Surgery for colon cancer

From Crypts to Cancer: A Holistic Perspective on Colorectal Carcinogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a significant global health burden, with high incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Recent progress in research highlights the distinct clinical and molecular characteristics of colon versus rectal cancers, underscoring tumor location's importance in treatment approaches. This article provides a comprehensive review of our current understanding of CRC epidemiology, risk factors, molecular pathogenesis, and management strategies. We also present the intricate cellular architecture of colonic crypts and their roles in intestinal homeostasis. Colorectal carcinogenesis multistep processes are also described, covering the conventional adenoma-carcinoma sequence, alternative serrated pathways, and the influential Vogelstein model, which proposes sequential APC, KRAS, and TP53 alterations as drivers. The consensus molecular CRC subtypes (CMS1-CMS4) are examined, shedding light on disease heterogeneity and personalized therapy implications.

Comparison of D2 vs D3 lymph node dissection for RIght COloN cancer (RICON): study protocol for an international multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is a global health concern, ranking fifth in both new diagnoses and deaths among tumors worldwide. Surgical intervention remains the primary treatment for localized cases, with a historical evolution marked by a focus on short-term outcomes. While Japan pioneered radical tumor removal with a systematic categorization of lymph nodes (D1, D2, D3), the dissemination of Japanese practices to the West was delayed until 90th of last century. Discrepancies between Japanese D3 dissection and the CME with CVL principle persist, with variations in longitudinal margins and recommended procedures. Non-randomized trials indicate the superiority of D3 over D2, but a consensus is lacking.

METHODS

This prospective, international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial employs a two-arm, parallel-group, open-label design to rigorously compare the 5-year overall survival outcomes between D2 and D3 lymph node dissection in stage II-III right colon cancer. Building on prior studies, the trial aims to address existing knowledge gaps and provide a comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes associated with D3 dissection. The study population comprises patients with right colon cancer, ensuring a focused investigation into the specific context of this disease. The trial design emphasizes its global scope and collaboration across multiple centers, enhancing the generalizability of the findings.

DISCUSSION

This study's primary objective is to elucidate the potential superiority in 5-year overall survival benefits of D3 lymph node dissection compared to the conventional D2 approach in patients with stage II-III right colon cancer. By examining this specific subset of patients, the research aims to contribute valuable insights into optimizing surgical strategies for improved long-term outcomes. The trial's international and multicenter nature enhances its applicability across diverse populations. The outcomes of this study may inform future guidelines and contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding the standardization of colon cancer surgery, particularly in the context of right colon cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03200834. Registered on June 27, 2017.

A Novel Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Emergency Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival after emergency colorectal cancer surgery is low, and its estimation is most frequently neglected, with priority given to the immediate prognosis. This study aimed to propose an effective nomogram to predict overall survival in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 437 patients who underwent emergency surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2019, in whom we analyzed the clinical, paraclinical, and surgical parameters.

RESULTS

Only 30 patients (6.86%) survived until the end of the study. We identified the risk factors through the univariate Cox regression analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model. The model included the following eight independent prognostic factors: age > 63 years, Charlson score > 4, revised cardiac risk index (RCRI), LMR (lymphocytes/neutrophils ratio), tumor site, macroscopic tumoral invasion, surgery type, and lymph node dissection (p < 0.05 for all), with an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.831, with an ideal agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities. On this basis, we constructed a nomogram for prediction of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram created, on the basis of a multivariate logistic regression model, has a good individual prediction of overall survival for patients with emergency surgery for colon cancer and may support clinicians when informing patients about prognosis.

Luteolin induces pyroptosis in HT-29 cells by activating the Caspase1/Gasdermin D signalling pathway

Luteolin, which is a natural flavonoid, has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties. Numerous studies have proven that luteolin inhibits the growth of many types of cancer cells by promoting apoptosis, autophagy, and cell cycle arrest in tumour cells. However, in vivo research on this topic has been limited. In addition, other studies have shown that luteolin exerts a good inhibitory effect on apoptosis-resistant cancer cells. While existing studies have not completely elucidated the mechanism underlying this phenomenon, we assume that luteolin, which is a natural compound that exerts its effects through various mechanisms, may have the potential to inhibit tumour growth. In our study, we proved that luteolin exerted a good inhibitory effect on the proliferation of colon cancer cells according to CCK8 and EdU fluorescence assays, and the same conclusion was drawn in animal experiments. In addition, we found that luteolin, which is an antioxidant, unexpectedly promoted oxidative stress as shown by measuring the levels of oxidative balance-related indicators, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), SOD, H₂O₂ and GSH. However, the decreased oxidation of luteolin-treated HT-29 cells after treatment with the active oxygen scavenger NAC did not reverse the inhibition of cell growth. However, the Caspase1 inhibitor VX765 did reverse the inhibition of cell growth. Western blotting analysis showed that luteolin treatment increased the expression of Caspase1, Gasdermin D and IL-1β, which are members of the pyroptosis signalling pathway, in colon cancer cells. We further intuitively observed NLRP3/Gasdermin D colocalization in luteolin-treated HT-29 cells and mouse tumour tissues by immunofluorescence. These results suggest that luteolin inhibits the proliferation of colon cancer cells through a novel pathway called pyroptosis. This study provides a new direction for the development of natural products that inhibit tumour growth by inducing pyroptosis.

Postoperative Quality Assessment Score Can Select Patients with High Risk for Locoregional Recurrence in Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Monitoring surgical quality has been shown to reduce locoregional recurrence (LRR). We previously showed that the arterial stump length (ASL) after complete mesocolic excision (CME) is a reproducible quality instrument and correlates with the lymph-node (LN) yield. We hypothesized that generating an LRR prediction score by integrating the ASL would predict the risk of LRR after suboptimal surgery.

METHODS

502 patients with curative resections for stage I-III colon cancer were divided in two groups (CME vs. non-CME) and compared in terms of surgical data, ASL-derived parameters, pathological parameters, LRR and LRR-free survival. A prediction score was generated to stratify patients at high risk for LRR.

RESULTS

The ASL showed significantly higher values (50.77 mm ± 28.5 mm) with LRR vs. (45.59 mm ± 28.1 mm) without LRR (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significant increase in LRR-free survival at 5.58 years when CME was performed (Group A: 81%), in contrast to non-CME surgery (Group B: 67.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction score placed 76.6% of patients with LRR in the high-risk category, with a strong predictive value. Patients with long vascular stumps and positive nodes could benefit from second surgery to complete the mesocolic excision.

A prognostic score predicting survival following emergency surgery in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) varies. We aim to develop a prognostic score for mCRC after emergency surgery to guide treatment decisions.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed mCRC patients who presented with primary tumor-related complications and underwent emergency surgery between January 1999 and December 2013 were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify covariates significantly associated with the time to death following surgery. A survival score was derived using the Cox regression equation.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 248 patients. Median patient age was 66 ± 13 years. Primary tumor was located in the left colon and rectum in 211 patients (85.1%) while 37 patients (14.9%) had primaries in the right colon. Liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases occurred in 161 patients (64.9%), 59 patients (23.8%), and 96 patients (38.7%), respectively. Majority of patients presented with either obstruction (174 patients, 70.1%) or perforation (52 patients, 21%). On multivariate analysis, age of 60 years or older (p = 0.007), carcinoembryonic antigen levels greater than 45 ng/ml (p = 0.022), presence of liver metastases (p = 0.024), and peritoneal carcinomatosis (p < 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with overall survival. A simplified score was derived with good survivors (score 0-2), moderate survivors (score 3-4), and poor survivors (score 5 and above) experiencing median survival of 7, 14, and 23 months, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The management of mCRC presenting with an emergency is challenging. A prognostic score that estimates survival after emergency surgery may aid clinical decision-making.

Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Multimodal Management and Survival from Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study

This retrospective population-based study examined the impact of age and comorbidity burden on multimodal management and survival from colorectal cancer (CRC). From 2000 to 2015, 1479 consecutive patients, who underwent surgical resection for CRC, were reviewed for age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) including 19 well-defined weighted comorbidities. The impact of ACCI on multimodal management and survival was compared between low (score 0–2), intermediate (score 3) and high ACCI (score ≥ 4) groups. Changes in treatment from 2000 to 2015 were seen next to a major increase of laparoscopic surgery, increased use of adjuvant chemotherapy and an intensified treatment of metastatic disease. Patients with a high ACCI score were, by definition, older and had higher comorbidity. Major elective and emergency resections for colon carcinoma were evenly performed between the ACCI groups, as were laparoscopic and open resections. (Chemo)radiotherapy for rectal carcinoma was less frequently used, and a higher rate of local excisions, and consequently lower rate of major elective resections, was performed in the high ACCI group. Adjuvant chemotherapy and metastasectomy were less frequently used in the ACCI high group. Overall and cancer-specific survival from stage I-III CRC remained stable over time, but survival from stage IV improved. However, the 5-year overall survival from stage I–IV colon and rectal carcinoma was worse in the high ACCI group compared to the low ACCI group. Five-year cancer-specific and disease-free survival rates did not differ significantly by the ACCI. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that high ACCI was an independent predictor of poor overall survival (p < 0.001). Our results show that despite improvements in multimodal management over time, old age and high comorbidity burden affect the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and management of metastatic disease, and worsen overall survival from CRC.

Laparoscopic Colectomy vs Laparoscopic CME: a Retrospective Study of Two Hospitals with Comparable Laparoscopic Experience

PURPOSE

To compare laparoscopic non-CME colectomy with laparoscopic CME colectomy in two hospitals with similar experience in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from Päijät-Häme Central Hospital (PHCH, NCME group) and Central Finland Central Hospital (CFCH, CME group) records. Elective laparoscopic resections performed during 2007-2016 for UICC stage I-III adenocarcinoma were included to assess differences in short-term outcome and survival.

RESULTS

There were 340 patients in the NCME group and 325 patients in the CME group. CME delivered longer specimens (p < 0.001), wider resection margins (p < 0.001), and more lymph nodes (p < 0.001) but did not result in better 5-year overall or cancer-specific survival (NCME 77.9% vs CME 72.9%, p = 0.528, NCME 93.2% vs CME 88.9%, p = 0.132, respectively). Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay were similar between the groups. Conversion to open surgery was associated with decreased survival.

DISCUSSION

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is reported to improve survival. Most previous studies have compared open CME with open non-CME (NCME) or open CME with laparoscopic CME. NCME populations have been historical or heterogeneous, potentially causing bias in the interpretation of results. Studies comparing laparoscopic CME with laparoscopic NCME are few and involve only small numbers of patients. In this study, diligently performed laparoscopic non-CME D2 resection delivered disease-free survival results comparable with laparoscopic CME but was not safer.

Comparison of extended right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy and segmental colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim of this work was to compare the outcomes of extended right hemicolectomy (ERH), left hemicolectomy (LH) and segmental colectomy (SC) for the surgical management of splenic flexure tumours.

METHOD

In compliance with PRISMA statement standards, a systematic review was performed to identify all studies comparing outcomes of ERH, LH and SC for the surgical management of splenic flexure tumours. Primary outcomes included anastomotic leakage and all postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes included operative time, R0 resection, number of harvested lymph nodes, > 12 harvested lymph nodes, severe complications, postoperative mortality, paralytic ileus, wound infection, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, need for reoperation, length of hospital stay, 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival. The ROBINS-I tool and GRADE system were used to assess the risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively.

RESULTS

Analysis of 956 patients from seven observational studies showed that ERH was associated with more paralytic ileus than LH (OR 2.74, P = 0.002) and SC (OR 6.67, P < 0.0001) and the operative time was shorter in SC than in ERH (mean difference 25.48, P < 0.0001) and LH (mean difference -17.94, P = 0.0002). There were no differences between ERH, LH and SC in terms of anastomotic leakage, postoperative complications, R0 resection, severe complications, postoperative mortality, wound infection, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, need for reoperation, length of hospital stay, > 12 harvested lymph nodes, 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence, limited to observational studies, suggests that there is no difference between ERH, LH and SC in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, lymph node yield and cancer survival. Randomized controlled trials are required for definite conclusions.

Complete mesocolic excision in minimally invasive surgery of colonic cancer: do we need the robot?

Background

Robotic surgery offers favorable prerequisites for complex minimally invasive surgeries which are delivered by higher degrees of freedom, improved instrument stability, and a perfect visualization in 3D which is fully surgeon controlled. In this article we aim to assess its impact on complete mesocolic excision (CME) in colon cancer and to answer the question of whether the current evidence expresses a need for robotic surgery for this indication.

Methods

Retrospective analysis and review of the current literature on complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer comparing the outcome after open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Results

Complete mesocolic excision results in improved disease-free survival and reduced local recurrence, but turns out to be complex and prone to complications. Introduced in open surgery, the transfer to minimally invasive surgery resulted in comparable results, however, with high conversion rates. In comparison, robotic surgery shows a reduced conversion rate and a tendency toward higher lymph node yield. Data, however, are insufficient and no high-quality studies have been published to date. Almost no oncologic follow-up data are available in the literature.

Conclusion

The current data do not allow for a reliable conclusion on the need of robotic surgery for CME, but show results which hypothesize an equivalence if not superiority to laparoscopy. Due to recently published technical improvements for robotic CME and supplementary features of this method, we suppose that this approach will gain in importance in the future.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes for locally advanced right colon cancers: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with right hemicolectomy (RH) to treat locally advanced right colon cancer (LARCC) has been rarely reported in the literature. Herein, we characterize clinicopathologic factors and evaluate outcomes of en bloc PD and RH for LARCC.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on PubMed using MeSH terms ("pancreaticoduodenectomy" or "pancreas/surgery" or "duodenum/surgery" or "colectomy") and ("colonic neoplasms"). Data was extracted from patients who underwent en bloc PD and RH for LARCC. Factors investigated included patient demographics, surgical and pathologic parameters, postoperative complications, disease recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 27 articles (106 patients), including 1 case from our institution. Most patients were male (62.1%), median age 58 years (range 34-83). Surgical procedures performed included en bloc RH with PD (n = 91, 85.8%) and en bloc RH with pylorus-preserving PD (n = 15, 14.2%). Among reported, 95.5% of patients (n = 63), underwent R0 resection. One or more complications were reported in 33 patients (52.4%). Median survival was 168 months. Survival after resection was 75.9% at 2 years and 66.3% at 5 years. Overall survival was greater in patients with no lymph node involvement (IIC versus IIIC, hazard ratio 8.4, P = .003). Five-year survival for patients was 84.9% in patients with stage IIC versus 46.4% in patients with stage IIIC. There were 3 postoperative mortalities.

CONCLUSION

This data demonstrates that en bloc PD and RH is rarely performed yet can be a potentially safe treatment option in patients with LARCC. Lymph node involvement was the only independent prognostic factor.

Surgical and oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer compared with conventional surgery: a retrospective, single-institution study

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was whether complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) is associated with a survival benefit compared with traditional procedure in right-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

Overall, 251 consecutive patients underwent surgery for right colon cancer between 2007 and 2012. After exclusion, 95 subjects received non-CME surgery before 2010, and 97 subjects received CME surgery after January 2010, when we started to perform CME systematically. The number of lymph nodes, morbidity, and mortality was analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were investigated.

RESULTS

The median number of examined lymph nodes was 33.28 in the CME group and 26.92 in the non-CME group, p < 0.001. Postoperative complications were 21.6% in the CME group and 17.8% in the non-CME group, without significant difference. One out of 192 patients died. Three-year OS was 88% in the CME group and 71% in the non-CME group (p = 0.003). In stage II, 3-year DSS was 97% in the CME group and 86% in the non-CME group. In stage III, the 3-year DSSs in the CME and in the non-CME groups were 86 and 67%, respectively (p < 0.001). Cox's regression showed that CME (p = 0.0012), the number of lymph nodes (p = 0.029), and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of DSS at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

Surgical standardization of CME with CVL for right-sided colon cancer is associated with better staging and prognosis, particularly in UICC stage II and III. This study shows that CME is safe and reproducible with acceptable morbidity.

Laparoscopic Wide Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation for Carcinoma of the Colon

Background and Aims:

The principle of complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer has been introduced to improve oncologic outcome. However, this approach is scantily discussed for laparoscopic surgery and there is a lack of randomized trials. This study examined oncologic and clinical outcome after laparoscopic wide mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer.

Material and Methods:

This is a review of prospectively gathered data from a single-institution colorectal cancer database. This study was conducted in the Central Hospital of Central Finland. From January 2003 to December 2011, 222 patients underwent laparoscopic colonic resections with wide mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation in the multimodal setting. The main measures of outcome were cancer recurrence and survival, with early recovery, 30d-mortality and morbidity, reoperation, readmission, and late complications as secondary outcomes.

Results:

The median follow-up was 5.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 3.7–8.0) years. The 5-year overall survival for all 222 patients was 80.2% and disease-specific survival was 87.5%, and for those 210 R0-patients with stage I–III disease, 83.9% and 91.3%, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival was 85.8%: stage I was 94.7%, stage II was 90.8%, and stage III was 75.6% ( p = 0.004). Increasing lymph node ratio significantly decreased the 5-year disease-free survival. Conversion rate to open surgery was 12.2%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.3% and morbidity, 19.7%. Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 (IQR = 3–7) days.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic wide mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer resulted in good long-term oncologic outcome. Randomized trials are needed to show that laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision technique would become the standard of care for the carcinoma of the colon.

Prognosis of patients with colonic carcinoma before, during and after implementation of complete mesocolic excision

Background

The implementation of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colonic cancer was accompanied by other important changes, including more patients with early diagnosis by screening and the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III disease. The contribution of CME remains unclear.

Methods

In this observational study, data from patients with stage I–III colonic carcinoma were analysed by comparing five time intervals: 1978–1984 (pre-CME), 1985–1994 (CME development), 1995–2002 (CME implementation), 2003–2009 (CME) and 2010–2014 (CME), with a special focus on indicators of process and outcome quality.

Results

During the observed periods, the median age of patients increased (from 65 to 67 years), there were more right-sided carcinomas (from 17·0 to 32·4 per cent), more stage I disease (from 14·0 to 27·7 per cent) and fewer patients with regional lymph node metastases (from 42·7 to 32·0 per cent). The proportion of patients with pN0 disease and at least 12 examined regional lymph nodes increased (from 84·8 to 100 per cent) as did the R0 resection rate (from 97·0 to 100 per cent). Overall morbidity increased, whereas the in-hospital mortality rate was stable (range 1·8–3·7 per cent). Use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colonic carcinoma increased from 0 to 79 per cent. The improvement in outcome quality was more evident in stage III than in stage I–II tumours. In stage III, the 5-year locoregional recurrence rate decreased from 14·8 to 4·1 per cent (P = 0·046) and the 5-year cancer-related survival rate increased from 61·7 to 80·9 per cent (P = 0·010).

Conclusion

With CME, the quality indicators of process and outcome quality improved, especially in stage III colonic carcinoma. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III and multidisciplinary approaches in patients with metachronous distant metastases contributed to further outcome improvement.

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision provides acceptable perioperative outcomes but is lengthy--analysis of learning curves for a novice minimally invasive surgeon

BACKGROUND

Associated with reduced trauma, laparoscopic colon surgery is an alternative to open surgery. Furthermore, complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been shown to provide superior nodal yield and offers the prospect of better oncological outcomes.

METHODS

All oncologic laparoscopic right colon resections with CME performed by a single surgeon since the beginning of his surgical practice were retrospectively analyzed for operative duration and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 81 patients. The average duration of surgery was 220.0 (range 206-233) minutes. The initial durations of about 250 minutes gradually decreased to less than 200 minutes in an inverse linear relationship (y = -0.58x × 248). The major complication rate was 3.6% ± 4.2% and the average nodal yield was 31.3 ± 4.1. CumulativeSum analysis showed acceptable complication rates and oncological results from the beginning of surgeon's laparoscopic career.

CONCLUSION

Developing laparoscopic skills can provide acceptable outcomes in advanced right hemicolectomy for a surgeon who primarily trained in open colorectal surgery. Operative duration is nearly triple that reported for conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The slow operative duration learning curve without a plateau reflects complex anatomy and the need for careful dissection around critical structures. Should one wish to adopt this strategy either based on some available evidence of superiority or with intention to participate in research, one has to change the view of right hemicolectomy being a rather simple case to being a complex, lengthy laparoscopic surgery.

Determinants of recurrence after intended curative resection for colorectal cancer

Despite intended curative resection, colorectal cancer will recur in ∼45% of the patients. Results of meta-analyses conclude that frequent follow-up does not lead to early detection of recurrence, but improves overall survival. The present literature shows that several factors play important roles in development of recurrence. It is well established that emergency surgery is a major determinant of recurrence. Moreover, anastomotic leakages, postoperative bacterial infections, and blood transfusions increase the recurrence rates although the exact mechanisms still remain obscure. From pathology studies it has been shown that tumors behave differently depending on their location and recur more often when micrometastases are present in lymph nodes and around vessels and nerves. K-ras mutations, microsatellite instability, and mismatch repair genes have also been shown to be important in relation with recurrences, and tumors appear to have different mutations depending on their location. Patients with stage II or III disease are often treated with adjuvant chemotherapy despite the fact that the treatments are far from efficient among all patients, who are at risk of recurrence. Studies are now being presented identifying subgroups, in which the therapy is inefficient. Unfortunately, only few of these facts are implemented in the present follow-up programs. Therefore, further research is urgently needed to verify which of the well-known parameters as well as new parameters that must be added to the current follow-up programs to identify patients at risk of recurrence.

Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on survival for patients with T3 and T4 colon cancer

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of D3 lymph node dissection for patients with colon cancer remains controversial. This study aims to clarify the impact of D3 lymph node dissection on survival in patients with colon cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively registered multi-institutional database of colorectal cancer in Japan. Propensity score matching method was applied to balance potential confounders of the treatment. A cohort of 10,098 patients who underwent radical colectomy for pT3 and pT4 colon cancer between 1985 and 1994 were identified. A total of 3,425 propensity score matched pairs were extracted from the entire cohort. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the patients who had D3 and D2 lymph node dissection (p = 0.00003). The estimated hazard ratio (HR) for OS of patients who had D3 versus D2 lymph node dissection was 0.827 (95 % confidence interval, 0.757 to 0.904). In the matched cohort, there was also a significant difference in OS between the two groups (p = 0.0001), and the estimated HR for OS was 0.814 (95 % confidence interval, 0.734 to 0.904).

CONCLUSIONS

We found D3 lymph node dissection for pT3 and pT4 colon cancer to be associated with a significant survival advantage in a large-scale database, even after adjusting potential confounders of lymph node dissection. This finding may provide a rationale for D3 lymph node dissection in radical surgery for pT3 and pT4 colon cancer.

Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study

PURPOSE

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been proposed for treatment of colon cancers based on the same principles as total mesorectal excision. Impressive outcomes have been reported, however, direct comparisons with the classic procedure are lacking.

METHODS

Forty-five consecutive patients operated on in the last 5 years with CME and CVL right hemicolectomy entered the study. Fifty-eight right-sided colon cancer patients operated in the previous 5 years with classic approach constituted the control group. Intra- and postoperative course assessed the safety of the procedure. Primary end-points for oncological adequacy were recurrence and survival rate.

RESULTS

All operations were successful with no increase in postoperative complications (p = 0.85). Number of harvested nodes and length of vascular ligation were shown to be significantly better in the CME group (p < 0.01). A higher number of tumor deposits were harvested thus allowing chemotherapy in newly upstaged patients. Locoregional recurrences were never experienced in CME patients (p = 0.03). The risk of cancer-related death was reduced by over one half in all CME patients, and even by three quarters in node-positive tumors. The classic operation was significantly associated with poor outcome (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that CME with CVL is a safe and effective surgical approach for right colon cancer, thus confirming the previously reported oncological adequacy. The procedure was shown to significantly decrease local recurrences and to improve the survival rate, particularly in node-positive patients. Urgent diffusion of this technique is warranted.

Wide excision in right-sided colon cancer is associated with decreased survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Nodal involvement is the most important prognostic factor in colon cancer. Although theoretically appealing, it is not known if wider mesenteric excision improves the oncological result. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether wider mesenteric excision yields a superior oncological result.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Depending on the resection length, 333 cases of locally radical right-sided hemicolectomies due to adenocarcinoma were compared for perioperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free survival, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in the quartile with the longest resections, p = 0.003. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, stage, emergency operation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and year of operation, a negative relationship between resection length and 5-year overall survival was noted, p = 0.01. No differences in the causes of death or in the incidence of local or distant recurrences were noted between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Wider excision in right-sided hemicolectomies was not associated with any oncological benefit but an increased postoperative mortality and a decreased 5-year overall survival. These findings may suggest consideration to perform wide mesenteric resections routinely. Further research is warranted to define which patients benefit from wider resections.

The relation between lymph node status and survival in Stage I-III colon cancer: results from a prospective nationwide cohort study

AIM

This study involved a large nationwide Danish cohort to evaluate the hypothesis that a high lymph node harvest has a positive effect on survival in curative resected Stage I-III colon cancer and a low lymph node ratio has a positive effect on survival in Stage III colon cancer.

METHOD

Analysis of overall survival was conducted using a nationwide Danish cohort of patients treated with curative resection of Stage I-III colon cancer. All 8901 patients in Denmark diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the colon and treated with curative resection in the period 2003-2008 were identified from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). The impact of lymph node count and lymph node ratio was analysed.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival was 56.8 and 66.6%, (P < 0.0001) for lymph node counts of fewer than 12 and 12 or more, respectively. The percentages of lymph node positive patients in the two groups were 29.8 and 40.3% (P < 0.0001), respectively. When putting the Stage III patients into four subgroups according to the lymph node ratio (cut-off points 1/12, 1/4 and 1/2) we found an overall 5-year survival rate of 68.1, 57.2, 49.3 and 32.4% (P < 0.0001). Lymph node count and lymph node ratio were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

High lymph node count was associated with improved overall survival in colon cancer. Lymph node ratio was superior to N-stage in differentiating overall survival in Stage III colon cancer. Stage migration was observed.

The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials

Greater attention needed to achieve equipoise in surgical trials

Prognostic impact of lymph node harvest and lymph node ratio in patients with colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of the number of lymph nodes and ratio in colon cancer is still debated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate lymph node harvest in patients with colon cancer over time, and to test the hypotheses that investigation of more lymph nodes, and low lymph node ratio in stage III patients, has positive prognostic impact.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, observational study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a single institution treating all patients with colon cancer in a defined catchment area.

PATIENTS

All patients admitted in the period 1993 to 2009 (n = 1481) were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the number of examined regional lymph nodes according to treatment period, 5-year overall survival and time to recurrence, and univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate (Cox regression) analyses of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty (65%) patients underwent curative resection. Median number of examined lymph nodes increased from 7 to 15 (p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients with stage III disease increased from 25% to 33% (p = 0.02) during the study period. In patients with stage I to III disease, time to recurrence (proportion of patients without recurrence or death of colon cancer) improved from 65% to 82% during the period (p < 0.001). An association between lymph node count (<8 compared with ≥ 12) and overall survival was found for patients with stage II disease (57% vs 71%, p = 0.004). Hazard ratio for death within 5 years was 0.7 (p = 0.043) when 8 to 11 nodes were examined and 0.6 (p = 0.001) when ≥ 12 nodes were examined (<8 reference). In patients with stage III disease, increasing lymph node ratio was associated with reduced overall survival and time to recurrence in uni- and multivariate analyses.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the small number of patients in each stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of examined lymph nodes increased in the study period. A stage migration was observed, and time to recurrence improved in patients with stage I to III disease. In patients with stage III disease, lymph node ratio was a stronger prognostic factor than the total number of lymph nodes examined.

Despite aggressive histopathology survival is not impaired in young patients with colorectal cancer : CRC in patients under 50 years of age

PURPOSE

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is generally a disease of persons older than 50 years. Concerning younger patients, controversies still exist regarding features and prognosis of CRC. We performed this study to characterize CRC in young patients (≤50 years) as well as to evaluate outcome in comparison with older patients (>50 years) with CRC.

METHODS

Clinical and histopathological parameters of 244 patients aged 50 years or less were compared with 1,718 patients aged more than 50 years.

RESULTS

Compared with older patients, the younger had less adenocarcinomas (82.8% vs. 89.1%; p = 0.004) and less postoperative complications (18.4% vs. 28.7%; p = 0.001), and less Union Internationale Contre le Cancer stage I colon cancers (22.9% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.046) but elevated overall 5-year survival rates for M0 colon and rectal cancers (p = 0.005; p < 0.001). In young patients, the minority suffered from hereditary cancer syndromes (7.4%) and inflammatory bowel diseases (7.0%). Furthermore, up to 40% of young patients denied any cancers in their families. Cancer-related survival rates were significantly elevated in young patients with M0 rectal carcinoma (p = 0.014), whereas in M0 colon cancers, no differences were detectable (p = 0.542). In case of the presence of distant metastases, overall and cancer-related survival rates were similar in old and young patients.

CONCLUSION

Although young patients present with more aggressive histopathological subtypes and less early stages, cancer-related survival is not less favourable compared with older patients.

Outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin appears to be a combination of systemic chemotherapy and complete surgical cytoreduction with synchronous intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of, and outcomes following, surgical treatment and systemic chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

Prospectively collated data from the Erlangen Registry for Colorectal Cancer were analysed for patients presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin between 1990 and 2006. Operative and adjuvant treatment, along with details of postoperative morbidity, were evaluated and correlated with survival outcomes after 5 years.

RESULTS

Some 125 patients underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer and synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis. Two-thirds also had non-peritoneal distant metastases. R0/R1 resection was possible in 24 (59 per cent) of 41 patients with peritoneal metastases alone, and in a further seven patients with both peritoneal and distant metastases (overall R0/R1 resection rate 24·8 per cent). In-hospital morbidity and mortality rates were 32·0 and 12·0 per cent respectively. Twenty-three of the 31 patients who underwent R0/R1 resection developed recurrent disease. Median survival for the entire group was 12 months. Following R0/R1 resection median survival was 25 months and the 5-year survival rate 22 per cent. Six (4·8 per cent) of the 125 patients survived for more than 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Complete resection of all metastatic disease was associated with improved survival and was possible in almost 60 per cent of patients with peritoneal metastases alone.

Symptomatic venous thromboembolism in Asian colorectal cancer surgery patients

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), manifesting as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), after colorectal cancer surgery in Asian patients remains poorly characterized. The present study was designed to investigate the incidence of symptomatic VTE in Korean colorectal cancer patients following surgery, and to identify the associated risk factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who developed symptomatic VTE after colorectal cancer surgery between 2006 and 2008. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed with Doppler ultrasound or contrast venography, and PE was identified with lung ventilation/perfusion scans or chest computed tomography. Thromboprophylaxis, including low-molecular-weight heparin, graduated compression stockings, and intermittent pneumatic compression, was used in patients considered at high risk of VTE.

RESULTS

Of the 3,645 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery, 31 (0.85%) developed symptomatic VTE. Of those 31 patients, 23 (74.2%) had DVT, 16 (51.6%) had PE, and 8 (25.8%) had both. Two patients died from PE. Univariate analysis showed that a history of VTE, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, transfusions, postoperative immobilization time, and postoperative complications were associated with VTE (p < 0.05 for each). Multivariate analysis showed that a history of VTE, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, postoperative complication, advanced cancer stage, and postoperative immobilization time were risk factors for developing symptomatic VTE. The mean hospital stay was 18.3 days, and the mortality rate was 6.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidences of symptomatic DVT and PE were found to be not low in Asian colorectal cancer surgery patients compared with Western countries. The risk factors for VTE were a history of VTE, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, postoperative complications, advanced cancer stage, and postoperative immobilization. Thromboprophylaxis should be strongly considered in patients with these characteristics. Large prospective randomized controlled trials should be conducted to further evaluate the risk of VTE in Asian patients, and to determine the optimal prophylaxis.

Overall survival after resection for colon cancer in a national cohort study was adversely affected by TNM stage, lymph node ratio, gender, and old age

BACKGROUND

A national surveillance program of colon cancer treatment was introduced in 2007. We examined prognostic factors for colon cancer operated in 2000 with an aim of improving survival in the new program and a special focus on the merit of lymph node yield.

METHODS

A cohort of 269 patients, 152 women (56.5%), with a mean age of 71 years, was operated for colon cancer in 2000 at three teaching hospitals and followed up for 7 years.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival was 58.0%, and overall hospital mortality was 5.2%, with 4.5% in elective cases and 12.5% after urgent surgery. In only 41.1% of the specimens were 12 or more lymph nodes retrieved, but this did not affect survival in the combined cohort, although one of the hospitals achieved a significantly better result with a harvest of 12 or more lymph nodes. In a multivariate analysis, old age, gender, a high lymph node ratio (LNR) at stage III, and tumor-node-metastasis stage were adverse factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The operative mortality was high and should be reassessed. The lymph node count did not have a significant impact on outcome overall, whereas the LNR proved significant for stage III. A prospective protocol using overall lymph node yield as a surrogate measure for more radical surgery, nevertheless, seems warranted to improve the lymph node harvest according to international recommendations.

Function and dysfunction of the colon and anorectum in adults: working team report of the Swedish Motility Group (SMoG)

Symptoms of fecal incontinence and constipation are common in the general population. These can, however, be unreliably reported and are poorly discriminatory for underlying pathophysiology. Furthermore, both symptoms may coexist. In the elderly, fecal impaction always must be excluded. For patients with constipation, colon transit studies, anorectal manometry and defecography may help to identify patients with slow-transit constipation and/or pelvic floor dysfunction. The best documented medical treatments for constipation are the macrogols, lactulose and isphagula. Evolving drugs include lubiprostone, which enhances colonic secretion by activating chloride channels. Surgery is restricted for a highly selected group of patients with severe slow-transit constipation and for those with large rectoceles that demonstrably cause rectal evacuatory impairment. For patients with fecal incontinence that does not resolve on antidiarrheal treatment, functional and structural evaluation with anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance (MR) of the anal canal may help to guide management. Sacral nerve stimulation is a rapidly evolving alternative when other treatments such as biofeedback and direct sphincter repair have failed. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology as a guide to treatment of patients with constipation and fecal incontinence is a continuing important goal for translational research. The content of this article is a summary of presentations given by the authors at the Fourth Meeting of the Swedish Motility Group, held in Gothenburg in April 2007.

Multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of curative surgery for colon carcinoma is the complete resection of the neoplasm. In locally advanced colon carcinomas with adhesion to neighboring organs, standard surgical procedures often turn into multivisceral resections. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of multivisceral resection in primary colon carcinomas and factors influencing its success.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data for 174 patients from the Erlangen Registry for Colorectal Carcinomas who underwent multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma from 1978 through 2002 were analyzed. Multivisceral resection was defined as the excision or resection of at least one further organ in addition to the carcinoma-affected colon. Postoperative complications, locoregional tumor recurrence, distant metastases, and cancer-related survival were evaluated after a five-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Multivisceral resection most commonly involved parts of the small intestine (31.6%), urinary bladder (27.0%), and the abdominal wall (15.5%). R0 resection (no residual tumor) was achieved in 93.1%. Overall, postoperative complications occurred in 25.8%, and the postoperative mortality rate was 6.9%. For patients with R0 resection, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of five-year cancer-related survival was 80.7%; no patient with R1 or R2 resection survived for 5 years. The five-year rate of locoregional tumor recurrence was 6.5%, and the five-year rate of distant metastases was 24.2%. The presence of lymphatic metastases was a significant prognostic factor for locoregional tumor recurrence, distant metastases, and cancer-related survival.

CONCLUSION

The high percentage of R0 resections achieved through multivisceral resection justifies this procedure for locally advanced colon carcinomas and highlights the importance of experienced, well-trained surgeons to decrease the incidence of locoregional recurrence.

Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome

OBJECTIVE

Total mesorectal excision (TME) as proposed by R.J. Heald more than 20 years ago, is nowadays accepted worldwide for optimal rectal cancer surgery. This technique is focused on an intact package of the tumour and its main lymphatic drainage. This concept can be translated into colon cancer surgery, as the mesorectum is only part of the mesenteric planes which cover the colon and its lymphatic drainage like envelopes. According to the concept of TME for rectal cancer, we perform a concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colonic cancer. This technique aims at the separation of the mesocolic from the parietal plane and true central ligation of the supplying arteries and draining veins right at their roots.

METHOD

Prospectively obtained data from 1329 consecutive patients of our department with RO-resection of colon cancer between 1978 and 2002 were analysed. Patient data of three subdivided time periods were compared.

RESULTS

By consequent application of the procedure of CME, we were able to reduce local 5-year recurrence rates in colon cancer from 6.5% in the period from 1978 to 1984 to 3.6% in 1995 to 2002. In the same period, the cancer related 5-year survival rates in patients resected for cure increased from 82.1% to 89.1%.

CONCLUSION

The technique of CME in colon cancer surgery aims at a specimen with intact layers and a maximum of lymphnode harvest. This is translated into lower local recurrence rates and better overall survival.

Thromboprophylaxis following Surgery for Colorectal Cancer — Is it Worthwhile after Hospital Discharge?

Background:

The efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after surgery for colorectal cancer is well documented, but the optimal duration of postoperative thromboprophylaxis is not known. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the occurrence of symptomatic VTE after surgery for colorectal cancer in patients in whom LMWH was continued only until hospital discharge.

Methods:

During 2003–2006 a total of 494 patients underwent abdominal surgery for colorectal cancer at our institution. Enoxaparin (Klexane® 40mg s.c.) prophylaxis was started 12 hours before surgery and continued once a day until hospital discharge. The median duration of thromboprophylaxis was 11 days. The follow-up data were collected retrospectively from electronic archives and analyzed up to three months after the operation.

Results:

Only three (0.6%) symptomatic VTEs occurred during the follow-up period. One patient presented with pulmonary embolism, while the remaining two had proximal deep-vein thrombosis. The 30-day-mortality was 1.6%. None of the deaths were obviously associated with VTE.

Conclusion:

LMWH given for a median of 11 days until hospital discharge seems to provide sufficient thromboprophylaxis after surgery for colorectal cancer combined with the use of graded compression stockings and early mobilization.

[Lymphadenectomy with tumors of the lower gastrointestinal tract]

For advanced adenocarcinomas, which are the most frequent tumours of the lower GI tract, the concept of radical lymphnode dissection is well accepted. The quality of lymphadenectomy for these malignancies has a strong effect on cancer-related survival. Based upon a strict quality control program with outcome evaluated according to internal results, the technique and extent of lymph node dissection have been continuously developed over the last three decades. These are described in detail, including instructive pictures to clarify the surgical steps needed. Apart from multivisceral resection in far advanced cases, which still have a chance of cure if adequate guidelines are followed, two additional steps in the so-called radical surgical treatment of these tumours are prerequisites for cure. The first is complete mobilisation of the intestine involving complete mesocolic excision with complete retention of the visceral fascia and covering potential lymph node metastases and extranodal spread on the intestinal side. The second step is the central tying of the tumor's supplying vessels. Following these rules and with no adjuvant systemic treatment, 5-year survival figures of 80% can be reached, even for UICC stage III disease.

Colon cancer management and outcome in relation to individual hospitals in a defined population

Background

The Stockholm and Gotland region in Sweden has a common management protocol for the treatment of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the management and treatment of colon cancer in the region and to try to identify ways to improve the outcome further.

Methods

Clinical data on all patients diagnosed with colon cancer in the region's nine hospitals between January 1996 and December 2000 were prospectively collected. Patients were followed until December 2004, and their management and outcome analysed.

Results

Colon cancer was diagnosed in 2775 patients. An elective operation was performed in 2116 (76·3 per cent) patients and an emergency procedure in 590 (21·3 per cent). Emergency surgery was an independent risk factor for death. The crude overall cumulative 5-year survival was 46·2 per cent. A multivariable analysis of risk of dying and risk of local recurrence showed significant differences between hospitals. The number of lymph nodes examined in the specimens also differed between hospitals.

Conclusion

Differences in the management and outcome of colon cancer in the nine hospitals, despite a common management protocol, indicate a need for improving collaboration between hospitals and multidisciplinary management.

Temporal trends in the proportion cured for cancer of the colon and rectum: A population-based study using data from the Finnish Cancer Registry

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second most common cancer in Europe. Cumulative relative survival curves for both cancer of the colon and cancer of the rectum generally plateau after approximately 6-8 years. When this occurs, "population" or "statistical" cure is reached. We analyzed data from the Finnish Cancer Registry over a 50-year period using methods that simultaneously estimate the proportion of patients cured of disease (the cure fraction) and the survival time distribution of the "uncured" group. Our primary aim was to investigate temporal trends in the cure fraction and median survival of the uncured by age group for both cancer of the colon and rectum. For both cancers, the cure fraction has increased dramatically over time for all age groups. However, the difference in the cure fraction between age groups has reduced over time, particularly for cancer of the colon. Median survival in the uncured has also increased over time in all age groups but there still remains an inverse relationship between age and median survival, with shorter median survival with increasing age. The reasons for these impressive increases in patient survival are complex, but are highly likely to be strongly related to many improvements in cancer care over this same time period.

Loco-regional recurrence from colon cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The survival after colon cancer surgery has not improved to the same extent as after rectal cancer treatment and studies on loco-regional recurrence after colon cancer surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the problem of loco-regional recurrence after potentially curative resections for colon cancer, regarding incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome.

METHODS

All 1,856 patients submitted to potentially curative surgery for colon cancer in the Stockholm/Gotland region in Sweden between 1996 and 2000 were followed until January 2005 or until death. Follow-up data were prospectively collected. Risk factors for loco-regional recurrences were analyzed, treatment and outcome for patients with recurrence was studied.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year incidence of loco-regional recurrence was 11.5%. Tumor locations in the right flexure and in the sigmoid colon, bowel perforation and emergent surgery were identified as independent risk factors for loco-regional recurrence. The risk also increased with increasing T- and N-stage. The median survival for all 192 patients with loco-regional recurrence was 9 months. Surgery was performed in 110 (57%) patients. In 23 (12%) patients a complete tumor clearance was achieved and the estimated 5-year survival in this group was 43%.

CONCLUSION

Loco-regional recurrence from colon cancer is a significant clinical problem. A multidisciplinary treatment approach, including preoperative staging, a complete resection of the recurrence and more effective adjuvant treatments may improve the outcome.