Cutaneous adverse events associated with disease-modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Switching from injectable to other Disease Modifying Therapies may improve sexual dysfunction in people with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) a central nervous system autoimmune disorder, mainly affecting young adults and more prevalent among women, can lead to sexual dysfunction (SD) among both males and females with MS. Female sexual dysfunction can be defined as dyspareunia, a lack of sexual desire, disorders in the arousal and orgasm phases, and sexual pain disorders. The purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in sexual function among females with MS whose treatment was switched from first-line injectable medications to other agents after a six-month duration. And assess the changes in all three domains of SD.

METHODS

In this longitudinal study females diagnosed with MS, aged between 18 and 50 years old, and were candidates for switching their treatment from interferon beta-1a (intra-muscular and subcutaneous), and Glatiramer Acetate (GA), to Fingolimod, Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF), or Natalizumab (NTZ) due to patients' convenience and tolerability and adverse events were included. "Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire-19" was used to evaluate the SD changes before and six months after the new treatment initiation. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS V.24 software. Histograms and the Shapiro-Wilk test were used to assess the normality of the variables; due to the non-normal distribution of quantitative variables (except for age), the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the scores, before and six months after the medication change. The level of significance was considered less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Out of 107 female participants (average age: 35.09 ± 5.61), The mean of overall MSISQ-19 scores, before and six months after the medication change were not significant (p-value = 0.091). However, considering the subdomains, the medication changes only affected the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 (p-value = 0.017). Still, the scores of other subdomains did not change significantly (p-value = 0.761 for primary SD and 0.479 for secondary SD). Also, there wasn't any significant difference between EDSS before and after the medication change (p-value = 0.461).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this was the first study, assessing the effect of MS medication change on the improvement of SD among patients. According to the results of the presented cross-sectional study, we found that during a six-month period, the tertiary subdomain of MSISQ-19 symptoms improved significantly, while the changes in other SD domains were not significant.

Psoriasiform dermatitis following ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Case report and literature review

We present a case of a 30-year-old man with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who developed psoriasiform dermatitis following his second course of ocrelizumab. This resolved with topical therapies and discontinuation of treatment. Cases of psoriasiform rashes have been increasingly reported in the use of ocrelizumab and are possibly due to B-cell (CD20) depletion and T-cell overregulation. Nevertheless, skin-related adverse reactions are not yet considered in the risk management plans of anti-CD20 treatments in multiple sclerosis.

Innovative drug delivery strategies to the CNS for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), such as multiple sclerosis (MS) represent a great emotional, financial and social burden. Despite intense efforts, great unmet medical needs remain in that field. MS is an autoimmune, chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease with no curative treatment up to date. The current therapies mostly act in the periphery and seek to modulate aberrant immune responses as well as slow down the progression of the disease. Some of these therapies are associated with adverse effects related partly to their administration route and show some limitations due to their rapid clearance and inability to reach the CNS. The scientific community have recently focused their research on developing MS therapies targeting different processes within the CNS. However, delivery of therapeutics to the CNS is mainly limited by the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop new drug delivery strategies that ensure CNS availability to capitalize on identified therapeutic targets. Several approaches have been developed to overcome or bypass the BBB and increase delivery of therapeutics to the CNS. Among these strategies, the use of alternative routes of administration, such as the nose-to-brain (N2B) pathway, offers a promising non-invasive option in the scope of MS, as it would allow a direct transport of the drugs from the nasal cavity to the brain. Moreover, the combination of bioactive molecules within nanocarriers bring forth new opportunities for MS therapies, allowing and/or increasing their transport to the CNS. Here we will review and discuss these alternative administration routes as well as the nanocarrier approaches useful to deliver drugs for MS.

Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Associated with Monoclonal Antibodies Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis: Case Reports and Short Literature Review

Background and aims. Multiple sclerosis is a disease of the central nervous system, whose treatment often involves the use of monoclonal antibodies. This can lead to a series of complications that the clinician should pay attention to and accordingly adjust the therapy. We aim to emphasize real-life experiences with adverse cutaneous reactions to monoclonal antibodies by presenting a series of two cases from our clinic. Methods. In the first case, a female patient was treated with natalizumab for eight years and developed relapsing-remitting cutaneous lesions following the monthly administration of the treatment. The second case is of a male patient treated with ocrelizumab, who developed plaque-like lesions following the fifth administration. We analyzed the biological parameters and performed investigations, dermatological evaluation and skin biopsies. Results. The result of the skin biopsy for the natalizumab patient showed a chronic spongiotic dermatitis, with the anti-natalizumab antibodies being negative. The patient who received ocrelizumab developed nummular eczema, disseminated on his trunk and limbs. Conclusions. Given the fact that these therapies are frequently used in multiple sclerosis patients, and their skin adverse reactions are known, we described some particularities and a brief review of the literature with practical implications. Further studies need to be conducted to establish a firm association between monoclonal antibodies therapy and adverse cutaneous reactions, but the clinician should be aware of their existence.

Lymphomatoid papulosis in a patient treated with glatiramer acetate and the glatiramoid Glatopa for multiple sclerosis: A case report

A 48-year-old Caucasian woman with history of multiple sclerosis (MS) presented with erythematous papulonodular lesions in her extremities and trunk. She was being treated with glatiramer acetate (GA) for the past 10 years and the glatiramoid, Glatopa, for 2 years prior to this presentation. A skin biopsy showed CD30⁺ lymphoproliferative disorder consistent with lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP). Three weeks after stopping Glatopa, her skin lesions were improved. It remains unclear whether GA’s or Glatopa’s capability to alter T-cell differentiation, may have a link with LyP. This case report is a reminder to be vigilant for skin lesions in patients with MS.

Bioequivalence of intramuscular and subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a: results of a phase I, open-label crossover study in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Peginterferon beta-1a administered every 2 weeks via subcutaneous (SC) injection is approved to treat adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). However, associated injection site reactions (ISRs) can lead to treatment discontinuation. Prior studies with interferon beta-1a reported a lower frequency of ISRs with intramuscular (IM) administration than with SC administration. IM administration of peginterferon beta-1a may therefore represent a useful alternative treatment option.

METHODS

A phase I, open-label, two-period crossover study randomized healthy volunteers to receive a single dose of peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg administered IM followed by a single 125 mcg dose administered SC after a 28-day washout or vice versa. Blood samples were collected up to 504 h post dose to determine pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles. The primary endpoint was assessment of bioequivalence based on maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf). Other PK parameters, as well as PD (serum neopterin) and safety profiles, were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 136 participants. Bioequivalence of IM and SC peginterferon beta-1a was established for both Cmax ([least squares (LS)] mean IM/SC ratio: 1.083 [90% confidence interval (CI), 0.975-1.203]) and AUCinf (LS mean IM/SC ratio: 1.089 [90% CI, 1.020-1.162]). Other PK and PD parameters were similar between administration routes, although moderate to high inter-subject variability was observed for IM and SC. Safety profiles were generally balanced between IM and SC administration. ISRs occurred at a lower frequency with IM [14.4% (95% CI, 8.89-21.56%)] than with SC [32.1% (95% CI, 24.29-40.70%)] administration (p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate bioequivalence between peginterferon beta-1a IM and SC and support the consideration of IM injection of peginterferon beta-1a as a viable treatment option in patients with RRMS and RMS.

Subcutaneous Interferon Beta Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients - Characterization of Injection Site Reactions and Flu-Like Symptoms in a Daily Practice Setting - Results from the Non-Interventional Study PERFECT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of injection site reactions (ISR) and flu-like symptoms (FLS) during treatment with subcutaneous (SC) interferon (IFN) beta therapies and to document measures to mitigate and prevent ISR and FLS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The cross-sectional post-authorization safety study PERFECT was conducted from 11/2017 to 7/2019 in neurology practices in Germany. Adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving SC IFN beta for ≥3 months were eligible. The primary endpoints were patient-reported prevalence of ISR and FLS. Additional endpoints reported by patients, MS nurses, and neurologists included type, frequency, duration, time of occurrence, and management of ISR and FLS.

RESULTS

In total, 603 patients (median age 45 years [range 36-53], 74% female) were included in the analysis. Time since MS diagnosis was >5 years in most patients. The majority had received none (64%) or 1 (22%) prior therapy. Current MS therapy in 36%, 32%, and 30% of patients was IFN beta-1b, IFN beta-1a, and peginterferon beta-1a, respectively. ISR and FLS under current therapy were reported by 84% and 68% of patients, respectively. ISR developed within 5 days after injection (84%) and lasted for 2-14 days (53%) in most patients. The most frequent patient-reported symptom was erythema (39%). ISR resolved or abated with systemic treatments or topical ointments. Most frequent preventive measures included alternating injection sites (58%). Occurrence of ISR rarely resulted in treatment interruption (5%). FLS occurred predominantly up to 6 h after injection (40%) and lasted <12 h (26%). The most frequent patient-reported symptoms were fatigue (15%) and aching limbs (15%). Assessments by physicians and MS nurses differed from patient-reported results.

CONCLUSION

Although ISR were experienced by the majority of patients, they rarely resulted in treatment interruption. In this real-world setting, ISR and FLS management was in line with published expert recommendations.

The role of xenobiotics in triggering psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease affecting approximately 2% of the world population. A complex interplay of genetic predisposition and risk factors contributes to the risk of its onset. Several xenobiotics have been implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Drugs are among the most investigated trigger factors; strong association with disease induction or exacerbation has been reported for β-blockers, lithium, NSAIDs and ACE inhibitors, all of which are commonly used in the management of various comorbidities in psoriasis patients. Furthermore, inhibitors of TNF have a well-documented potential for triggering new-onset psoriasis when used for other indications (e.g. Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthritis), while post-marketing data have revealed the same association for ustekinumab. Several other drugs have been connected with psoriasis, but the evidence is less compelling. Smoking and alcohol have been reported to increase the risk for occurrence of psoriasis, but can also affect unfavorably the course of the disease and its response to treatment. Furthermore, exposure to secondhand smoke, especially in childhood, also mediates the risk. Emerging data now suggest that air pollution also has a detrimental effect on skin disease, including psoriasis, but this association needs further investigation. Understanding of the toxic effect of xenobiotics on the initiation and clinical course of psoriasis can contribute to its better control, as it can help with the avoidance of triggering factors and, in some cases, influence the success of pharmacological treatment. It, therefore, has an important place in the comprehensive management of psoriasis.

[The pegylated form of interferon beta in the treatment of multiple sclerosis]

Interferons-beta (IFN-β) along with glatiramer acetate is one of the most commonly used disease modifying treatment (DMT) of multiple sclerosis (MS) associated with effectiveness and acceptable safety profile. At the same time, therapy with IFN-β has a number of limitations associated with a high frequency of injections and production of neutralizing antibodies. The development of the pegylated form of IFN-β (PEG-IFN-β) is aimed at resolving these issues. This article reviewed the mechanism of action, efficacy, safety and tolerability of PEG-IFN-β in the treatment of MS.

Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010-2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is one of the first therapies approved for multiple sclerosis (MS). We prospectively included and monitored drug-naïve and pre-treated MS patients who had been prescribed GA for 1 year, to investigate reasons for GA prescription, its effectiveness and safety in real life clinical practice.

METHODS

One year, prospective, multicentre, observational study performed between 2010 and 2015 in consecutive MS and clinically isolated syndrome patients starting GA as a first ("naïve") or second ("switcher") line therapy. Primary endpoint was the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over 1 year of GA treatment (from baseline, V1, to 12 months, V2) in naïve and switchers compared to previous 24 months. Secondary endpoints were: EDSS changes between V1 and V2, frequency of adverse events, and reasons for prescribing and discontinuing GA. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were retrieved from medical records, and outcome measures were documented at V1 and V2, and in case of clinical worsening.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four consecutive patients were monitored over 12 months (N = 64 naïve, N = 130 switchers). Side effect profile (naïve = 36%, switchers = 28%) and comorbidities (naïve = 31%, switchers = 15%) were the most frequent reasons to start GA. The ARR was reduced in both naïve and switchers during V1-2 as compared to the 24 months preceding V1 [naïve: 0.0 (0.0-0.0) vs 0.5 (0.5-1.0, p = 2.9e-10); switchers: 0.0 (0.0-0.0) vs 0.5 (0.0-0.5, p = 0.022)]. EDSS at V2 was significantly reduced only in naïve [(1.5 (1.0-2.5) vs 2.0 (1.5-2.5), p = 0.003)]. Naïve status and EDSS at V1 were negatively associated with EDSS change between V1-V2 in multivariable analysis (regression coefficient = - 0.436, p = 0.008, and regression coefficient = - 0.263, p = 6.18e-05, respectively). No new unexpected AE was reported.

CONCLUSION

In our Swiss cohort, GA was prescribed mainly to naïve or switcher MS patients fearing interferon related side effects, with various comorbidities or considering pregnancy, and showed effectiveness and safety comparable with data of previous GA studies.

An update on Peginterferon beta-1a Management in Multiple Sclerosis: results from an interdisciplinary Board of German and Austrian Neurologists and dermatologists

BACKGROUND

Interferon (IFN) beta drugs have been approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) for more than 20 years and are considered to offer a favourable benefit-risk profile. In July 2014, subcutaneous (SC) peginterferon beta-1a 125 μg dosed every 2 weeks, a pegylated form of interferon beta-1a, was approved by the EMA for the treatment of adult patients with RRMS and in August 2014 by the FDA for RMS. Peginterferon beta-1a shows a prolonged half-life and increased systemic drug exposure resulting in a reduced dosing frequency compared to other available interferon-based products in MS. In the Phase 3 ADVANCE trial peginterferon beta-1a demonstrated significant positive effects on clinical and MRI outcome measures versus placebo after one year. Furthermore, in the ATTAIN extension study, sustained efficacy with long-term treatment for nearly 6 years was shown.

MAIN TEXT

In July 2016, an interdisciplinary panel of German and Austrian experts convened to discuss the management of side effects associated with peginterferon beta-1a and other interferon beta-based treatments in MS in daily practice. The panel was composed of experts from university hospitals and private clinics comprised of neurologists, dermatologists, and an MS nurse. In this paper we report recommendations regarding best practices for adverse event management, focussing on peginterferon beta-1a. Injection site reactions (ISRs) and influenza-like illness are the most common adverse effects of interferon beta therapies and can present a burden for MS patients leading to non-adherence and discontinuation of therapy. Peginterferon beta-1a shows improved pharmacological properties. In clinical trials, the adverse event (AE) profile of peginterferon beta-1a was similar to other interferon beta formulations. The most common AEs were mild to moderate ISRs, influenza-like illness, pyrexia, and headache. Current information on the underlying cause of skin reactions associated with SC interferon treatment, and the management strategies for these AEs are limited. In pivotal trials, ISRs were mainly characterized and classified by neurologists, while dermatologists were only rarely consulted.

CONCLUSIONS

This report addresses expert recommendations on the management of most relevant adverse effects related to peginterferon beta-1a and other interferon betas, based on literature and interdisciplinary experience.

Risks and risk management in modern multiple sclerosis immunotherapeutic treatment

In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) owing to the approval of a number of new drugs with very distinct mechanisms of action. All approved disease-modifying drugs primarily work directly on the immune system. However, the identification of an ‘optimal choice’ for individual patients with regard to treatment efficacy, treatment adherence and side-effect profile has become increasingly complex including conceptual as well as practical considerations. Similarly, there are peculiarities and specific requirements with regard to treatment monitoring, especially in relation to immunosuppression, the development of secondary immune-related complications, as well as the existence of drug-specific on- and off-target effects. Both classical immunosuppression and selective immune interventions generate a spectrum of potential therapy-related complications. This article provides a comprehensive overview of available immunotherapeutics for MS and their risks, detailing individual mechanisms of action and side-effect profiles. Furthermore, practical recommendations for patients treated with modern MS immunotherapeutics are provided.

Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis and multiple Sclerosis: A rare association or an atypical presentation?

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has been associated with several immune-mediated diseases but the mechanisms that explain such associations, as well as their implications in clinical practice and treatment are rarely discussed.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a patient with a history of MS since she was 27 years old, followed by a diagnosis of Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis (HUV) seven years later. Several disease-modifying treatments for MS and HUV were used but with limited benefit in both diseases and significant MS progression. Activity of both diseases was later stabilized with Rituximab. We discuss the hypotheses of a central nervous system involvement in urticarial vasculitis or an association between MS and HUV, and examine the challenges in their management.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of concurrent immune-mediated diseases, the diagnosis of MS can be challenging. This clinical presentation posed significant difficulties in disease management, influencing therapeutic options and their effectiveness/adverse effects profile. The best approach in MS patients with concurrent autoimmune diseases remains to be established and more reports are needed to help clarify this subject.

Different Interferon Beta Preparations Induce the Same Qualitative Immune Response in Human Skin

Interferon beta (IFNβ) is used as a first-line treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) and is injected intramuscularly or subcutaneously (s.c.). The subcutaneous route is considered more immunogenic as it is associated with increased antidrug antibody-positive patients. The skin contains dendritic cells (DCs) and it is unclear whether these contribute to immunogenicity. To assess the effect of IFNβ on skin-resident cells, IFNβ was injected intradermally (i.d.) ex vivo using a human skin explant model or s.c. in vivo in MS patients. Ex vivo, intradermal IFNβ injections reduced migration and enhanced surface CD86 expression of dermal DCs, and an increased expression of HLA-DR⁺ was observed in skin biopsies taken after subcutaneous IFNβ injection (in vivo). In both models, IFNβ elevated the expression of several inflammatory cytokines when compared to the control biopsies. Our results show that 3 different IFNβ preparations, normalized in dose and injection site, induce similar immune responses, suggesting that the differences in immunogenicity are likely due to the route and frequency of administration.

Enduring Clinical Value of Copaxone® (Glatiramer Acetate) in Multiple Sclerosis after 20 Years of Use

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system. Glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone®) was the first disease-modifying treatment (DMT) for MS successfully tested in humans (1977) and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 1996. Since then, there have been numerous developments in the MS field: advances in neuroimaging allowing more rapid and accurate diagnosis; the availability of a range of DMTs including immunosuppressant monoclonal antibodies and oral agents; a more holistic approach to treatment by multidisciplinary teams; and an improved awareness of the need to consider a patient's preferences and patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life. The use of GA has endured throughout these advances. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the important developments in the MS field during the 20 years since GA was approved and to review clinical data for GA in MS, with the aim of understanding the continued and widespread use of GA. Both drug-related (efficacy versus side-effect profile and monitoring requirements) and patient factors (preferences regarding mode of administration and possible pregnancy) will be explored.

Recent developments in interferon-based therapies for multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and disabling immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. Beta-interferons are the first approved and still the most widely used first-line disease-modifying treatment in MS.

AREAS COVERED

Here we focus on recent developments in pharmacology and delivery systems of beta-interferons, and discuss their place within current state of the art therapeutic approaches. We briefly review the clinical trials for classical and PEGylated formulations, emphasizing effectiveness, safety concerns, and tolerability. The mechanisms of action of IFN-β in view of MS pathogenesis are also debated

EXPERT OPINION

Though only modestly efficient in reducing the annualized relapse rate, beta-interferons remain a valid first-line option due to their good long-term safety profile and cost-efficacy. Moreover, they are endogenous class II cytokines essential for mounting an effective antiviral response, and they may interact with putative MS triggering factors such as Epstein-Barr virus infection and human endogenous retroviruses. Recent improvements in formulations, delivery devices and drug regimens tackle the tolerability and adherence issues frequently seen with these drugs, and scientific advances may offer means for a better selection of patients. Although a well-established immunomodulatory treatment, beta-interferons have not said their last word in the management of MS.

Multiple Sclerosis: Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Therapeutic Aspects

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune and degenerative disease of the central nervous system that affects young people. MS develops in genetically susceptible individuals exposed to different unknown triggering factors. Different phenotypes are described. About 15% of patients present with a primary progressive course and 85% with a relapsing-remitting course. An increasing number of disease-modifying treatments has emerged. Although encouraging, the number of drugs challenges the neurologist because each treatment has its own risk-benefit profile. Patients should be involved in the decision-making process to ensure good treatment and safety monitoring adherence.

Drug-induced psoriasis: clinical perspectives

Exposure to certain drugs can elicit an induction or exacerbation of psoriasis. Although well-conducted systematic studies on drug-related psoriasis are mostly lacking, traditionally strong associations have been documented for beta-blockers, lithium, antimalarial drugs such as (hydroxy)chloroquine, interferons, imiquimod, and terbinafine. More recently, new associations have been reported for monoclonal antibody- and small-molecule-based targeted therapies used for oncological and immunological indications, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Recognizing potential drug-related psoriasis is of clinical relevance to allow an optimal management of psoriasis. However, in clinical practice, identifying medication-related exacerbations and induction of psoriasis can be challenging. The clinical and histopathological features of drug-provoked psoriasis may differ little from that of “classical” nondrug-related forms of psoriasis. In addition, the latency period between start of the medication and onset of psoriasis can be significantly long for some drugs. Assessment of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale could be used as a practical tool to better differentiate drug-related psoriasis. The first step in the management of drug-related psoriasis is cessation and replacement of the offending drug when deemed clinically possible. However, the induced psoriasis skin lesions may persist after treatment withdrawal. Additional skin-directed treatment options for drug-related psoriasis follows the conventional psoriasis treatment guidelines and includes topical steroids and vitamin D analogs, ultraviolet phototherapy, systemic treatments, such as acitretin, methotrexate, and fumaric acid esters, and biological treatments.

Subcutaneous peginterferon β-1a injection-site reaction experience and mitigation: Delphi analysis of the ALLOW study

AIM

The objective of this Delphi analysis was to obtain consensus on injection-site reaction (ISR) experience and mitigation strategies for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis switching from nonpegylated interferons (IFNs) to peginterferon β-1a in the ALLOW Phase IIIb trial using a three-step approach.

METHODS

Study investigators and coordinators from investigative sites enrolling four or more patients in ALLOW participated in three rounds of questionnaires and interviews.

RESULTS

Respondents (n = 37) agreed that the most common ISR, erythema, was not disruptive to daily activities. Patient education, as a conversation with a clinician about ISR potential, was recommended.

CONCLUSION

The consensus of Delphi respondents on ISR experience and ISR management after switching from nonpegylated IFNs to peginterferon β-1a can help inform treatment decisions and manage patient expectations.

Multiple sclerosis: Therapeutic applications of advancing drug delivery systems

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, which is accompanying with demyelination, neurodegeneration and sensibility to oxidative stress. In MS, auto-reactive lymphocytes cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reside in the perivenous demyelinating lesions which create various distinct inflammatory demyelinated plaques situated predominantly in the white matter. The current MS-related therapeutic approaches can be classified into disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and symptomatic therapy. DMTs suppress circulating immune cells, inhibit passing the BBB and decrease the inflammatory responses. Recent advances have remarkably delayed disease development and improved the quality of life for numerous patients. In spite of major improvements in therapeutic options, there are some limitations regarding the routes of administration and the necessity for repeated and long-term dosing in which cause to systemic disadvantageous consequences and patient non-compliance. Nanotechnology presents promising approaches to improve autoimmune disease treatment with the capability to overcome many of the limitations common to the current immunosuppressive and biological therapies. Here we emphasis on nanomedicine-based drug delivery approaches of biological immunomodulatory mediators for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. This comprehensive review details the most successful drugs in MS therapy and also focuses on conceptions and clinical potential of novel nanomedicine attitudes for inducing immunosuppression and immunological tolerance in MS to modulate abnormal and pathologic immune responses.

Management Strategies for Flu-Like Symptoms and Injection-Site Reactions Associated with Peginterferon Beta-1a: Obtaining Recommendations Using the Delphi Technique

BACKGROUND

Flu-like symptoms (FLSs) and injection-site reactions (ISRs) have been reported with interferon beta treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS). We sought to obtain consensus on the characteristics/management of FLSs/ISRs in patients with relapsing-remitting MS based on experiences from the randomized, placebo-controlled ADVANCE study of peginterferon beta-1a.

METHODS

ADVANCE investigators with a predefined number of enrolled patients were eligible to participate in a consensus-generating exercise using a modified Delphi method. An independent steering committee oversaw the development of two sequential Delphi questionnaires. An average rating (AR) of 2.7 or more was defined as consensus a priori.

RESULTS

Thirty and 29 investigators (ie, responders) completed questionnaires 1 and 2, respectively, representing 374 patients from ADVANCE. Responders reported that the incidence/duration of FLSs/ISRs in their typical patient generally declined after 3 months of treatment. Responders reached consensus that FLSs typically last up to 24 hours (AR = 3.17) and have mild/moderate effects on activities of daily living (AR = 3.34). Patients should initiate acetaminophen/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment on a scheduled basis (AR = 3.31) and change the timing of injection (AR = 3.28) to manage FLSs. Injection-site rotation/cooling and drug administration at room temperature (all AR ≥ 3.10) were recommended for managing ISRs. Patient education on FLSs/ISRs was advocated before treatment initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Delphi responders agreed on the management strategies for FLSs/ISRs and agreed that patient education is critical to set treatment expectations and promote adherence.

A study to evaluate the effect of ultrasound treatment on nodules in multiple sclerosis patients

Purpose/aim: Ultrasound has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and pain-relief benefits in several conditions such as cellulite or trauma events. We assessed the efficacy of ultrasound therapy on nodules associated with first-line treatments in multiple sclerosis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two multiple sclerosis patients were enrolled during 2013 and randomized to two groups: in the control group patients were treated only with a conventional gel prescribed for cellulite and nodules, while in the experimental group the gel was combined with ultrasound therapy. Patients were treated during 10 weeks and followed up for 10 additional weeks. Three nodules were assessed for each patient, measuring size, pain and redness at 0, 10 and 20 weeks.

RESULTS

We found a significant decrease in both groups in size, pain and redness across the three visits (p < 0.0001 for size, p = 0.01 and p < 0.0001 for pain, and p = 0.0002 and p < 0.0001 for redness, respectively for the difference at visit 2 and 3 with respect to visit 1). More interestingly, we observed a greater reduction in pain and redness in the ultrasound-treated group, but the difference was only statistically significant at 10 weeks (p = 0.01 for both pain and redness). On the third visit, no differences between control and experimental groups were detected, both achieving the same levels in measured variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments are useful to improve skin reaction after first-line treatments, but ultrasound in combination with gel achieves a faster reduction in pain and redness, suggesting that ultrasound treatment might be a good analgesic for nodule management in multiple sclerosis patients.

Dimethyl fumarate in the management of multiple sclerosis: appropriate patient selection and special considerations

Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF), also known as gastroresistant DMF, is the most recently approved oral disease-modifying treatment (DMT) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Two randomized clinical trials (Determination of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting MS [DEFINE] and Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [CONFIRM]) demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing relapse rate and radiological signs of disease activity, as seen on magnetic resonance imaging. The DEFINE study also indicated a significant effect of DMF on disability worsening, while the low incidence of confirmed disability worsening in the CONFIRM trial rendered an insignificant reduction among the DMF-treated groups when compared to placebo. DMF also demonstrated a good safety profile and acceptable tolerability, since the most common side effects (gastrointestinal events and flushing reactions) are usually transient and mild to moderate in severity. Here, we discuss the place in therapy of DMF for individuals with relapsing multiple sclerosis, providing a tentative therapeutic algorithm to manage newly diagnosed patients and those who do not adequately respond to self-injectable DMTs. Literature data supporting the potential role of DMF as a first-line therapy are presented. The possibility of using DMF as switching treatment or even as an add-on strategy in patients with breakthrough disease despite self-injectable DMTs will also be discussed. Lastly, we argue about the role of DMF as an exit strategy from natalizumab-treated patients who are considered at risk for developing multifocal progressive leukoencephalopathy.

Cutaneous Adverse Effects of Neurologic Medications

Life-threatening and benign drug reactions occur frequently in the skin, affecting 8 % of the general population and 2-3 % of all hospitalized patients, emphasizing the need for physicians to effectively recognize and manage patients with drug-induced eruptions. Neurologic medications represent a vast array of drug classes with cutaneous side effects. Approximately 7 % of the United States (US) adult population is affected by adult-onset neurological disorders, reflecting a large number of patients on neurologic drug therapies. This review elucidates the cutaneous reactions associated with medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat the following neurologic pathologies: Alzheimer disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, Huntington disease, migraine, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and pseudobulbar affect. A search of the literature was performed using the specific FDA-approved drug or drug classes in combination with the terms 'dermatologic,' 'cutaneous,' 'skin,' or 'rash.' Both PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were utilized, with side effects ranging from those cited in randomized controlled trials to case reports. It behooves neurologists, dermatologists, and primary care physicians to be aware of the recorded cutaneous adverse reactions and their severity for proper management and potential need to withdraw the offending medication.

Recurrent Nicolau syndrome associated with subcutaneous glatiramer acetate injection--a case report

BACKGROUND

Glatiramer acetate is worldwide used as first line treatment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Local skin reactions associated with glatiramer acetate are common, however, only isolated cases of severe local injection site reactions known as Nicolau Syndrome have been reported so far.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the case of a recurrent Nicolau Syndrome occurred during longstanding glatiramer acetate treatment in a woman with multiple sclerosis. The haemorrhagic patch necrotized and was treated locally as a deep second degree burn with excision of dead skin tissue and was healed. Treatment with glatiramer acetate was definitely suspended.

CONCLUSIONS

GA injections can be complicated by isolated or recurrent Nicolau Syndrome, a potentially life-threatening condition of which neurologists should be aware.

Optimizing the initial choice and timing of therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

With 12 available US Food and Drug Administration approved medications for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), choosing an initial therapy is no longer a straightforward task. Each disease-modifying therapy (DMT) has a distinct risk-benefit profile and each patient is an individual. Therefore, the development of a simple algorithm to apply in selecting initial therapy is not feasible. Instead, the prescribing physician must consider many factors related to the treatments themselves, such as efficacy, safety, and tolerability, while also taking into account a particular patient's disease characteristics, personal preferences, comorbid illnesses and reproductive plans. The efficacy of each drug may be assessed through clinical trial data, although these data are limited by scarcity of direct comparisons among the different agents and lack of availability of biomarkers to predict an individual patient's response. Differences in safety profiles help to distinguish the various DMTs and influence selection of agent; both the known safety concerns, which can be addressed with risk mitigation and monitoring strategies, and the potential for yet undiscovered safety issues must be assessed, and an individual patient's comfort level with the risks and ability to comply with monitoring must be determined. Potential issues related to tolerability, which largely relate to matters of patient personal preference and lifestyle, should also be factored into the decision-making process. With regard to the timing of therapy initiation, it must be acknowledged that long-term benefits of early DMT have not yet been definitively demonstrated. Nonetheless, starting DMT early in the MS disease course has been shown to have a beneficial effect on relapse prevention, and appears to curtail the atrophy and neurodegenerative changes that are now known to begin at disease onset. Although under certain circumstances there are acceptable reasons for deferring treatment, it is generally recommended that DMT is initiated early in the disease course.

Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated with Interferon-β Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Interferons are widely used platform therapies as disease-modifying treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Although interferons are usually safe and well tolerated, they frequently cause dermatological side effects. Here, we present a multiple sclerosis (MS) patient treated with interferon-β who developed new-onset psoriasis. Both her MS as well as her psoriasis finally responded to treatment with fumarates. This case illustrates that interferons not only cause local but also systemic adverse events of the skin. These systemic side effects might indicate that the Th17/IL-17 axis plays a prominent role in the immunopathogenesis of this individual case and that the autoimmune process might be deteriorated by further administration of interferons. In conclusion, we think that neurologists should be aware of systemic cutaneous side effects and have a closer look on interferon-associated skin lesions. Detection of psoriasiform lesions might indicate that interferons are probably not beneficial in the individual situation. We suggest that skin lesions may serve as biomarkers to allocate MS patients to adequate disease-modifying drugs.

Severe septal panniculitis in a multiple sclerosis patient treated with interferon-beta

We report a memorable case of severe septal panniculitis in an MS patient following the subcutaneous administration of interferon beta-1b, manifesting as a painful, indurated, erythematous lesion of the thigh, which appeared at the injection site.

A 2-year observational study of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis converting to glatiramer acetate from other disease-modifying therapies: the COPTIMIZE trial

Studies suggest that patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who do not benefit from other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) may benefit from converting to glatiramer acetate (GA). COPTIMIZE was a 24-month observational study designed to assess the disease course of patients converting to GA 20 mg daily from another DMT. Eligible patients had converted to GA and had received prior DMT for 3-6 months, depending on the reasons for conversion. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. In total, 672 patients from 148 centers worldwide were included in the analysis. Change of therapy to GA was prompted primarily by lack of efficacy (53.6 %) or intolerable adverse events (AEs; 44.8 %). Over a 24-month period, 72.7 % of patients were relapse free. Mean annual relapse rate decreased from 0.86 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.91] before the change to 0.32 (95 % CI 0.26-0.40; p < 0.0001) at last observation, while the progression of disability was halted, as the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores remained stable. Patients improved significantly (p < 0.05) on measures of fatigue, quality of life, depression, and cognition; mobility scores remained stable. The results indicate that changing RRMS patients to GA is associated with positive treatment outcomes.

Benefit of endermology on indurations and panniculitis/lipoatrophy during relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis long-term treatment with glatiramer acetate

INTRODUCTION

Use of endermology (Endermologie®), which consists of a deep mechanical massage, in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving glatiramer acetate suggested improvements in injection-site indurations and panniculitis/lipoatrophy in our previous pilot experience. We aimed to assess the effect of endermology in a larger population of patients with multiple sclerosis receiving glatiramer acetate in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was the extension phase of our pilot experience, carried out in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and indurations and/or panniculitis/lipoatrophy associated with long-term glatiramer acetate administration. Patients underwent endermology sessions twice per week, for 6 weeks, according to clinical practice.

RESULTS

Seventy evaluable patients were included (mean age, 42.7±9.3 years; female, 95.7%; mean multiple sclerosis duration, 9.2±8.6 years; mean glatiramer acetate duration, 46.7±29.9 months). Fifty (71.4%) patients showed indurations and 58 (82.9%) panniculitis/lipoatrophy. After 12 endermology sessions, the number of patients with indurations significantly decreased (71.4% vs. 28.6%; p<0.001), as did the number of their indurations (4.2±3.6 vs. 3.7±3.4; p<0.001). Although the number of patients with panniculitis/lipoatrophy did not significantly decrease, there was a significant reduction in the number of areas of panniculitis/lipoatrophy (4.3±2.6 vs. 3.9±2.2; p<0.05). Forty-nine (98.0%) patients with indurations and 57 (98.3%) patients with panniculitis/lipoatrophy felt satisfied/very satisfied with treatment and considered endermology useful/very useful. Endermology was well tolerated, as some pain was reported in eight (11.4%) patients, discomfort in three (4.3%) patients, and local blotch/swelling and transient bruise in one (1.4%) patient each. Endermology enabled glatiramer acetate tolerance to be enhanced in 42 (60.0%) patients.

CONCLUSION

This project represents the largest experience available supporting the benefit of endermology in the reduction/disappearance of indurations and improvement in panniculitis/lipoatrophy in patients with RRMS receiving long-term glatiramer acetate treatment. Moreover, these benefits also contributed to enhancing glatiramer acetate tolerance.

New and emerging immune-targeted drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease with a major inflammatory component that constitutes the most common progressive and disabling neurological condition in young adults. Injectable immunomodulatory medicines such as interferon drugs and glatiramer acetate have dominated the MS market for over the past two decades but this situation is set to change. This is because of: (i) patent expirations, (ii) the introduction of natalizumab, which targets the interaction between leukocytes and the blood-CNS barrier, (iii) the launch of three oral immunomodulatory drugs (fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide), with another (laquinimod) under regulatory review and (iv) a number of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab, daclizumab and ocrelizumab) about to enter the market. Current and emerging medicines are reviewed and their impact on people with MS considered.

Prevalence of cutaneous adverse events associated with long-term disease-modifying therapy and their impact on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Glatiramer acetate (GA) and interferon-beta (IFN-β) are disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis that are administered through subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injections. Skin reactions associated with DMTs are common and may influence patient's health-related quality of life (QoL). We aimed to determine the prevalence of cutaneous adverse events associated with long-term DMT use, and to assess the impact of cutaneous adverse events on QoL.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study among patients with multiple sclerosis who had been treated with their first DMT for at least 2 years. Cutaneous events were assessed from photographs of injection-sites by dermatologists blinded for DMT. Generic and dermatology-specific health-related QoL were assessed using validated patient-reported questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients were enrolled, of whom 156 (68%) had at least one skin reaction. The prevalence of cutaneous adverse events was higher for SC DMTs (75-82%) compared to IM DMT (41%) (P < 0.001). Erythema and lipoatrophy were the most common skin reactions, observed in 156 (68%) and 45 (20%) patients, respectively. Dermatology-specific, but not generic, QoL was significantly lower among patients with skin reactions compared to those without.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of cutaneous adverse events was high in long-term DMT-treatment. Patients with cutaneous adverse events had a lower perceived dermatology-specific QoL.

Autoinjectors for administration of interferon beta-1b in multiple sclerosis: patient preferences and the ExtaviPro™ 30G and Betacomfort® devices

BACKGROUND

The ExtaviPro™ 30G autoinjector has been developed for self-administration of interferon beta-1b (Extavia^®), which is used as a first-line, parenteral, disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this survey was to investigate patients' perceptions of the importance of different general attributes of autoinjectors, and patient preferences when comparing the ExtaviPro™ 30G and Betacomfort^® autoinjectors.

METHOD

The survey was conducted in France, Germany, Italy, and the USA in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had been using an autoinjector for at least 1 year. Participants examined the ExtaviPro™ 30G and Betacomfort^® devices, viewed fact sheets, and watched a video of these autoinjectors in use, then scored nine prespecified attributes of autoinjectors in terms of importance on a scale of 1-7 (1 = not at all important; 7 = extremely important). They then indicated which device they preferred, both overall and by individual attribute.

RESULTS

Among the 201 participants who completed the survey, being reliable to use was considered the most important general attribute of autoinjectors, followed by attributes associated with convenience (ease of operation, one-handed injection, ease of reach of injection sites, ergonomic shape). For each of the nine attributes, a significantly higher proportion of participants (74%-94% by attribute; P < 0.05 for each) preferred ExtaviPro™ 30G to the Betacomfort^® autoinjector, and 173 (86%) participants indicated that they preferred ExtaviPro™ 30G overall (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this survey suggest that patients with MS rate reliability and convenience as the most important general attributes of autoinjectors, and are more likely to prefer ExtaviPro™ 30G to the Betacomfort^® autoinjector for routine self-administration of interferon beta-1b.

Is mipomersen ready for clinical implementation? A transatlantic dilemma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mipomersen has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an orphan drug for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). In contrast, the European Medicines Agency advised negatively on the use of mipomersen. In this review, we discuss the efficacy and safety considerations for this discrepancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

On the basis of the results of clinical trials with mipomersen, safety concerns have been raised regarding cardiovascular risk reduction and development of hepatic steatosis. In addition, (long-term) tolerability concerns have been raised predominantly regarding injection site reactions. A pooled analysis of cardiovascular events in phase III trials with mipomersen did not provide evidence for either a positive or negative effect on cardiovascular disease. Although long-term studies with mipomersen are eagerly awaited, hepatic fat content appears to stabilize after 6-12 months notwithstanding continued mipomersen administration.

SUMMARY

HoFH is a disease with an unmet medical need for new lipid-lowering therapies. On the basis of a mean 2.9 mmol/l LDL-cholesterol reduction, mipomersen is expected to reduce cardiovascular risk in HoFH. Available evidence suggests that the fat accumulation associated with this treatment differs from steatohepatitis, which is a progressive and damaging liver disease. No evidence is available suggesting that injection site reactions because of mipomersen treatment will result in safety issues.

Necrotizing skin lesion and radial nerve palsy in a patient treated with glatiramer acetate

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an approved and well tolerated drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We report a case of a 52 year-old man with psoriasis and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who developed, after 21 months of GA treatment, an injection-site cutaneous necrosis that involved both subcutaneous and muscular tissue with massive edema, followed, 3 days later, by radial nerve palsy. After few days another similar lesion appeared in another injection-site. We hypothesize that cutaneous necrosis could be due to a local dis-immune reaction and, probably, psoriasis could have played an important role in its pathogenesis.

Role of oral teriflunomide in the management of multiple sclerosis

The landscape of the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is changing fast. Several oral treatments have shown benefit and generate much interest because of the convenience of their administration. Two oral compounds, fingolimod and teriflunomide, have been approved in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, while others have completed Phase III trials and are awaiting review for registration. Teriflunomide is a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor with selective immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive properties that have shown consistent efficacy in clinical trials, and a good safety profile. This paper provides an overview of the mechanisms of action and efficacy and safety results from clinical trials with this drug. The role of teriflunomide in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is discussed.

Pharmacotherapeuetic Options for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is the most common progressive and disabling neurological condition in young adults. Neuro-inflammation is an early and persistent change and forms the basis of most pharmacotherapy for this disease. Immunomodulatory drugs are mainly biologies (β-interferons, a four amino acid peptide, and a monoclonal antibody to a cell adhesion molecule on the blood-CNS barrier) that either attenuate the inflammatory response or block the movement of immune cells into the CNS. They reduce the rate of relapse, but have little or no effect on the progression of disability. The market landscape for MS drugs is in the midst of major change because the patent life of many of these medicines will soon expire, which will lead to the emergence of biosimilars. In addition, new small molecule immunomodulatory and palliative drugs have entered the market, with more in the pipeline; a number of monoclonal antibodies and other immunomodulatory drugs are also in clinical development.