1
|
Alharbi R, Almosallam O, Albastaki S, Almughamsi A, Alsanea N. Role of body mass index in anastomotic leakage after curative treatment for rectal cancer. Ann Saudi Med 2024; 44:135-140. [PMID: 38853477 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage (AL) represents a severe complication after rectal surgery, leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Despite improvements in surgical methods and perioperative care, the challenge of AL persists. OBJECTIVES Explore the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of AL following curative treatment for rectal cancer, providing insight into its predictive value. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTINGS Data were collected from a single tertiary center, emphasizing the specialized postoperative outcomes in a high-care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population was comprised patients who underwent sphincter-saving surgery combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer from 2001 to 2011. Patients with anastomotic stenosis were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome investigated was the occurrence of AL post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of local cancer recurrence rates within the AL group. SAMPLE SIZE 224; 13 excluded. RESULTS Of 237 patients who underwent surgery, 13 with anastomotic stenosis were excluded from this study. Of the remaining 224, 15 individuals (6.3%) developed AL. A potential association between higher BMI and increased AL risk was identified. Additionally, the study noted a higher incidence of local rectal cancer recurrence in the group that developed leakage. CONCLUSION The findings suggest BMI as a significant predictive factor for AL after curative rectal cancer treatment. This emphasizes the need for heightened awareness and possible preoperative counseling for obese patients regarding their increased risk of postoperative leakage. LIMITATIONS The study was retrospective with all the inherit biases of such studies. The sample size was small and this may have introduced a type 2 statistical error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Alharbi
- From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Osama Almosallam
- From the Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Abdullah Specialist Children Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara Albastaki
- From the Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Asim Almughamsi
- From the College of Medicine - Taibah University, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser Alsanea
- From the Director General, Health Affairs, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahhman University, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Greijdanus NG, Wienholts K, Ubels S, Talboom K, Hannink G, Wolthuis A, de Lacy FB, Lefevre JH, Solomon M, Frasson M, Rotholtz N, Denost Q, Perez RO, Konishi T, Panis Y, Rutegård M, Hompes R, Rosman C, van Workum F, Tanis PJ, de Wilt JH. Stoma-free Survival After Rectal Cancer Resection With Anastomotic Leakage: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model in a Large International Cohort. Ann Surg 2023; 278:772-780. [PMID: 37498208 PMCID: PMC10549897 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prediction model (STOMA score) for 1-year stoma-free survival in patients with rectal cancer (RC) with anastomotic leakage (AL). BACKGROUND AL after RC resection often results in a permanent stoma. METHODS This international retrospective cohort study (TENTACLE-Rectum) encompassed 216 participating centres and included patients who developed AL after RC surgery between 2014 and 2018. Clinically relevant predictors for 1-year stoma-free survival were included in uni and multivariable logistic regression models. The STOMA score was developed and internally validated in a cohort of patients operated between 2014 and 2017, with subsequent temporal validation in a 2018 cohort. The discriminative power and calibration of the models' performance were evaluated. RESULTS This study included 2499 patients with AL, 1954 in the development cohort and 545 in the validation cohort. Baseline characteristics were comparable. One-year stoma-free survival was 45.0% in the development cohort and 43.7% in the validation cohort. The following predictors were included in the STOMA score: sex, age, American Society of Anestesiologist classification, body mass index, clinical M-disease, neoadjuvant therapy, abdominal and transanal approach, primary defunctioning stoma, multivisceral resection, clinical setting in which AL was diagnosed, postoperative day of AL diagnosis, abdominal contamination, anastomotic defect circumference, bowel wall ischemia, anastomotic fistula, retraction, and reactivation leakage. The STOMA score showed good discrimination and calibration (c-index: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.76). CONCLUSIONS The STOMA score consists of 18 clinically relevant factors and estimates the individual risk for 1-year stoma-free survival in patients with AL after RC surgery, which may improve patient counseling and give guidance when analyzing the efficacy of different treatment strategies in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nynke G. Greijdanus
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Kiedo Wienholts
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Kevin Talboom
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Francisco B. de Lacy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jérémie H. Lefevre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Michael Solomon
- Department of Surgery, University of Sydney Central Clinical School, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matteo Frasson
- Department of Surgery, Valencia University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Quentin Denost
- Bordeaux Colorectal Institute, Clinique Tivoli, Bordeaux, France
| | - Rodrigo O. Perez
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yves Panis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, Neuilly Seine, France
| | - Martin Rutegård
- Department of Surgery, Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J. Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H.W. de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zheng XC, Su JB, Zheng JJ. Risk assessment of rectal anastomotic leakage (RAREAL) after DIXON in non-emergency patients with rectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:343. [PMID: 37789294 PMCID: PMC10548611 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02982-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The routine establishment of a diverting stoma (DS) remains controversial in every patient undergoing Dixon operation. We aimed to establish a model for the risk assessment of rectal anastomotic leak (RAREAL) after Dixon in non-emergency patients with rectal cancer, using routinely available variables, by which surgeons could individualize their approach to DS. METHODS 323 patients who underwent Dixon operation for rectal cancer from January 2015 to December 2018 were taken as the model group for retrospective study. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage. We constructed the RAREAL model. 150 patients who underwent Dixon operation due to rectal cancer from January 2019 to December 2020 were collected according to the uniform criteria as a validation group to validate the RAREAL model. RESULTS In the model group, multivariable analysis identified the following variables as independent risk factors for AL: HbA1c (odds ratio (OR) = 4.107; P = 0.044), Left colic artery (LCA) non preservation (OR = 4.360; P = 0.026), Tumor distance from the anal margin (TD) (OR = 6.373; P = 0.002). In the model group, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for evaluating AL with RAREAL was 0.733, and when RAREAL score = 2.5, its sensitivity, specificity and Youden index were 0.385, 0.973, 0.358, respectively. The AUC was 0.722 in the validation group and its sensitivity and specificity were 0.333 and 0.985, respectively, when RAREAL score = 2.5. CONCLUSION The RAREAL score can be used to assess the risk of AL after Dixon operation for rectal cancer, and prophylactic DS should be proactively done when the score is greater than 2.5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Cong Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362000, China.
| | - Jin-Bo Su
- Endocrine Department, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362000, China
| | - Jin-Jie Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362000, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang F, Qiao S, Yao N, Li C, Weber MC, Jefferies B, Friess H, Reischl S, Neumann PA. Anastomotic Rings and Inflammation Values as Biomarkers for Leakage of Stapled Circular Colorectal Anastomoses. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12122902. [PMID: 36552909 PMCID: PMC9777459 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12122902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Reliable markers to predict or diagnose anastomotic leakage (AL) of stapled circular anastomoses following colorectal resections are an important clinical need. Here, we aim to quantitatively investigate the morphology of anastomotic rings as an early available prognostic marker for AL and compare them to established inflammatory markers. We perform a prospective single-center cohort study, including patients undergoing stapled circular anastomosis between August 2020 and August 2021. The predictive value of the anastomotic ring configuration and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) regarding anastomotic leakage is examined by ROC analyses and compared to the C-reactive protein (CRP) as an established marker. We included 204 patients, of which 19 suffered from anastomotic leakage (LEAK group), while in 185 patients the anastomoses healed well (HEAL group). The minimal height of the anastomotic rings as a binary classifier had a good ROC-AUC of 0.81 but was inferior to the NLR at postoperative day (POD) 5, with an excellent ROC-AUC of 0.93. Still, it was superior to the NLR at POD 3 (0.74) and the CRP at POD 3 (ROC-AUC 0.54) and 5 (ROC-AUC 0.70). The minimal height of the anastomotic rings as indicator for technically insufficient anastomoses is a good predictor of AL, while postoperatively the NLR was superior to the CRP in prediction of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of General Surgery, Tongren Municipal People’s Hospital of Guizhou Medical University (GMU), Tongren 554300, China
| | - Song Qiao
- Department of General Surgery, Tongren Municipal People’s Hospital of Guizhou Medical University (GMU), Tongren 554300, China
| | - Ning Yao
- Department of Pathology, Tongren Municipal People’s Hospital of Guizhou Medical University (GMU), Tongren 554300, China
| | - Chunqiao Li
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Marie-Christin Weber
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Benedict Jefferies
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Reischl
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp-Alexander Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4140-8480
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carboni F, Zazza S, Valle M. Response: A multicentre confirmatory single-arm trial of the safety and efficacy of a transanal drain for prevention of anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:1246-1247. [PMID: 35510583 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Carboni
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Settimio Zazza
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Valle
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuo CY, Lin YK, Wei PL, Chi-Yong Ngu J, Lee KD, Chen CL, Huang Y, Chen CC, Kuo LJ. Clinical assessment for non-reversal stoma and stoma re-creation after reversal surgery for rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving operation. Asian J Surg 2022; 46:1944-1950. [PMID: 36229306 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify the risk factors for permanent stoma (PS) in patients who underwent sphincter-saving operations for rectal cancer. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 597 consecutive patients with rectal cancer from January 2012 to December 2020 at Taipei Medical University Hospital. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to analyze risk factors for PS. RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (range 7-114 months), 59 patients (15.1%) were alive with a PS, including 46 patients who did not undergo reversal surgery and 13 patients who underwent stoma re-creation after reversal surgery. The mean period between primary surgery and stoma reversal was 6.0 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for PS were local recurrence [odd ratio (OR), 25.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.428-147.761; p < 0.001], perirectal abscess [OR, 154.34; 95% CI, 15.806 - >999; p < 0.001], anastomosis site stenosis [OR, 187.081; 95% CI, 22.193 - >999; p < 0.001], perineural invasion [OR, 4.782; 95% CI, 1.22-18.736; p = 0.025], and operation time (min) [OR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002-1.014; p = 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS Local recurrence, perirectal abscess, anastomosis site stenosis, perineural invasion, and operation time were independent risk factors for PS. Therefore, before a patient undergoes surgery for rectal cancer, surgeons should consider the possibility of the need for a PS, and patients should be informed before the operation that closure of the temporary stoma may not always be possible.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan X, Zhang M, Li L, Wang H, Liu X, Jiang H. Retrospective study of active drainage in the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:3000605211065942. [PMID: 34918983 PMCID: PMC8721718 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211065942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most serious postoperative complication following anterior resection for rectal cancer. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of active drainage for the management of AL. Methods This was a retrospective study using information from a database of patients who underwent colorectal resection without a defunctioning ileostomy at our center between September 2013 and January 2021. We identified 122 cases with definitive AL who did not require revision emergent laparotomy. Among these patients, we evaluated those who received active drainage to replace the original passive drainage. Results There were 62 cases in the active drainage group and 60 cases in the passive drainage group. The active drainage group had a shorter mean AL spontaneous resolution time (26.9 ± 3.3 vs. 32.2 ± 4.8 days) and lower average hospitalization costs (82,680.6 vs. 92,299.3 renminbi (RMB)) compared with the passive drainage group, respectively. Moreover, seven patients in the passive drainage group subsequently underwent diverting stoma to resolve the Al, while all ALs resolved spontaneously after replacing the passive drainage with active drainage. Conclusions Our study suggests that active drainage may accelerate the spontaneous resolution of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojie Tan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266003, China
| | - Mei Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the People's Hospital of Jimo District of Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266200, China
| | - Lai Li
- Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266042, China
| | - He Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266003, China
| | - Xiaodong Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266003, China
| | - Haitao Jiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266003, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zarnescu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R. Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122382. [PMID: 34943616 PMCID: PMC8700187 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage is a potentially severe complication occurring after colorectal surgery and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, permanent stoma formation, and cancer recurrence. Multiple risk factors for anastomotic leak have been identified, and these can allow for better prevention and an earlier diagnosis of this significant complication. There are nonmodifiable factors such as male gender, comorbidities and distance of tumor from anal verge, and modifiable risk factors, including smoking and alcohol consumption, obesity, preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative use of steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Perioperative blood transfusion was shown to be an important risk factor for anastomotic failure. Recent studies on the laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery found no statistical difference in anastomotic leakage rate compared with open surgery. A diverting stoma at the time of primary surgery does not appear to reduce the leak rate but may reduce its clinical consequences and the need for additional surgery if anastomotic leakage does occur. It is still debatable if preoperative bowel preparation should be used, especially for left colon and rectal resections, but studies have shown similar incidence of postoperative leak rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu
- Department of General Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.Z.); (R.C.)
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Narcis Octavian Zarnescu
- Department of General Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.Z.); (R.C.)
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-723-592-483
| | - Radu Costea
- Department of General Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.Z.); (R.C.)
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Carboni F, Valle M. Letter to Baeza-Murcia M et al. 'Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: prospective observational study of the utility of inflammatory markers and determination of pathological levels". Updates Surg 2021; 74:789-790. [PMID: 34596835 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01184-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Carboni
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Mario Valle
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferko A, Váňa J, Adámik M, Švec A, Žáček M, Demeter M, Grendár M. Mucosa plication reinforced colorectal anastomosis and trans-anal vacuum drainage: a pilot study with preliminary results. Updates Surg 2021; 73:2145-2154. [PMID: 34089500 PMCID: PMC8606370 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01105-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis is a serious complication that is associated with increased mortality, impaired functional and oncological outcomes. The hypothesis was that anastomosis reinforcement and vacuum trans-anal drainage could eliminate some risk factors, such as mechanically stapled anastomosis instability and local infection. Patients with rectal cancer within 10 cm of the anal verge and low anterior resection with double-stapled technique were included consecutively. A stapler anastomosis was supplemented by trans-anal reinforcement and vacuum drainage using a povidone-iodine-soaked sponge. Modified reinforcement using a circular mucosa plication was developed and used. Patients were followed up by postoperative endoscopy and outcomes were acute leak rate, morbidity, and diversion rate. The procedure was successfully completed in 52 from 54 patients during time period January 2019–October 2020. The mean age of patients was 61 years (lower–upper quartiles 54–69 years). There were 38/52 (73%) males and 14/52 (27%) females; the neoadjuvant radiotherapy was indicated in a group of patients in 24/52 (46%). The mean level of anastomosis was 3.8 cm (lower–upper quartiles 3.00–4.88 cm). The overall morbidity was 32.6% (17/52) and Clavien–Dindo complications ≥ 3 grade appeared in 3/52 (5.7%) patients. No loss of anastomosis was recorded and no patient died postoperatively. The symptomatic anastomotic leak was recorded in 2 (3.8%) patients and asymptomatic blind fistula was recorded in one patient 1/52 (1.9%). Diversion ileostomy was created in 1/52 patient (1.9%). Reinforcement of double-stapled anastomosis using a circular mucosa plication with combination of vacuum povidone-iodine-soaked sponge drainage led to a low acute leak and diversion rate. This pilot study requires further investigation. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.: Trial registration number is NCT04735107, date of registration February 2, 2021, registered retrospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Ferko
- Department of Surgery and Transplant Centre, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic. .,, Františka Komárka 865/6, 503 11, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
| | - Juraj Váňa
- Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Žilina, Žilina, Slovak Republic
| | - Marek Adámik
- Department of Surgery and Transplant Centre, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic
| | - Adam Švec
- Department of Surgery and Transplant Centre, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic
| | - Michal Žáček
- Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Žilina, Žilina, Slovak Republic
| | - Michal Demeter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic
| | - Marián Grendár
- Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Biomedical Center Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovak Republic
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu L, Li X, Li P, Pan L, Ji Z, Feng Y, Shi C. Bioabsorbable flexible elastomer of
PTMC‐b‐PEG‐b‐PTMC
copolymer as intestinal anastomosis scaffold. POLYM ADVAN TECHNOL 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/pat.5371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wu
- School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin China
- Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering, Wenzhou Institute University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Wenzhou Zhejiang China
| | - Xujian Li
- Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering, Wenzhou Institute University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Wenzhou Zhejiang China
| | - Pengpeng Li
- School of Biomedical Engineering Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou Zhejiang China
| | - Luqi Pan
- Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering, Wenzhou Institute University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Wenzhou Zhejiang China
| | - Zhixiao Ji
- Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering, Wenzhou Institute University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Wenzhou Zhejiang China
| | - Yakai Feng
- School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin China
- Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education) Tianjin University Tianjin China
| | - Changcan Shi
- Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering, Wenzhou Institute University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Wenzhou Zhejiang China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pei W, Cui H, Liu Z, Zhao F, Zhu X, Li L, Jing C, Xu T, Peng L, Zhuo H, Chen Y, Zhang J. One-stitch method vs. traditional method of protective loop ileostomy for rectal cancer: the impact of BMI obesity. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:2709-2719. [PMID: 33606093 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03556-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Protective loop ileostomy is an effective diversion measure often used to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the one-stitch method (OM) of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior resection for BMI obesity patients with rectal cancer compared with the traditional method (TM). METHODS The patients diagnosed as rectal adenocarcinoma cases by preoperative pathology were included in this retrospective study. The subjects underwent protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior resection from January 2016 to June 2019 in the Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University. The data of loop ileostomy and stoma closure operation were retrieved from the medical cases system of the hospital. RESULTS 242 patients were included in the present study. In the BMI obese cohort, the OM group showed a shorter operative time both in the loop ileostomy (232.5 vs. 250.0 min, p = 0.04) and stoma closure operation (102.5 vs. 115.0 min, p = 0.001) and a lower peristomal adhesion extent (p = 0.02) and a shorter median postoperative stay (6 vs. 7 days, p = 0.03) during stoma closure operation than that of the TM group. In the TM group, obese cases showed a higher operative time of stoma closure operation (115.0 vs. 95.0, p < 0.001), a higher parastomal hernia rate (p = 0.04), a higher peristomal adhesion extent (p = 0.005) and a longer postoperative stay of stoma closure operation (p = 0.02) compared with the non-obese cases, while in the OM group, no significant differences were observed between the obese and non-obese cases in terms of the above-mentioned factors. CONCLUSIONS The OM exhibited more advantages than TM, notably in BMI obesity patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenting Pei
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Qilu Children's Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China
| | - Huaiping Cui
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Zhenjun Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Feicheng Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, FeiCheng People's Hospital, Feicheng, 271600, Shandong, China
| | - Feng Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, People's Hospital of Lingcheng District, Lingcheng District, Dezhou, 253500, Shandong, China
| | - Xuezhang Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Leping Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Changqing Jing
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Lipan Peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Hongqing Zhuo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Yuezhi Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China
| | - Jizhun Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Daniel VT, Alavi K, Davids JS, Harnsberger CR, Maykel JA. Defining Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery: Results of a National Survey. J Surg Res 2021; 261:242-247. [PMID: 33460969 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leaks are a dreaded complication after colorectal surgery. Although anastomotic leak is often used as a metric to compare patient outcomes, a standard definition does not exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS A web-based survey was developed and distributed to US surgeons. Respondents were queried on the definition of anastomotic leaks using a 5-point Likert scale to rate different scenarios related to colorectal surgery. RESULTS Of potential 2209 respondents, 649 (29%) responded to the survey. The majority of respondents was men (76%) and practiced colon and rectal surgery as their primary specialty (89%). Contrast extravasation at the anastomosis, regardless of timing related to the surgery, is the clinical scenario with greatest consensus (>85%). 50% of surgeons do not believe that an abscess near the anastomosis in an asymptomatic patient defines a leak. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the pressing need for standardization of the anastomotic leak definition given the implications on outcomes measurement, research trials, and health care reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijaya T Daniel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer S Davids
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Cristina R Harnsberger
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Justin A Maykel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Spinelli A, Anania G, Arezzo A, Berti S, Bianco F, Bianchi PP, De Giuli M, De Nardi P, de Paolis P, Foppa C, Guerrieri M, Marini P, Persiani R, Piazza D, Poggioli G, Pucciarelli S, D'Ugo D, Renzi A, Selvaggi F, Silecchia G, Montorsi M. Italian multi-society modified Delphi consensus on the definition and management of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Updates Surg 2020; 72:781-792. [PMID: 32613380 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00837-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of anastomotic leak (AL) has not decreased over the past decades and some important grey areas remain in its definition, prevention, and management. The aim of this study was to reach a national consensus on the definition of AL and to identify key points to be applied in clinical practice. METHODS A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Ten representative members of the major Italian surgical scientific societies with proven colorectal expertise were selected after a call to action. After a comprehensive literature search, each expert drew a list of evidence-based statements which were voted in round one by the scientific board. Panel members were asked to mark "totally disagree", "partially agree" or "totally agree" for each statement and provide comments. The same voting method was used for round 2. Round 3 consisted of a final face-to-face meeting. RESULTS Thirty-three statements (clustered into 14 topics) were included in round 1. Following the third voting round, a final list of 16 items was formulated, which encompass the following 9 topics: AL definition, patient- and operative-related risk factors, prevention measures, bowel preparation, surgical technique, intraoperative assessment, early diagnosis, radiological diagnosis and management of specific patterns of AL. The overall response rate was 100% for all items in all the three rounds. CONCLUSIONS This Delphi survey identified items that expert colorectal surgeons agreed were important to be applied in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of AL. This represents the first consensus involving all relevant national scientific societies, defining important and shared concepts in the diagnosis and management of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Gabriele Anania
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche-Università di Ferrara, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Stefano Berti
- S.C. Chirurgia Generale, Dipartimento Chirurgico, ASL 5 Spezzino-POLL-Regione Liguria, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Francesco Bianco
- General and Colo-Rectal Surgery Unit, S. Leonardo-ASL Naples 3 Hospital, C.mare di Stabia, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- UOC di Chirurgia Generale e Mini-Invasiva, Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialistiche, ASL Toscana Sud-Est. Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Maurizio De Giuli
- Department of Oncology, Head, Digestive and Surgical Oncology, University of Torino, and San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Paola De Nardi
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Scientific Institute San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Caterina Foppa
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Clinica Chirurgica Generale e d'urgenza, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Persiani
- Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Piazza
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Oncologica, ARNAS Garibaldi, Catania, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche Oncologiche e Gastroenterologiche-DISCOG, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Adolfo Renzi
- Department of General Surgery, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Deparment of Medico-Surgical Science and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van Helsdingen CPM, Jongen ACHM, de Jonge WJ, Bouvy ND, Derikx JPM. Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:3293-3303. [PMID: 32684743 PMCID: PMC7336323 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the emerging knowledge about colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) through the increasing number of clinical and experimental studies, there is no generally accepted definition of CAL. Because of the wide variety of definitions used in literature, comparison of study outcomes and quality of care is complicated.
AIM To reach consensus on the definition of CAL using a modified Delphi method.
METHODS The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used. The expert panel consisted of international colorectal surgeons and researchers who had published three or more articles about CAL. The consensus process consisted of two online distributed questionnaires and a third round with a recommendation. In the questionnaires participants were asked to rate the appropriateness of statements using a 1-9 Likert scale. Consensus was defined as a panel median between 1-3 or 7-9 without disagreement. In the final round a recommendation was formed regarding the definition of CAL and the expert panel was asked if they agreed or disagreed.
RESULTS Twenty-three authors participated in the first round and twenty-one finished the second round. After two rounds consensus was reached on 37 items (80%) in nine different categories. The International Study Group of Rectal Cancer definition is the most frequently advised general definition by our panel. Consensus was reached regarding the clinical symptoms of CAL, which serum markers contributes to the suspicion of CAL, which radiological and perioperative findings should be considered as CAL, which grading system is appropriate and if there should be a range of postoperative days in the definition. Eventually, 19 experts completed all three rounds of which 16 (84%) agreed with our final recommendations for the definition of CAL.
CONCLUSION A consensus-based recommendation for the definition of CAL was formed using our modified Delphi method that can be widely incorporated in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire PM van Helsdingen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, Netherlands
- Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1105 BK, Netherlands
| | - Audrey CHM Jongen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6202 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Wouter J de Jonge
- Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1105 BK, Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn 53127, Germany
| | - Nicole D Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6202 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Joep PM Derikx
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors for Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of the Rectal Cancer without a Diverting Stoma. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020; 2020:4863542. [PMID: 32351555 PMCID: PMC7174905 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4863542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and devastating postoperative issue for patients who have undergone anterior resection of rectal carcinoma and can lead to increased short-term morbidity and mortality. Moreover, it might be associated with a worse oncological prognosis of tumors. This study is aimed at exploring the risk factors for symptomatic AL after laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) for rectal tumors without a preventive diverting stoma. Materials and Methods This case control study retrospectively reviewed the data of 496 consecutive patients who underwent LAR of the rectum without a preventive diverting stoma at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between September 2016 and September 2017. All patients were divided into an AL group and a control group based on the occurrence of postoperative symptomatic AL. Factors regarding patient-related variables, operation-related variables, and tumor-related variables were collected and assessed between the two groups through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors for AL. Results In total, 18 (3.6%) patients developed postoperative symptomatic AL. Univariate analysis showed that a synchronous primary malignancy of the left hemicolon (P = 0.047), intraoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.003), and level of anastomosis (P = 0.033) were significantly related with AL. Multivariate analysis was subsequently performed to adjust for confounding biases and confirmed that a synchronous primary malignancy of the left hemicolon (odds ratio (OR), 12.225; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.764-84.702; P = 0.011), intraoperative chemotherapy (OR, 3.931; 95% CI, 1.334-11.583; P = 0.013), and level of anastomosis (OR, 3.224; 95% CI, 1.124-9.249; P = 0.030) were independent risk factors for symptomatic AL for patients who received LAR for rectal neoplasms without a preventive diverting stoma. Conclusions Synchronous primary malignancy of the left hemicolon, intraoperative chemotherapy, and a low anastomotic level can increase the risks of postoperative symptomatic AL after LAR of the rectum without a protective diverting stoma.
Collapse
|
17
|
Can a Local Drainage Salvage a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis? A Prospective Cohort of 54 Patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:93-100. [PMID: 31804271 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local drainages can be used to manage leakage in select patients without peritonitis. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of drainage procedures in maintaining a primary low anastomosis after anastomotic leakage. DESIGN A retrospective observational study was performed on a prospectively maintained database. SETTINGS The study was performed between 2014 and 2017 in a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients undergoing rectal resections with either a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma were identified. Anastomotic leakages requiring a radiological or transanal drainage without peritonitis were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the maintenance of the primary anastomosis after local drainage of an anastomotic leakage and stoma reversal. RESULTS A low anastomosis for rectal cancer with diverting stoma was performed in 326 patients. A total of 77 anastomotic leakages (24%) occurred, of which, 6 (8%) required abdominal surgery, 17 (22%) were treated conservatively (medical management), and 54 (70%) were managed by drainage. Surgical transanal drainage was performed in 21 patients (39%), with radiologic drainage procedures performed in 33 patients (61%). The median interval between surgery and drainage was 13 days (range, 9-21 d). Five patients (9%) required emergency abdominal surgery. Twenty-seven patients (50%) did not require any additional intervention after drainage procedure, whereas 21 patients (39%) underwent redo anastomotic surgery. Forty-three patients (80%) had no stoma at the end of follow-up. Failure to maintain the primary anastomosis after local drainage was associated with increased age (p = 0.04), a pelvic per-operative drainage (p = 0.05), a drainage duration >10 days (p = 0.002), the time between surgery and drainage >15 days (p = 0.03), a side-to-end or J-pouch anastomosis (p = 0.04), and surgical transanal drainage (p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS The small sample size of the study was the main limitation. CONCLUSIONS Local drainage procedures maintained primary anastomosis in 50% of cases after an anastomotic leakage. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B57. ¿PUEDE UN DRENAJE LOCAL SALVAR UNA ANASTOMOSIS COLORRECTAL O COLOANAL FALLIDA? UNA COHORTE PROSPECTIVO DE 54 PACIENTES: Los drenajes locales se pueden utilizar para controlar las fugas en pacientes seleccionados sin peritonitis.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia de los procedimientos de drenaje, para mantener una anastomosis primaria baja, después de una fuga anastomótica.Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo en una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.El estudio se realizó entre 2014-2017, en un centro de referencia terciaria.Se identificaron pacientes sometidos a resecciones rectales con anastomosis colorrectal o coloanal y estoma de derivación. Se incluyeron fugas anastomóticas sin peritonitis, que requirieron drenaje radiológico o transanal.El resultado primario fue el mantenimiento de la anastomosis primaria, después del drenaje local de una fuga anastomótica y la reversión del estoma.Se realizó una anastomosis baja para cáncer rectal con estoma derivativo en 326 pacientes. Se produjeron 77 (24%) fugas anastomóticas, de las cuales 6 (8%) requirieron cirugía abdominal, 17 (22%) fueron tratadas de forma conservadora (tratamiento médico) y 54 (70%) fueron manejadas por drenaje. Se realizó drenaje transanal en 21 pacientes (39%) y procedimientos de drenaje radiológico en 33 pacientes (61%). La mediana del intervalo entre la cirugía y el drenaje fue de 13 días [9-21]. 5 (9%) pacientes requirieron cirugía abdominal de emergencia. Veintisiete (50%) pacientes no requirieron ninguna intervención adicional después del procedimiento de drenaje, mientras que 21 pacientes (39%) se sometieron a una reparación quirúrgica anastomótica. 43 pacientes (80%) no tuvieron estoma al final del seguimiento. El fracaso para mantener la anastomosis primaria después del drenaje local, se asoció con un aumento de la edad (p = 0.04), un drenaje pélvico preoperatorio (p = 0.05), una duración del drenaje >10 días (p = 0.002), el tiempo entre la cirugía y el drenaje >15 días (p = 0.03), anastomosis termino lateral o bolsa en J (p = 0.04) y drenaje quirúrgico transanal (p = 0.03).El pequeño tamaño de la muestra del estudio fue la principal limitación.Después de la fuga anastomótica, los procedimientos del drenaje local conservaron la anastomosis primaria en el 50% de los casos. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B57.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kralovic M, Vjaclovsky M, Kestlerova A, Rustichelli F, Hoch J, Amler E. Electrospun nanofibers as support for the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Physiol Res 2019; 68:S517-S525. [PMID: 32118484 DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.934387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The breakdown of intestinal anastomosis is a serious postsurgical complication. The worst complication is anastomotic leakage, resulting in contaminated peritoneal cavity, sepsis, multi-organ failure and even death. In problematic locations like the rectum, the leakage rate has not yet fallen below 10 %. Such a life-threatening condition is the result of impaired healing in the anastomotic wound. It is still vital to find innovative strategies and techniques in order to support regeneration of the anastomotic wound. This paper reviews the surgical techniques and biomaterials used, tested or published. Electrospun nanofibers are introduced as a novel and potential material in gastrointestinal surgery. Nanofibers possess several, unique, physical and chemical properties, that may effectively stimulate cell proliferation and collagen production; a key requirement for the healed intestinal wound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kralovic
- Czech Technical University Prague, University Center for Energy Efficient Buildings, Buštěhrad, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|