Phase I study of multi-gene cell therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease

Bioengineering Cell Therapy for Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease is an atherosclerotic disease associated with limb ischemia that necessitates limb amputation in severe cases. Cell therapies comprised of adult mononuclear or stromal cells have been clinically tested and show moderate benefits. Bioengineering strategies can be applied to modify cell behavior and function in a controllable fashion. Using mechanically tunable or spatially controllable biomaterials, we highlight examples in which biomaterials can increase the survival and function of the transplanted cells to improve their revascularization efficacy in preclinical models. Biomaterials can be used in conjunction with soluble factors or genetic approaches to further modulate the behavior of transplanted cells and the locally implanted tissue environment in vivo. We critically assess the advances in bioengineering strategies such as 3-dimensional bioprinting and immunomodulatory biomaterials that can be applied to the treatment of peripheral artery disease and then discuss the current challenges and future directions in the implementation of bioengineering strategies.

Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia by pIRES/VEGF165/HGF Administration

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of peripheral artery disease (PAD), especially critical limb ischemia (CLI), is very poor despite the development of endovascular therapy and bypass surgery. Many patients result in having leg amputation. We decided to investigate the safety and efficacy of plasmid of internal ribosome entry site/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 165/hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) gene therapy (GT) in patients suffered from CLI.

METHODS

Administration of plasmid of internal ribosome entry site/VEGF165/HGF was performed in 12 limbs of 12 patients with rest pain and ischemic ulcers due to CLI. Plasmid was injected into the muscles of the ischemic limbs. The levels of VEGF in serum and the ankle-brachial index (ABI) were measured before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) plasma levels of VEGF increased nonsignificantly from 258 ± 81 pg/L to 489 ± 96 pg/L (P > 0.05) 2 weeks after therapy, and the ABI improved significantly from 0.27 ± 0.20 to 0.50 ± 0.22 (P < 0.001) 3 months after therapy. Ischemic ulcers healed in 9 limbs. Amputation was performed in 3 patients because of advanced necrosis and wound infection. However, the level of amputations was lowered below knee in these cases. Complications were limited to transient leg edema in 3 patients and fever in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramuscular administration of plasmid of internal ribosome entry site/VEGF165/HGF is safe, feasible, and effective for patients with critical leg ischemia.

Efficient Reconstitution of Hepatic Microvasculature by Endothelin Receptor Antagonism in Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells

Reconstitution of healthy endothelial cells in vascular beds offers opportunities for mechanisms in tissue homeostasis, organ regeneration, and correction of deficient functions. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells express unique functions, and their transplantation is relevant for disease models and for cell therapy. As molecular targets for improving transplanted cell engraftment and proliferation will be highly significant, this study determined whether ET_A/B receptor antagonism by the drug bosentan could overcome cell losses due to cell transplantation-induced cytotoxicity. Cell engraftment and proliferation assays were performed with healthy wild-type liver sinusoidal endothelial cells transplanted into the liver of dipeptidylpeptidase IV knockout mice. Transplanted cells were identified in tissues by enzyme histochemistry. Cells with prospective ET_A/B antagonism engrafted significantly better in hepatic sinusoids. Moreover, these cells underwent multiple rounds of division under liver repopulation conditions. The gains of ET_A/B antagonism resulted from benefits in cell viability and membrane integrity. Also, in bosentan-treated cells, mitochondrial homeostasis was better maintained with less oxidative stress and DNA damage after injuries. Intracellular effects of ET_A/B antagonism were transduced by conservation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein, which directs DNA damage response. Therefore, ET_A/B antagonism in donor cells will advance vascular reconstitution. Extensive experience with ET_A/B antagonists will facilitate translation in people.

Genetically engineered human muscle transplant enhances murine host neovascularization and myogenesis

Engineered tissues are a promising tool for addressing the growing need for tissues and organs in surgical reconstructions. Prevascularization of implanted tissues is expected to enhance survival prospects post transplantation and minimize deficiencies and/or hypoxia deeper in the tissue. Here, we fabricate a three-dimensional, prevascularized engineered muscle containing human myoblasts, genetically modified endothelial cells secreting angiopoietin 1 (ANGPT1) and genetically modified smooth muscle cells secreting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The genetically engineered human muscle shows enhanced host neovascularization and myogenesis following transplantation into a mouse host, compared to the non-secreting control. The vascular, genetically modified cells have been cleared for clinical trials and can be used to construct autologous vascularized tissues. Therefore, the described genetically engineered vascularized muscle has the potential to be fully translated to the clinical setting to overcome autologous tissue shortage and to accelerate host neovascularization and integration of engineered grafts following transplantation.

Luba Perry et al. report transplantation of engineered prevascularized human muscle into mice to repair an abdominal muscle defect. They show that genetically engineering smooth muscle cells to secrete VEGF and endothelial cells to secrete ANGPT1 significantly improves host neovascularization and myogenesis.

Autologous cells derived from different sources and administered using different regimens for 'no-option' critical lower limb ischaemia patients

BACKGROUND

Revascularisation is the gold standard therapy for patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). In over 30% of patients who are not suitable for or have failed previous revascularisation therapy (the 'no-option' CLI patients), limb amputation is eventually unavoidable. Preliminary studies have reported encouraging outcomes with autologous cell-based therapy for the treatment of CLI in these 'no-option' patients. However, studies comparing the angiogenic potency and clinical effects of autologous cells derived from different sources have yielded limited data. Data regarding cell doses and routes of administration are also limited.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of autologous cells derived from different sources, prepared using different protocols, administered at different doses, and delivered via different routes for the treatment of 'no-option' CLI patients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and trials registries (16 May 2018). Review authors searched PubMed until February 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 'no-option' CLI patients comparing a particular source or regimen of autologous cell-based therapy against another source or regimen of autologous cell-based therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of the trials. We extracted outcome data from each trial and pooled them for meta-analysis. We calculated effect estimates using a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), or a mean difference (MD) with 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with a total of 359 participants. These studies compared bone marrow-mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) versus mobilised peripheral blood stem cells (mPBSCs), BM-MNCs versus bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), high cell dose versus low cell dose, and intramuscular (IM) versus intra-arterial (IA) routes of cell implantation. We identified no other comparisons in these studies. We considered most studies to be at low risk of bias in random sequence generation, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting; at high risk of bias in blinding of patients and personnel; and at unclear risk of bias in allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors. The quality of evidence was most often low to very low, with risk of bias, imprecision, and indirectness of outcomes the major downgrading factors.Three RCTs (100 participants) reported a total of nine deaths during the study follow-up period. These studies did not report deaths according to treatment group.Results show no clear difference in amputation rates between IM and IA routes (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.18; three RCTs, 95 participants; low-quality evidence). Single-study data show no clear difference in amputation rates between BM-MNC- and mPBSC-treated groups (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.24; 150 participants; low-quality evidence) and between high and low cell dose (RR 3.21, 95% CI 0.87 to 11.90; 16 participants; very low-quality evidence). The study comparing BM-MNCs versus BM-MSCs reported no amputations.Single-study data with low-quality evidence show similar numbers of participants with healing ulcers between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.83; 49 participants) and between IM and IA routes (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.76; 41 participants). In contrast, more participants appeared to have healing ulcers in the BM-MSC group than in the BM-MNC group (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.92; one RCT, 22 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Researchers comparing high versus low cell doses did not report ulcer healing.Single-study data show similar numbers of participants with reduction in rest pain between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.06; 104 participants; moderate-quality evidence) and between IM and IA routes (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.64; 32 participants; low-quality evidence). One study reported no clear difference in rest pain scores between BM-MNC and BM-MSC (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.61; 37 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Trials comparing high versus low cell doses did not report rest pain.Single-study data show no clear difference in the number of participants with increased ankle-brachial index (ABI; increase of > 0.1 from pretreatment), between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.40; 104 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and between IM and IA routes (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.00; 35 participants; very low-quality evidence). In contrast, ABI scores appeared higher in BM-MSC versus BM-MNC groups (MD 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09; one RCT, 37 participants; low-quality evidence). ABI was not reported in the high versus low cell dose comparison.Similar numbers of participants had improved transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcO₂) with IM versus IA routes (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.72; two RCTs, 62 participants; very low-quality evidence). Single-study data with low-quality evidence show a higher TcO₂ reading in BM-MSC versus BM-MNC groups (MD 8.00, 95% CI 3.46 to 12.54; 37 participants) and in mPBSC- versus BM-MNC-treated groups (MD 1.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.99; 150 participants). TcO₂ was not reported in the high versus low cell dose comparison.Study authors reported no significant short-term adverse effects attributed to autologous cell implantation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Mostly low- and very low-quality evidence suggests no clear differences between different stem cell sources and different treatment regimens of autologous cell implantation for outcomes such as all-cause mortality, amputation rate, ulcer healing, and rest pain for 'no-option' CLI patients. Pooled analyses did not show a clear difference in clinical outcomes whether cells were administered via IM or IA routes. High-quality evidence is lacking; therefore the efficacy and long-term safety of autologous cells derived from different sources, prepared using different protocols, administered at different doses, and delivered via different routes for the treatment of 'no-option' CLI patients, remain to be confirmed.Future RCTs with larger numbers of participants are needed to determine the efficacy of cell-based therapy for CLI patients, along with the optimal cell source, phenotype, dose, and route of implantation. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the durability of angiogenic potential and the long-term safety of cell-based therapy.

Improved Patency of ePTFE Grafts as a Hemodialysis Access Site by Seeding Autologous Endothelial Cells Expressing Fibulin-5 and VEGF

Small caliber synthetic vascular grafts used for dialysis access sites have high failure rates due to neointima formation and thrombosis. Seeding synthetic grafts with endothelial cells (ECs) provides a biocompatible surface that may prevent graft failure. We tested the use of ePTFE grafts seeded with autologous ECs expressing fibulin-5 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), as a dialysis access site in a porcine model. We connected the carotid arteries and jugular veins of 12 miniature pigs using 7-mm ePTFE grafts; five grafts were seeded with autologous venous ECs modified to express fibulin-5 and VEGF, and seven unseeded grafts were implanted at the same location and served as controls. At 6 months, after completion of angiography, the carotid arteries and jugular veins with the connecting grafts were excised and fixed. Autologous EC isolation and transduction and graft seeding were successful in all animals. At 3 months, 4 of 5 seeded grafts and 3 of 7 control grafts were patent. At 6 months, 4 of 5 (80%) seeded grafts and only 2 of 7 (29%) control grafts were patent. Seeding ePTFE vascular grafts with genetically modified ECs improved long term small caliber graft patency. The biosynthetic grafts offer a novel therapeutic modality for vascular access in hemodialysis.

Elderly Patient-Derived Endothelial Cells for Vascularization of Engineered Muscle

In vitro prevascularization of engineered tissue constructs promises to enhance their clinical applicability. We hypothesize that adult endothelial cells (ECs), isolated from limb veins of elderly patients, bear the vasculogenic properties required to form vascular networks in vitro that can later integrate with the host vasculature upon implantation. Here, we show that adult ECs formed vessel networks that were more developed and complex than those formed by human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) seeded with various supporting cells on three-dimensional (3D) biodegradable polymer scaffolds. In parallel, secreted levels of key proangiogenic cytokines were significantly higher in adult EC-bearing scaffolds as compared to HUVEC scaffolds. As a proof of concept for applicability of this model, adult ECs were co-seeded with human myoblasts as well as supporting cells and successfully formed a branched network, which was surrounded by aligned human myotubes. The vascularized engineered muscle tissue implanted into a full-thickness defect in immunodeficient mice remained viable and anastomosed with the host vasculature within 9 days of implantation. Functional "chimeric" blood vessels and various types of anastomosis were observed. These findings provide strong evidence of the applicability of adult ECs in construction of clinically relevant autologous vascularized tissue.

Phase Ib Safety, Two-Dose Study of MultiGeneAngio in Patients with Chronic Critical Limb Ischemia

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe presentation of peripheral arterial disease. We developed cell-based therapy entailing intra-arterial injection of autologous venous endothelial cells (ECs) modified to express angiopoietin 1, combined with autologous venous smooth muscle cells (SMCs) modified to express vascular endothelial growth factor. This combination promoted arteriogenesis in animal models and was safe in patients with limiting claudication. In an open-label, phase Ib study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of this therapy in CLI patients who failed or were unsuitable for surgery or intravascular intervention. Of 23 patients enrolled, 18 with rest pain or non-healing ulcers (Rutherford categories 4 and 5) were treated according to protocol, and 5 with significant tissue loss (Rutherford 6) were treated under compassionate treatment. Patients were assigned randomly to receive 1 × 10⁷ or 5 × 10⁷ (EC-to-SMC ratio, 1:1) of the cell combination. One-year amputation-free survival rate was 72% (13/18) for Rutherford 4 and 5 patients; all 5 patients with Rutherford 6 underwent amputation. Of the 12 with unhealing ulcers at dosing, 6 had complete healing and 2 others had >66% reduction in ulcer size. Outcomes did not differ between the dose groups. No severe adverse events were observed related to the therapy.