Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy Presenting as Pharyngeal Dysphagia and Recurrent Mouth Ulcers: A Case Report

We report a Munchausen syndrome by proxy (MSBP) case, which presented as pharyngeal dysphagia and an acquired tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). A six-month-old Saudi male presented with fever, persistent oral ulcers, intermittent bleeding from the ulcers, failure to thrive (FTT), poor appetite, and possible genetic disease. He had a history of recurring admissions due to infections, including those affecting the chest, ear, and bowel. Additionally, he tested positive for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus. There was no history of surgical procedures or blood transfusions. Due to the patient's nutritional status, a gastrostomy tube was inserted. The patient had recurrent bleeding from the tracheostomy tube during the hospital stay despite normal coagulation and platelet profile. Consequently, after diagnostic laryngoscopy, the otolaryngologist specialist pointed out that such retropharyngeal injuries are seen in patients with inflicted injuries, which is, in this case, caused by the mother, as she was the only one with the child during the recurrent bleeding episodes. Thus, we describe a clinical instance of MSBP, especially imitating pharyngeal dysphagia, leading to a delayed diagnosis. We advise adding MSBP to the possible diagnoses upon encountering pharyngeal dysphagia and oral ulcers.

Predictive Utility of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in Inter-Arytenoid Injection Augmentation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the utility of preoperative penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores and clinical findings on modified barium swallow (MBS) in predicting advancement of diet after interarytenoid injection augmentation (IAIA).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 372 consecutive patients who underwent IAIA for pharyngeal dysphagia between 2009 and 2019 were initially identified. Patients were excluded from the study if they had insufficient preop MBS, no postop MBS within 3 months of injection, supraglottoplasty, or underlying neurological condition. Ninety-three patients were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative PAS scores were recorded, as were pre and postop diets. PAS scores were calculated by a single pediatric speech and language pathologist.

RESULTS

Average PAS score on MBS was 5.87 (standard deviation [SD] 2.74); median (range) = 8 (1-8). Postop average was 4.29 (SD 3.02); median (range) = 2 (1-8), P < .001. Those with worse preop PAS scores had increased odds of improvement in diet (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.49, P = .029). An improvement in PAS score of 3.0 or greater predicted an improvement in diet with a sensitivity of 76.7% and a specificity of 85.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

PAS score on MBS can be a useful tool when assessing pediatric patients who may be candidates for IAIA. Prospectively comparing PAS score in patients post-IAIA to patients solely undergoing diet modification can help to better objectively assess differences in outcomes and understand the full utility of PAS score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Individual Cohort Study) Laryngoscope, 131:E1707-E1713, 2021.

A pilot study assessing clinic value in pediatric pharyngeal dysphagia: The OPPS/cost method

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Given the costs of healthcare, capitation, and desires for quality improvement (QI), there is a need to better assess healthcare value. Time-driven activity-based costing and the Quadruple Aim have evaluated value by assessing health outcomes and provider experiences relative to costs. The proposed OPPS/Cost method expands on this to examine value for aerodigestive clinic treatment of pediatric persistent pharyngeal dysphagia: O + P₁  + P₂  + S/Cost (O = objective health [video-fluoroscopic swallow study results], P₁  = patient/family experience [Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems], P₂  = provider experience [Copenhagen Burnout Inventory {CBI}], S = subjective health [Feeding/Swallowing-Impact Survey], C = cost [time-driven activity-based costing]).

STUDY DESIGN

Use of QI time data, surveys, and retrospective chart review for 56 patient encounters.

METHODS

Staff interviews were used to develop process maps, and monetary values were assigned to activities. OPPS/Cost outcomes were normalized amongst variables, and composite values were calculated. Comparisons were made using a Student t test for pre- and postclinic relocation over a 14-month period.

RESULTS

Time reductions were check-in (13 minutes/patient), rooming (21 minutes/patient), and providers (4 minutes/patient). Patient in-room wait time increased (4 minutes/patient). The CBI identified burnout as an area for improvement. OPPS/Cost composite values increased by 14%, with a 1.7% cost reduction, improvement in objective and subjective health outcomes of 47.4% (P < .05) and 7.3%, respectively, and stable patient/family experience.

CONCLUSIONS

OPPS/Cost is feasible in an interdisciplinary clinic and helped evaluate value during a clinic relocation. The QI opportunities identified are indicative of the potential of OPPS/Cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 129:1527-1532, 2019.