Dysphagia after cardiac surgery: Prevalence, risk factors, and associated outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The study objectives were to determine the prevalence of swallowing impairment in adults after cardiac surgery and examine associated risk factors and health-related outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective single-center study was conducted in postoperative adult cardiac surgery patients with no history of dysphagia. A standardized fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing was performed within 72 hours of extubation. Blinded raters completed validated outcomes of swallowing safety and efficiency. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative health-related outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In 182 patients examined, imaging confirmed inefficient swallowing (residue) in 52% of patients and unsafe swallowing in 94% (65% penetrators, 29% aspirators). Silent aspiration was observed in 53% of aspirators, and 32% did not clear aspirate material. Independent risk factors for aspiration included New York Heart Association III and IV (OR, 2.9; CI, 1.2-7.0); reoperation (OR, 2.0; CI, 0.7-5.5); transesophageal echocardiogram images greater than 110 (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.1-6.3); intubation greater than 27 hours (OR, 2.1; CI, 0.8-5.3); and endotracheal tube size 8.0 or greater (OR, 3.1; CI, 1.1-8.6). Patients with 3 or 4 identified risk factors had a 16.4 (CI, 3.2-148.4) and 22.4 (CI, 3.7-244.7) increased odds of aspiration, respectively. Compared with nonaspirators, aspirators waited an additional 85 hours to resume oral intake, incurred $49,372 increased costs, and experienced a 43% longer hospital stay (P < .05). Aspiration was associated with pneumonia (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.1-6.5), reintubation (OR, 5.7; CI, 2.1-14.0), and death (OR, 2.8; CI, 1.2-9.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Tracheal aspiration was prevalent, covert, and associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Transesophageal Echocardiography - Dysphagia Risk in Acute Stroke (TEDRAS): a prospective, blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dysphagia is common in acute stroke and leads to worse overall outcome. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used in the diagnostic evaluation of stroke with regard to its etiology and is a known cause of postoperative dysphagia in cardiac surgery. The prevalence of dysphagia in acute stroke patients undergoing TEE remains unknown. The aim of the Transesophageal Echocardiography - Dysphagia Risk in Acute Stroke (TEDRAS) study was to assess the influence of TEE on swallowing among patients who have experienced acute stroke.

METHODS

The TEDRAS study was a prospective, blind, randomized, controlled trial that included two groups of patients with acute stroke. Simple unrestricted randomization was performed, and examiners were blinded to each other's results. Swallowing was tested using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) at three different time points in the intervention group (24 h before, immediately after and 24 h after TEE) and in the control group (FEES on three consecutive days and TEE earliest after the third FEES). Validated scales were used to assess dysphagia severity for all time points as primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were randomized: 19 to the intervention group and 15 to the control group. The key findings of the repeated-measures between-group comparisons were significant increases in the intervention group for the following dysphagia measures: (1) secretion severity score (immediately after TEE: P < 0.001; 24 h after TEE: P < 0.001) and (2) Penetration-Aspiration Scale score for saliva (immediately after TEE: P < 0.001; 24 h after TEE: P = 0.007), for small (immediately after TEE: P = 0.009) and large liquid boli (immediately after TEE: P = 0.009; 24 h after TEE: P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate a negative influence of TEE on swallowing in acute stroke patients for at least 24 hours.

Dysphagia after Cardiac Operations is Associated with Increased Length of Stay and Costs

Although the true incidence of postoperative dysphagia after cardiac surgery is unknown, it has been reported to occur in 3 to 21.6 per cent of patients. Historically, dysphagia has been associated with increased surgical complications and prolonged hospital stay. This study aimed to evaluate the costs and outcomes associated with dysphagia after cardiac surgery. Patients undergoing nonemergent, nontransplant cardiac operations between June 2013 and June 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Independent predictors of cost were identified through a multivariate linear regression model. Of the 354 patients (35% female) included for analysis, 56 (16%) were diagnosed with postoperative dysphagia. On univariate analysis, patients with dysphagia had increased intensive care unit and total hospital lengths of stay (11.8 vs 5.2 days, P < 0.001 and 18.2 vs 9.7 days, P < 0.001, respectively), and a 57 ± 15 per cent increase in cost of care ( P < 0.001). Dysphagia was not associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 3.0%, P = 0.83). On multivariate linear regression, the development of dysphagia was independently associated with a 45.1 per cent increase in total hospital costs [95% confidence interval (31% and 59%), P < 0.001]. Dysphagia is an independent and major contributor to health care costs after cardiac operations, suggesting that postoperative dysphagia represents a highly suitable target for quality improvement and cost containment efforts.