Correlates of depression and anxiety among homeless adults with latent tuberculosis infection

Mental illness and pulmonary tuberculosis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Background

Observational studies have confirmed that mental illness and pulmonary tuberculosis are closely related and increase each other's incidence; however, whether there is a causal genetic association between the two diseases remains unknown. We attempted to answer this question using bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) in a large cohort study.

Method

We performed a bidirectional MR analysis between mental illness (major depressive, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia) and pulmonary tuberculosis using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies in European individuals. The inverse-variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical method to assess causality. In addition, other additional MR methods (weighted median, MR-Egger, and weighted mode) were used to supplement the inverse-variance weighted results. Furthermore, several sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and stability.

Result

We identified no causal genetic association between mental illness and pulmonary tuberculosis after applying the inverse variance weighted method (major depressive: odds ratio (OR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59-1.71, P = 0.98; anxiety disorder: OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 0.05-67.67, P = 0.76; bipolar disorder OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.66-1.22, P = 0.48; and schizophrenia: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.91-1.20, P = 0.51). Similarly, pulmonary tuberculosis was not caustically associated with mental illness (major depressive: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02, P = 0.17; anxiety disorder: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99-1.01, P = 0.06; bipolar disorder: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.98-1.07, P = 0.38; and schizophrenia: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.97-1.05, P = 0.66).

Conclusion

Our research does not support a bidirectional causal association between the aforementioned mental illnesses and pulmonary tuberculosis.

Prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression in patients with multi-drug/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis

Background

Mental health disorders in patients with multi-drug or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) receive consistent attention. Anxiety and depression can manifest and may impact disease progression in patients with MDR/RR-TB. Given the heightened stressors resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, this scenario is even more concerning.

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors associated with anxiety and depression among patients with MDR/RR-TB in southern China.

Methods

A facility-based cross-sectional study was undertaken at Guangzhou Chest Hospital in southern China, encompassing a cohort of 219 patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient treatment for MDR/RR-TB. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using the 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The ramifications of anxiety and depression were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, with odds ratios (ORs) and age- and sex-adjusted ORs (AORs) employed to quantify their influence. All data underwent statistical analysis using SPSS 25.0, with statistical significance established at P < 0.05.

Results

Two hundred and nineteen individuals with MDR/RR-TB were included in the study. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was 57.53% (n = 126) and 65.75% (n = 144), respectively, with 33.3% (n = 73) of the participants experiencing both conditions simultaneously. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an age of 20-40 years [anxiety AOR = 3.021, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.240-7.360; depression AOR = 3.538, 95% CI: 1.219-10.268], disease stigma (anxiety AOR = 10.613, 95% CI: 2.966-37.975; depression AOR = 4.514, 95% CI: 2.051-10.108) and poor physical health (anxiety AOR = 7.636, 95% CI: 2.938-19.844; depression AOR = 6.190, 95% CI: 2.468-15.529) were significant risk factors for moderate levels of anxiety and depression.

Conclusions

We found that individuals with MDR/RR-TB had an elevated risk of anxiety and depression. To decrease the likelihood of unfavorable treatment outcomes, it is imperative to carefully monitor the psychological wellbeing of patients with MDR/RR-TB and promptly address any detrimental psychiatric conditions.

Anxiety, stress, and quality of life in patients with tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anxiety symptoms when coexisting with tuberculosis (TB), can have deleterious effects on treatment continuation that could contribute to the development of treatment resistance in TB. It is essential to understand the prevalence of anxiety in TB to develop clinical recommendations for its management. The primary objective of our review was to estimate the pooled prevalence of anxiety in TB patients along with the estimation of stress and quality of life in such patients. The relevant literature search on observational studies published in the English language till the year 2020 was carried out. A total of 8086 participants from 29 studies were included, of which 24 were cross-sectional studies and the remaining were case-control, and cohort studies. The estimated pooled prevalence of anxiety, comorbid depression, stress, and poor quality of life in TB patients was 32.54% [24.95, 41.18], 32.87% [25.79, 40.82], 52.68% [48.60, 56.72], and 79.51% [45.67, 94.72] respectively. When comparing the prevalence of anxiety across World Health Organization (WHO) regions, there was a statistically significant difference, with the African Region (AFR) having the highest prevalence i.e. 37.87% [29.59, 46.92], and the Western Pacific Region (WPR) having the lowest prevalence i.e. 15.83 % [12.72, 19.53]. The higher prevalence of anxiety in TB in the AFR and South-East Asian Region (SEAR) suggests a strong correlation with the developing status of these regions which calls for efforts to identify and treat the risk factors common to both anxiety and TB.

Perceptions of Homeless Adults and Their Providers on Coping With the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health, Substance Use, and Harm Reduction Services

Adults experiencing homelessness experience a disproportionate burden of health disparities which has further exacerbated mental health, substance use, and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic. As limited data is available to understand the experience of adults experiencing homelessness and their health during this time, the purpose of this study was to explore how COVID-19 may have impacted their mental health, substance use, and ways of coping in this population. Using community-based participatory research, a community advisory board was established and remote individual interviews with 21 adults experiencing homelessness and 10 providers were conducted in Skid Row, Los Angeles. Using a qualitative, data analytic approach, the following major themes emerged: (1) Negative Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health; (2) Negative Impact of COVID-19 on Limitation of Harm Reduction Services; and (3) Coping Strategies Utilized During the COVID-19 Pandemic. More research is needed to understand the impact of this pandemic on underserved communities.