Effects of fluvastatin treatment on insulin sensitivity in patients with hyperlipidaemia

Fluvastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

Fluvastatin is thought to be the least potent statin on the market, however, the dose-related magnitude of effect of fluvastatin on blood lipids is not known.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectiveTo quantify the effects of various doses of fluvastatin on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol), high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol), and triglycerides in participants with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.Secondary objectivesTo quantify the variability of the effect of various doses of fluvastatin.To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in randomised placebo-controlled trials.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to February 2017: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2017, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1946 to February Week 2 2017), MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Embase (1974 to February Week 2 2017), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, CDSR, DARE, Epistemonikos and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of fluvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered data from placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous and generic inverse variance data, respectively. WDAEs information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials. We assessed all trials using the 'Risk of bias' tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and forty-five trials (36 placebo controlled and 109 before and after) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of fluvastatin in 18,846 participants. The participants were of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and fluvastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over doses of 2.5 mg to 80 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of fluvastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Fluvastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 15% to 33%, total cholesterol by 11% to 25% and triglycerides by 3% to 17.5%. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 6.0% (95% CI 5.4 to 6.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol, a 4.2% (95% CI 3.7 to 4.8) decrease in blood total cholesterol and a 4.2% (95% CI 2.0 to 6.3) decrease in blood triglycerides. The quality of evidence for these effects was judged to be high. When compared to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, fluvastatin was about 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin at reducing LDL cholesterol. Very low quality of evidence showed no difference in WDAEs between fluvastatin and placebo in 16 of 36 of these short-term trials (risk ratio 1.52 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.45).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. Based on the effect on LDL cholesterol, fluvastatin is 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with fluvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 56% of the placebo-controlled trials.

The effect of fluvastatin on plasma adiponectin levels in dyslipidaemia

OBJECTIVE

There is controversy about the effects of statins on insulin resistance and plasma adiponectin. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fluvastatin treatment on these parameters in a group of dyslipidaemic patients who had no confounding factors for insulin resistance or alterations in plasma adiponectin.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Forty-nine patients [27 males, 22 females; mean age 47.2 +/- 10.3 years; body mass index (BMI) 29.64 +/- 3.2 kg/m2] with dyslipidaemia and 20 controls (six males, 14 females; mean age 45.3 +/- 9.31 years; BMI 30.07 +/- 4.04 kg/m2) were enrolled. All patients were treated initially with therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) for 6 weeks. Six out of 49 subjects were excluded from the study. Then, 24 out of 43 patients with high blood cholesterol despite TLC were allocated to fluvastatin 80 mg daily plus TLC, and the remaining 19 patients with normal cholesterol were subjected to TLC alone for additional 12 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Plasma adiponectin, immunoreactive insulin levels, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipids, and glucose were determined. The insulin sensitivity index was quantified using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA).

RESULTS

TLC caused significant improvement in plasma insulin (P = 0.02) and elevation in plasma adiponectin (P = 0.02). Fluvastatin treatment decreased total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol significantly (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). No significant effect of fluvastatin was observed on plasma insulin or adiponectin or on the HOMA index.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin does not improve plasma adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity, despite its beneficial effects on lipid levels. Our data, however, were limited by the fact that a more accurate method of assessing insulin sensitivity, the euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp technique, was not used.

No effect of simvastatin treatment on insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE

Statins, in addition to cholesterol lowering, have nonlipid effects on formation and progression of atheromatous plaque. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia may have detrimental influences on the arterial wall. Statins (may also) inhibit insulin signal transferring in vascular smooth cell cultures. However, their effect on insulin sensitivity remains controversial. Therefore, we decided to investigate the effect of simvastatin on insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were divided into simvastatin group (n = 9; 4 females, 5 males; BMI 30.6 +/- 4 kg/m2; mean ages 57 +/- 6 years) and placebo group (n = 9; 4 females, 5 males; BMI 28 +/- 2.9 kg/m2; mean ages 49 +/- 10 years). Simvastatin (20 mg/day) or placebo were given for 2 months. Total and HDL cholesterol were measured and LDL cholesterol was calculated by Friedewald formula. Insulin sensitivity was determined by using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique [40 microU/m2/min insulin infusion rate; glucose disposal rate (M)= mg/kg/min] before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of total, LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased significantly in simvastatin group after treatment (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.048, respectively). Plasma levels of total cholesterol decreased significantly (p = 0.032), whereas LDL and HDL levels remained unchanged in placebo group. M value (mg/kg/min) decreased insignificantly in simvastatin group (4.32 +/- 1.57 vs. 3.71 +/- 1.91) and increased in placebo group (3.55 +/- 1.91 vs. 3.95 +/- 0.95).

CONCLUSION

Short-term simvastatin treatment did not affect insulin sensitivity determined by "gold standard" euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp method in hypercholesterolemic patients in this research. Further studies with simvastatin using higher doses and longer duration should be performed.