upper limb central motor conduction time (CMCT) was prolonged in MS patients with pyramidal signs. Upper and lower limb CMCT and CMCT-f wave (CMCT-f) were prolonged in patients with ataxia. Moreover, CMCT and CMCT-f were prolonged in MS patients with EDSS of 5–9.5 as compared to those with a score of 0–4.5. EDSS correlated with upper and lower limb cortical latency (CL), CMCT, and CMCT-f whereas motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude not.
Conclusion
TMS yields objective data to evaluate clinical disability and its parameters correlated well with EDSS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mamoei S, Hvid LG, Boye Jensen H, Zijdewind I, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Neurophysiological impairments in multiple sclerosis-Central and peripheral motor pathways. Acta Neurol Scand 2020; 142:401-417. [PMID: 32474916 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
A systematic review of the literature was conducted comparing neurophysiological outcomes in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) to healthy controls (HC), in studies of the central nervous system (CNS) function comprising motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and in studies of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) function comprising electroneuronography (ENG) outcomes elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation. Studies comparing neuromuscular function, assessed during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of muscle, were included if they reported muscle strength along with muscle activation by use of electromyography (EMG) and/or interpolated twitch technique (ITT). Studies investigating CNS function showed prolonged central motor conduction times, asymmetry of nerve conduction motor pathways, and prolonged latencies in PwMS when compared to HC. Resting motor threshold, amplitude, and cortical silent periods showed conflicting results. CNS findings generally correlated with disabilities. Studies of PNS function showed near significant prolongation in motor latency of the median nerve, reduced nerve conduction velocities in the tibial and peroneal nerves, and decreased compound muscle action potential amplitudes of the tibial nerve in PwMS. ENG findings did not correlate with clinical severity of disabilities. Studies of neuromuscular function showed lower voluntary muscle activation and increased central fatigue in PwMS, whereas EMG showed divergent muscle activation (ie, EMG amplitude) during MVC. When comparing the existing literature on neurophysiological motor examinations in PwMS and HC, consistent and substantial impairments of CNS function were seen in PwMS, whereas impairments of the PNS were less pronounced and inconsistent. In addition, impairments in muscle activation were observed in PwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Mamoei
- Department of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark
- Denmark/MS‐Clinic of Southern Jutland (Sønderborg, Kolding, Esbjerg) Department of Neurology University Hospital of Southern Jutland Sønderborg Denmark
| | - Lars G. Hvid
- Exercise Biology Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark
| | - Henrik Boye Jensen
- Department of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark
- Department of Neurology Kolding Sygehus Kolding Denmark
| | - Inge Zijdewind
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems UMCG University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Egon Stenager
- Department of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark
- Denmark/MS‐Clinic of Southern Jutland (Sønderborg, Kolding, Esbjerg) Department of Neurology University Hospital of Southern Jutland Sønderborg Denmark
| | - Ulrik Dalgas
- Exercise Biology Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thompson AK, Sinkjær T. Can Operant Conditioning of EMG-Evoked Responses Help to Target Corticospinal Plasticity for Improving Motor Function in People With Multiple Sclerosis? Front Neurol 2020; 11:552. [PMID: 32765389 PMCID: PMC7381136 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Corticospinal pathway and its function are essential in motor control and motor rehabilitation. Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes damage to the brain and descending connections, and often diminishes corticospinal function. In people with MS, neural plasticity is available, although it does not necessarily remain stable over the course of disease progress. Thus, inducing plasticity to the corticospinal pathway so as to improve its function may lead to motor control improvements, which impact one's mobility, health, and wellness. In order to harness plasticity in people with MS, over the past two decades, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been examined for addressing common symptoms, such as cognitive deficits, fatigue, and spasticity. While these methods appear promising, when it comes to motor rehabilitation, just inducing plasticity or having a capacity for it does not guarantee generation of better motor functions. Targeting plasticity to a key pathway, such as the corticospinal pathway, could change what limits one's motor control and improve function. One of such neural training methods is operant conditioning of the motor-evoked potential that aims to train the behavior of the corticospinal-motoneuron pathway. Through up-conditioning training, the person learns to produce the rewarded neuronal behavior/state of increased corticospinal excitability, and through iterative training, the rewarded behavior/state becomes one's habitual, daily motor behavior. This minireview introduces operant conditioning approach for people with MS. Guiding beneficial CNS plasticity on top of continuous disease progress may help to prolong the duration of maintained motor function and quality of life in people living with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiko K Thompson
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Thomas Sinkjær
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Lundbeck Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Systematic review of prediction models in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233575. [PMID: 32453803 PMCID: PMC7250448 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The natural history of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is variable and prediction of individual prognosis challenging. The inability to reliably predict prognosis at diagnosis has important implications for informed decision making especially in relation to disease modifying therapies. We conducted a systematic review in order to collate, describe and assess the methodological quality of published prediction models in RRMS. We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full text for eligibility and assessed risk of bias. Studies reporting development or validation of prediction models for RRMS in adults were included. Data collection was guided by the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews (CHARMS) and applicability and methodological quality assessment by the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). 30 studies were included in the review. Applicability was assessed as high risk of concern in 27 studies. Risk of bias was assessed as high for all studies. The single most frequently included predictor was baseline EDSS (n = 11). T2 Lesion volume or number and brain atrophy were each retained in seven studies. Five studies included external validation and none included impact analysis. Although a number of prediction models for RRMS have been reported, most are at high risk of bias and lack external validation and impact analysis, restricting their application to routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Machine learning analysis of motor evoked potential time series to predict disability progression in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2020; 20:105. [PMID: 32199461 PMCID: PMC7085864 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01672-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evoked potentials (EPs) are a measure of the conductivity of the central nervous system. They are used to monitor disease progression of multiple sclerosis patients. Previous studies only extracted a few variables from the EPs, which are often further condensed into a single variable: the EP score. We perform a machine learning analysis of motor EP that uses the whole time series, instead of a few variables, to predict disability progression after two years. Obtaining realistic performance estimates of this task has been difficult because of small data set sizes. We recently extracted a dataset of EPs from the Rehabiliation & MS Center in Overpelt, Belgium. Our data set is large enough to obtain, for the first time, a performance estimate on an independent test set containing different patients. Methods We extracted a large number of time series features from the motor EPs with the highly comparative time series analysis software package. Mutual information with the target and the Boruta method are used to find features which contain information not included in the features studied in the literature. We use random forests (RF) and logistic regression (LR) classifiers to predict disability progression after two years. Statistical significance of the performance increase when adding extra features is checked. Results Including extra time series features in motor EPs leads to a statistically significant improvement compared to using only the known features, although the effect is limited in magnitude (ΔAUC = 0.02 for RF and ΔAUC = 0.05 for LR). RF with extra time series features obtains the best performance (AUC = 0.75±0.07 (mean and standard deviation)), which is good considering the limited number of biomarkers in the model. RF (a nonlinear classifier) outperforms LR (a linear classifier). Conclusions Using machine learning methods on EPs shows promising predictive performance. Using additional EP time series features beyond those already in use leads to a modest increase in performance. Larger datasets, preferably multi-center, are needed for further research. Given a large enough dataset, these models may be used to support clinicians in their decision making process regarding future treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Grgić S, Dominović-Kovačević A, Đajić V, Vukojević Z, Tadić D, Račić D, Vujković Z. Prognostic significance of intrathecal oligoclonal immunoglobulin G in multiple sclerosis. SCRIPTA MEDICA 2020. [DOI: 10.5937/scriptamed51-27558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction/Aim: Detection of intrathecal oligoclonal bands of immunoglobulin G (OB IgG), in addition to diagnostic, has a predictive significance in multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic significance of OB IgG and to correlate the presence of OB IgG with the progression of disability in MS patients. Methods: A retrospective-prospective cohort study included 177 MS patients examined at the Centre for MS, Clinic of Neurology, University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska. In all patients, demographic data, clinical parameters, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, isoelectric focusing (IEF) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cyto-biochemical analysis of CSF, evoked potentials (EP) and magnetic resonance (MR) of the head were analysed. MS patients were divided in two groups: with and without intrathecal synthesis of oligoclonal IgG. According to the EDSS determined in both groups, the relation between the degree of functional disability and the presence of OB in the CSF and also with characteristics of the cyto-biochemical profile were analysed. Methods of descriptive and analytical statistics, analysis of variance, chi-square test, Bonferroni's post hoc test, correlation and regression analysis were used in the analysis of the results. Results: In the examined cohort of MS patients, the sensitivity of IEF was 96.6 %. There was a statistically significant association between the detectability of intrathecally synthesised IgG and EDSS score (p = 0.004) so that individuals who do not have intrathecally synthesised IgG had lower EDSS scores. MS patients with a CSF protein concentration > 0.40 g/L were 2.45 times more likely to enter secondary progression and 2.51 times more likely to achieve EDSS 4.0. Conclusion: IEF is a very sensitive diagnostic and prognostic method for MS patients, which indicates a more benign course of MS in patients without oligoclonal bands in the CSF.
Collapse
|
11
|
Operant Up-Conditioning of the Tibialis Anterior Motor-Evoked Potential in Multiple Sclerosis: Feasibility Case Studies. Neural Plast 2018; 2018:4725393. [PMID: 30123249 PMCID: PMC6079394 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4725393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Damage to the corticospinal pathway often results in weak dorsiflexion of the ankle, thereby limiting the mobility of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Thus, strengthening corticospinal connectivity may improve locomotion. Here, we investigated the feasibility of tibialis anterior (TA) motor-evoked potential (MEP) operant conditioning and whether it can enhance corticospinal excitability and alleviate locomotor problems in people with chronic stable MS. The protocol consisted of 6 baseline and 24 up-conditioning sessions over 10 weeks. In all sessions, TA MEPs were elicited at 10% above active threshold while the sitting subject provided 30–35% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) level of TA background EMG. During baseline sessions, MEPs were simply measured. During conditioning trials of the conditioning sessions, the subject was encouraged to increase MEP and was given immediate feedback indicating whether MEP size was above a criterion. In 3/4 subjects, TA MEP increased 32–75%, MVC increased 28–52%, locomotor EMG modulation improved in multiple leg muscles, and foot drop became less severe. In one of them, MEP and MVC increases were maintained throughout 3 years of extensive follow-up sessions. These initial results support a therapeutic possibility of MEP operant conditioning for improving locomotion in people with MS or other CNS disorders, such as spinal cord injury and stroke.
Collapse
|
12
|
Peeters LM, Vanheusden M, Somers V, Van Wijmeersch B, Stinissen P, Broux B, Hellings N. Cytotoxic CD4+ T Cells Drive Multiple Sclerosis Progression. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1160. [PMID: 28979263 PMCID: PMC5611397 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the leading cause of chronic neurological disability in young adults. The clinical disease course of MS varies greatly between individuals, with some patients progressing much more rapidly than others, making prognosis almost impossible. We previously discovered that cytotoxic CD4+ T cells (CD4+ CTL), identified by the loss of CD28, are able to migrate to sites of inflammation and that they contribute to tissue damage. Furthermore, in an animal model for MS, we showed that these cells are correlated with inflammation, demyelination, and disability. Therefore, we hypothesize that CD4+ CTL drive progression of MS and have prognostic value. To support this hypothesis, we investigated whether CD4+ CTL are correlated with worse clinical outcome and evaluated the prognostic value of these cells in MS. To this end, the percentage of CD4+CD28null T cells was measured in the blood of 176 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (=baseline). Multimodal evoked potentials (EP) combining information on motoric, visual, and somatosensoric EP, as well as Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were used as outcome measurements at baseline and after 3 and 5 years. The baseline CD4+CD28null T cell percentage is associated with EP (P = 0.003, R2 = 0.28), indicating a link between these cells and disease severity. In addition, the baseline CD4+CD28null T cell percentage has a prognostic value since it is associated with EP after 3 years (P = 0.005, R2 = 0.29) and with EP and EDSS after 5 years (P = 0.008, R2 = 0.42 and P = 0.003, R2 = 0.27). To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first direct link between the presence of CD4+ CTL and MS disease severity, as well as its prognostic value. Therefore, we further elaborate on two important research perspectives: 1° investigating strategies to block or reverse pathways in the formation of these cells resulting in new treatments that slow down MS disease progression, 2° including immunophenotyping in prediction modeling studies to aim for personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbet M. Peeters
- School of Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Transnationale Universiteit Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Marjan Vanheusden
- School of Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Transnationale Universiteit Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Veerle Somers
- School of Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Transnationale Universiteit Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Bart Van Wijmeersch
- School of Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Transnationale Universiteit Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Piet Stinissen
- School of Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Transnationale Universiteit Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Bieke Broux
- School of Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Transnationale Universiteit Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Niels Hellings
- School of Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Transnationale Universiteit Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lascano AM, Lalive PH, Hardmeier M, Fuhr P, Seeck M. Clinical evoked potentials in neurology: a review of techniques and indications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017; 88:688-696. [PMID: 28235778 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Revised: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Evoked potentials (EPs) are a powerful and cost-effective tool for evaluating the integrity and function of the central nervous system. Although imaging techniques, such as MRI, have recently become increasingly important in the diagnosis of neurological diseases, over the past 30 years, many neurologists have continued to employ EPs in specific clinical applications. This review presents an overview of the recent evolution of 'classical' clinical applications of EPs in terms of early diagnosis and disease monitoring and is an extension of a previous review published in this journal in 2005 by Walsh and collaborators. We also provide an update on emerging EPs based on gustatory, olfactory and pain stimulation that may be used as clinically relevant markers of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and cortical or peripheral impaired pain perception. EPs based on multichannel electroencephalography recordings, known as high-density EPs, help to better differentiate between healthy subjects and patients and, moreover, they provide valuable spatial information regarding the site of the lesion. EPs are reliable disease-progression biomarkers of several neurological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating disorders. Overall, EPs are excellent neurophysiological tools that will expand standard clinical practice in modern neurology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustina M Lascano
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patrice H Lalive
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hardmeier
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter Fuhr
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Margitta Seeck
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Early disturbances in multimodal evoked potentials as a prognostic factor for long-term disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128:561-569. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Revised: 12/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
15
|
Giffroy X, Maes N, Albert A, Maquet P, Crielaard JM, Dive D. Multimodal evoked potentials for functional quantification and prognosis in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2016; 16:83. [PMID: 27245221 PMCID: PMC4888661 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0608-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional biomarkers able to identify multiple sclerosis (MS) patients at high risk of fast disability progression are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of multimodal (upper and lower limbs motor, visual, lower limbs somatosensory) evoked potentials (EP) to monitor disease course and identify patients exposed to unfavourable evolution. METHODS One hundred MS patients were assessed with visual, somatosensory and motor EP and rated on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at baseline (T0) and about 6 years later (T1). The Spearman correlation (rS) was used to evaluate the relationship between conventional EP scores and clinical findings. Multiple (logistic) regression analysis estimated the predictive value of baseline electrophysiological data for three clinical outcomes: EDSS, annual EDSS progression, and the risk of EDSS worsening. RESULTS In contrast to longitudinal correlations, cross-sectional correlations between the different EP scores and EDSS were all significant (0.33 ≤ rS < 0.67, p < 0.001). Baseline global EP score and EDSS were highly significant predictors (p < 0.0001) of EDSS progression 6 years later. The baseline global EP score was found to be an independent predictor of the EDSS annual progression rate (p < 0.001), and of the risk of disability progression over time (p < 0.005). Based on a ROC curve determination, we defined a Global EP Score cut off point (17/30) to identify patients at high risk of disability progression illustrated by a positive predictive value of 70%. CONCLUSION This study provides a proof of the concept that electrophysiology could be added to MRI and used as another complementary prognostic tool in MS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Giffroy
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Liege, Rue Grandfosse 31-33, 4130, Esneux, Belgium.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Liege, B35, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
| | - Nathalie Maes
- Department of Biostatistics and Medico-Economic Information, University Hospital (CHU, ULg) of Liege, B35, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Adelin Albert
- Department of Biostatistics and Medico-Economic Information, University Hospital (CHU, ULg) of Liege, B35, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Pierre Maquet
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Liege, Rue Grandfosse 31-33, 4130, Esneux, Belgium
| | - Jean-Michel Crielaard
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Liege, B35, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dominique Dive
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Liege, Rue Grandfosse 31-33, 4130, Esneux, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nechemia Y, Moreh E, Weingarden H, Bloch A, Givon U, Vaknin-Dembinsky A, Schwartz I, Meiner Z, Zeilig G. Effectiveness of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for patients with Neuromyelitis Optica. J Spinal Cord Med 2016; 39:311-6. [PMID: 26446695 PMCID: PMC5073758 DOI: 10.1179/2045772315y.0000000060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), previously considered a subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS), is now known to be a unique disorder associated with autoantibodies against aquaporin-4. The rehabilitation protocols for MS have been applied to NMO, without specific measures of efficacy. PURPOSE The evaluation of the effectiveness of an MS type inpatient rehabilitation program for patients with NMO. PATIENT AND METHODS Retrospective chart reviews of 15 inpatients with NMO and 32 inpatients with MS. Clinical severity was assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), functional assessments were scored using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS), and the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC). There was a higher percentage of women in the NMO group (87% vs 56% P = 0.003). The MS group had significantly more cognitive and communication deficits (P = 0.003 and P = 0.00001). No significant differences were found in admission FIM, EDSS and FAC scores. RESULTS Both groups benefitted, however at discharge, the NMO group showed greater improvement in FIM scores (NMO admission 79 ± 24, discharge 98 ± 21; MS admission 80 ± 28, discharge 89 ± 28); and lower EDSS score (NMO from 7.2 ± 1.4 to 6.3 ± 1.4; MS from 7.4 ± 1.4 to 7 ± 1.5). CONCLUSIONS Inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs available for the patients with MS may be successfully implemented for patients with NMO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Nechemia
- Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Elior Moreh
- Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem
| | - Harold Weingarden
- Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Ayala Bloch
- Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Uri Givon
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Multiple Sclerosis Center, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | - Zeev Meiner
- Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem
| | - Gabi Zeilig
- Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Correspondence to: Gabi Zeilig, Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schlaeger R, Hardmeier M, D’Souza M, Grize L, Schindler C, Kappos L, Fuhr P. Monitoring multiple sclerosis by multimodal evoked potentials: Numerically versus ordinally scaled scoring systems. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127:1864-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 11/28/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
18
|
Kiiski HSM, Ní Riada S, Lalor EC, Gonçalves NR, Nolan H, Whelan R, Lonergan R, Kelly S, O'Brien MC, Kinsella K, Bramham J, Burke T, Ó Donnchadha S, Hutchinson M, Tubridy N, Reilly RB. Delayed P100-Like Latencies in Multiple Sclerosis: A Preliminary Investigation Using Visual Evoked Spread Spectrum Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146084. [PMID: 26726800 PMCID: PMC4699709 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Conduction along the optic nerve is often slowed in multiple sclerosis (MS). This is typically assessed by measuring the latency of the P100 component of the Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) using electroencephalography. The Visual Evoked Spread Spectrum Analysis (VESPA) method, which involves modulating the contrast of a continuous visual stimulus over time, can produce a visually evoked response analogous to the P100 but with a higher signal-to-noise ratio and potentially higher sensitivity to individual differences in comparison to the VEP. The main objective of the study was to conduct a preliminary investigation into the utility of the VESPA method for probing and monitoring visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. The latencies and amplitudes of the P100-like VESPA component were compared between healthy controls and multiple sclerosis patients, and multiple sclerosis subgroups. The P100-like VESPA component activations were examined at baseline and over a 3-year period. The study included 43 multiple sclerosis patients (23 relapsing-remitting MS, 20 secondary-progressive MS) and 42 healthy controls who completed the VESPA at baseline. The follow-up sessions were conducted 12 months after baseline with 24 MS patients (15 relapsing-remitting MS, 9 secondary-progressive MS) and 23 controls, and again at 24 months post-baseline with 19 MS patients (13 relapsing-remitting MS, 6 secondary-progressive MS) and 14 controls. The results showed P100-like VESPA latencies to be delayed in multiple sclerosis compared to healthy controls over the 24-month period. Secondary-progressive MS patients had most pronounced delay in P100-like VESPA latency relative to relapsing-remitting MS and controls. There were no longitudinal P100-like VESPA response differences. These findings suggest that the VESPA method is a reproducible electrophysiological method that may have potential utility in the assessment of visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanni S. M. Kiiski
- Neural Engineering Group, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- * E-mail:
| | - Sinéad Ní Riada
- Neural Engineering Group, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edmund C. Lalor
- Neural Engineering Group, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nuno R. Gonçalves
- Neural Engineering Group, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hugh Nolan
- Neural Engineering Group, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Robert Whelan
- Neural Engineering Group, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience Research Group, School of Psychology, UCD College of Human Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Róisín Lonergan
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Siobhán Kelly
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marie Claire O'Brien
- Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience Research Group, School of Psychology, UCD College of Human Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Katie Kinsella
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jessica Bramham
- Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience Research Group, School of Psychology, UCD College of Human Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Teresa Burke
- Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience Research Group, School of Psychology, UCD College of Human Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Seán Ó Donnchadha
- Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience Research Group, School of Psychology, UCD College of Human Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Hutchinson
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall Tubridy
- Department of Neurology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard B. Reilly
- Neural Engineering Group, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Simpson M, Macdonell R. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in diagnosis, prognostication and treatment evaluation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015; 4:430-436. [PMID: 26346791 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Revised: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Despite advances in brain imaging which have revolutionised the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), current imaging techniques have limitations, including poor correlation with clinical disability and prognosis. There is growing evidence that electrophysiological techniques may provide complementary functional information which can aid in diagnosis, prognostication and perhaps even monitoring of treatment response in patients with MS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an underutilised technique with potential to assist diagnosis, predict prognosis and provide an objective surrogate marker of clinical progress and treatment response. This review explores the existing body of evidence relating to the use of TMS in patients with MS, outlines the practical aspects and scope of TMS testing and reviews the current evidence relating to the use of TMS in diagnosis, disease classification, prognostication and response to symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Simpson
- Department of Neurology, Austin Health and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
| | - Richard Macdonell
- Department of Neurology, Austin Health and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
7. Neurophysiology in diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis in age of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
21
|
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by progressive dysfunction of the nervous system as a result of neuronal loss in the brain and spinal cord. Despite extensive research efforts aimed at development of new disease-modifying therapeutics, there is still no effective treatment to halt neurodegenerative processes. Thus, modification of current therapeutic and diagnostic research strategies is a goal of increasing urgency. The biggest limitation in neurodegenerative disease research is the lack of appropriate biomarkers. Discovery of universal biomarkers capable of diagnosing patients with neurodegenerative diseases, monitoring their response to therapy, and predicting disease progression seems to be a tall order. Instead, a combination of different methodologies in the discovery of biomarkers specific for each described aspect of the disease seems to be a more viable approach. Although application of personalized medicine in diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases may seem far off, some recent developments, such as utilizing specific biological therapies in multiple sclerosis, microRNA profiling as a source of novel biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease, or combination of neuroimaging and proteomic analyses in diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease patients, already point to the way clinical neurology may integrate new achievements in everyday practice. Combination of genomic, proteomic, glycomic, and metabolomic approaches may yield novel insights into molecular mechanisms of disease pathophysiology, which could then be integrated and translated into clinical neurology. Based on the developments during the past decade, it is feasible to predict that a personalized approach to treating neurological disorders will become more widely applicable in the coming years.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hutchinson M. Evoked potentials are of little use in the diagnosis or monitoring of MS: commentary. Mult Scler 2014; 19:1824-5. [PMID: 24277734 DOI: 10.1177/1352458513506506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hutchinson
- Consultant Neurologist, St Vincent's University Hospital, Newman Clinical Research Professor, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Margaritella N, Mendozzi L, Garegnani M, Nemni R, Gilardi E, Pugnetti L. The EP-score to assess treatment efficacy in RRMS patients: a preliminary study. Int J Neurosci 2014; 125:38-42. [DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2014.904305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
24
|
Schlaeger R, Schindler C, Grize L, Dellas S, Radue EW, Kappos L, Fuhr P. Combined visual and motor evoked potentials predict multiple sclerosis disability after 20 years. Mult Scler 2014; 20:1348-54. [DOI: 10.1177/1352458514525867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background: The development of predictors of multiple sclerosis (MS) disability is difficult due to the complex interplay of pathophysiological and adaptive processes. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether combined evoked potential (EP)-measures allow prediction of MS disability after 20 years. Methods: We examined 28 patients with clinically definite MS according to Poser’s criteria with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, combined visual and motor EPs at entry (T0), 6 (T1), 12 (T2) and 24 (T3) months, and a cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at T0 and T2. EDSS testing was repeated at year 14 (T4) and year 20 (T5). Spearman rank correlation was used. We performed a multivariable regression analysis to examine predictive relationships of the sum of z-transformed EP latencies ( s-EPT0) and other baseline variables with EDSST5. Results: We found that s-EPT0 correlated with EDSST5 (rho=0.72, p<0.0001) and ΔEDSST5-T0 (rho=0.50, p=0.006). Backward selection resulted in the prediction model: E (EDSST5)=3.91–2.22×therapy+0.079×age+0.057× s-EPT0 (Model 1, R2=0.58) with therapy as binary variable (1=any disease-modifying therapy between T3 and T5, 0=no therapy). Neither EDSST0 nor T2-lesion or gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion quantities at T0 improved prediction of EDSST5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.89 for model 1. Conclusions: These results further support a role for combined EP-measures as predictors of long-term disability in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christian Schindler
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Leticia Grize
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sophie Dellas
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ernst W Radue
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- Medical Image Analysis Centre, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter Fuhr
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rossi S, Studer V, Motta C, Germani G, Macchiarulo G, Buttari F, Mancino R, Castelli M, De Chiara V, Weiss S, Martino G, Furlan R, Centonze D. Cerebrospinal fluid detection of interleukin-1β in phase of remission predicts disease progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation 2014; 11:32. [PMID: 24548694 PMCID: PMC3975953 DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2013] [Accepted: 01/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Absence of clinical and radiological activity in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is perceived as disease remission. We explored the role of persisting inflammation during remission in disease evolution. Methods Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of interleukin 1β (IL-1β), a major proinflammatory cytokine, were measured in 170 RRMS patients at the time of clinical and radiological remission. These patients were then followed up for at least 4 years, and clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures of disease progression were recorded. Results Median follow-up of RRMS patients was 5 years. Detection of CSF IL-1β levels at the time of remission did not predict earlier relapse or new MRI lesion formation. Detection of IL-1β in the CSF was instead associated with higher progression index (PI) and Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS) scores at follow-up, and the number of patients with sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) or Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite worsening at follow-up was higher in individuals with detectable levels of IL-1β. Patients with undetectable IL-1β in the CSF had significantly lower PI and MSSS scores and a higher probability of having a benign MS phenotype. Furthermore, patients with undetectable CSF levels of IL-1β had less retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macular volume alterations visualized by OCT compared to patients with detectable IL-1β. Conclusions Our results suggest that persistence of a proinflammatory environment in RRMS patients during clinical and radiological remission influences midterm disease progression. Detection of IL-1β in the CSF at the time of remission appears to be a potential negative prognostic factor in RRMS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Diego Centonze
- Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Medicina dei Sistemi, Università Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Magon S, Chakravarty MM, Amann M, Weier K, Naegelin Y, Andelova M, Radue EW, Stippich C, Lerch JP, Kappos L, Sprenger T. Label-fusion-segmentation and deformation-based shape analysis of deep gray matter in multiple sclerosis: the impact of thalamic subnuclei on disability. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35:4193-203. [PMID: 24510715 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2013] [Revised: 12/03/2013] [Accepted: 01/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep gray matter (DGM) atrophy has been reported in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) already at early stages of the disease and progresses throughout the disease course. We studied DGM volume and shape and their relation to disability in a large cohort of clinically well-described MS patients using new subcortical segmentation methods and shape analysis. Structural 3D magnetic resonance images were acquired at 1.5 T in 118 patients with relapsing remitting MS. Subcortical structures were segmented using a multiatlas technique that relies on the generation of an automatically generated template library. To localize focal morphological changes, shape analysis was performed by estimating the vertex-wise displacements each subject must undergo to deform to a template. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the volume of specific thalamic nuclei (the ventral nuclear complex) together with normalized gray matter volume explains a relatively large proportion of expanded disability status scale (EDSS) variability. The deformation-based displacement analysis confirmed the relation between thalamic shape and EDSS scores. Furthermore, white matter lesion volume was found to relate to the shape of all subcortical structures. This novel method for the analysis of subcortical volume and shape allows depicting specific contributions of DGM abnormalities to neurological deficits in MS patients. The results stress the importance of ventral thalamic nuclei in this respect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Magon
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Medical Image Analysis Center, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schlaeger R, D'Souza M, Schindler C, Grize L, Kappos L, Fuhr P. Prediction of MS disability by multimodal evoked potentials: investigation during relapse or in the relapse-free interval? Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125:1889-92. [PMID: 24555924 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2013] [Revised: 11/19/2013] [Accepted: 12/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known about optimal timing of multimodal evoked potential (EP)-investigations regarding prediction of MS disability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether timing of EP-investigations during a relapse or in the relapse-free interval influences prediction of MS disability. METHODS Two groups of MS patients with similar age and gender distributions received visual, motor and somatosensory EPs either during a relapse (Group 1) or in the relapse-free interval (Group 2). Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) was obtained at baseline (T0) and year 3 (T2). Linear regression analysis was performed to examine the association between EDSS(T2) and a baseline EP compound measure (s-EP-Q(T0)) for each group. RESULTS Median EDSS(T0) was 3.0 for Group 1 and 1.5 for Group 2. Mean disease durations were 2.0 and 2.8 years, respectively. Median EDSS(T2) was 2.0 for both groups. The s-EP-Q(T0) significantly predicted EDSS(T2) (R(2)=0.47) for patients in Group 2, but not for patients in Group 1 (R(2)=0.07). CONCLUSION In early MS the functional remnants of relapses are a better predictor for development of medium-term disability than is the extent of impulse propagation impairment measured during relapse. SIGNIFICANCE This suggests a role of multimodal EPs in prediction of MS disability if performed in the relapse-free interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Schlaeger
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - M D'Souza
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - C Schindler
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Switzerland; University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - L Grize
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Switzerland; University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - L Kappos
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - P Fuhr
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rogne S. Uetisk av nevrologene ikke å tilby pasienter med multippel sklerose cytostatikabehandling med autolog stamcellestøtte. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2014; 134:1931-2. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.14.1027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
29
|
Gelfand JM. Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and clinical presentation. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2014; 122:269-90. [PMID: 24507522 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-52001-2.00011-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is based on demonstrating evidence of inflammatory-demyelinating injury within the central nervous system that is disseminated in both time and space. Diagnosis is made through a combination of the clinical history, neurologic examination, magnetic resonance imaging and the exclusion of other diagnostic possibilities. Other so-called "paraclinical" tests, including the examination of the cerebrospinal fluid, the recording of evoked potentials, urodynamic studies of bladder function, and ocular coherence tomography, may be helpful in establishing the diagnosis for individual patients, but are often unnecessary. Differential diagnosis in MS must be guided by clinical presentation and neurologic localization. While the list of conditions that can mimic MS clinically or radiologically is long, in clinical practice there are few conditions that truly mimic MS on both fronts. A positive test for a putative MS "mimic" does not unto itself exclude the diagnosis of MS. Typical symptoms of MS include discrete episodes ("attacks" or "relapses") of numbness, tingling, weakness, vision loss, gait impairment, incoordination, imbalance, and bladder dysfunction. In between attacks, patients tend to be stable, but may experience fatigue and heat sensitivity. Some MS patients go on to experience, or only experience, an insidious worsening of neurologic function and accumulation of disability ("progression") that is not associated with discrete relapse activity. Progression accounts for most of the long-term disability in MS. Diagnostic criteria for MS have evolved over the past several decades, with each revision impacting the apparent prevalence and prognosis of the disorder - the result has been to encourage earlier diagnosis without compromising accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A new neurophysiological approach to assess central motor conduction damage to proximal and distal muscles of lower limbs. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125:133-41. [PMID: 23867064 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Revised: 05/26/2013] [Accepted: 06/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
31
|
Clinical, MRI, and CSF markers of disability progression in multiple sclerosis. DISEASE MARKERS 2013; 35:687-99. [PMID: 24324285 PMCID: PMC3842089 DOI: 10.1155/2013/484959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2013] [Revised: 09/12/2013] [Accepted: 10/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) in which the complex interplay between inflammation and neurodegeneration determines varying degrees of neurological disability. For this reason, it is very difficult to express an accurate prognosis based on purely clinical information in the individual patient at an early disease stage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are promising sources of prognostic information with a good potential of quantitative measure, sensitivity, and reliability. However, a comprehensive MS outcome prediction model combining multiple parameters is still lacking. Current relevant literature addressing the topic of clinical, MRI, and CSF markers as predictors of MS disability progression is reviewed here.
Collapse
|
32
|
The utility of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis prognostication. J Clin Neurosci 2013; 20:1576-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2012] [Accepted: 01/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
33
|
Hardmeier M, Hatz F, Naegelin Y, Hight D, Schindler C, Kappos L, Seeck M, Michel CM, Fuhr P. Improved characterization of visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis by topographic analysis. Brain Topogr 2013; 27:318-27. [PMID: 24085573 PMCID: PMC3921459 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-013-0318-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2013] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis (MS), the combination of visual, somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (EP) has been shown to be highly correlated with the Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS) and to predict the disease course. In the present study, we explored whether the significance of the visual EP (VEP) can be improved with multichannel recordings (204 electrodes) and topographic analysis (tVEP). VEPs were analyzed in 83 MS patients (median EDSS 2.0; 52 % with history of optic neuritis; hON) and 47 healthy controls (HC). TVEP components were automatically defined on the basis of spatial similarity between the scalp potential fields (topographic maps) of single subjects’ VEPs and reference maps generated from HC. Non-ambiguous measures of latency, amplitude and configuration were derived from the maps reflecting the P100 component. TVEP was compared to conventional analysis (cVEP) with respect to reliability in HC, validity using descriptors of logistic regression models, and sensitivity derived from receiver operating characteristics curves. In tVEP, reliability tended to be higher for measurement of amplitude (p = 0.06). Regression models on diagnosis (MS vs. HC) and hON were more favorable using tVEP- versus cVEP-predictors. Sensitivity was increased in tVEP versus cVEP: 72 % versus 60 % for diagnosis, and 88 % versus 77 % for hON. The advantage of tVEP was most pronounced in pathological VEPs, in which cVEPs were often ambiguous. TVEP is a reliable, valid, and sensitive method of objectively quantifying pathological VEP in particular. In combination with other EP modalities, tVEP may improve the monitoring of disease course in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hardmeier
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fernández V, Valls-Sole J, Relova J, Raguer N, Miralles F, Dinca L, Taramundi S, Costa-Frossard L, Ferrandiz M, Ramió-Torrentà L, Villoslada P, Saiz A, Calles C, Antigüedad A, Alvarez-Cermeño J, Prieto J, Izquierdo G, Montalbán X, Fernández O. Recommendations for the clinical use of motor evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2013.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
35
|
Recomendaciones para la utilización clínica del estudio de potenciales evocados motores en la esclerosis múltiple. Neurologia 2013; 28:408-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2012.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
36
|
Sand T, Kvaløy MB, Wader T, Hovdal H. Evoked potential tests in clinical diagnosis. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2013; 133:960-5. [PMID: 23652144 DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.1176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evoked potentials are used to detect conduction disturbances in the central nervous system. This paper provides an overview of the areas in which evoked potentials are used in clinical neurophysiological diagnostics, with the emphasis on coma and demyelinating disease. METHOD The article is based on a literature search in PubMed and the authors' long experience of neurological and neurophysiological diagnostics. RESULTS Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) can be a reliable predictor of failure to regain consciousness as early as 24 hours after anoxic coma has occurred. If coma is caused by a brain trauma, cerebrovascular episode or other neurological disease, information about which sensory brainstem pathways are damaged can be obtained from somatosensory evoked potentials and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP), which can also be useful for planning rehabilitation. Normal SEP and BAEP findings in cases of coma caused by trauma are associated with a favourable prognosis. Visually evoked potential (VEP) can often reveal signs of a history of optic neuritis. SEP and BAEP can also reveal subclinical lesions in the central nervous system and be a supplementary diagnostic test for multiple sclerosis. INTERPRETATION The clinical value of SEP and BAEP is high in coma cases. Evoked potentials are also important in intraoperative monitoring. The clinical value of VEP is high when a history of optic neuritis is a deciding factor for a multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Some selected patients who are being assessed for demyelinating disease will benefit from a full EP study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trond Sand
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Norway.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schlaeger R, D’Souza M, Schindler C, Grize L, Kappos L, Fuhr P. Electrophysiological markers and predictors of the disease course in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013; 20:51-6. [DOI: 10.1177/1352458513490543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Currently no valid surrogate marker exists for primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Objective: Our aim was to prospectively investigate multimodal evoked potentials (EPs) as markers and predictors of the disease course in PPMS. Methods: Twenty-two PPMS patients were prospectively examined with visual, somatosensory and motor EPs and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments at baseline (T0) and at six-month intervals over three years. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine the relationship between EP measures and EDSS. The relationship between disease evolution and a numerical score derived from z-transformed EP-latencies ( s-EP-Q) and baseline characteristics was further assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. Results: s-EP-Q correlated with EDSS score at all points in time in cross-sectional comparison (0.53≤rs ≤0.68; 0.0007≤p≤0.0232) and also longitudinally by trend ( rs=0.46, p=0.0740). The s-EP-QT0 correlated with the EDSS score at year 3 (T6) ( rs=0.77, p<0.0001). The s-EP-Q changes became statistically significant six months before corresponding changes were seen in the EDSS score. EDSST6 as predicted by EDSST6= −1.027+0.037* age+0.217* s-EP-QT0 + 0.695* EDSST0 correlated with the observed values ( rs=0.92, p<0.0001). Conclusions: Multimodal EPs correlate well with disability in PPMS, and allow some prediction of the disease course over three years. These findings support a role of EPs as surrogate markers in clinical trials in PPMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcus D’Souza
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Schindler
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Leticia Grize
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter Fuhr
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Baumstarck K, Pelletier J, Butzkueven H, Fernández O, Flachenecker P, Idiman E, Stecchi S, Boucekine M, Auquier P. Health-related quality of life as an independent predictor of long-term disability for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2013; 20:907-14, e78-9. [PMID: 23347258 DOI: 10.1111/ene.12087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2012] [Accepted: 11/29/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Predictive factors of long-term disability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) are well known, but the weight of these factors does not explain the entire change of disability. Few studies have examined the predictive value of quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVES To determine the value of the initial level of QoL to predict changes in the disability status of patients with MS and to determine if specific-MS questionnaires predict more accuracy in these changes than generic questionnaires. METHODS DESIGN multicenter, multi-regional, and longitudinal study. Main inclusion criteria: patients with RR-MS subtype and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score lower than 7.0. Sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded at baseline. Every 6 months up to month 24, QoL (MusiQoL and SF-36) was recorded. At 24 months, individuals were defined into two 'disability change' groups: the worsened and not worsened patients. RESULTS Five-hundred and twenty-six patients were enrolled: 386 (83.7%) not worsened and 75 (16.3%) worsened patients at 24 months. The activity of daily living and the relationship with healthcare workers dimensions of MusiQoL questionnaire were independent predictors of change in the EDSS score after 24 months. The physical-functioning dimension of the SF-36 questionnaire predicted independently disability change after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported baseline QoL levels provide additional prognostic information on MS disability beyond traditional clinical or sociodemographic factors. These findings reinforce the importance of incorporating a patient's evaluation of their own QoL level during patient monitoring and the assessment of treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Baumstarck
- EA3279 Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit, School of Medicine, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, the biological understanding of the mechanisms underlying structural and functional repair of the injured central nervous system has strongly increased. This has resulted in the development of multiple experimental treatment strategies with the collective aim of enhancing and surpassing the limited spontaneous recovery occurring in animal models and ultimately humans suffering from spinal cord or brain injuries. Several of these experimental treatments have revealed beneficial effects in animal models of spinal cord injury. With the exception of neurorehabilitative therapies, however, therapeutic interventions that enhance recovery are currently absent within the clinical realm of spinal cord injury. The present review surveys the prospects and challenges in experimental and clinical spinal cord repair. Major shortcomings in experimental research center on the difficulty of closely modeling human traumatic spinal cord injury in animals, the small number of investigations done on cervical spinal injury and tetraplegia, and the differences in lesion models, species, and functional outcome parameters used between laboratories. The main challenges in the clinical field of spinal cord repair are associated with the standardization and sensitivity of functional outcome measures, the definition of the inclusion/exclusion criteria for patient recruitment in trials, and the accuracy and reliability of an early diagnosis to predict subsequent neurological outcome. Research and clinical networks were recently created with the goal of optimizing animal studies and human trials. Promising clinical trials are currently in progress. The time has come to translate the biologic-mechanistic knowledge from basic science into efficacious treatments able to improve the conditions of humans suffering from spinal cord injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linard Filli
- Brain Research Institute, University Zurich and Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schlaeger R, Hardmeier M, Fuhr P. Superficial brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2013; 116:577-84. [PMID: 24112925 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53497-2.00046-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Central motor conduction time (CMCT) is the most frequently studied measure derived from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in multiple sclerosis (MS); it is abnormal in 57-93% of patients. Addition of the triple stimulation technique and combining motor with other evoked potentials (EPs) increases sensitivity. Cross-sectional correlations of TMS measures with clinical assessments of motor dysfunction or global disability are high. Longitudinally, CMCT is sensitive to both worsening and improvement of motor function, showing its potential to detect therapeutic responses. Moreover, combined multimodal EPs are valid quantitative predictors of the clinical course over periods ranging from 2 to 14 years. Measures of transcallosal connectivity (ipsilateral silent period and interhemispheric inhibition) are altered even in early MS, and yield complementary information on subclinical changes. Pathological brain plasticity in MS has been demonstrated by paired associative stimulation studies revealing a compensatory role of the ipsilateral motor and premotor areas. Central motor fatigue is associated with reduced motor EP amplitudes and increased cortical silent periods in normal controls, whereas patients with MS suffering from subjective fatigue show various abnormalities in cortical modulation of the motor system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Schlaeger
- Department of Neurology, Hospitals of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Central motor conduction time (CMCT) is the time taken for neural impulses to travel through the central nervous system on their way to the target muscles. When the motor cortex is stimulated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), CMCT is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time from the motor evoked potential latency elicited by motor cortical TMS. CMCT in infants and children reaches adult level at about age of 6 years for the lower limbs. The alterations of CMCT in various neurological conditions are reviewed in this chapter. Prolongation of CMCT occurs due to slowing of conduction through rapidly conducting corticospinal fibers, as seen in various disorders such as demyelinating diseases (multiple sclerosis, MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, structural lesions in the corticospinal tract such as stroke and compressive myelopathy, and neurodegenerative disorders including multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. As CMCT is prolonged in certain clinical conditions, it is of diagnostic value in some neurological disorders such as myelopathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and MS when used together with other clinical and electrophysiological measures. It could also be used as a prognostic marker in some of neurological conditions, such as myelopathy and MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaviraja Udupa
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Division of Brain Imaging & Behaviour Systems - Neuroscience, Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Personalized treatment is highly desirable in multiple sclerosis because it is an immensely heterogeneous disease. This heterogeneity is seen in both the disease course and the treatment responses. Currently, a combination of clinical features and imaging parameters in magnetic resonance imaging is used to classify active and non-active patients and treatment responders and non-responders. Although this classification works on a group level, individual patients often behave differently from the group. Therefore additional biomarkers are needed to provide better indicators for prognosis and treatment response. Basic and clinical research have discovered different promising targets. It is now essential to verify the utility and accuracy of these markers in large, prospectively sampled patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Derfuss
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Margaritella N, Mendozzi L, Garegnani M, Nemni R, Colicino E, Gilardi E, Pugnetti L. Exploring the predictive value of the evoked potentials score in MS within an appropriate patient population: a hint for an early identification of benign MS? BMC Neurol 2012; 12:80. [PMID: 22913733 PMCID: PMC3488473 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2012] [Accepted: 07/31/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic value of evoked potentials (EPs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been fully established. The correlations between the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at First Neurological Evaluation (FNE) and the duration of the disease, as well as between EDSS and EPs, have influenced the outcome of most previous studies. To overcome this confounding relations, we propose to test the prognostic value of EPs within an appropriate patient population which should be based on patients with low EDSS at FNE and short disease duration. METHODS We retrospectively selected a sample of 143 early relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients with an EDSS < 3.5 from a larger database spanning 20 years. By means of bivariate logistic regressions, the best predictors of worsening were selected among several demographic and clinical variables. The best multivariate logistic model was statistically validated and prospectively applied to 50 patients examined during 2009-2011. RESULTS The Evoked Potentials score (EP score) and the Time to EDSS 2.0 (TT2) were the best predictors of worsening in our sample (Odds Ratio 1.10 and 0.82 respectively, p=0.001). Low EP score (below 15-20 points), short TT2 (lower than 3-5 years) and their interaction resulted to be the most useful for the identification of worsening patterns. Moreover, in patients with an EP score at FNE below 6 points and a TT2 greater than 3 years the probability of worsening was 10% after 4-5 years and rapidly decreased thereafter. CONCLUSIONS In an appropriate population of early RRMS patients, the EP score at FNE is a good predictor of disability at low values as well as in combination with a rapid buildup of disability. Interestingly, an EP score at FNE under the median together with a clinical stability lasting more than 3 years turned out to be a protective pattern. This finding may contribute to an early identification of benign patients, well before the term required to diagnose Benign MS (BMS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Margaritella
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Scientific Institute (IRCCS) S, Maria Nascente, don C. Gnocchi Foundation, Via Capecelatro 66, Milan, 20148, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|