Alternative receptive language assessment modalities and stimuli for autistic children who are minimally verbal

Receptive language and receptive-expressive discrepancy in minimally verbal autistic children and adolescents

Among the approximately one-third of autistic individuals who experience considerable challenges in acquiring spoken language and are minimally verbal (MV), relatively little is known about the range of their receptive language abilities. This study included 1579 MV autistic children and adolescents between 5 and 18 years of age drawn from the National Database for Autism Research and the SFARI Base data repository. MV autistic children and adolescents demonstrated significantly lower receptive language compared to the norms on standardized language assessment and parent report measures. Moreover, their receptive language gap widened with age. Overall, our sample demonstrated significantly better receptive than expressive language. However, at the individual level, only about 25% of MV autistic children and adolescents demonstrated significantly better receptive language relative to their minimal expressive levels. Social skills explained a significant proportion of the variance in parent-reported receptive language skills, while motor skills were the most significant predictor of greater receptive-expressive discrepancy. Findings from this study revealed the heterogeneous language profiles in MV autistic children and adolescents, underscoring the importance of individualizing interventions to match their different communication strengths and needs and integrating multiple interconnected areas to optimize their overall development of language comprehension, socialization, and general motor skills.

Exploring the Clinical Feasibility of Alternative Word-Understanding Measures for Autistic Children With Minimal Spoken Language

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to explore the clinical feasibility of using alternate word-understanding assessment modalities for autistic children who have minimal verbal skills. Specifically, assessment duration, occurrence of disruptive behavior, and no-response trials were examined across three word-understanding assessment conditions: a low-tech condition, a touchscreen condition, and a condition that used real-object stimuli. A secondary aim was to examine the relationship between disruptive behavior and assessment outcomes.

METHOD

Twenty-seven autistic children between the ages of 3 and 12 years who had minimal verbal skills completed 12 test items on the three assessment conditions. Repeated-measures analyses of variance with post hoc Bonferroni procedures were used to describe and compare assessment duration, occurrence of disruptive behavior, and no-response trials across conditions. A Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship between disruptive behavior and assessment outcomes.

RESULTS

The real-object assessment condition took significantly longer than the low-tech and touchscreen conditions. Participants engaged in disruptive behavior most frequently during the low-tech condition; however, differences among conditions were not significant. There were significantly more no-response trials in the low-tech condition than in the touchscreen condition. There was a significant, weak negative correlation between disruptive behavior and experimental assessment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Results show there is promise in using real objects and touchscreen devices to assess word understanding in autistic children who have minimal verbal skills.