1
|
Januel E, Hajage D, Labauge P, Maillart E, De Sèze J, Zephir H, Pelletier J, Guilloton L, Bensa C, Heinzlef O, Casez O, Biotti D, Bourre B, Vukusic S, Maurousset A, Berger E, Laplaud D, Lebrun-Frénay C, Dubessy AL, Branger P, Thouvenot E, Clavelou P, Sellal F, Manchon E, Moreau T, Papeix C, Tubach F, Louapre C. Association Between Anti-CD20 Therapies and COVID-19 Severity Among Patients With Relapsing-Remitting and Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2319766. [PMID: 37351881 PMCID: PMC10290250 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), factors associated with severe COVID-19 include anti-CD20 therapies and neurologic disability, but it is still unclear whether these 2 variables are independently associated with severe COVID-19 or whether the association depends on MS clinical course. Objective To assess the association between anti-CD20 therapies and COVID-19 severity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, retrospective cohort study used data from the COVISEP study, which included patients with MS and COVID-19 from February 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022, at 46 French MS expert centers, general hospitals, and private neurology practices. Eligible patients with RRMS were those treated with high-efficacy MS therapy (ie, anti-CD20, fingolimod, or natalizumab), and eligible patients with PMS were those younger than 70 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 8 or lower. Patients were monitored from COVID-19 symptom onset until recovery or death. Exposures Current anti-CD20 therapy (ocrelizumab or rituximab). Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization with any mode of oxygenation or death). All analyses were conducted separately in patients with RRMS and PMS using propensity score-weighted logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to COVID-19 vaccine status, sex, EDSS score, and age. Results A total of 1400 patients, 971 with RRMS (median age, 39.14 years [IQR, 31.38-46.80 years]; 737 [76.1%] female) and 429 with PMS (median age, 54.21 years [IQR, 48.42-60.14 years]; 250 [58.3%] female) were included in the study. A total of 418 patients with RRMS (43.0%) and 226 with PMS (52.7%) were treated with anti-CD20 therapies. In weighted analysis, 13.4% and 2.9% of patients with RRMS treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 5.20; 95% CI, 2.78-9.71); this association persisted among vaccinated patients (7.0% vs 0.9%; OR, 8.85; 95% CI, 1.26-62.12). Among patients with PMS, 19.0% and 15.5% of patients treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and there was no association between anti-CD20 treatment and severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.76-2.16). In PMS subgroup analysis, anti-CD20 exposure interacted negatively with EDSS score (P = .009 for interaction) and age (P = .03 for interaction); anti-CD20 therapies were associated with risk of severe COVID-19 only in patients with less neurologic disability and younger patients with PMS. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, risk of severe COVID-19 was higher in patients with PMS than in those with RRMS. Use of anti-CD20 therapies was associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 among patients with RRMS. In patients with PMS, there was no association between anti-CD20 therapies and risk of severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edouard Januel
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Clinical Investigation Center, Paris Brain Institute, Paris, France
| | - David Hajage
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Labauge
- Department of Neurology, CRC-SEP, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France/Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, INSERM and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Elisabeth Maillart
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Clinical Investigation Center, Paris Brain Institute, Paris, France
| | - Jérome De Sèze
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Investigation Center, CHU de Strasbourg, CIC 1434, INSERM 1434, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hélène Zephir
- Department of Neurology, CHU Lille, INSERM U1172, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean Pelletier
- Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle de Neurosciences Cliniques, Service de Neurologie, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Guilloton
- Association des Neurologues Libéraux de Langue Française, Bergerac, France
| | - Caroline Bensa
- Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Heinzlef
- Département de Neurologie, CRC-SEP, Centre Hospitalier de Poissy-St Germain-en-Laye, France
| | - Olivier Casez
- Neurologie, Pathologies Inflammatoires du Système Nerveux, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France / Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité–Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications, Grenoble, Translational Research in Autoimmunity and Inflammation Group, Université de Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Damien Biotti
- Centre Ressources et Compétences Sclérose en Plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France INSERM UMR1291–CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Sandra Vukusic
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Bron, France
| | - Aude Maurousset
- CRC-SEP and Department of Neurology, CHU de Tours, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - Eric Berger
- CHU de Besançon, Service de Neurologie, Besançon, France
| | - David Laplaud
- CHU de Nantes, Service de Neurologie & CIC015 INSERM, Nantes, France
| | | | - Anne-Laure Dubessy
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Department of Neurology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, CRC-SEP Paris, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Branger
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Eric Thouvenot
- Department of Neurology, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France
- Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, UMR5203, INSERM 1191, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Clavelou
- Department of Neurology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - François Sellal
- Département de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, Unité INSERM U-1118, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eric Manchon
- Department of Neurology, Gonesse Hospital, Gonesse, France
| | | | - Caroline Papeix
- Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, Paris, France
| | - Céline Louapre
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Neuroscience Clinical Investigation Center, Paris Brain Institute, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Capone F, Rossi M, Cruciani A, Motolese F, Pilato F, Di Lazzaro V. Safety, immunogenicity, efficacy, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: a narrative review. Neural Regen Res 2023; 18:284-288. [PMID: 35900404 PMCID: PMC9396498 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.346539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last two years, a new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection has spread worldwide leading to the death of millions. Vaccination represents the key factor in the global strategy against this pandemic, but it also poses several problems, especially for vulnerable people such as patients with multiple sclerosis. In this review, we have briefly summarized the main findings of the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination for multiple sclerosis patients. Although the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines has progressively increased in the last year, a small but significant part of patients with multiple sclerosis still has relevant concerns about vaccination that make them hesitant about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Overall, available data suggest that the COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective in multiple sclerosis patients, even though some pharmacological treatments such as anti-CD20 therapies or sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators can reduce the immune response to vaccination. Accordingly, COVID-19 vaccination should be strongly recommended for people with multiple sclerosis and, in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies and sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators, and clinicians should evaluate the appropriate timing for vaccine administration. Further studies are necessary to understand the role of cellular immunity in COVID-19 vaccination and the possible usefulness of booster jabs. On the other hand, it is mandatory to learn more about the reasons why people refuse vaccination. This would help to design a more effective communication campaign aimed at increasing vaccination coverage among vulnerable people.
Collapse
|
3
|
Totschnig D, Augustin M, Niculescu I, Laferl H, Jansen-Skoupy S, Lehmann C, Wenisch C, Zoufaly A. SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis with Sotrovimab and Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab in Immunocompromised Patients—A Single-Center Experience. Viruses 2022; 14:v14102278. [PMID: 36298832 PMCID: PMC9607212 DOI: 10.3390/v14102278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunocompromised patients experience reduced vaccine effectiveness and are at higher risk for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) death. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) aims to protect these patients. So far, only tixagevimab/cilgavimab is authorized for use as PrEP. This paper aims to provide real-world data on the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab and sotrovimab as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PrEP in immunocompromised patients, comparing the evolution of antibody levels and reporting the incidence of breakthrough infections. A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted including 132 immunocompromised patients with inadequate vaccine response, who received COVID-PrEP at our clinic between January and June 2022. Initially, 95 patients received sotrovimab while 37 patients received tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Antibody levels after first PrEP with sotrovimab remain high for several months after infusion (median 10,058 and 7235 BAU/mL after 1 and 3 months, respectively), with higher titers than after tixagevimab/cilgavimab injection even 3 months later (7235 vs. 1647 BAU/mL, p = 0.0007). Overall, breakthrough infections were rare (13/132, 10%) when compared to overall infection rates during this period (over 30% of the Austrian population), with mild disease course and rapid viral clearance (median 10 days). Sotrovimab may be an additional option for SARS-CoV-2 PrEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Totschnig
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
- Correspondence:
| | - Max Augustin
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Iulia Niculescu
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Hermann Laferl
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Sonja Jansen-Skoupy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Clara Lehmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Wenisch
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Zoufaly
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bsteh G, Gradl C, Heschl B, Hegen H, Di Pauli F, Assar H, Leutmezer F, Traxler G, Krajnc N, Zulehner G, Hiller M, Rommer P, Wipfler P, Guger M, Enzinger C, Berger T. Impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outcome in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:10.1111/ene.15488. [PMID: 35791496 PMCID: PMC9350380 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 continues to challenge neurologists in counselling persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) regarding disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and vaccination. The objective here was to characterize predictors of COVID-19 outcome in pwMS. METHODS We included pwMS with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from a nationwide population-based registry. COVID-19 outcome was classified as either mild or severe. Impact of DMT, specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and vaccination on COVID-19 outcome was determined by multivariable models adjusted for a-priori-risk (determined by a cumulative risk score comprising age, disability and comorbidities). RESULTS Of 317 pwMS with COVID-19 (mean age 41.8 years [SD 12.4], 72.9% female, median EDSS 1.5 [range 0-8.5], 77% on DMT [16% on antiCD20]), 92.7% had a mild course and 7.3% a severe course with 2.2% dying from COVID-19. Ninety-seven pwMS (30.6%) were fully vaccinated. After a median 5 months from vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 1-9), severe COVID-19 occurred in 2.1% of fully vaccinated pwMS compared to 9.5% in unvaccinated pwMS (p=0.018). A-priori-risk robustly predicted COVID-19 severity (R2 0.605; p<0.001). Adjusting for a-priori-risk, anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased COVID-19 severity (odds ratio [OR] 3.3; R2 0.113; p=0.003), but exposure to any other DMT was not. Fully vaccinated pwMS showed a significantly decreased risk for severe COVID-19 (OR 0.21, R2 0.144, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In a population-based MS cohort, COVID-19 course is primarily predicted by a-priori-risk (depending on age, disability and comorbidities) explaining about 60% of variance. Anti-CD20 treatment is associated with a moderately increased risk, while reassuringly vaccination provides protection from severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Bsteh
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Christiane Gradl
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of St PöltenSt PöltenAustria
| | - Bettina Heschl
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Harald Hegen
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| | | | - Hamid Assar
- Department of NeurologyKepler University HospitalLinzAustria
| | - Fritz Leutmezer
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Gerhard Traxler
- Department of Neurology 2, Med Campus IIIKepler University HospitalLinzAustria
| | - Nik Krajnc
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Gudrun Zulehner
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | | | - Paulus Rommer
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Peter Wipfler
- Department of NeurologyParacelsus Medical University of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
| | - Michael Guger
- Department of NeurologyPyhrn‐Eisenwurzen Hospital SteyrSteyrAustria
| | | | - Thomas Berger
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schiavetti I, Cordioli C, Stromillo ML, Teresa Ferrò M, Laroni A, Cocco E, Cola G, Pasquali L, Rilla MT, Signoriello E, Iodice R, Di Sapio A, Lanzillo R, Caleri F, Annovazzi P, Conte A, Liberatore G, Ruscica F, Docimo R, Bonavita S, Ulivelli M, Cavalla P, Patti F, Ferraro D, Clerico M, Immovilli P, Di Filippo M, Salvetti M, Sormani MP. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in MS patients on disease-modifying therapies. Mult Scler 2022; 28:2106-2111. [PMID: 35735030 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221102918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) treated with anti-CD20 or fingolimod showed a reduced humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. OBJECTIVE In this study we aimed to monitor the risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in pwMS on different disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS Data on the number of vaccinated patients and the number of patients with a breakthrough infection were retrospectively collected in 27 Italian MS centers. We estimated the rate of breakthrough infections and of infection requiring hospitalization per DMT. RESULTS 19,641 vaccinated pwMS were included in the database. After a median follow-up of 8 months, we observed 137 breakthrough infections. Compared with other DMTs, the rate of breakthrough infections was significantly higher on ocrelizumab (0.57% vs 2.00%, risk ratio (RR) = 3.55, 95% CI = 2.74-4.58, p < 0.001) and fingolimod (0.58% vs 1.62%, RR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.75-4.00, p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in any other DMT group. In the ocrelizumab group the hospitalization rate was 16.7% versus 19.4% in the pre-vaccination era (RR = 0.86, p = 0.74) and it was 3.9% in all the other DMT groups versus 11.9% in the pre-vaccination period (RR = 0.33, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections is higher in patients treated with ocrelizumab and fingolimod, and the rate of severe infections was significantly reduced in all the DMTs excluding ocrelizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Schiavetti
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Cordioli
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Stromillo
- Clinica Neurologica e Malattie Neurometaboliche, Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Ferrò
- Neuroimmunology, Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cardiocerebrovascular Department, Neurological Unit, ASST Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Alice Laroni
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy/Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cocco
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla Ospedale Binaghi, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gaia Cola
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Livia Pasquali
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Neurology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Rosa Iodice
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Di Sapio
- Department of Neurology, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovì, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Caleri
- Department of Neurology, MS Center, F. Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy
| | - Pietro Annovazzi
- UOC Centro Sclerosi Multipla, ASST Valle-Olona, PO di Gallarate (VA), Varese, Italy
| | - Antonella Conte
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Liberatore
- Neuromuscular and Neuroimmunology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesca Ruscica
- UOC Neurologia e Centro SM Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Renato Docimo
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Aversa Hospital "San Giuseppe Moscati", ASL Caserta, Aversa, Italy
| | - Simona Bonavita
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche avanzate, Università degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Monica Ulivelli
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Paola Cavalla
- Multiple Sclerosis Center and 1st Division of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, City of Health and Science University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Patti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia," University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Diana Ferraro
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neurosciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marinella Clerico
- Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Massimiliano Di Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Neurology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marco Salvetti
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy/IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Sormani
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy/IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sechi E, Cacciaguerra L, Chen JJ, Mariotto S, Fadda G, Dinoto A, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Pittock SJ, Flanagan EP. Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease (MOGAD): A Review of Clinical and MRI Features, Diagnosis, and Management. Front Neurol 2022; 13:885218. [PMID: 35785363 PMCID: PMC9247462 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.885218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is the most recently defined inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Over the last decade, several studies have helped delineate the characteristic clinical-MRI phenotypes of the disease, allowing distinction from aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The clinical manifestations of MOGAD are heterogeneous, ranging from isolated optic neuritis or myelitis to multifocal CNS demyelination often in the form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), or cortical encephalitis. A relapsing course is observed in approximately 50% of patients. Characteristic MRI features have been described that increase the diagnostic suspicion (e.g., perineural optic nerve enhancement, spinal cord H-sign, T2-lesion resolution over time) and help discriminate from MS and AQP4+NMOSD, despite some overlap. The detection of MOG-IgG in the serum (and sometimes CSF) confirms the diagnosis in patients with compatible clinical-MRI phenotypes, but false positive results are occasionally encountered, especially with indiscriminate testing of large unselected populations. The type of cell-based assay used to evaluate for MOG-IgG (fixed vs. live) and antibody end-titer (low vs. high) can influence the likelihood of MOGAD diagnosis. International consensus diagnostic criteria for MOGAD are currently being compiled and will assist in clinical diagnosis and be useful for enrolment in clinical trials. Although randomized controlled trials are lacking, MOGAD acute attacks appear to be very responsive to high dose steroids and plasma exchange may be considered in refractory cases. Attack-prevention treatments also lack class-I data and empiric maintenance treatment is generally reserved for relapsing cases or patients with severe residual disability after the presenting attack. A variety of empiric steroid-sparing immunosuppressants can be considered and may be efficacious based on retrospective or prospective observational studies but prospective randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to better guide treatment. In summary, this article will review our rapidly evolving understanding of MOGAD diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Sechi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Laura Cacciaguerra
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - John J. Chen
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Sara Mariotto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Fadda
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alessandro Dinoto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sean J. Pittock
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Eoin P. Flanagan
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- *Correspondence: Eoin P. Flanagan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zabalza A, Thompson AJ, Montalban X. Two years of COVID-19 in the MS community: What have we learnt so far? Mult Scler 2022; 28:1005-1008. [PMID: 35549532 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221099844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Zabalza
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alan J Thompson
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Immovilli P, Morelli N, Terracciano C, Rota E, Marchesi E, Vollaro S, De Mitri P, Zaino D, Bazzurri V, Guidetti D. Multiple Sclerosis Treatment in the COVID-19 Era: A Risk-Benefit Approach. Neurol Int 2022; 14:368-377. [PMID: 35466211 PMCID: PMC9036272 DOI: 10.3390/neurolint14020030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic poses an ongoing global challenge, and several risk factors make people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) particularly susceptible to running a severe disease course. Although the literature does report numerous articles on the risk factors for severe COVID-19 and vaccination response in pwMS, there is a scarcity of reviews integrating both these aspects into strategies aimed at minimizing risks. The aim of this review is to describe the risk of vulnerable pwMS exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the issues related to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and to evidence possible future strategies in the clinical management of pwMS. The authors searched for papers on severe COVID-19 risk factors, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and people with multiple sclerosis in support of this narrative literature review. We propose a multilevel strategy aimed at: the evaluation of risk factors for severe COVID-19 in people with multiple sclerosis, identifying the most appropriate vaccination schedule that is safe for people on disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and a strict follow-up of high-risk people with multiple sclerosis to allow for the prompt administration of monoclonal antibodies to manage COVID-19 risks in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Immovilli
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0523-302-408
| | - Nicola Morelli
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
- Radiology Unit, Radiology Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Chiara Terracciano
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
| | - Eugenia Rota
- Neurology Unit, San Giacomo Hospital, 15067 Novi Ligure, Italy;
| | - Elena Marchesi
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
| | - Stefano Vollaro
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
| | - Paola De Mitri
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
| | - Domenica Zaino
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
| | - Veronica Bazzurri
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
| | - Donata Guidetti
- Neurology Unit, Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy; (N.M.); (C.T.); (E.M.); (S.V.); (P.D.M.); (D.Z.); (V.B.); (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|