1
|
Thomas DC, Litherland EF, Masso S, Raymundo G, Keep M. Clinicians' Decision-Making Regarding Telehealth Services: Focus Group Study in Pediatric Allied Health. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e46300. [PMID: 38848121 PMCID: PMC11193077 DOI: 10.2196/46300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many allied health services now provide both telehealth and in-person services following a rapid integration of telehealth as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about how decisions are made about which clinical appointments to provide via telehealth versus in person. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to explore clinicians' decision-making when contemplating telehealth for their clients, including the factors they consider and how they weigh up these different factors, and the clinicians' perceptions of telehealth utility beyond COVID-19 lockdowns. METHODS We used reflexive thematic analysis with data collected from focus groups with 16 pediatric community-based allied health clinicians from the disciplines of speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, social work, psychology, and counseling. RESULTS The findings indicated that decision-making was complex with interactions across 4 broad categories: technology, clients and families, clinical services, and clinicians. Three themes described their perceptions of telehealth use beyond COVID-19 lockdowns: "flexible telehealth use," "telehealth can be superior to in-person therapy," and "fear that in-person services may be replaced." CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the complexity of decision-making in a community-allied health setting and the challenges experienced by clinicians when reconciling empirical evidence with their own clinical experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Claire Thomas
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Eva Frances Litherland
- Integrated and Community Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, Blacktown, Australia
| | - Sarah Masso
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Gianina Raymundo
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Melanie Keep
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raymer M, Swete Kelly P, O'Leary S. Developing and embedding an advanced practice musculoskeletal physiotherapy service in public specialist outpatient services in Queensland: A health service masterclass. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 70:102917. [PMID: 38309180 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Screening Clinic and Multi-disciplinary Service (MPSC&MDS) is an advanced practice physiotherapist-led model of care developed initially to address overburdened specialist orthopaedic outpatient public hospital services across Queensland, Australia. PURPOSE This Masterclass explores the experiences and success of embedding the MPSC&MDS state-wide across the Queensland public health system and its expansion in scale and reach to other specialist services. Key characteristics and development strategies are described that have collectively underpinned the expansion and sustainability of the service, using relevant stream sections and themes from a recommended musculoskeletal model of care framework. IMPLICATIONS The aim of this masterclass is to be informative for readers involved in the future development or refinement of similar models of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maree Raymer
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Patrick Swete Kelly
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
| | - Shaun O'Leary
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia; University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomas EE, Chambers R, Phillips S, Rawstorn JC, Cartledge S. Sustaining telehealth among cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation services: a qualitative framework study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2023; 22:795-803. [PMID: 36468293 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS As we move into a new phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiac and pulmonary services are considering how to sustain telehealth modalities long-term. It is important to learn from services that had greater telehealth adoption and determine factors that support sustained use. We aimed to describe how telehealth has been used to deliver cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation services across Queensland, Australia. METHODS AND RESULTS Semi-structured interviews (n = 8) and focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with 27 cardiac and pulmonary clinicians and managers from health services across Queensland between June and August 2021. Interview questions were guided by Greenhalgh's Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework. Hybrid inductive/deductive framework analysis elicited six main themes: (i) Variable levels of readiness; (ii) Greater telehealth uptake in pulmonary vs. cardiac rehabilitation; (iii) Safety and risk management; (iv) Client willingness-targeted support required; (v) Equity and access; and (vi) New models of care. We found that sustained integration of telehealth in cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation will require contributions from all stakeholders: consumers (e.g. co-design), clinicians (e.g. shared learning), health services (e.g. increasing platform functionality), and the profession (e.g. sharing resources). CONCLUSION There are opportunities for telehealth programmes servicing large geographic areas and opportunities to increase programme participation rates more broadly. Centralized models of care serving large geographic areas could maximize sustainability with current resource limitations; however, realizing the full potential of telehealth will require additional funding for supporting infrastructure and workforce. Individuals and organizations both have roles to play in sustaining telehealth in cardiac and pulmonary services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E Thomas
- Centre for Online Health, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Ground Floor, Building 33, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Rebecca Chambers
- Healthcare Excellence and Innovation, Metro North Health, Cartwright St, Windsor, QLD 4030, Australia
| | - Samara Phillips
- Clinical Improvement Unit, Metro South Health, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Rawstorn
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
| | - Susie Cartledge
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maltby A, Underhill A, Woodbridge S. The use of telephone and video consultations in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A scoping review. HAND THERAPY 2023; 28:89-102. [PMID: 37904901 PMCID: PMC10581535 DOI: 10.1177/17589983231191867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Introduction In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid uptake of virtual consultations (VCs) to minimise disease transmission and for this reason, research into telerehabilitation has been expanding. This review aimed to map and synthesize evidence on the use of VCs in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation, describe key characteristics, and identify gaps in the research. Methods This scoping review investigated synchronous rehabilitation consultations performed over VC. All asynchronous, wearable or pre-recorded technology was excluded. CINAHL Complete, Medline, PEDro, Google Scholar and grey literature sources were searched. Screening and data extraction were done by a single researcher. Frequency counts were used to analyse the data. Results Nineteen studies were identified, with patients with shoulder injury/pain most frequently studied. Most sources (n = 9) used bespoke video programmes. Range of motion (ROM) was the most common assessment (n = 10) and exercise prescription (n = 7) was the most common treatment. Benefits included time and cost savings, maintaining therapeutic relationships and increasing patient independence. Most diagnostic assessments, except joint and nerve tension tests, were found to be reliable and valid. Studies noted increased function in activities, decreased pain and increased ROM after VCs. Limitations included restricted 'hands-on' treatment, resource and training concerns and limiting patient factors. Conclusions This review mapped available evidence and identified several gaps in the literature. Further robust research into VCs for hand/wrist disorders, ROM assessment and cost-effectiveness is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Maltby
- School of Allied Health and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK
- Hand Therapy Department, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ann Underhill
- School of Allied Health and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - Sarah Woodbridge
- School of Allied Health and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Rezende DRB, Neto IA, Iunes DH, Carvalho LC. Analysis of the effectiveness of remote intervention of patients affected by chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE ACCESS 2023; 7:27550834231197316. [PMID: 37781504 PMCID: PMC10540568 DOI: 10.1177/27550834231197316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the study was to verify the effectiveness of telemedicine in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in terms of its influence on physical conditioning, quality of life, and health conditions in adults/elderly people affected by chronic diseases. Design This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods The search covered RCTs published from 2011 to 2021 and was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, and Cochrane Library databases, on volunteers of both sexes, that were rehabilitated, and/or monitored, and/or evaluated, specifically, via remote care. The extraction, quality of studies, and risk of bias were assessed using the RoB2 (risk of bias) tool, for analysis of the strength of evidence, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Developing, and Evaluation) method was used, and for the preparation of meta-analysis was used at RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager) was used. Results The database search identified 3949 potential articles for screening, 13 of which were eligible for the present systematic review, involving 1469 participants with chronic diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and fibromyalgia). Through the meta-analysis, an advantage was identified for the remote intervention on physical conditioning (p = 0.001), with an estimated effect of 0.29 (0.11, 0.46) and on health conditions (p = 0.0004), -0.30 (-0.47, -0.14), while for quality of life, no significant difference was identified (p = 0.90), 0.01 (-0.13, 0.14). Conclusion Telemedicine has clinical effectiveness for the outcome of physical conditioning and general health conditions in adults with chronic diseases when compared to usual care without face-to-face intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Denise Hollanda Iunes
- Physiotherapy Course at the Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
- Department of Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
| | - Leonardo César Carvalho
- Department of Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Biosciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
- Physiotherapy Course at the Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
- Department of Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
- Institute of Motricity Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marks D, Kitcher S, Attrazic E, Hing W, Cottrell M. The Health Economic Impact of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Delivered by Telehealth: A Systematic Review. Int J Telerehabil 2022. [DOI: 10.5195/ijt.2022.6524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: While the efficacy of telehealth in musculoskeletal physiotherapy has been supported, its cost effectiveness has not been established. Therefore, the objective of this review was to ascertain the health economic impact of outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy delivered by telehealth and describe methodology utilized to date. Methods: Electronic searching of PubMed, CINHAL, PEDro, and Web of Science databases was undertaken alongside handsearching for publications comprising: population: adults with musculoskeletal disorders managed in any type of outpatient ambulatory setting; intervention: physiotherapy delivered by telehealth comparison: traditional in-person physiotherapy; and, outcomes: economic analyses reporting costs and consequences. Appraisal was undertaken with the Downs and Black Questionnaire and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Checklist. Results: Eleven studies of mixed methodological quality were included. Most were conducted in the public sector, from the economic perspective of the health service funder. Telehealth consistently produced health outcomes akin to in-person care. In all but one, telehealth was less costly, with savings achieved by reducing in-person consultations and travel costs. Conclusion: Telehealth is as effective and cheaper than in-person physiotherapy for musculoskeletal disorders in public hospital outpatients. Further health economic research is needed to clarify the economic impact of telehealth upon non-government providers of musculoskeletal physiotherapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Zischke C, Simas V, Hing W, Milne N, Spittle A, Pope R. The utility of physiotherapy assessments delivered by telehealth: A systematic review. J Glob Health 2021; 11:04072. [PMID: 34956637 PMCID: PMC8684795 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.11.04072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth use is increasing due to its ability to overcome service access barriers and provide continued care when disease transmission is of concern. However, little is known of the validity, reliability and utility of performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth across all physiotherapy practice areas. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the current clinometric value of performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth across all areas of physiotherapy practice. METHODS A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Embase and EBSCO) was undertaken to identify studies investigating the clinometric value of performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth across all physiotherapy practice areas. Following selection, a quality appraisal was conducted using the Brink and Louw or Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Evidence regarding validity, reliability and utility of synchronous telehealth physiotherapy assessments was extracted and synthesised using a critical narrative approach. RESULTS Thirty-nine studies conducted in a variety of simulated (n = 15) or real-world telehealth environments (n = 24), were included. The quality of the validity, reliability and utility studies varied. Assessments including range of movement, muscle strength, endurance, pain, special orthopaedic tests (shoulder/elbow), Berg Balance Scale, timed up and go, timed stance test, six-minute walk test, steps in 360-degree turn, Movement Assessment Battery for Children (2nd Edition), step test, ABILHAND assessment, active straight leg raise, and circumferential measures of the upper limb were reported as valid/reliable in limited populations and settings (many with small sample sizes). Participants appeared to embrace telehealth technology use, with most studies reporting high levels of participant satisfaction. If given a choice, many reported a preference for in-person physiotherapy assessments. Some inconsistencies in visual/auditory quality and challenges with verbal/non-verbal communication methods were reported. Telehealth was considered relatively cost-effective once services were established. CONCLUSIONS Performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth appears valid and reliable for specific assessment types in limited populations. Further research is needed in all areas of physiotherapy practice, to strengthen the evidence surrounding its clinometric value. Clinicians contemplating using this assessment mode should consider the client/family preferences, assessment requirements, cultural needs, environment, cost considerations, access and confidence using technology. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42018108166.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherie Zischke
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vinicius Simas
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| | - Wayne Hing
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nikki Milne
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alicia Spittle
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rodney Pope
- School of Allied Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lafrance S, Demont A, Thavorn K, Fernandes J, Santaguida C, Desmeules F. Economic evaluation of advanced practice physiotherapy models of care: a systematic review with meta-analyses. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1214. [PMID: 34753487 PMCID: PMC8579553 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07221-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of this systematic review is to appraise evidence on the economic evaluations of advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) care compared to usual medical care. Methods Systematic searches were conducted up to September 2021 in selected electronic bibliographical databases. Economic evaluation studies on an APP model of care were included. Economic data such as health care costs, patient costs, productivity losses were extracted. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Meta-analyses were performed and mean differences (MD) in costs per patient were calculated using random-effect inverse variance models. Certainty of the evidence was assessed with the GRADE Approach. Results Twelve studies (n = 14,649 participants) including four randomized controlled trials, seven analytical cohort studies and one economic modeling study were included. The clinical settings of APP models of care included primary, emergency and specialized secondary care such as orthopaedics, paediatrics and gynaecology. The majority of the included participants were adults with musculoskeletal disorders (n = 12,915). Based on low quality evidence, health system costs including salaries, diagnostic tests, medications, and follow-up visits were significantly lower with APP care than with usual medical care, at 2 to 12-month follow-up (MD: -139.08 €/patient; 95%CI: -265.93 to -12.23; n = 7648). Based on low quality evidence, patient costs including travel and paid medication prescriptions, or treatments were significantly higher with APP care compared to usual medical care, at 2 to 6-month follow-up (MD: 29.24 €/patient; 95%CI: 0.53 to 57.95 n = 1485). Based on very low quality evidence, no significant differences in productivity losses per patient were reported between both types of care (MD: 590 €/patient; 95%CI: -100 to 1280; n = 819). Conclusions This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the economic evaluation of APP models of care. Low quality evidence suggests that APP care might result in lower health care costs, but higher patient costs compared to usual medical care. Costs differences may vary depending on various factors such as the cost methodology used and on the clinical setting. More evidence is needed to evaluate cost benefits of APP models of care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07221-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lafrance
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. .,Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Anthony Demont
- INSERM 1123 ECEVE, Faculty of Medicine, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France.,Physiotherapy School, University of Orleans, Orleans, France
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Julio Fernandes
- Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carlo Santaguida
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medecine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Université de Montréal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cottrell MA, Russell TG. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2020; 48:102193. [PMID: 32560876 PMCID: PMC7261082 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Musculoskeletal conditions are a leading cause of global morbidity. Access to traditional in-person healthcare can be difficult for some under usual conditions and has become a ubiquitous barrier throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Telehealth, defined as the 'delivery of healthcare at a distance using information and communication technology' is a solution to many access barriers and has been rapidly adopted by many healthcare professions throughout the crisis. While significant advancements in technology has made the widespread adoption of telehealth feasible, there are many factors to be considered when implementing a telehealth service. PURPOSE The aims of this masterclass are to (i) introduce telehealth and outline the current research within the context of musculoskeletal physiotherapy; (ii) provide insights into some of the broader challenges in the wide-scale adoption of telehealth; and (iii) to describe a systematic approach to implementing telehealth into existing healthcare settings, along with some practical considerations. IMPLICATIONS Telehealth is a broad concept and should be implemented to meet the specific needs of a healthcare service. This masterclass offers a structured approach to the implementation of a musculoskeletal physiotherapy telehealth service, and highlights practical considerations required by both clinicians and healthcare organisations throughout all stages of the implementation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle A. Cottrell
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, 4029, Australia,Corresponding author. Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Physiotherapy Department, Level 2 Ned Hanlon Building, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4029, Australia.
| | - Trevor G. Russell
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia,School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|