1
|
Filippi M, Pagani E, Turrini R, Bartezaghi M, Brescia Morra V, Borriello G, Torri Clerici V, Mirabella M, Pasquali L, Patti F, Totaro R, Gallo P, Rocca MA. Effects of fingolimod on focal and diffuse damage in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - The "EVOLUTION" study. J Neurol 2024; 271:6181-6196. [PMID: 39073436 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12590-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In multiple sclerosis (MS), MRI markers can measure the potential neuroprotective effects of fingolimod beyond its anti-inflammatory activity. In this study we aimed to comprehensively explore, in the real-word setting, whether fingolimod not only reduces clinical/MRI inflammatory activity, but also influences the progression of irreversible focal and whole brain damage in relapsing-remitting [RR] MS patients. METHODS The "EVOLUTION" study, a 24-month observational, prospective, single-arm, multicenter study, enrolled 261 RRMS patients who started fingolimod at 32 Italian MS centers and underwent biannual neurological assessments and annual MRI evaluations. Study outcomes included the proportions of evaluable RRMS patients achieving at 24 months: (1) no new/enlarging T2-hyperintense white matter (WM) lesions and/or clinical relapses; (2) a modified classification of "No Evidence of Disease Activity 4" ("modified NEDA-4") defined as no new/enlarging T2-hyperintense WM lesions, clinical relapses, and 6-month confirmed disability progression, and a yearly percentage lateral ventricular volume change on T2-FLAIR images < 2%; (3) less than 40% of active lesions at baseline and month 12 evolving to permanent black holes (PBHs). RESULTS At month 24, 76/160 (47.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 39.8%;55.2%) RRMS patients had no clinical/MRI activity. Thirty-nine of 170 RRMS patients (22.9%; 95% CI = 16.6%;29.3%) achieved "modified NEDA-4" status. Forty-four of 72 RRMS patients (61.1%; 95% CI = 49.8%;72.4%) had less than 40% of active WM lesions evolving to PBHs. The study confirmed the established safety and tolerability profile of fingolimod. DISCUSSION By comparing our results with those from the literature, the EVOLUTION study seems to indicate a neuroprotective effect of fingolimod, limiting inflammatory activity, brain atrophy and PBH development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Elisabetta Pagani
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Vincenzo Brescia Morra
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Center, Department of Neuroscience (NSRO), Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Borriello
- Centro Di Riferimento Regionale per la Sclerosi Multipla, Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Massimiliano Mirabella
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro Di Ricerca Sclerosi Multipla (CERSM), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Livia Pasquali
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Patti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate, GF Ingrassia, Centro Sclerosi Multipla, Università Di Catania, Sez. Neuroscienze, Catania, Italy
| | - Rocco Totaro
- Demyelinating Disease Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Paolo Gallo
- Department of Neurosciences, Multiple Sclerosis Centre-Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Ridley B, Minozzi S, Del Giovane C, Peryer G, Piggott T, Foschi M, Filippini G, Tramacere I, Baldin E, Nonino F. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 1:CD011381. [PMID: 38174776 PMCID: PMC10765473 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011381.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different therapeutic strategies are available for the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), including immunomodulators, immunosuppressants and biological agents. Although each one of these therapies reduces relapse frequency and slows disability accumulation compared to no treatment, their relative benefit remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review published in 2015. OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety, through network meta-analysis, of interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab, pegylated interferon beta-1a, daclizumab, laquinimod, azathioprine, immunoglobulins, cladribine, cyclophosphamide, diroximel fumarate, fludarabine, interferon beta 1-a and beta 1-b, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline, mycophenolate mofetil, ofatumumab, ozanimod, ponesimod, rituximab, siponimod and steroids for the treatment of people with RRMS. SEARCH METHODS CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers were searched on 21 September 2021 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. A top-up search was conducted on 8 August 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied one or more of the available immunomodulators and immunosuppressants as monotherapy in comparison to placebo or to another active agent, in adults with RRMS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We considered both direct and indirect evidence and performed data synthesis by pairwise and network meta-analysis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 50 studies involving 36,541 participants (68.6% female and 31.4% male). Median treatment duration was 24 months, and 25 (50%) studies were placebo-controlled. Considering the risk of bias, the most frequent concern was related to the role of the sponsor in the authorship of the study report or in data management and analysis, for which we judged 68% of the studies were at high risk of other bias. The other frequent concerns were performance bias (34% judged as having high risk) and attrition bias (32% judged as having high risk). Placebo was used as the common comparator for network analysis. Relapses over 12 months: data were provided in 18 studies (9310 participants). Natalizumab results in a large reduction of people with relapses at 12 months (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.63; high-certainty evidence). Fingolimod (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.57; moderate-certainty evidence), daclizumab (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; moderate-certainty evidence), and immunoglobulins (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.79; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a large reduction of people with relapses at 12 months. Relapses over 24 months: data were reported in 28 studies (19,869 participants). Cladribine (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.64; high-certainty evidence), alemtuzumab (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.68; high-certainty evidence) and natalizumab (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.65; high-certainty evidence) result in a large decrease of people with relapses at 24 months. Fingolimod (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.60; moderate-certainty evidence), dimethyl fumarate (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.70; moderate-certainty evidence), and ponesimod (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.70; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a large decrease of people with relapses at 24 months. Glatiramer acetate (RR 0.84, 95%, CI 0.76 to 0.93; moderate-certainty evidence) and interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif) (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91; moderate-certainty evidence) probably moderately decrease people with relapses at 24 months. Relapses over 36 months findings were available from five studies (3087 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate- or high-certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 24 months was assessed in 31 studies (24,303 participants). Natalizumab probably results in a large reduction of disability worsening (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.75; moderate-certainty evidence) at 24 months. Disability worsening over 36 months was assessed in three studies (2684 participants) but none of the studies used placebo as the comparator. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events data were available from 43 studies (35,410 participants). Alemtuzumab probably results in a slight reduction of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.79; moderate-certainty evidence). Daclizumab (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.63; moderate-certainty evidence), fingolimod (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.57; moderate-certainty evidence), teriflunomide (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.79; moderate-certainty evidence), interferon beta-1a (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.20; moderate-certainty evidence), laquinimod (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.00 to 2.15; moderate-certainty evidence), natalizumab (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.05), and glatiramer acetate (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.14; moderate-certainty evidence) probably result in a slight increase in the number of people who discontinue treatment due to adverse events. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 35 studies (33,998 participants). There was probably a trivial reduction in SAEs amongst people with RRMS treated with interferon beta-1b as compared to placebo (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.54; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are highly confident that, compared to placebo, two-year treatment with natalizumab, cladribine, or alemtuzumab decreases relapses more than with other DMTs. We are moderately confident that a two-year treatment with natalizumab may slow disability progression. Compared to those on placebo, people with RRMS treated with most of the assessed DMTs showed a higher frequency of treatment discontinuation due to AEs: we are moderately confident that this could happen with fingolimod, teriflunomide, interferon beta-1a, laquinimod, natalizumab and daclizumab, while our certainty with other DMTs is lower. We are also moderately certain that treatment with alemtuzumab is associated with fewer discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, and moderately certain that interferon beta-1b probably results in a slight reduction in people who experience serious adverse events, but our certainty with regard to other DMTs is lower. Insufficient evidence is available to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMTs in a longer term than two years, and this is a relevant issue for a chronic condition like MS that develops over decades. More than half of the included studies were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies and this may have influenced their results. Further studies should focus on direct comparison between active agents, with follow-up of at least three years, and assess other patient-relevant outcomes, such as quality of life and cognitive status, with particular focus on the impact of sex/gender on treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marien Gonzalez-Lorenzo
- Laboratorio di Metodologia delle revisioni sistematiche e produzione di Linee Guida, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ben Ridley
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Minozzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Cinzia Del Giovane
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Cochrane Italy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University-Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Guy Peryer
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK
| | - Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matteo Foschi
- Department of Neuroscience, Multiple Sclerosis Center - Neurology Unit, S.Maria delle Croci Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Graziella Filippini
- Scientific Director's Office, Carlo Besta Foundation and Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Tramacere
- Department of Research and Clinical Development, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Baldin
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Nonino
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nunes CC, Abreu P, Correia F, Mendes I, da Silva AM. Teriflunomide treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A Portuguese real-life experience. Brain Neurosci Adv 2023; 7:23982128231185290. [PMID: 37492519 PMCID: PMC10363901 DOI: 10.1177/23982128231185290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Teriflunomide is an oral disease-modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. A decline in physical and cognitive functions, which negatively impacts their quality of life (QoL), is observed in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. The aim of this study was to characterise adult Portuguese relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with teriflunomide in routine clinical practice concerning their quality of life, comorbidities, treatment effectiveness, satisfaction, compliance and safety. TeriLIVE-QoL was a multicentre, non-interventional, prospective cohort study that collected demographic and clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes and adverse events from patients treated with teriflunomide of 14 mg over 2 years. Notably, around 18 months of this period occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 99 participants, 25% were treatment-naïve. Annualised relapse rate and the score for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale decreased after 1 (p = 0.01) and 2 years of treatment (p < 0.001), respectively. Convenience (p = 0.001), effectiveness (p = 0.002) and global satisfaction scores (p < 0.001) presented high values (up to 95.6) and continued to improve along the study. Treatment persistence was 77%, and compliance reached 82% 2 years after initiation. Three patients experienced serious adverse events. TeriLIVE-QoL provides real-world evidence of clinical effectiveness, high treatment satisfaction, consistent safety and improved psychiatric outcomes, associated with elevated treatment persistence and compliance in patients treated with teriflunomide.iance reached 82% 2 years after initiation. Three patients experienced serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pedro Abreu
- Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal
| | - Filipe Correia
- Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos (ULSM) – Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Portugal
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dardiotis E, Perpati G, Borsos M, Nikolaidis I, Tzanetakos D, Deretzi G, Koutlas E, Kilidireas C, Mitsikostas DD, Hadjigeorgiou G, Grigoriadis N. Real-World Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Teriflunomide for Two Years: Patient-Reported Outcomes from the AURELIO Study in Greece. Neurol Ther 2022; 11:1375-1390. [PMID: 35829919 PMCID: PMC9338205 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00384-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a real-world clinical setting can provide detailed information about MS from the patient's perspective. PROs were used here to assess quality of life (QoL), treatment satisfaction, clinical efficacy, and safety outcomes in a Greek cohort of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients treated with oral teriflunomide (14 mg/day). METHODS AURELIO was a 2-year, prospective, observational study whose QoL primary endpoint was assessed with the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29). Secondary endpoints included analyses of Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), annualized relapse rate (ARR), adherence, and safety outcomes. RESULTS AURELIO enrolled 282 patients (62.8% female; mean age 44.8 [SD ± 11] years; EDSS 2.0 [SD ± 1.6]; 44.6% treatment-naïve), with 212 patients (75%) remaining on treatment at study end. MSIS-29 total scores remained stable, while the MSIS-29 psychological scale showed significant improvement (p = 0.0015) at 2 years vs. baseline. TSQM scores at 2 years showed significant improvements in effectiveness (+ 6.6, p = 0.0001), convenience (+ 1.9, p = 0.0256), and global satisfaction (+ 8.1, p = 0.0001) vs. baseline. Disease progression was stable as indicated by non-significant changes in PDDS and EDSS vs. baseline. The ARR was low at 0.065, with a slightly higher ARR in previously treated (0.070) vs. naïve patients (0.058). Adherence was high at > 90%. Overall, 91 patients (32.3%) in the study reported a total of 215 safety events (32 serious, of which 21 were classified as mild-moderate). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS These data highlight the importance of PROs to facilitate personalized treatment strategies in MS. In line with other teriflunomide studies, AURELIO showed stable QoL, efficacy and safety outcomes, and good treatment satisfaction both in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients in this Greek cohort of patients with RRMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efthymios Dardiotis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Mariann Borsos
- AdWare Research Development and Consulting Ltd, Balatonfüred, Hungary
| | - Ioannis Nikolaidis
- 2nd Neurology Department, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tzanetakos
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Deretzi
- Neurology Clinic, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Constantinos Kilidireas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimos Dimitrios Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Hadjigeorgiou
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Grigoriadis
- 2nd Neurology Department, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steinman L, Fox E, Hartung HP, Alvarez E, Qian P, Wray S, Robertson D, Huang D, Selmaj K, Wynn D, Cutter G, Mok K, Hsu Y, Xu Y, Weiss MS, Bosco JA, Power SA, Lee L, Miskin HP, Cree BAC. Ublituximab versus Teriflunomide in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:704-714. [PMID: 36001711 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2201904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The monoclonal antibody ublituximab enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytolysis and produces B-cell depletion. Ublituximab is being evaluated for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. METHODS In two identical, phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy trials (ULTIMATE I and II), participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous ublituximab (150 mg on day 1, followed by 450 mg on day 15 and at weeks 24, 48, and 72) and oral placebo or oral teriflunomide (14 mg once daily) and intravenous placebo. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Secondary end points included the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by 96 weeks and worsening of disability. RESULTS A total of 549 participants were enrolled in the ULTIMATE I trial, and 545 were enrolled in the ULTIMATE II trial; the median follow-up was 95 weeks. In the ULTIMATE I trial, the annualized relapse rate was 0.08 with ublituximab and 0.19 with teriflunomide (rate ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.62; P<0.001); in the ULTIMATE II trial, the annualized relapse rate was 0.09 and 0.18, respectively (rate ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.78; P = 0.002). The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was 0.02 in the ublituximab group and 0.49 in the teriflunomide group (rate ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06; P<0.001) in the ULTIMATE I trial and 0.01 and 0.25, respectively (rate ratio, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06; P<0.001), in the ULTIMATE II trial. In the pooled analysis of the two trials, 5.2% of the participants in the ublituximab group and 5.9% in the teriflunomide group had worsening of disability at 12 weeks (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.41; P = 0.51). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 47.7% of the participants in the ublituximab group. Serious infections occurred in 5.0% in the ublituximab group and in 2.9% in the teriflunomide group. CONCLUSIONS Among participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ublituximab resulted in lower annualized relapse rates and fewer brain lesions on MRI than teriflunomide over a period of 96 weeks but did not result in a significantly lower risk of worsening of disability. Ublituximab was associated with infusion-related reactions. (Funded by TG Therapeutics; ULTIMATE I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03277261 and NCT03277248.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Steinman
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Edward Fox
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Enrique Alvarez
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Peiqing Qian
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Sibyl Wray
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Derrick Robertson
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - DeRen Huang
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Krzysztof Selmaj
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Daniel Wynn
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Gary Cutter
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Koby Mok
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Yanzhi Hsu
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Yihuan Xu
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Michael S Weiss
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Jenna A Bosco
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Sean A Power
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Lily Lee
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Hari P Miskin
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| | - Bruce A C Cree
- From the Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford (L.S.), and the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (B.A.C.C.) - both in California; Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock (E.F.); Heinrich Heine University Medical School, Düsseldorf, Germany (H.-P.H.); the Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney (H.-P.H.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (H.-P.H.); Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic (H.-P.H.); University of Colorado, Aurora (E.A.); Swedish Medical Center, Seattle (P.Q.); Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN (S.W.); University of South Florida, Tampa (D.R.); Columbus Neuroscience, Westerville, OH (D.H.); the Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, and Center of Neurology, Lodz - both in Poland (K.S.); Consultants in Neurology, Northbrook, IL (D.W.); and TG Therapeutics, New York (G.C., K.M., Y.H., Y.X., M.S.W., J.A.B., S.A.P., L.L., H.P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Collongues N, Becker G, Jolivel V, Ayme-Dietrich E, de Seze J, Binamé F, Patte-Mensah C, Monassier L, Mensah-Nyagan AG. A Narrative Review on Axonal Neuroprotection in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Ther 2022; 11:981-1042. [PMID: 35610531 PMCID: PMC9338208 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00363-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) resulting in demyelination and neurodegeneration. The therapeutic strategy is now largely based on reducing inflammation with immunosuppressive drugs. Unfortunately, when disease progression is observed, no drug offers neuroprotection apart from its anti-inflammatory effect. In this review, we explore current knowledge on the assessment of neurodegeneration in MS and look at putative targets that might prove useful in protecting the axon from degeneration. Among them, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-apoptotic and antioxidant agents, sex hormones, statins, channel blockers, growth factors, and molecules preventing glutamate excitotoxicity have already been studied. Some of them have reached phase III clinical trials and carry a great message of hope for our patients with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Collongues
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. .,Center for Clinical Investigation, INSERM U1434, Strasbourg, France. .,Biopathology of Myelin, Neuroprotection and Therapeutic Strategy, INSERM U1119, Strasbourg, France. .,University Department of Pharmacology, Addictology, Toxicology and Therapeutic, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Guillaume Becker
- University Department of Pharmacology, Addictology, Toxicology and Therapeutic, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France.,NeuroCardiovascular Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, UR7296, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Valérie Jolivel
- Biopathology of Myelin, Neuroprotection and Therapeutic Strategy, INSERM U1119, Strasbourg, France
| | - Estelle Ayme-Dietrich
- University Department of Pharmacology, Addictology, Toxicology and Therapeutic, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France.,NeuroCardiovascular Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, UR7296, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jérôme de Seze
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Center for Clinical Investigation, INSERM U1434, Strasbourg, France.,Biopathology of Myelin, Neuroprotection and Therapeutic Strategy, INSERM U1119, Strasbourg, France
| | - Fabien Binamé
- Biopathology of Myelin, Neuroprotection and Therapeutic Strategy, INSERM U1119, Strasbourg, France
| | - Christine Patte-Mensah
- Biopathology of Myelin, Neuroprotection and Therapeutic Strategy, INSERM U1119, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laurent Monassier
- University Department of Pharmacology, Addictology, Toxicology and Therapeutic, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France.,NeuroCardiovascular Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, UR7296, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ayikoé Guy Mensah-Nyagan
- Biopathology of Myelin, Neuroprotection and Therapeutic Strategy, INSERM U1119, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Valizadeh A, Fattahi MR, Sadeghi M, Saghab Torbati M, Sahraian MA, Azimi AR. Disease-modifying therapies and T1 hypointense lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CNS Neurosci Ther 2022; 28:648-657. [PMID: 35218155 PMCID: PMC8981477 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research has shown that cerebral T1 hypointense lesions are positively correlated with the disability of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Hence, they could be used as an objective marker for evaluating the progression of the disease. Up to this date, there has not been a systematic evaluation of the effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on this prognostic marker. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of FDA-approved DMTs on the numbers and volume of T1 hypointense lesions in adult patients with MS. METHODS We included studies with the mentioned desired outcomes. In March 2021, we searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and CENTRAL to find relevant studies. All included studies were assessed for the risk of bias using the RoB-2 tool. Extracted data were analyzed using a random-effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS Thirteen studies with 7484 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed the mean difference between the intervention and comparator groups for the number of lesions was -1.3 (95% CI: -2.1, -0.5) and for the mean volume of lesions was -363.1 (95% CI: -611.6, -114.6). Certainty of evidence was judged to be moderate. Heterogeneity was considerable. DISCUSSION DMTs reduce the number and volume of T1 hypointense lesions. Although, these findings must be interpreted cautiously due to the high values of heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Valizadeh
- Neuroscience InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | - Maryam Sadeghi
- Neuroscience InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | - Mohammad Ali Sahraian
- Multiple Sclerosis Research CenterNeuroscience InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Amir Reza Azimi
- Multiple Sclerosis Research CenterNeuroscience InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu Q, Zheng Q, Luo D, Peng Y, Yan Z, Wang X, Chen X, Li Y. The Application of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging on the Heterogeneous White Matter in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:849425. [PMID: 35360163 PMCID: PMC8960252 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.849425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the microstructural damage in the heterogeneity of different white matter areas in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients by using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and its correlation with clinical and cognitive status. Materials and Methods Kurtosis fractional anisotropy (KFA), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) in T1-hypointense lesions (T1Ls), pure T2-hyperintense lesions (pure-T2Ls), normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and white matter in healthy controls (WM in HCs) were measured in 48 RRMS patients and 26 sex- and age-matched HCs. All the participants were assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) scores as the cognitive status. The Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were used to evaluate the clinical status in RRMS patients. Results The lowest KFA, FA, and MK values and the highest MD values were found in T1Ls, followed by pure-T2Ls, NAWM, and WM in HCs. The T1Ls and pure-T2Ls were significantly different in FA (p = 0.002) and MK (p = 0.013), while the NAWM and WM in HCs were significantly different in KFA, FA, and MK (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.001). The KFA, FA, MK, and MD values in NAWM (r = 0.360, p = 0.014; r = 0.415, p = 0.004; r = 0.369, p = 0.012; r = −0.531, p < 0.001) were correlated with the MMSE scores and the FA, MK, and MD values in NAWM (r = 0.423, p = 0.003; r = 0.427, p = 0.003; r = −0.359, p = 0.014) were correlated with the SDMT scores. Conclusion Applying DKI to the imaging-based white matter classification has the potential to reflect the white matter damage and is correlated with cognitive impairment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chitnis T, Banwell B, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Gücüyener K, Deiva K, Skripchenko N, Cui LY, Saubadu S, Hu W, Benamor M, Le-Halpere A, Truffinet P, Tardieu M. Safety and efficacy of teriflunomide in paediatric multiple sclerosis (TERIKIDS): a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2021; 20:1001-1011. [PMID: 34800398 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00364-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic options for children with multiple sclerosis are scarce. Teriflunomide is approved in more than 80 countries for the treatment of adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis. The TERIKIDS study examined the safety and efficacy of teriflunomide in children with relapsing multiple sclerosis. METHODS The TERIKIDS trial was a multicentre, phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, placebo-controlled study conducted at 57 clinical centres in 22 countries in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, and North America. The trial enrolled patients aged 10-17 years, diagnosed with relapsing multiple sclerosis and with at least one relapse in the year preceding screening or at least two relapses in the 2 years preceding screening. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral teriflunomide (dosage equivalent to 14 mg in adults) or matching placebo, using an interactive web and voice response system, for up to 96 weeks. Personnel in all sites and all patients were masked to study treatment in the double-blind period. Early entry into a subsequent 96-week open-label extension phase was possible before the end of the double-blind period for patients with confirmed clinical relapse or high MRI activity (at least five new or enlarged T2 lesions at week 24, followed by at least nine new or enlarged T2 lesions at week 36, or at least five new or enlarged T2 lesions at weeks 36 and 48, or at weeks 48 and 72). The primary endpoint was time to first confirmed clinical relapse by the end of the double-blind period. Key secondary imaging endpoints were number of new or enlarged T2 lesions and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per MRI scan. Efficacy endpoints were analysed in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment and exposed to the double-blind study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (trial number NCT02201108) and is closed to recruitment, but an additional optional open-label extension is ongoing. FINDINGS Between July 24, 2014, and the date of last patient visit on Oct 25, 2019, 185 patients were screened for eligibility, 166 (90%) were enrolled, and 109 were randomly assigned teriflunomide and 57 were randomly assigned placebo. 102 (94%) of 109 and 53 (93%) of 57 completed the double-blind period. Switch to the ongoing open-label extension because of high MRI activity was more frequent than anticipated in the placebo group (14 [13%] of 109 patients in the teriflunomide group vs 15 [26%] of 57 in the placebo group), decreasing the power of the study. After 96 weeks, there was no difference in time to first confirmed clinical relapse with teriflunomide compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·39-1·11; p=0·29). Teriflunomide reduced the number of new or enlarged T2 lesions versus placebo by 55% (relative risk 0·45, 95% CI 0·29-0·71; p=0·00061), and the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions by 75% (relative risk 0·25, 0·13-0·51; p<0·0001). Adverse events occurred in 96 (88%) patients in the teriflunomide group and 47 (82%) patients in the placebo group; serious adverse events occurred in 12 (11%) patients in the teriflunomide group and 6 (11%) patients in the placebo group. Nasopharyngitis, upper-respiratory-tract infection, alopecia, paraesthesia, abdominal pain, and increased blood creatine phosphokinase were more frequent with teriflunomide than with placebo. During the double-blind phase, four patients in the teriflunomide group had pancreatic adverse events (two with acute pancreatitis and two with pancreatic enzyme elevation), of which three events led to treatment discontinuation. INTERPRETATION No significant difference in time to first confirmed clinical relapse was found, possibly because more patients than expected switched from the double-blind to the open-label treatment period because of high MRI activity. Key secondary imaging analyses and a prespecified sensitivity analysis of probability of relapse or high MRI activity suggest that teriflunomide might have beneficial effects in children with relapsing multiple sclerosis by reducing the risk of focal inflammatory activity. FUNDING Sanofi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanuja Chitnis
- Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Brenda Banwell
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Research Centre for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Douglas L Arnold
- NeuroRx Research, Montréal, QC, Canada; Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Kivilcim Gücüyener
- Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakültesi Pediatrik Nöroloji Bilim Dali, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Natalia Skripchenko
- FSBI Research Institute for Paediatric Infectious Diseases FMBA Russia, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Li-Ying Cui
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Tardieu
- Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wei W, Ma D, Li L, Zhang L. Progress in the Application of Drugs for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:724718. [PMID: 34326775 PMCID: PMC8313804 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.724718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune and chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), which gives rise to focal lesion in CNS and cause physical disorders. Although environmental factors and susceptibility genes are reported to play a role in the pathogenesis of MS, its etiology still remains unclear. At present, there is no complete cure, but there are drugs that decelerate the progression of MS. Traditional therapies are disease-modifying drugs that control disease severity. MS drugs that are currently marketed mainly aim at the immune system; however, increasing attention is being paid to the development of new treatment strategies targeting the CNS. Further, the number of neuroprotective drugs is presently undergoing clinical trials and may prove useful for the improvement of neuronal function and survival. In this review, we have summarized the recent application of drugs used in MS treatment, mainly introducing new drugs with immunomodulatory, neuroprotective, or regenerative properties and their possible treatment strategies for MS. Additionally, we have presented Food and Drug Administration-approved MS treatment drugs and their administration methods, mechanisms of action, safety, and effectiveness, thereby evaluating their treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weipeng Wei
- Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center for Nervous System Drugs, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases of Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Denglei Ma
- Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center for Nervous System Drugs, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases of Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center for Nervous System Drugs, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases of Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center for Nervous System Drugs, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases of Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zivadinov R, Dwyer MG, Carl E, Poole EM, Cavalier S, Briassouli P, Bergsland N. Slowing of brain atrophy with teriflunomide and delayed conversion to clinically definite MS. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2020; 13:1756286420970754. [PMID: 33240397 PMCID: PMC7672760 DOI: 10.1177/1756286420970754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: We explored the effect of teriflunomide on cortical gray matter (CGM) and whole brain (WB) atrophy in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) from the phase III TOPIC study and assessed the relationship between atrophy and risk of conversion to clinically definite MS (CDMS). Methods: Patients (per McDonald 2005 criteria) were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, teriflunomide 7 mg, or teriflunomide 14 mg for ⩽108 weeks (core study). In the extension, teriflunomide-treated patients maintained their original dose; placebo-treated patients were re-randomized 1:1 to teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg. Brain volume was assessed during years 1–2. Results: Teriflunomide 14 mg significantly slowed annualized CGM and WB atrophy versus placebo during years 1–2 [percent reduction: month 12, 61.4% (CGM; p = 0.0359) and 28.6% (WB; p = 0.0286); month 24, 40.2% (CGM; p = 0.0416) and 43.0% (WB; p < 0.0001)]. For every 1% decrease in CGM or WB volume during years 1–2, risk of CDMS conversion increased by 14.5% (p = 0.0004) and 47.3% (p < 0.0001) during years 1–2, respectively, and 6.6% (p = 0.0570) and 35.9% (p = 0.0250) during years 1–5. In patients with the least (bottom quartile) versus most (top quartile) atrophy during years 1–2, risk of CDMS conversion was reduced by 58% (CGM; p = 0.0024) and 58% (WB; p = 0.0028) during years 1–2, and 42% (CGM; p = 0.0138) and 29% (WB; p = 0.1912) during years 1–5. Conclusion: These findings support the clinical relevance of CGM and WB atrophy and early intervention with teriflunomide in CIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael G. Dwyer
- The Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Carl
- The Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Niels Bergsland
- The Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vermersch P, Oh J, Cascione M, Oreja-Guevara C, Gobbi C, Travis LH, Myhr KM, Coyle PK. Teriflunomide vs injectable disease modifying therapies for relapsing forms of MS. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 43:102158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
13
|
Approved and Emerging Disease Modifying Therapies on Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21124312. [PMID: 32560364 PMCID: PMC7348940 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, chronic, progressive disease leading to a combination of inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration throughout the central nervous system (CNS). The outcome of these processes can be visualized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans as brain atrophy, or brain volume loss (BVL), as well as lesions, “black holes” and spinal cord atrophy. MRI outcomes such as BVL have been used as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and other measures of MS disease progression in clinical research settings. Several FDA-approved medications seek to alleviate disease progression by reducing the impact of such factors as demyelination and neurodegeneration, but there are still many shortcomings that current clinical research aims to mitigate. This review attempts to provide an overview of the FDA-approved medications available for treating multiple sclerosis and their effect on neurodegeneration, measured by BVL.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sastre-Garriga J, Pareto D, Battaglini M, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O, Enzinger C, Wuerfel J, Sormani MP, Barkhof F, Yousry TA, De Stefano N, Tintoré M, Filippi M, Gasperini C, Kappos L, Río J, Frederiksen J, Palace J, Vrenken H, Montalban X, Rovira À. MAGNIMS consensus recommendations on the use of brain and spinal cord atrophy measures in clinical practice. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:171-182. [PMID: 32094485 PMCID: PMC7054210 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0314-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Early evaluation of treatment response and prediction of disease evolution are key issues in the management of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). In the past 20 years, MRI has become the most useful paraclinical tool in both situations and is used clinically to assess the inflammatory component of the disease, particularly the presence and evolution of focal lesions - the pathological hallmark of MS. However, diffuse neurodegenerative processes that are at least partly independent of inflammatory mechanisms can develop early in people with MS and are closely related to disability. The effects of these neurodegenerative processes at a macroscopic level can be quantified by estimation of brain and spinal cord atrophy with MRI. MRI measurements of atrophy in MS have also been proposed as a complementary approach to lesion assessment to facilitate the prediction of clinical outcomes and to assess treatment responses. In this Consensus statement, the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS (MAGNIMS) study group critically review the application of brain and spinal cord atrophy in clinical practice in the management of MS, considering the role of atrophy measures in prognosis and treatment monitoring and the barriers to clinical use of these measures. On the basis of this review, the group makes consensus statements and recommendations for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Battaglini
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- NMR Research Unit, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Department of Neurology and Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jens Wuerfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maria P Sormani
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tarek A Yousry
- NMR Research Unit, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, University College London Hospitals National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Gasperini
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jordi Río
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jette Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jackie Palace
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Division of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Paolicelli D, Manni A, Iaffaldano A, Trojano M. Efficacy and Safety of Oral Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. CNS Drugs 2020; 34:65-92. [PMID: 31898276 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-019-00691-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Disease-modifying therapies have now become standard treatment for multiple sclerosis. These include five oral therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, namely fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, cladribine, and siponimod, although there is some discrepancy on the relative efficacy and safety of these agents. To gain further insight on these oral agents in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we performed a narrative review of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, cladribine, and siponimod. We limited the analysis to randomized clinical studies in which a comparator was used (i.e., placebo or other disease-modifying therapy). As relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is a chronic disease and treatment is lifelong, long-term outcomes were an additional focus. A total of 37 studies met inclusion criteria: 15 for fingolimod, 8 for dimethyl fumarate, 7 for teriflunomide, 4 for cladribine, and 3 for siponimod. All drugs showed some functional and magnetic resonance imaging benefit in nearly all clinical studies. The reduction in annual relapse rate was similar for fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, and cladribine, and somewhat greater than for teriflunomide; there is limited information on the annual relapse rate for siponimod. For all drugs, the benefits reported at short follow-up times are broadly consistent with those seen at longer follow-up times. For fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate, there was a definite trend towards a progressively lower annual relapse rate with continuing treatment. The safety profile of all five drugs was considered to be acceptable, even after extended treatment. While these results should be treated with caution, they highlight that future head-to-head studies are needed to better understand the long-term benefits of disease-modifying therapies. Such information will be of value when considering the risk-benefit profile of these oral therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Paolicelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Alessia Manni
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Iaffaldano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Andravizou A, Dardiotis E, Artemiadis A, Sokratous M, Siokas V, Tsouris Z, Aloizou AM, Nikolaidis I, Bakirtzis C, Tsivgoulis G, Deretzi G, Grigoriadis N, Bogdanos DP, Hadjigeorgiou GM. Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: mechanisms, clinical relevance and treatment options. AUTO- IMMUNITY HIGHLIGHTS 2019; 10:7. [PMID: 32257063 PMCID: PMC7065319 DOI: 10.1186/s13317-019-0117-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system characterized by focal or diffuse inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss and neurodegeneration. Brain atrophy can be seen in the earliest stages of MS, progresses faster compared to healthy adults, and is a reliable predictor of future physical and cognitive disability. In addition, it is widely accepted to be a valid, sensitive and reproducible measure of neurodegeneration in MS. Reducing the rate of brain atrophy has only recently been incorporated as a critical endpoint into the clinical trials of new or emerging disease modifying drugs (DMDs) in MS. With the advent of easily accessible neuroimaging softwares along with the accumulating evidence, clinicians may be able to use brain atrophy measures in their everyday clinical practice to monitor disease course and response to DMDs. In this review, we will describe the different mechanisms contributing to brain atrophy, their clinical relevance on disease presentation and course and the effect of current or emergent DMDs on brain atrophy and neuroprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina Andravizou
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Efthimios Dardiotis
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Artemios Artemiadis
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aeginition Hospital, Vas. Sophias Ave 72-74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Sokratous
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University General Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, 40500 Larissa, Greece
| | - Vasileios Siokas
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Zisis Tsouris
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Athina-Maria Aloizou
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis Nikolaidis
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, 2nd Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christos Bakirtzis
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, 2nd Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Tsivgoulis
- Second Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Deretzi
- Department of Neurology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Grigoriadis
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, 2nd Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios P. Bogdanos
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University General Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, 40500 Larissa, Greece
| | - Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
- Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sprenger T, Kappos L, Radue EW, Gaetano L, Mueller-Lenke N, Wuerfel J, Poole EM, Cavalier S. Association of brain volume loss and long-term disability outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with teriflunomide. Mult Scler 2019; 26:1207-1216. [PMID: 31198103 PMCID: PMC7493202 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519855722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background: Teriflunomide 14 mg significantly reduced brain volume loss (BVL) and confirmed disability worsening (CDW) compared with placebo in the TEMSO core study. Objective: To investigate the relationship between BVL from Baseline to Year 2 in the TEMSO core study and long-term CDW (Year 7) in the TEMSO long-term extension (NCT00803049). Methods: Structural Image Evaluation using Normalization of Atrophy determined BVL. Long-term CDW was assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale confirmed for 12 and 24 weeks. An additional analysis evaluated the relative contribution of BVL (Year 2) and other outcomes as potential mediators of the effect of teriflunomide 14 mg on 12-week CDW. Results: Patients with the least BVL were significantly less likely to have 12- and 24-week CDW at Year 7 compared with patients with the most BVL. A mediation analysis revealed that BVL (Year 2) explained 51.3% of the treatment effect on CDW; new or enlarging T2w lesions over 2 years explained 30.8%, and relapses in the first 2 years explained 38.5%. Conclusions: These results highlight the potential predictive value of BVL earlier in the disease course on long-term disability outcomes. The mediation analysis suggests that teriflunomide may prevent disability worsening largely through its effects on BVL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Sprenger
- University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland/ Department of Neurology, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ernst-Wilhelm Radue
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Laura Gaetano
- Medical Image Analysis Center, Basel, Switzerland/ Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Jens Wuerfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center, Basel, Switzerland/ Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Steven Cavalier
- Global Scientific Communications, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Comi G, Miller AE, Benamor M, Truffinet P, Poole EM, Freedman MS. Characterizing lymphocyte counts and infection rates with long-term teriflunomide treatment: Pooled analysis of clinical trials. Mult Scler 2019; 26:1083-1092. [PMID: 31172849 PMCID: PMC7412877 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519851981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: In Phase 3 studies, teriflunomide reduced relapse rates and disability progression compared with placebo; however, decreases in lymphocyte counts were also observed. Objective: To describe the effect of long-term teriflunomide treatment on lymphocyte counts and infection rates among patients in pooled analyses of Phase 3 core and extension studies. Methods: Four randomized trials (TEMSO, TOWER, TENERE, and TOPIC) compared teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg treatment with either placebo and/or subcutaneous interferon (IFN) β-1a 44 µg in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) (or first clinical episode suggestive of MS in TOPIC). Results: In 1895, patients ever exposed to teriflunomide, mean (standard deviation) absolute lymphocyte counts declined from Week 0 (1.89 (0.59)) to Week 24 (1.67 (0.52)) and then remained stable thereafter. In the core plus extension studies (up to 10.7 years), 7.3% and 2.2% experienced Grade 1 and Grade 2 lymphopenia, respectively. Infections were reported in 56.9% of patients without lymphopenia, 60.9% with Grade 1 lymphopenia, and 54.8% with Grade 2 lymphopenia. Serious infections occurred in 3.7%, 4.3%, and 7.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Long-term risk of lymphopenia and infections in patients who continue to receive teriflunomide is low, demonstrating a limited impact on adaptive and innate immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aaron E Miller
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mark S Freedman
- University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Klein A, Selter RC, Hapfelmeier A, Berthele A, Müller-Myhsok B, Pongratz V, Gasperi C, Zimmer C, Mühlau M, Hemmer B. CSF parameters associated with early MRI activity in patients with MS. NEUROLOGY-NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2019; 6:e573. [PMID: 31355309 PMCID: PMC6624100 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objective To identify CSF parameters at diagnosis of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and MS that are associated with early inflammatory disease activity as measured by standardized cerebral MRI (cMRI). Methods One hundred forty-nine patients with newly diagnosed CIS and MS were included in the retrospective study. cMRI at onset and after 12 months was analyzed for T2 and gadolinium-enhancing lesions. CSF was tested for oligoclonal bands and intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulin G (IgG), A (IgA), and M (IgM) before initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). In a subgroup of patients, CSF and serum samples were analyzed for sCD27, neurofilament light chain, and IgG subclasses 1 and 3. Association between CSF parameters and cMRI activity was investigated by univariable and multivariable regression analysis in all patients, DMT-treated patients, and untreated patients. Results IgG index, sCD27 levels in CSF, and to a lesser extent IgM index were associated with the occurrence of new cMRI lesions. IgG index and sCD27 levels in CSF were highly correlated. In a multivariable analysis, IgG index and to a lesser extent IgM index together with DMT treatment status and gender were strongest predictors of future cMRI activity. Conclusions CSF parameters such as IgG and IgM index are independently associated with future MRI activity and thus might be helpful to support early treatment decisions in patients newly diagnosed with CIS and MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Klein
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Rebecca C Selter
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Bertram Müller-Myhsok
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Viola Pongratz
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Christiane Gasperi
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Mark Mühlau
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology (A.K., R.C.S., A.B., V.P., C.G., M.M., B.H.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Institute of Medical Informatics (A.H.), Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (B.M.-M.), Munich; Department of Neuroradiology (C.Z.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; TUM Neuroimaging Center (M.M.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (B.H.), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Guan Y, Jakimovski D, Ramanathan M, Weinstock-Guttman B, Zivadinov R. The role of Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: from molecular pathophysiology to in vivo imaging. Neural Regen Res 2019; 14:373-386. [PMID: 30539801 PMCID: PMC6334604 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.245462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and neuronal damage. Environmental and genetic factors are associated with the risk of developing MS, but the exact cause still remains unidentified. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), vitamin D, and smoking are among the most well-established environmental risk factors in MS. Infectious mononucleosis, which is caused by delayed primary EBV infection, increases the risk of developing MS. EBV may also contribute to MS pathogenesis indirectly by activating silent human endogenous retrovirus-W. The emerging B-cell depleting therapies, particularly anti-CD20 agents such as rituximab, ocrelizumab, as well as the fully human ofatumumab, have shown promising clinical and magnetic resonance imaging benefit. One potential effect of these therapies is the depletion of memory B-cells, the primary reservoir site where EBV latency occurs. In addition, EBV potentially interacts with both genetic and other environmental factors to increase susceptibility and disease severity of MS. This review examines the role of EBV in MS pathophysiology and summarizes the recent clinical and radiological findings, with a focus on B-cells and in vivo imaging. Addressing the potential link between EBV and MS allows the better understanding of MS pathogenesis and helps to identify additional disease biomarkers that may be responsive to B-cell depleting intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Guan
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Dejan Jakimovski
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Murali Ramanathan
- Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
- Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Robert Zivadinov
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging at Clinical Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brod SA, Lincoln JA, Nelson F. Myelinating Proteins in MS Are Linked to Volumetric Brain MRI Changes. J Neuroimaging 2019; 29:400-405. [PMID: 30748043 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There is evidence of a relationship between promyelinating proteins and clinical multiple sclerosis (MS) activity during clinical relapse or recovery from clinical relapses. We examined the linkage between promyelinating biomarkers and volumetric changes in MS subjects during serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS We enrolled 13 MS subjects with active brain MRI scans not on disease modifying therapies. Subjects underwent baseline MRI, serum, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling. Qualitative changes, new/resolving gadolinium, new/enlarging/diminishing T2 and T1 hypointense lesions, were compared to baseline in subsequent MRI scans, and volumetric analysis was calculated. Analysis of biomarkers on serial CSF samples was performed only in subjects with qualitative (and quantitative) changes on MRI. The study was performed at a MS Center of Excellence academic medical center. RESULTS There was increased CSF neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) during increased qualitative T1 activity. A positive correlation between CSF and serum N-CAM and T1 lesion volume was observed. A negative correlation between serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and BPH (T1 vol/T2 vol + T1 vol) was observed. CONCLUSIONS Increased N-CAM levels may be related to repair or remyelination following injury to the brain as shown by increased T1 volumes. Our data suggest an early kind of blood signaling that induces release of peripheral BDNF levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Staley A Brod
- Departments of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - John A Lincoln
- Departments of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.,Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Flavia Nelson
- Departments of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.,Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.,Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Standardizing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols, Requisitions, and Reports in Multiple Sclerosis: An Update for Radiologist Based on 2017 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis and 2018 Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers Consensus Guidelines. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019; 43:1-12. [PMID: 30015803 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The advent of magnetic resonance imaging has improved our understanding of the pathophysiology and natural course of multiple sclerosis (MS). The ability of magnetic resonance imaging to show the evolution of MS lesions on sequential scans has brought it to be one of the endpoints in clinical trials for disease-modifying therapies. Based on the most updated consensus guidelines from the American (Consortium of MS Centers) and European (Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS) boards of experts in MS, this document shows the most relevant landmarks related to imaging findings, diagnostic criteria, indications to obtain a magnetic resonance, scan protocols and sequence options for patients with MS. Although incorporating the knowledge derived from the research arena into the daily clinical practice is always challenging, in this article, the authors provide useful recommendations to improve the information contained in the magnetic resonance report oriented to facilitate communication between radiologists and specialized medical teams involved in MS patients' multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
|
24
|
Medina S, Sainz de la Maza S, Villarrubia N, Álvarez-Lafuente R, Costa-Frossard L, Arroyo R, Monreal E, Tejeda-Velarde A, Rodríguez-Martín E, Roldán E, Álvarez-Cermeño JC, Villar LM. Teriflunomide induces a tolerogenic bias in blood immune cells of MS patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2019; 6:355-363. [PMID: 30847367 PMCID: PMC6389853 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Teriflunomide, a disease‐modifying treatment approved for multiple sclerosis (MS), inhibits reversibly dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, an enzyme involved in de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis and down‐regulates proliferation of activated lymphocytes. We aimed to study the impact of this drug in the lymphocyte profiles of MS patients. Methods Fifty‐five patients with relapsing‐remitting MS who initiated teriflunomide treatment were included in the study. We studied peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained before and 6 months after treatment initiation and explored effector, memory, and regulatory cells by flow cytometry. Wilcoxon matched pair tests were used to assess differences between basal and 6 months after treatment results. P‐values were corrected with Bonferroni test. Results When explored T and B cell subsets, we observed a decrease in the percentages of terminally differentiated CD4+ T cells (P = 0.001) and plasmablasts (P < 0.0001) after 6 months of treatment. These results were confirmed with the total cell number. When studied immunomodulatory cells, we observed a clear increase of monocytes expressing programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) (P = 0.005), which correlated negatively with all effector CD8+ T cell subsets. We also observed an increase in the percentage of CD8+ T cells (P = 0.028) and monocytes (P = 0.04) producing IL‐10. Conclusions Teriflunomide induces a specific reduction in effector T and B cells that have shown to play a role in MS course and an increase in immunomodulatory cells. Particularly, this drug induces the expression of PD‐L1, a molecule involved in tolerance to autoantigens, which can contribute to inhibit the abnormal immune response taking place in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Medina
- Department of Immunology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain.,The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain
| | - Susana Sainz de la Maza
- The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain.,Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain
| | - Noelia Villarrubia
- Department of Immunology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain.,The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain
| | - Roberto Álvarez-Lafuente
- The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain.,Department of Neurology Hospital Clínico San Carlos IDISSC Madrid Spain
| | - Lucienne Costa-Frossard
- The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain.,Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain
| | - Rafael Arroyo
- The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain.,Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid Madrid Spain
| | - Enric Monreal
- The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain.,Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain
| | - Amalia Tejeda-Velarde
- Department of Immunology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain.,The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain
| | - Eulalia Rodríguez-Martín
- Department of Immunology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain.,The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain
| | - Ernesto Roldán
- Department of Immunology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain.,The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain
| | - José C Álvarez-Cermeño
- The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain.,Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain
| | - Luisa M Villar
- Department of Immunology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Madrid Spain.,The Spanish Network of Multiple Sclerosis (REEM) Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Qiu W, Huang DH, Hou SF, Zhang MN, Jin T, Dong HQ, Peng H, Zhang CD, Zhao G, Huang YN, Zhou D, Wu WP, Wang BJ, Li JM, Zhang XH, Cheng Y, Li HF, Li L, Lu CZ, Zhang X, Bu BT, Dong WL, Fan DS, Hu XQ, Xu XH. Efficacy and Safety of Teriflunomide in Chinese Patients with Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: A Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 TOWER Study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018; 131:2776-2784. [PMID: 30511679 PMCID: PMC6278187 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.246067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Disease-modifying therapy is the standard treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in remission. The primary objective of the current analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of two teriflunomide doses (7 mg and 14 mg) in the subgroup of Chinese patients with relapsing MS included in the TOWER study. Methods TOWER was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group (three groups), placebo-controlled study. This subgroup analysis includes 148 Chinese patients randomized to receive either teriflunomide 7 mg (n = 51), teriflunomide 14 mg (n = 43), or placebo (n = 54). Results Of the 148 patients in the intent-to-treat population, adjusted annualized relapse rates were 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44, 0.92) in the placebo group, 0.48 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.70) in the teriflunomide 7 mg group, and 0.18 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.36) in the teriflunomide 14 mg group; this corresponded to a significant relative risk reduction in the teriflunomide 14 mg group versus placebo (-71.2%, P = 0.0012). Teriflunomide 14 mg also tended to reduce 12-week confirmed disability worsening by 68.1% compared with placebo (hazard ratio: 0.319, P = 0.1194). There were no differences across all treatment groups in the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 72.2% in the placebo group, 74.5% in the teriflunomide 7 mg group, and 69.8% in the teriflunomide 14 mg group); corresponding proportions for serious adverse events were 11.1%, 3.9%, and 11.6%, respectively. The most frequently reported TEAEs with teriflunomide versus placebo were neutropenia, increased alanine aminotransferase, and hair thinning. Conclusions Teriflunomide was as effective and safe in the Chinese subpopulation as it was in the overall population of patients in the TOWER trial. Teriflunomide has the potential to meet unmet medical needs for MS patients in China. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00751881; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00751881?term=NCT00751881&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Qiu
- Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
| | - De-Hui Huang
- Department of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Shi-Fang Hou
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Mei-Ni Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, China
| | - Tao Jin
- Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, China
| | - Hui-Qing Dong
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Hua Peng
- Department of Neurology, Shanghai Chang Zheng Hospital, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Chao-Dong Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110000, China
| | - Gang Zhao
- Department of Neurology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710001, China
| | - Yi-Ning Huang
- Department of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Dong Zhou
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Wei-Ping Wu
- Department of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Bao-Jun Wang
- Department of Neurology, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014040, China
| | - Ji-Mei Li
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Xing-Hu Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yan Cheng
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Hai-Feng Li
- Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Neurology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China
| | - Chuan-Zhen Lu
- Department of Neurology, Hua Shan Hospital of the Shanghai Fudan University Medical College, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
| | - Bi-Tao Bu
- Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China
| | - Wan-Li Dong
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Fan
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Xue-Qiang Hu
- Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
| | - Xian-Hao Xu
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Whole brain and deep gray matter atrophy detection over 5 years with 3T MRI in multiple sclerosis using a variety of automated segmentation pipelines. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0206939. [PMID: 30408094 PMCID: PMC6224096 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cerebral atrophy is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and selectively involves gray matter (GM). Several fully automated methods are available to measure whole brain and regional deep GM (DGM) atrophy from MRI. Objective To assess the sensitivity of fully automated MRI segmentation pipelines in detecting brain atrophy in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS and normal controls (NC) over five years. Methods Consistent 3D T1-weighted sequences were performed on a 3T GE unit in 16 mildly disabled patients with RRMS and 16 age-matched NC at baseline and five years. All patients received disease-modifying immunotherapy on-study. Images were applied to two pipelines to assess whole brain atrophy [brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) from SPM12; percentage brain volume change (PBVC) from SIENA] and two other pipelines (FSL-FIRST; FreeSurfer) to assess DGM atrophy (thalamus, caudate, globus pallidus, putamen). MRI change was compared by two sample t-tests. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) change was compared by repeated measures proportional odds models. Results Using FreeSurfer, the MS group had a ~10-fold acceleration in on-study volume loss than NC in the caudate (mean decrease 0.51 vs. 0.05 ml, p = 0.022). In contrast, caudate atrophy was not detected by FSL-FIRST (mean decrease 0.21 vs. 0.12 ml, p = 0.53). None of the other pipelines showed any difference in volume loss between groups, for whole brain or regional DGM atrophy (all p>0.38). The MS group showed on-study stability on EDSS (p = 0.47) but slight worsening of T25FW (p = 0.054). Conclusions In this real-world cohort of mildly disabled treated patients with RRMS, we identified ongoing atrophy of the caudate nucleus over five years, despite the lack of any significant whole brain atrophy, compared to healthy controls. The detectability of caudate atrophy was dependent on the MRI segmentation pipeline employed. These findings underscore the increased sensitivity gained when assessing DGM atrophy in monitoring MS.
Collapse
|
27
|
Patient-reported outcomes in patients with relapsing forms of MS switching to teriflunomide from other disease-modifying therapies: Results from the global Phase 4 Teri-PRO study in routine clinical practice. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2018; 26:211-218. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
28
|
Smith PA, Schmid C, Zurbruegg S, Jivkov M, Doelemeyer A, Theil D, Dubost V, Beckmann N. Fingolimod inhibits brain atrophy and promotes brain-derived neurotrophic factor in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2018. [PMID: 29530550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Longitudinal brain atrophy quantification is a critical efficacy measurement in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials and the determination of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA). Utilising fingolimod as a clinically validated therapy we evaluated the use of repeated brain tissue volume measures during chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a new preclinical efficacy measure. Brain volume changes were quantified using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7 Tesla and correlated to treatment-induced brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) measured in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, spinal cord and brain. Serial brain MRI measurements revealed slow progressive brain volume loss in vehicle treated EAE mice despite a stable clinical score. Fingolimod (1 mg/kg) significantly ameliorated brain tissue atrophy in the cerebellum and striatum when administered from established EAE disease onwards. Fingolimod-dependent tissue preservation was associated with induction of BDNF specifically within the brain and co-localized with neuronal soma. In contrast, therapeutic teriflunomide (3 mg/kg) treatment failed to inhibit CNS autoimmune mediated brain degeneration. Finally, weekly anti-IL-17A antibody (15 mg/kg) treatment was highly efficacious and preserved whole brain, cerebellum and striatum volume. Fingolimod-mediated BDNF increases within the CNS may contribute to limiting progressive tissue loss during chronic neuroinflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Smith
- Autoimmunity, Transplantation and Inflammation, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Cindy Schmid
- Autoimmunity, Transplantation and Inflammation, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Stefan Zurbruegg
- Neurosciences, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Magali Jivkov
- Preclinical Safety, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Arno Doelemeyer
- Musculoskeletal Diseases, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Diethilde Theil
- Preclinical Safety, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Valérie Dubost
- Preclinical Safety, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Nicolau Beckmann
- Musculoskeletal Diseases, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yousuf F, Dupuy SL, Tauhid S, Chu R, Kim G, Tummala S, Khalid F, Weiner HL, Chitnis T, Healy BC, Bakshi R. A two-year study using cerebral gray matter volume to assess the response to fingolimod therapy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2017; 383:221-229. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Revised: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
30
|
Elkjaer ML, Molnar T, Illes Z. Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis in real-world setting. Acta Neurol Scand 2017; 136:447-453. [PMID: 28321835 DOI: 10.1111/ane.12755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Teriflunomide 14 mg is a once-daily oral disease-modifying treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We examined adverse event (AE) profile and efficacy in real life. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this observational cohort study, we retrospectively examined 1521 blood samples and data of 102 patients followed for up to 28 months. RESULTS The number of female patients starting teriflunomide peaked in the fifth decade, 10 years later compared to male patients (P<.001), reflecting pregnancy concerns. Seventy-six percentages of patients shifted to teriflunomide from treatment with interferon-beta. Expanded disability status scale improved in 11% of patients (18.2±3.6 months follow-up) and remained constant in 67.5% (15±5.3 months follow-up). Of ten relapses, three occurred within 6 months after starting treatment. Seventeen patients (16.5%) discontinued teriflunomide: 53% because of AEs and 29% because of relapse. Levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) remained normal in 95.3% of the blood samples and remained below 1.5 times the upper limit of normal in 91% of the 4.7% abnormal samples. One-third of the patients had abnormal ALT values at least once. Haematological abnormalities were found in <4% of the blood samples, but at least one abnormal value was observed in up to 21% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Efficacy and safety of teriflunomide in real-life setting support data obtained by the pivotal trials. Laboratory abnormalities are rare among the large number of samples, but patients may commonly have a single mild, abnormal value if frequently tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. L. Elkjaer
- Department of Neurology; Odense University Hospital; Odense Denmark
| | - T. Molnar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care; University of Pecs; Pecs Hungary
| | - Z. Illes
- Department of Neurology; Odense University Hospital; Odense Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research; University of Southern Denmark; Odense Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Coyle PK, Khatri B, Edwards KR, Meca-Lallana JE, Cavalier S, Rufi P, Benamor M, Brette S, Robinson M, Gold R. Patient-reported outcomes in relapsing forms of MS: Real-world, global treatment experience with teriflunomide from the Teri-PRO study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017; 17:107-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
32
|
Moccia M, de Stefano N, Barkhof F. Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials. Mult Scler 2017; 23:1614-1626. [PMID: 29041865 PMCID: PMC5650056 DOI: 10.1177/1352458517729456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Imaging markers that are reliable, reproducible and sensitive to neurodegenerative changes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) can enhance the development of new medications with a neuroprotective mode-of-action. Accordingly, in recent years, a considerable number of imaging biomarkers have been included in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in primary and secondary progressive MS. Brain lesion count and volume are markers of inflammation and demyelination and are important outcomes even in progressive MS trials. Brain and, more recently, spinal cord atrophy are gaining relevance, considering their strong association with disability accrual; ongoing improvements in analysis methods will enhance their applicability in clinical trials, especially for cord atrophy. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques (e.g. magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), spectroscopy) have been included in few trials so far and hold promise for the future, as they can reflect specific pathological changes targeted by neuroprotective treatments. Positron emission tomography (PET) and optical coherence tomography have yet to be included. Applications, limitations and future perspectives of these techniques in clinical trials in progressive MS are discussed, with emphasis on measurement sensitivity, reliability and sample size calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Moccia
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola de Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Translational Imaging Group, UCL Institute of Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lublin FD, Cofield SS, Cutter GR, Gustafson T, Krieger S, Narayana PA, Nelson F, Salter AR, Wolinsky JS. Long-term follow-up of a randomized study of combination interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: Efficacy and safety results up to 7 years. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017; 18:95-102. [PMID: 29141831 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report the long-term results of the blinded extension phase of the randomized, controlled study of the combined use of interferon beta-1a (IFN) 30μg IM weekly and glatiramer acetate (GA) 20mg daily compared to each agent alone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS 1008 RRMS patients were followed on protocol until the last participant enrolled completed 3 years, allowing some subjects to be followed for up to 7 years. The primary endpoint was reduction in annualized relapse rate. Secondary outcomes included time to confirmed disability, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) score and MRI metrics. RESULTS Similar to the core study, combination IFN + GA was not superior to the better of the single agents (GA) in risk of relapse. Both the combination therapy and GA were significantly better than IFN in reducing the risk of relapse. The combination was not better than either agent alone in lessening confirmed EDSS worsening or change in MSFC. Also similar to the core result, the combination was superior to either agent alone in reducing new lesion activity, but the 3 year MRI result did not presage a clinical benefit over the extended observation interval. CONCLUSION Combining GA & IFN did not produce a significant clinical benefit over the entire study duration. The earlier effect on reducing MRI activity did not result in a later clinical advantage. The combination showed a sustained advantage in reducing disease activity free status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred D Lublin
- Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Department of Neurology & Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th Street, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Stacey S Cofield
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Gary R Cutter
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Tarah Gustafson
- Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Department of Neurology & Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th Street, New York, NY, United States
| | - Stephen Krieger
- Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Department of Neurology & Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th Street, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ponnada A Narayana
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Flavia Nelson
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amber R Salter
- Department of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jerry S Wolinsky
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Radue EW, Sprenger T, Gaetano L, Mueller-Lenke N, Cavalier S, Thangavelu K, Panzara MA, Donaldson JE, Woodward FM, Wuerfel J, Wolinsky JS, Kappos L. Teriflunomide slows BVL in relapsing MS: A reanalysis of the TEMSO MRI data set using SIENA. NEUROLOGY-NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2017; 4:e390. [PMID: 28828394 PMCID: PMC5550381 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To assess, using structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy (SIENA), the effect of teriflunomide, a once-daily oral immunomodulator, on brain volume loss (BVL) in patients with relapsing forms of MS enrolled in the phase 3 TEMSO study. Methods: TEMSO MR scans were analyzed (study personnel masked to treatment allocation) using SIENA to assess brain volume changes between baseline and years 1 and 2 in patients treated with placebo or teriflunomide. Treatment group comparisons were made via rank analysis of covariance. Results: Data from 969 patient MRI visits were included in this analysis: 808 patients had baseline and year 1 MRI; 709 patients had baseline and year 2 MRI. Median percentage BVL from baseline to year 1 and year 2 for placebo was 0.61% and 1.29%, respectively, and for teriflunomide 14 mg, 0.39% and 0.90%, respectively. BVL was lower for teriflunomide 14 mg vs placebo at year 1 (36.9% relative reduction, p = 0.0001) and year 2 (30.6% relative reduction, p = 0.0001). Teriflunomide 7 mg was also associated with significant reduction in BVL vs placebo over the 2-year study. The significant effects of teriflunomide 14 mg on BVL were observed in both patients with and without on-study disability worsening. Conclusions: The significant reduction of BVL vs placebo over 2 years achieved with teriflunomide is consistent with its effects on delaying disability worsening and suggests a neuroprotective potential. Classification of evidence: Class II evidence shows that teriflunomide treatment significantly reduces BVL over 2 years vs placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00134563.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst-Wilhelm Radue
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Till Sprenger
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Laura Gaetano
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Nicole Mueller-Lenke
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Steve Cavalier
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Karthinathan Thangavelu
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Michael A Panzara
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica E Donaldson
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Fiona M Woodward
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Jens Wuerfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Jerry S Wolinsky
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) (E.-W.R., L.G., N.M.-L., J.W.), Basel, Switzerland; DKD HELIOS Klinik (T.S.), Wiesbaden, Germany; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic (T.S., L.G., L.K.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Sanofi Genzyme (S.C., K.T.), Previously Sanofi Genzyme (M.A.P.), and WAVE Life Sciences (M.A.P.), Cambridge, MA; Fishawack Communications Ltd (J.E.D., F.M.W.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK; and McGovern Medical School (J.S.W.), UTHealth, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Aly L, Hemmer B, Korn T. From Leflunomide to Teriflunomide: Drug Development and Immunosuppressive Oral Drugs in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Curr Neuropharmacol 2017; 15:874-891. [PMID: 27928949 PMCID: PMC5652031 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x14666161208151525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Revised: 12/03/2016] [Accepted: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunosuppressive drugs have been used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) for a long time. Today, orally available second generation immunosuppressive agents have been approved or are filed for licensing as MS therapeutics. Due to semi-selective targeting of cellular processes, these second-generation immunosuppressive compounds might rather be immunomodulatory. For example, Teriflunomide inhibits the de novo pyrimidine synthesis and thus only targets rapidly proliferating cells, including lymphocytes. It is used as first line disease modifying therapy (DMT) in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS Review of online content related to oral immunosuppressants in MS with an emphasis on Teriflunomide. RESULTS Teriflunomide and Cladribine are second-generation immunosuppressants that are efficient in the treatment of MS patients. For Teriflunomide, a daily dose of 14 mg reduces the annualized relapse rate (ARR) by more than 30% and disability progression by 30% compared to placebo. Cladribine reduces the ARR by about 50% compared to placebo but has not yet been licensed due to unresolved safety concerns. We also discuss the significance of older immunosuppressive compounds including Azathioprine, Mycophenolate mofetile, and Cyclophosphamide in current MS therapy. CONCLUSION Teriflunomide has shown a favorable safety and efficacy profile in RRMS and is a therapeutic option for a distinct group of adult patients with RRMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Aly
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany,
- Department of Experimental Neuroimmunology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany,
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany,
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Korn
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany,
- Department of Experimental Neuroimmunology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany,
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kappos L, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, Camm J, Derfuss T, Kieseier BC, Sprenger T, Greenough K, Ni P, Harada T. Safety and efficacy of amiselimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MOMENTUM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:1148-59. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30192-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
37
|
Khalid F, Tauhid S, Chua AS, Healy BC, Stankiewicz JM, Weiner HL, Bakshi R. A longitudinal uncontrolled study of cerebral gray matter volume in patients receiving natalizumab for multiple sclerosis. Int J Neurosci 2016; 127:396-403. [PMID: 27143245 DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2016.1185421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) selectively affects gray matter (GM), which is highly relevant to disability and cognitive impairment. We assessed cerebral GM volume (GMV) during one year of natalizumab therapy. DESIGN/METHODS Patients with relapsing-remitting (n = 18) or progressive (n = 2) MS had MRI ∼1 year apart during natalizumab treatment. At baseline, patients were on natalizumab for (mean ± SD) 16.6 ± 10.9 months with age 38.5 ± 7.4 and disease duration 9.7 ± 4.3 years. RESULTS At baseline, GMV was 664.0 ± 56.4 ml, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.3 ± 2.0, timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) was 6.1±3.4 s; two patients (10%) had gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions. At follow-up, GMV was 663.9 ± 60.2 mL; EDSS was 2.6 ± 2.1 and T25FW was 5.9 ± 2.9 s. One patient had a mild clinical relapse during the observation period (0.052 annualized relapse rate for the entire cohort). No patients had Gd-enhancing lesions at follow-up. Linear mixed-effect models showed no significant change in annualized GMV [estimated mean change per year 0.338 mL, 95% confidence interval -9.66, 10.34, p = 0.94)], GM fraction (p = 0.92), whole brain parenchymal fraction (p = 0.64), T2 lesion load (p = 0.64), EDSS (p = 0.26) or T25FW (p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS This pilot study shows no GM atrophy during one year of natalizumab MS therapy. We also did not detect any loss of whole brain volume or progression of cerebral T2 hyperintense lesion volume during the observation period. These MRI results paralleled the lack of clinical worsening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fariha Khalid
- a a Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Shahamat Tauhid
- a a Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Alicia S Chua
- a a Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Brian C Healy
- a a Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA.,c c Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - James M Stankiewicz
- a a Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Howard L Weiner
- a a Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Rohit Bakshi
- a a Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA.,b b Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an update of the Cochrane review "Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis" (first published in The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12).Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system. It is clinically characterized by recurrent relapses or progression, or both, often leading to severe neurological disability and a serious decline in quality of life. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS aim to prevent occurrence of relapses and disability progression. Teriflunomide is a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor approved by both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as a DMT for adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). OBJECTIVES To assess the absolute and comparative effectiveness and safety of teriflunomide as monotherapy or combination therapy versus placebo or other disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) (interferon beta (IFNβ), glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, alemtuzumab) for modifying the disease course in people with MS. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group Specialised Trials Register (30 September 2015). We checked reference lists of published reviews and retrieved articles and searched reports (2004 to September 2015) from the MS societies in Europe and America. We also communicated with investigators participating in trials of teriflunomide and the pharmaceutical company, Sanofi-Aventis. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trials with a length of follow-up of one year or greater evaluating teriflunomide, as monotherapy or combination therapy, versus placebo or other approved DMDs for people with MS without restrictions regarding dose, administration frequency and duration of treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological procedures of Cochrane. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Disagreements were discussed and resolved by consensus among the review authors. We contacted the principal investigators of included studies for additional data or confirmation of data. MAIN RESULTS Five studies involving 3231 people evaluated the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide 7 mg and 14 mg, alone or with add-on IFNβ, versus placebo or IFNβ-1a for adults with relapsing forms of MS and an entry Expanded Disability Status Scale score of less than 5.5.Overall, there were obvious clinical heterogeneities due to diversities in study designs or interventions and methodological heterogeneities across studies. All studies had a high risk of detection bias for relapse assessment and a high risk of bias due to conflicts of interest. Among them, three studies additionally had a high risk of attrition bias due to a high dropout rate and two studies had an unclear risk of attrition bias. The studies of combination therapy with IFNβ (650 participants) and the study with IFNβ-1a as controls (324 participants) also had a high risk for performance bias and a lack of power due to the limited sample.Two studies evaluated the benefit and the safety of teriflunomide as monotherapy versus placebo over a period of one year (1169 participants) or two years (1088 participants). A meta-analysis was not conducted. Compared to placebo, administration of teriflunomide at a dose of 7 mg/day or 14 mg/day as monotherapy reduced the number of participants with at least one relapse over one year (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.87, P value = 0.001 with 7 mg/day and RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.75, P value < 0.00001 with 14 mg/day) or two years (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98, P value = 0.03 with 7 mg/day and RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.93, P value = 0.004 with 14 days). Only teriflunomide at a dose of 14 mg/day reduced the number of participants with disability progression over one year (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.84, P value = 0.006) or two years (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.96, P value = 0.02). When taking the effect of drop-outs into consideration, the likely-case scenario analyses still showed a benefit in reducing the number of participants with at least one relapse, but not for the number of participants with disability progression. Both doses also reduced the annualized relapse rate and the number of gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions over two years. Quality of evidence for relapse outcomes at one year or at two years was low, while for disability progression at one year or at two years was very low.When compared to IFNβ-1a, teriflunomide at a dose of 14 mg/day had a similar efficacy to IFNβ-1a in reducing the proportion of participants with at least one relapse over one year, while teriflunomide at a dose of 7 mg/day was inferior to IFNβ-1a (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.67, P value = 0.14; 215 participants with 14 mg/day and RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.66 to 4.53, P value < 0.0001; 213 participants with 7 mg/day). However, the quality of evidence was very low.In terms of safety profile, the most common adverse events associated with teriflunomide were diarrhoea, nausea, hair thinning, elevated alanine aminotransferase, neutropenia and lymphopenia. These adverse events had a dose-related effects and rarely led to treatment discontinuation. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There was low-quality evidence to support that teriflunomide at a dose of 7 mg/day or 14 mg/day as monotherapy reduces both the number of participants with at least one relapse and the annualized relapse rate over one year or two years of treatment in comparison with placebo. Only teriflunomide at a dose of 14 mg/day reduced the number of participants with disability progression and delayed the progression of disability over one year or two years, but the quality of the evidence was very low. The quality of available data was too low to evaluate the benefit teriflunomide as monotherapy versus IFNβ-1a or as combination therapy with IFNβ. The common adverse effects were diarrhoea, nausea, hair thinning, elevated alanine aminotransferase, neutropenia and lymphopenia. These adverse effects were mostly mild-to-moderate in severity, but had a dose-related effect. New studies of high quality and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the comparative benefit of teriflunomide on these outcomes and the safety in comparison with other DMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dian He
- Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityDepartment of NeurologyNo. 28, Gui Yi StreetGuiyangGuizhou ProvinceChina550004
| | - Chao Zhang
- Jinan No. 6 People's HospitalDepartment of Internal MedicineNo. 38, Hui Quan RoadJinanShandong ProvinceChina250200
| | - Xia Zhao
- Jinan No. 6 People's HospitalDepartment of NursingNo. 38, Hui Quan RoadJinanShandong ProvinceChina250200
| | - Yifan Zhang
- Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityDepartment of NeurologyNo. 28, Gui Yi StreetGuiyangGuizhou ProvinceChina550004
| | - Qingqing Dai
- Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityDepartment of NeurologyNo. 28, Gui Yi StreetGuiyangGuizhou ProvinceChina550004
| | - Yuan Li
- Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityDepartment of NeurologyNo. 28, Gui Yi StreetGuiyangGuizhou ProvinceChina550004
| | - Lan Chu
- Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical UniversityDepartment of NeurologyNo. 28, Gui Yi StreetGuiyangGuizhou ProvinceChina550004
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim G, Tauhid S, Dupuy SL, Tummala S, Khalid F, Healy BC, Bakshi R. An MRI-defined measure of cerebral lesion severity to assess therapeutic effects in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2016; 263:531-8. [PMID: 26754005 PMCID: PMC4785194 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-8009-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Revised: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Assess the sensitivity of the Magnetic Resonance Disease Severity Scale (MRDSS), based on cerebral lesions and atrophy, for treatment monitoring of glatiramer acetate (GA) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). This retrospective non-randomized pilot study included patients who started daily GA [n = 23, age (median, range) 41 (26.2, 53.1) years, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score 1.0 (0, 3.5)], or received no disease-modifying therapy (noDMT) [n = 21, age 44.8 (28.2, 55.4), EDSS 0 (0, 2.5)] for 2 years. MRDSS was the sum of z-scores (normalized to a reference sample) of T2 hyperintense lesion volume (T2LV), the ratio of T1 hypointense LV to T2LV (T1/T2), and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) multiplied by negative 1. The two groups were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum tests; within group change was assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Glatiramer acetate subjects had less progression than noDMT on T1/T2 [(median z-score change (range), 0 (−1.07, 1.20) vs. 0.41 (−0.30, 2.51), p = 0.003)] and MRDSS [0.01 (−1.33, 1.28) vs. 0.46 (−1.57, 2.46), p = 0.01]; however, not on BPF [0.12 (−0.18, 0.58) vs. 0.10 (−1.47,0.50), p = 0.59] and T2LV [−0.03 (−0.90, 0.57) vs. 0.01 (−1.69, 0.34), p = 0.40]. While GA subjects worsened only on BPF [0.12 (−0.18, 0.58), p = 0.001], noDMT worsened on BPF [0.10 (−1.47, 0.50), p = 0.002], T1/T2 [0.41 (−0.30, 2.51), p = 0.0002], and MRDSS [0.46 (−1.57, 2.46), p = 0.0006]. These preliminary findings show the potential of two new cerebral MRI metrics to track MS therapeutic response. The T1/T2, an index of the destructive potential of lesions, may provide particular sensitivity to treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Kim
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shahamat Tauhid
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sheena L Dupuy
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Subhash Tummala
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fariha Khalid
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian C Healy
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rohit Bakshi
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, Partners MS Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Laboratory for Neuroimaging Research, One Brookline Place, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Comi G, Freedman MS, Kappos L, Olsson TP, Miller AE, Wolinsky JS, O'Connor PW, Benamor M, Dukovic D, Truffinet P, Leist TP. Pooled safety and tolerability data from four placebo-controlled teriflunomide studies and extensions. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016; 5:97-104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Revised: 10/30/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Freedman MS, Wolinsky JS, Truffinet P, Comi G, Kappos L, Miller AE, Olsson TP, Benamor M, Chambers S, O'Connor PW. A randomized trial of teriflunomide added to glatiramer acetate in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2015; 1:2055217315618687. [PMID: 28607708 PMCID: PMC5433345 DOI: 10.1177/2055217315618687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator for the treatment of relapsing−remitting MS. Objective To evaluate the safety and tolerability of teriflunomide as add-on therapy to a stable dose of glatiramer acetate (GA) in patients with relapsing forms of MS (RMS). Methods Phase II, randomized, double-blind, add-on, placebo-controlled study. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability; secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of treatment on disease activity assessed by MRI and relapse. Results Patients with RMS on GA (N = 123) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive teriflunomide 14 mg (n = 40), 7 mg (n = 42), or placebo (n = 41) for 24 weeks; 96 patients entered the 24-week extension, remaining on original treatment allocation. Teriflunomide was well tolerated over 48 weeks. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) was low across all groups; 5 (12.2%), 3 (7.1%), and 2 (5.0%) patients in the 14 mg, 7 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, discontinued treatment due to AEs. Teriflunomide reduced the number of T1-Gd lesions vs placebo (14 mg: 46.6% relative reduction, p = 0.1931; 7 mg: 64.0%: relative reduction, p = 0.0306). Conclusions Teriflunomide added to stable-dose GA had acceptable safety and tolerability, and reduced some MRI markers of disease activity compared with GA alone. NCT00475865 (core study); NCT00811395 (extension).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Freedman
- University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - J S Wolinsky
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P Truffinet
- Genzyme, a Sanofi company, Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | - G Comi
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - L Kappos
- University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A E Miller
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - S Chambers
- Fishawack Communications Ltd, Abingdon, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zivadinov R, Dwyer MG, Ramasamy DP, Davis MD, Steinerman JR, Khan O. The Effect of Three Times a Week Glatiramer Acetate on Cerebral T1 Hypointense Lesions in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2015; 25:989-95. [PMID: 26394270 PMCID: PMC5054834 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2015] [Revised: 08/02/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Two definitions of T1 hypointense (T1H) lesions can be derived from pre‐contrast images: those that may or may not have a corresponding gadolinium‐enhancing correlate on post‐contrast images (T1H total), and those that are simultaneously non‐gadolinium‐enhancing on post‐contrast scans (T1H non‐enhancing). To determine the differences in lesion evolution between these two T1H definitions, we examined the effect of glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL three times weekly subcutaneous injection (GA40) on the number of new or enlarging T1H total and T1H non‐enhancing lesions in patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS The Phase III GALA study randomized 1404 RRMS subjects 2:1 to receive GA40 or placebo for 12 months. MRI scans were obtained at baseline and at months 6 and 12. Cumulative numbers of T1H total and of T1H non‐enhancing lesions were analyzed using an adjusted negative binomial regression model. A total of 1,357 patients had MRI data collected at either the month 6 or month 12 visit. RESULTS Among the 1,357 patients with MRI scans performed at either the month 6 or month 12 visit, 883 treated with GA40 developed an adjusted cumulative mean of 1.72 T1H total lesions versus 2.62 in 440 placebo controls (risk ratio, .66; 95% CI, .54‐.80; P < .0001). On T1H non‐enhanced scans, GA40‐treated patients developed an adjusted cumulative mean of 1.35 T1H non‐enhancing lesions versus 1.91 in placebo controls (risk ratio, .71; CI, .58‐.87; P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS GA40 significantly reduced the number of new or enlarging T1H total lesions and T1H non‐enhancing lesions compared with placebo. Although the treatment effect magnitude was comparable with both definitions, the use of T1H non‐enhancing lesions may be more relevant for more uniform standardization in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Zivadinov
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - Michael G Dwyer
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - Deepa P Ramasamy
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | - Omar Khan
- The Sastry Foundation Advanced Imaging Laboratory & Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Miller AE. Teriflunomide: a once-daily oral medication for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther 2015; 37:2366-80. [PMID: 26365096 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose was to summarize US prescribing information for teriflunomide in the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS), with reference to clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. METHODS In September 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration granted approval for the use of teriflunomide, 14 mg and 7 mg once daily, to treat RMS on the basis of the results of a Phase II study and the Phase III TEMSO (Teriflunomide Multiple Sclerosis Oral) trial. After recent updates to the prescribing information (October 2014), key findings from these and 2 other Phase III clinical trials, TOWER (Teriflunomide Oral in People With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis) and TOPIC (Oral Teriflunomide for Patients with a First Clinical Episode Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis), and practical considerations for physicians are summarized. FINDINGS Teriflunomide, 14 mg and 7 mg, significantly reduced mean number of unique active lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; P < 0.05 for both doses) in the Phase II study. In the TEMSO and TOWER studies, the 14-mg dose of teriflunomide significantly reduced annualized relapse rate (31% and 36% relative risk reduction compared with placebo, respectively; both P < 0.001) and risk of disability progression sustained for 12 weeks (hazard ratio vs placebo 0.70 and 0.69, respectively; both P < 0.05). The 7-mg dose significantly (P < 0.02) reduced annualized relapse rate in both studies, although the reduction in risk of disability progression was not statistically significant. Teriflunomide treatment was also associated with significant efficacy on MRI measures of disease activity in TEMSO; both doses significantly reduced total lesion volume and number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions. TOPIC evaluated patients with a first clinical event consistent with acute demyelination and brain MRI lesions characteristic of multiple sclerosis. More patients were free of relapse in the teriflunomide 14-mg and 7-mg groups than in the placebo group (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). In safety data pooled from the 4 studies, adverse events occurring in ≥2% of patients and ≥2% higher than in the placebo group were headache, alanine aminotransferase increase, diarrhea, alopecia (hair thinning), nausea, paresthesia, arthralgia, neutropenia, and hypertension. Routine monitoring procedures before and on treatment are recommended to assess potential safety issues. Women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception and, in the event of pregnancy, undergo an accelerated elimination procedure to reduce plasma concentrations of teriflunomide. IMPLICATIONS Clinical evidence suggests that teriflunomide is an effective therapeutic choice for patients with RMS, both as an initial treatment and as an alternative for patients who may have experienced intolerance or inadequate response to a previous or current disease-modifying therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron E Miller
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ziemssen T, De Stefano N, Sormani MP, Van Wijmeersch B, Wiendl H, Kieseier BC. Optimizing therapy early in multiple sclerosis: An evidence-based view. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015; 4:460-469. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2015] [Revised: 06/01/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
45
|
Pérez-Miralles FC, Sastre-Garriga J, Vidal-Jordana A, Río J, Auger C, Pareto D, Tintoré M, Rovira A, Montalban X. Predictive value of early brain atrophy on response in patients treated with interferon β. NEUROLOGY-NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2015; 2:e132. [PMID: 26185778 PMCID: PMC4496631 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between brain volume loss during the first year of interferon treatment and clinical outcome at 4 years. Methods: Patients with multiple sclerosis initiating interferon β were clinically evaluated every 6 months for the presence of relapses and assessment of global disability using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). MRI scans were performed at baseline and after 12 months, and the percentage of brain volume change (PBVC), brain parenchymal volume change (BPVc%), gray matter volume change (GMVc%), and white matter volume change (WMVc%) were estimated. Patients were divided based on the cutoff values for predicting confirmed EDSS worsening obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis for all atrophy measurements. Survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression to predict disability worsening at last observation were applied, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and radiologic variables. Results: Larger PBVC and WMVc% decreases were observed in patients with disability worsening at 4 years of follow-up, whereas no differences were found in BPVc% or GMVc%. Cutoff points were obtained for PBVC (−0.86%; sensitivity 65.5%, specificity 71.4%) and WMVc% (−2.49%; sensitivity 85.3%, specificity 43.8%). Patients with decreases of PBVC and WMVc% below cutoff values were more prone to develop disability worsening (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.875, p = 0.005; HR 4.246, p = 0.004, respectively). PBVC (HR 4.751, p = 0.008) and the interaction of new T2 lesions with WMVc% (HR 1.086, p = 0.005) were found to be independent predictors of disability worsening in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: At the patient level, whole-brain and white matter volume changes in the first year of interferon β therapy are predictive of subsequent clinical evolution under treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Carlos Pérez-Miralles
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angela Vidal-Jordana
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Río
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Auger
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alex Rovira
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Servei de Neurologia/Neuroimmunologia (F.C.P.-M., J.S.-G., A.V.-J., J.R., M.T., X.M.) Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica (Servei de Radiologia) (C.A., D.P., A.R.), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; and Departament de Medicina (F.C.P.-M.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Vidal-Jordana A, Sastre-Garriga J, Rovira A, Montalban X. Treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: therapy effects on brain atrophy. J Neurol 2015; 262:2617-26. [PMID: 26041617 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-7798-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Revised: 05/22/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system with a complex and heterogeneous pathology that may ultimately lead to neurodegeneration and brain atrophy. Brain volume loss in MS is known to occur early in the disease course and to be clinically relevant, as it has been related to disability progression. Nowadays, brain volume loss is relatively easy to measure with different automated, reproducible and accurate software tools. Therefore, most of (if not all) the newest clinical trials have incorporated brain volume outcomes as a measure of treatment effect. With this review, we aimed to update and summarize all existing data regarding brain volume and RRMS treatment in clinical trials as well as in open-label observational studies of drugs with positive results in its primary outcome in at least one phase III trial as of March 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Vidal-Jordana
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Edifici Cemcat, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Edifici Cemcat, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alex Rovira
- Magnetic Resonance Unit, Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Edifici Cemcat, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Miller DH, Fox RJ, Phillips JT, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kita M, Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, Tozer DJ, MacManus DG, Yousry TA, Goodsell M, Yang M, Zhang R, Viglietta V, Dawson KT. Effects of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate on MRI measures in the phase 3 CONFIRM study. Neurology 2015; 84:1145-52. [PMID: 25681448 PMCID: PMC4371413 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2013] [Accepted: 11/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of oral delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) on MRI lesion activity and load, atrophy, and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) measures from the Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (CONFIRM) study. METHODS CONFIRM was a 2-year, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of DMF 240 mg twice (BID) or 3 times daily (TID) in 1,417 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS); subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg once daily was included as an active reference comparator. The number and volume of T2-hyperintense, T1-hypointense, and gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions, as well as whole brain volume and MTR, were assessed in 681 patients (MRI cohort). RESULTS DMF BID and TID produced significant and consistent reductions vs placebo in the number of new or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions and new nonenhancing T1-hypointense lesions after 1 and 2 years of treatment and in the number of Gd+ lesions at week 24, year 1, and year 2. Lesion volumes were also significantly reduced. Reductions in brain atrophy and MTR changes with DMF relative to placebo did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS The robust effects on MRI active lesion counts and total lesion volume in patients with RRMS demonstrate the ability of DMF to exert beneficial effects on inflammatory lesion activity in multiple sclerosis, and support DMF therapy as a valuable new treatment option in RRMS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class I evidence of reduction in brain lesion number and volume, as assessed by MRI, over 2 years of delayed-release DMF treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Miller
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA.
| | - Robert J Fox
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - J Theodore Phillips
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Michael Hutchinson
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Eva Havrdova
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Mariko Kita
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Daniel J Tozer
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - David G MacManus
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Tarek A Yousry
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Mary Goodsell
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Minhua Yang
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Ray Zhang
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Vissia Viglietta
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| | - Katherine T Dawson
- From the Departments of Neuroinflammation (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M.) and Brain Repair and Rehabilitation (T.A.Y.), NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre; University College London Institute of Neurology (D.H.M., C.A.M.W.-K., D.J.T., D.G.M., T.A.Y.), UK; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (R.J.F.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Multiple Sclerosis Program (J.T.P.), Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX; St. Vincent's University Hospital (M.H.), Elm Park, Donnybrook, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurology (E.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Virginia Mason Medical Center (M.K.), Seattle, WA; CircleScience (M.G.), Tytherington, UK; and Biogen Idec Incorporated (M.Y., R.Z., V.V., K.T.D.), Weston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our current treatment algorithms include only IFN-β and glatiramer as available first-line disease-modifying drugs and natalizumab and fingolimod as second-line therapies. Today, 10 drugs have been approved in Europe and nine in the United States making the choice of therapy more complex. The purpose of the review has been to work out new management algorithms for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis including new oral therapies and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. RECENT FINDINGS Recent large placebo-controlled trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have shown efficacy of new oral disease-modifying drugs, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate, with similar or better efficacy than the injectable disease-modifying drugs, IFN-β and glatiramer acetate. In addition, the new oral drugs seem to have a favorable safety profile. Further, the monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab, which in clinical trials has shown superiority to subcutaneous IFN-β 1a, has been approved in Europe, but not yet in the United States. SUMMARY In de novo-treated patients, the injectables, IFN-β and glatiramer acetate, will to a great extent be replaced by the new orals, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. However, patients who are stable on an injectable with no or minor side-effects could continue their current therapy. Alemtuzumab should be used as a second-line therapy.
Collapse
|
50
|
Miller AE. Teriflunomide for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 11:181-94. [DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2015.993611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|