Practice of end-of-life care for patients with advanced dementia by hospital physicians and nurses: Comparison between medical and surgical wards

Perceived Difficulties and Learning Needs Among Acute Care Ward Nurses Providing End-of-Life Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison by Years of Clinical Experience

Background

In the daily routine of acute care wards, where priority is given to patients with severe illnesses and those who require urgent care, working with and supporting the decision making of terminally ill patients can be challenging.

Methods

This study aimed to clarify the perceived difficulties of and learning needs among acute care ward nurses providing end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to perform analyses by years of clinical experience, we conducted semi-structured interviews with both novice and experienced nurses. Participants were nurses working in the acute care ward of hospitals in the Kansai area.

Results

We interviewed 31 nurses who agreed to cooperate, including 18 novice/advanced beginner nurses and 13 proficient/expert nurses. Perceived difficulties were categorized into four main groups for novice/advanced beginner nurses: , , , and . Perceived difficulties were categorized into four main groups for proficient/expert nurses: , , , and . Perceived learning needs were categorized into three main groups for novice/advanced beginner nurses: , , and . Perceived learning needs were categorized into three main groups for proficient/expert nurses: , , and .

Conclusion

Novice/advanced beginner nurses felt anxiety and confusion, and were overwhelmed with how to care for terminal patients. Proficient/expert nurses were able to think about how to make patients and their families feel better, and were able to think specifically about post-mortem care. Many proficient/expert nurses were thinking not only about patient care but also about patients' room environment and how to spend time with their families. They sought learning opportunities regarding angel care, including methods of teaching it and basic techniques for performing it, and realized that information sharing within wards, chain of command within the hospital, information exchange with other hospitals, and inter-hospital collaboration were all important during COVID-19 pandemic.

Cognitive biases and moral characteristics of healthcare workers and their treatment approach for persons with advanced dementia in acute care settings

Introduction

Palliative care (PC) delivery for persons with advanced dementia (AD) remains low, particularly in acute-care settings. Studies have shown that cognitive biases and moral characteristics can influence patient care through their effect on the thinking patterns of healthcare workers (HCWs). This study aimed to determine whether cognitive biases, including representativeness, availability, and anchoring, are associated with treatment approaches, ranging from palliative to aggressive care in acute medical situations, for persons with AD.

Methods

Three hundred fifteen HCWs participated in this study: 159 physicians and 156 nurses from medical and surgical wards in two hospitals. The following questionnaires were administered: a socio-demographic questionnaire; the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire; the Professional Moral Courage Scale; a case scenario of a person with AD presenting with pneumonia, with six possible interventions ranging from PC to aggressive care (referring to life-prolonging interventions), each given a score from (-1) (palliative) to 3 (aggressive), the sum of which is the "Treatment Approach Score;" and 12 items assessing perceptions regarding PC for dementia. Those items, the moral scores, and professional orientation (medical/surgical) were classified into the three cognitive biases.

Results

The following aspects of cognitive biases were associated with the Treatment Approach Score: representativeness-agreement with the definition of dementia as a terminal disease and appropriateness of PC for dementia; availability-perceived organizational support for PC decisions, apprehension regarding response to PC decisions by seniors or family, and apprehension regarding a lawsuit following PC; and anchoring-perceived PC appropriateness by colleagues, comfort with end-of-life conversations, guilt feelings following the death of a patient, stress, and avoidance accompanying care. No association was found between moral characteristics and the treatment approach. In a multivariate analysis, the predictors of the care approach were: guilt feelings about the death of a patient, apprehension regarding senior-level response, and PC appropriateness for dementia.

Conclusion

Cognitive biases were associated with the care decisions for persons with AD in acute medical conditions. These findings provide insight into the potential effects of cognitive biases on clinical decisions, which may explain the disparity between treatment guidelines and the deficiency in the implementation of palliation for this population.

Do Perceptions about Palliative Care Affect Emergency Decisions of Health Personnel for Patients with Advanced Dementia?

Decision analysis regarding emergency medical treatment in patients with advanced dementia has seldom been investigated. We aimed to examine the preferred medical treatment in emergency situations for patients with advanced dementia and its association with perceptions of palliative care. We conducted a survey of 159 physicians and 156 nurses from medical and surgical wards in two tertiary hospitals. The questionnaire included two case scenarios of patients with advanced dementia presenting gastrointestinal bleeding (scenario I) or pneumonia (scenario II) with a list of possible interventions and 11 items probing perceptions towards palliative care. Low burden interventions such as laboratory tests and intravenous administration of antibiotics/blood were preferred. Palliative measures such as analgesia/sedation were chosen by about half of the participants and invasive intervention by 41.6% (gastroscopy in scenario I) and 37.1% (intubation/mechanical ventilation in scenario II). Medical ward staff had a more palliative approach than surgical ward staff in scenario I, and senior staff had a more palliative approach than junior staff in scenario II. Most participants (90.4%) agreed that palliative care was appropriate for patients with advanced dementia. Stress in caring for patients with advanced dementia was reported by 24.5% of participants; 33.1% admitted fear of lawsuit, 33.8% were concerned about senior-level responses, and 69.7% were apprehensive of family members' reaction to palliative care. Perceptions of health care workers towards palliative care were associated with preferred treatment choice for patients with advanced dementia, mainly in scenario II. Attitudes and apprehensions regarding palliative care in these situations may explain the gap between positive attitudes towards palliative care and the chosen treatment approach. Acquainting emergency care practitioners with the benefits of palliative care may impact their decisions when treating this population.