The Integrated Behavior Therapy for Children with Selective Mutism: Findings from an open pilot study in a naturalistic setting

Exposure-Based Online Intervention and Behavioral Parent Training for a Child with Selective Mutism: A Case Report

Although exposure-based practices are effective in treating selective mutism, difficulties arise when the child refuses to visit a clinical center. In this situation, it is important to intervene using remote technology and to support parents who have children with selective mutism. In this patient report, an exposure-based intervention using online technology was implemented for an 8-year-old girl with selective mutism. In addition, her mother was also experiencing increased parenting stress. Therefore, the mother received behavioral parent training specifically designed for parents of children with selective mutism. As a result, the child's nervousness decreased during the intervention, and the frequency of their speech, facial expression, and body motion improved. Initially, the child refused to visit our clinical center. However, they eventually agreed and managed to communicate non-verbally with the primary author in our clinical center. Behavioral parent training for selective mutism improved her mother's understanding of the condition, the way she interacts with her child, and reduced her parenting stress. Implementing Internet-based interventions is highly beneficial because it significantly reduces the fear of clinic or hospital visits among children with selective mutism. Furthermore, behavioral parent training tailored to selective mutism to improve parental stress and interaction can be a valuable support option for parents of children with selective mutism.

Interactions between parenting styles, child anxiety, and oppositionality in selective mutism

Selective mutism (SM) is a poorly understood condition, and debate continues regarding its etiology and classification. Research suggests that a genetic vulnerability may play a role in the development of the disorder which may be compounded by anxious and over-protective parenting. While previous studies supported the role of parenting styles in the development of SM, most of them examined child and parent factors in isolation. The current study examined how the interactions between child internalizing and externalizing behaviors (anxiety and oppositionality, respectively) and parenting styles (authoritative, permissive, and authoritarian) are associated with SM diagnosis. The study included 285 children aged 3-7 years (57.2% females), and their parents (66 children with SM and 219 typically developed children). Parents completed questionnaires about child social anxiety, oppositional behavior, SM severity, and their parenting style. Results showed that parents of children with SM reported lower levels of authoritative practices than those of typically developed children. We also found that child social anxiety and oppositionality moderated the effects of authoritative and authoritarian parenting practices on SM diagnosis. Our results suggest that child anxiety and oppositionality may explain the different susceptibility of children to adaptive and maladaptive parenting styles.

Phasic Versus Tonic Irritability and Associations with Family Accommodation Among Youth with Selective Mutism: A Latent Profile Analysis

Clinical presentations of selective mutism (SM) vary widely across affected youth. Although studies have explored general externalizing problems in youth with SM, research has not specifically examined patterns of irritability. Relatedly, research has not considered how affected families differentially accommodate the anxiety of youth with SM as a function of the child's temper outbursts (i.e., phasic irritability) and general angry mood (i.e., tonic irritability). Data were drawn from a sample of treatment-seeking children and adolescents with a primary diagnosis of selective mutism (N = 152; Mean age = 6.12 years; 67.11% female), and their caregivers. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify distinct profiles in SM youth that were characterized by varying levels of phasic and/or tonic irritability. Analyses further examined whether these different profiles were associated with different levels of family accommodation and global impairment. LPA identified 5 profiles: SM with No irritability, SM with Low Phasic Irritability, SM with High Phasic Irritability, SM with High Phasic and Moderate Tonic Irritability, and SM with High Phasic and High Tonic Irritability. Patterns of family accommodation and global impairment were highest among youth belonging to profiles characterized by high phasic irritability. Findings highlight separable patterns of irritability across youth with SM, with phasic irritability (i.e., temper outbursts) appearing particularly linked with increased family accommodation and overall global impairment. Assessing phasic irritability is critical for optimizing treatment in youth with SM and can be useful for flagging possible patterns of family accommodation contributing to overall impairment.