1
|
Lou Y, Vu T, Piechota A, Monin JK. Emotion regulation in people living with dementia and their spouses: the role of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Aging Ment Health 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38940472 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2367038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES People with dementia (PwD) and their care partners (CP) may have difficulties in emotion regulation, and individual differences in emotion regulation may be related to PwD's neuropsychiatric symptoms. This study explores whether there is self-awareness of PwD's difficulties in emotion regulation and whether CP's emotion regulation relates to the PwD's neuropsychiatric symptoms, potentially revealing bias or interpersonal effects. METHOD We used data from the Wish Outcome Obstacle Plan Study with a sample of 45 PwD and their spousal CP (n = 90 individuals). Multivariate linear regression models were used to investigate the associations between the CP-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms in PwD and self-reports of emotion regulation in both dyad members, net of sociodemographic and health factors. Separate analyses were conducted for each neuropsychiatric subsyndrome and each domain of difficulties in emotion regulation. RESULTS Increasing severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms was associated with higher difficulties in emotion regulation in PwD (ß = 1.23, p < 0.05), but not with CP's difficulties in emotion regulation. When CP reported more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms in PwD, PwD reported that they had difficulties in accepting emotions, controlling impulses, goal-directed behaviors, and accessing emotion regulation strategies, but not in emotion awareness and clarification. Proxy-reports of hyperactivity and psychosis subsyndromes are significantly related to PwD's self-reported difficulties in emotion regulation. CONCLUSION PwD reported difficulties in emotion regulation at the early stage of dementia. Proxy-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms may capture PwD's emotion regulation capability and not be biased by CP's difficulties in emotion regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Lou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thi Vu
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Amanda Piechota
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
| | - Joan K Monin
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang S, Huang Y, Fan AYN, Ho MH, Davidson PM. Factors influencing the psychosocial well-being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers: A systematic review of dyadic studies. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:560-581. [PMID: 38131462 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with dementia and their informal caregivers face significant challenges to their psychosocial well-being, necessitating immediate attention. In spite of the prevalence of this problem, there is limited data regarding the factors that influence the dyadic psychosocial well-being and potential actor-partner influencing mechanisms. Therefore, this review was conducted to synthesise the factors associated with the psychosocial well-being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers. MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method studies examining the factors influencing dyadic psychosocial well-being outcomes were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis approach was employed for data analysis. A total of 3217 records were yield, out of which 26 studies were included in the analysis. Quality of life emerged as the most extensively investigated dyadic psychosocial well-being outcome, followed by depression. The interrelation between the quality of life for people with dementia and caregivers was observed, where individual members' quality of life was influenced by their own, partner and dyadic factors. However, there is a dearth of research exploring the mechanisms through which one member's factors exert influence on both their own and partner's quality of life within the dyad. This gap also exists for other psychosocial well-being outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which dyadic members influence their own and their partner's psychosocial well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Wang
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yaqi Huang
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Avis Yat Ngar Fan
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mu-Hsing Ho
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Read S, Hicks B, Budden E, Douglass J, Grahamslaw A, Herrero E, Joseph G, Kirkup C, Pusey M, Russell A, Sondh H, Sondh S, Storey B, Towson G, Baxter K, Birks Y, Brayne C, Colclough C, Dangoor M, Dixon J, Donaghy P, Gridley K, Harris PR, Hu B, King D, Knapp M, Miles E, Mueller C, Perach R, Robinson L, Rusted J, Thomas AJ, Wittenberg R, Banerjee S. Long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life of people with dementia and their family carers. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afad233. [PMID: 38275095 PMCID: PMC10811518 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few studies have longitudinally mapped quality of life (QoL) trajectories of newly diagnosed people with dementia and their carers, particularly during coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). METHODS In a UK cohort study, 261 newly diagnosed people with dementia and 206 family carers were assessed prior to the pandemic (July 2019-March 2020), followed up after the first lockdown (July-October 2020) and then again a year and 2 years later. Latent growth curve modelling examined the level and change of QoL over the four time-points using dementia-specific QoL measures (DEMQOL and C-DEMQOL). RESULTS Despite variations in individual change scores, our results suggest that generally people with dementia maintained their QoL during the pandemic and experienced some increase towards the end of the period. This contrasted with carers who reported a general deterioration in their QoL over the same period. 'Confidence in future' and 'Feeling supported' were the only carer QoL subscales to show some recovery post-pandemic. DISCUSSION It is positive that even during a period of global disruption, decline in QoL is not inevitable following the onset of dementia. However, it is of concern that carer QoL declined during this same period even after COVID-19 restrictions had been lifted. Carers play an invaluable role in the lives of people with dementia and wider society, and our findings suggest that, post-pandemic, they may require greater support to maintain their QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanna Read
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Ben Hicks
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Centre for Dementia Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Emily Budden
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | | | | | - Elena Herrero
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gregory Joseph
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Martha Pusey
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Alice Russell
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | | | - Sharon Sondh
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bryony Storey
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK
| | | | - Kate Baxter
- Social Policy Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Yvonne Birks
- Social Policy Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Carol Brayne
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Margaret Dangoor
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Josie Dixon
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Paul Donaghy
- Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Kate Gridley
- Social Policy Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter R Harris
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Bo Hu
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Derek King
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Miles
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Rotem Perach
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - Alan J Thomas
- Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Raphael Wittenberg
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Sube Banerjee
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|