Endovascular brachytherapy after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of recurrent femoropopliteal obstructions

The birth, decline, and contemporary re-emergence of endovascular brachytherapy for prevention of in-stent restenosis

Despite the advent of drug-eluting stents and dual antiplatelet therapy in the interventional management of cardiovascular disease, restenosis rates remain high with significant sequelae. Endovascular brachytherapy-popular in the 1990s and early 2000s-has recently resurfaced as a cost-effective treatment option. In this work, we outline the history of endovascular brachytherapy starting with its earliest promise in the 1990s. We discuss the development of drug-eluting stents and dual antiplatelet strategies and their impact on the perceived benefit of endovascular brachytherapy. For the contemporary era, we propose novel roles for endovascular brachytherapy in complex coronary artery disease and in high-risk patients managed with drug-eluting stents. We discuss the impetus for reducing the requirement and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy using endovascular brachytherapy. We also review innovative opportunities for endovascular brachytherapy after bare-metal stent placement in both coronary and noncoronary territories and offer economic arguments in favor of endovascular brachytherapy. Trials of endovascular brachytherapy in these regimes are merited.

Comparative Effectiveness of Endovascular Treatment Modalities for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose: To report the results of a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple endovascular treatments for de novo femoropopliteal lesions. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched on June 1, 2019, for prospective RCTs comparing 14 treatments [ie, atherectomy, brachytherapy, cryoplasty, cutting balloons, drug-coated balloons, bare nitinol stents, drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents (CS), and combinations] in the treatment of de novo femoropopliteal lesions. Outcomes were technical success; binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6, 12, and/or 24 months; and all-cause mortality at 12 months. Ultimately, 53 articles reporting on 45 studies (91 study arms; 5565 patients) were selected. For the technical success outcome, all types of stents, all balloons, and all atherectomy devices were aggregated in stent, balloon, and atherectomy technology groups, respectively. Results: In terms of technical success for aggregated treatment types, stent technology was the most effective treatment and was better than balloon and atherectomy technologies. In terms of binary restenosis, DES was the most effective single treatment at the 6- and 12-month follow-up and CS at the 24-month follow-up. Both DES and CS were better than the majority of other single treatments, including balloon angioplasty, cutting balloon, cryoplasty, directional atherectomy, and bare nitinol stent during all follow-up periods. In terms of TLR, DES was the second most effective single treatment and the most effective single treatment at the 6- and 12-month follow-up intervals; CS was the most effective single treatment at the 24-month follow-up. Both DES and CS were better than the majority of other single treatments. The 12-month all-cause mortality of both DES and CS were similar to other treatments, whereas cryoplasty seemed to be the least effective treatment with regard to binary restenosis and TLR. Conclusion: Both DES and CS had substantial advantages in terms of restenosis and TLR in femoropopliteal lesions and were similar to aggregate stent technology in terms of technical success. DES performed better within 12 months after operation and CS at ~24 months, but neither had much advantage in terms of mortality. In contrast, cryoplasty seemed to be a less effective treatment.

Diagnosis, classification, and treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis is a pervasive challenge to the durability of stenting for the treatment of lower extremity ischemia. There is considerable controversy about the criteria for diagnosis, indications for treatment, and preferred algorithm for addressing in-stent restenosis. This evidence summary seeks to review existing information on strategies for the treatment of this difficult problem.

High dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of lower extremity in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE

Historically, edge stenosis and late thrombosis limited the effectiveness of adjunctive endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting. We evaluated an updated protocol of PTA and EVBT for ISR among patients with lower extremity occlusive disease.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center review of patients treated with PTA and EVBT for ISR in the iliac and femoropopliteal segments between 2004 and 2012. A dose of 20 Gy was given at a depth of 0.5 mm beyond the radius of the largest PTA balloon using iridium 192, with at least 2-cm-long margins of radiation coverage proximal and distal to the injured area. Stents were assessed for patency by duplex ultrasound imaging at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months and then yearly. The primary end point was freedom from ≥50% restenosis in the treated segment at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patency data were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary end points were early and late thrombotic occlusion.

RESULTS

Among 42 consecutive cases in 35 patients of EVBT for ISR in common or external iliac (9 [20.8%]) and superficial femoral or popliteal (33 [76.7%]) arteries, or both, 21 patients (50%) had claudication, asymptomatic hemodynamically significant stenoses were identified on duplex ultrasound imaging in 16 (38.1%), and 4 (9.8%) had critical limb ischemia. Mean treated length was 23.5 ± 12.3 cm over a mean duration of 16.1 ± 9.6 minutes. There was one technical failure (2.3%). Median post-EVBT follow-up time was 682 days (range, 1-2262 days). There were two (4.9%) and five (11.9%) cases of early and late thrombotic occlusions, respectively. There was one death, believed to be secondary to acute coronary syndrome. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency in the entire cohort was 75.2%, 89.1%, and 89.1%, respectively, at 1 year and 63.7%, 80.6%, and 85.6%, respectively, at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This contemporary protocol of PTA and adjunctive EVBT for lower extremity ISR, which is updated from those used in prior trials and includes a surveillance strategy that identifies at-risk stents for reintervention before occlusion, may be a promising treatment for lower extremity ISR at institutions where a close collaboration between vascular surgeons and radiation oncologists is feasible.

Advances in Vascular Brachytherapy over the Last 10 Years: Focus on Femoropopliteal Applications

Restenosis and the need for repeated interventions after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remain major drawbacks limiting a widespread application of this minimally invasive technique in the femoropopliteal segment. During the last decade, vascular brachytherapy (BT) emerged as a promising, novel technology with the potential to reduce the rates of restenosis. Meanwhile, several randomized controlled trials have suggested beneficial short and midterm effects of BT in the femoropopliteal arteries. However, despite substantial advances, many questions remain regarding the utility of vascular BT and its dissemination as a practical tool to prevent restenosis. The risk of complications, such as late stent thrombosis, edge effect, catch-up late restenosis, and potential aneurysm formation, as well as the logistical issues associated with the use of this technology in the catheterization laboratory, are delaying the acceptance of BT for routine use. This article reviews the developments of BT for restenosis prevention during the past decade, focusing on implications for peripheral endovascular treatment.

An Update on Endovascular Therapy of the Lower Extremities

Considerable advances have been made over the last decade in percutaneous technology for treatment of atherosclerotic diseases in the iliac, femoropopliteal, and distal tibioperoneal arteries. While treatment strategies are well defined in the iliofemoral segment, where angioplasty and stenting perform well in appropriately selected lesions, the search for a durable transcatheter therapy for femoropopliteal and distal occlusive disease continues. The spectrum of treatment alternatives to angioplasty ranges from transcatheter plaque excision to laser ablation, rotational atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, and stenting. We review in this article the status of percutaneous endovascular techniques for the treatment of lower extremity vascular occlusive disease.

Predictors of Failure of Endovascular Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Disease

The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of a comparison of clinical failure and restenosis rates of endovascular procedures at 1 year in patients with peripheral arterial disease. The resulting comparison is presented as “clinical failure/restenosis coordinate.” The authors screened 171 papers describing the outcome of lower extremity angioplasty or stent placement. In 20 of them, authors reported detailed outcomes of interest, including baseline demographic measurements, location of arterial occlusive lesions, a measure of restenosis (measured by ankle-brachial indices, ultrasonography, or angiography), and clinical outcomes (mortality, repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, or amputation). An overview of these 20 angioplasty papers was performed. Besides the usual meta-analyses of each end point separately, data were also plotted as coordinates of clinical failure versus restenosis. The clinical failure-to-restenosis coordinate was calculated and reported for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal distributions. Clinically reported outcomes in the literature were used to calculate the clinical failure/restenosis coordinate. This value was significantly different for various locations of the angioplasty and various baseline angiographic characteristics. A numeric coordinate pair of clinical failure and restenosis is identifiable in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease. The varying coordinates may be important in elucidating the incidence and mechanisms of clinical failure after endovascular treatment. The coordinate reported in this article is hypothesis-generating about mechanisms of endovascular treatment failure. This coordinate is important in determining the role of restenosis in the clinical failure of endovascular therapy of peripheral arterial disease.

Current state of endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal artery disease

Considerable advances have been made over the last decade in percutaneous technology for the treatment of atherosclerotic diseases in the femoro-popliteal arteries. While treatment strategies are well defined in the iliac segment, where angioplasty and stenting perform well in appropriately selected lesions, the search for a durable transcatheter therapy for femoro-popliteal lesions continues. Whereas balloon angioplasty (PTA) is the accepted therapy for short lesions, long diffuse lesions are still recommended for surgical treatment. However, attractive new technologies ranging from transcatheter plaque excision to laser ablation, rotational atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, and placement of drug-eluting stents to simple angioplasty with drug-coated balloons may have the potential to replace femoro-popliteal bypass surgery as a treatment of choice for complex lesions. This article reviews the status of percutaneous endovascular techniques for the treatment of femoro-popliteal artery occlusive disease.

Intravascular brachytherapy for peripheral vascular disease

BACKGROUND

Interventional treatment of arteries that are narrowed and obstructed by atherosclerosis involves either bypassing the blockage using a graft; widening the artery from the inside with a balloon, a procedure known as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); or providing a strut to hold the vessel open, known as a stent. All of these treatments are, however, limited by the high numbers that fail within a year. Intravascular brachytherapy is the application of radiation directly to the site of vessel narrowing. It is known to inhibit the processes that lead to restenosis (narrowing) of vessels and grafts after treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of, and complications associated with, intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) for maintaining patency after angioplasty or stent insertion in native vessels or bypass grafts of the iliac or infrainguinal arteries.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched their Specialised Register (last searched August 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 7).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of the use of brachytherapy as an adjunct to the endovascular treatment of people with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or stenosed bypass grafts of the iliac or infrainguinal arteries versus the procedure without brachytherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and two other review authors independently extracted the data. Adverse event information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials with a combined total of 1090 participants were included in this review. All included studies used the femoropopliteal artery. We did not identify any studies that used the iliac arteries. All studies compared PTA with or without stenting plus IVBT versus PTA with or without stenting alone. No trials were found comparing IVBT to technologies such as drug eluting stents or balloons, or cryoplasty. Follow-up ranged from six months to five years. The quality of the included trials was moderate with our concerns relating to the difficulty of blinding due to the nature of the procedures and the small sample sizes for some studies. Primary outcomes (patency or restenosis and need for re-intervention) were reported in the majority of the trials, but reporting at various time points and the use of multiple definitions of the outcomes by the included studies meant that not all data were available for pooling. The secondary outcomes were not reported in many of the included studies.For brachytherapy, cumulative patency was higher at 24 months (odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 4.10, n = 222, P = 0.002). A statistically significant difference was found for restenosis at six months (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.66, n = 562, P = 0.004), 12 months (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.68, n = 375, P = 0.0002) and 24 months (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.78, n = 164, P = 0.007) in favour of IVBT. No difference was found after five years as measured in one study. The need for re-interventions was reported in six studies. Target lesion revascularisation was significantly reduced in trial participants treated with IVBT compared with angioplasty alone (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97, P = 0.04) at six months after the interventions. No statistically significant difference was found between the procedures on the need for re-intervention at 12 and 24 months after the procedures.A statistically significant lower number of occlusions was found in the control group at more than three months (OR 11.46, 95% CI 1.44 to 90.96, n = 363, P = 0.02) but no differences were found at less than one month nor at 12 months after the procedures making the clinical significance uncertain. Ankle brachial index was statistically significantly better for IVBT at the 12 month follow-up (mean difference 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.14, n = 100, P = 0.02) but no statistically significant differences were found at 24 hours and at six months.Quality of life, complications, limb loss, cardiovascular deaths, death from all causes, pain free walking distance and maximum walking distance on a treadmill were similar for the two arms of the trials with no statistically significant difference found between the treatment groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for using peripheral artery brachytherapy as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to maintain patency and for the prevention of restenosis in people with peripheral vascular disease is limited, mainly due to the inconsistency of assessment and reporting of clinically relevant outcomes. More data are needed on clinically relevant outcomes such as health related quality of life (HRQOL) or limb salvage and longer-term outcomes, together with comparisons with other techniques such as drug eluting balloons and stents. Adequately powered randomised controlled trials, health economics and cost-effectiveness data are required before the procedure could be recommended for widespread use.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of additional technologies to enhance angioplasty for infrainguinal peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Background

There are several additional techniques designed to enhance conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA). This systematic review assessed current evidence on the clinical effectiveness of additional techniques for infrainguinal peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD).

Methods

Relevant electronic databases, including MEDLINE, were searched in May 2011. The population comprised participants with symptomatic PAD undergoing endovascular treatment for disease distal to the inguinal ligament. Interventions were additional techniques compared with conventional PTA. Main outcome measures were restenosis and need for reintervention. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of clinical effectiveness were assessed for quality and data were extracted. Where appropriate, meta-analysis was undertaken to produce risk ratios (RRs).

Results

Forty RCTs were selected. Meta-analysis showed a significant benefit in reducing restenosis rates at 6 months for self-expanding stents (RR 0·49) and drug-coated balloons (RR 0·40), and at 12 months for endovascular brachytherapy (RR 0·63). There was also evidence that use of a stent-graft significantly reduced restenosis compared with PTA, as did drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents. Meta-analysis showed that use of drug-coated balloons was associated with significantly lower reintervention rates than PTA alone at 6 months (RR 0·24) and 24 months (RR 0·27) of follow-up. There was also evidence of significantly lower reintervention rates for self-expanding stents at 6 months. Other techniques did not show significant treatment effects for restenosis or reintervention.

Conclusion

The conclusions of this review should be tempered by small sample sizes, lack of clinical outcome measures and differing outcome definitions, making direct comparison across trials difficult. However, self-expanding stents, drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons appeared to be the most promising technologies worthy of future study.

Endovascular brachytherapy and restenosis following lower limb angioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Restenosis is a fundamental weakness of percutaneous femoropopliteal angioplasty (PTA). The potential of endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) to reduce restenosis has been evaluated in randomized clinical trials, but no pooled analysis has been undertaken.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials in which PTA alone was compared to PTA plus EVBT. The Pubmed and Medline databases, American Heart Association OASIS database and conference proceedings from the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society and Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland were searched. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials comparing PTA to PTA plus EVBT in human subjects with at least one clinical outcome reported (restenosis, complications, patency). Study quality was assessed by the Jadad score. Random-effects modeling was used to generate pooled effect size estimates.

RESULTS

Six trials (687 patients) were identified. EVBT reduced 12-month restenosis rates (pooled odds ratio 0.50; 95% CI 0.301-0.836; p=0.008). The benefit disappeared by 24 months. The short-term risk of new lesions elsewhere in the treated artery was significantly increased by EVBT (pooled odds ratio 8.65; 95% CI 2.176-34.391; p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

While limited by the small sample sizes in the included trials, this analysis suggests that the early benefit of EVBT is counter-balanced by the increased risk of new lesions and the lack of medium- to long-term reductions in restenosis risk. Based upon the best available evidence, EVBT cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.

Restenosis after lower extremity interventions: current status and future directions

The incidence of restenosis after percutaneous peripheral interventions (PPI) varies considerably depending upon the vascular bed but appears to be highest in the femoropopliteal and tibioperoneal arteries. The restenosis process in the periphery does not appear to stop at the 6-month mark, as seen with bare metal stents in the coronary arteries, but continues for a longer time, possibly years, after the intervention. This review evaluates the incidence of restenosis following lower extremity arterial interventions and potential drugs or devices that could alter this process, including nonpharmacological (stents, cryoplasty, Cutting Balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, brachytherapy, and photodynamic therapy) and pharmacological (systemic and direct drug delivery) approaches. A global strategy to achieve optimal outcome with PPI is offered: (1) obtain excellent acute angiographic results with less dissection and recoil, (2) protect the distal tibial vascular bed, and (3) reduce smooth muscle cell proliferation with pharmacological intervention.

Endovascular Brachytherapy After Femoropopliteal Balloon Angioplasty Fails to Show Robust Clinical Benefit Over Time

PURPOSE

To determine if the short-term efficacy of adjunctive endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) is maintained over time in patients undergoing balloon angioplasty (BA) of femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions.

METHODS

To evaluate the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of EVBT, 147 consecutive patients (82 men; mean age 70.8+/-8.5 years) with 147 treated limbs were randomized to BA with (n=72, 49%) or without (n=75, 51%) adjunctive EVBT (12 or 14-Gy from an (192)Ir source, no centering, a 5-mm reference depth). Sixty-eight (46%) limbs were treated for de novo and 79 (54%) for recurrent femoropopliteal lesions. Clinical follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter included evaluation of symptoms, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and intra-arterial angiography for new/worsening symptoms or at follow-up between 2 and 5 years. Sustained clinical success was defined as improvement in ABI >or=0.1 and/or of symptoms without repeated target lesion revascularization. Angiographic restenosis was defined as >or=50% diameter reduction. Subgroup analysis was performed for de novo versus recurrent lesions.

RESULTS

Mean clinical follow-up was 32.3+/-21.5 months. Angiographic follow-up was available in 83 (56%) patients (41 BA and 42 BA+EVBT) at a mean 31.8+/-20.7 months. Cumulative sustained clinical success rates at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, were 84.3%, 82.1%, and 76.4% after BA versus 82.4%, 69.8%, and 67.5% after BA+EVBT (p=0.26 by log-rank). Although the proportion of patients undergoing follow-up angiography was moderate, the freedom from angiographic restenosis at 1, 2, and 3 years was 70.7%, 63.1%, and 47.1% after BA versus 82.7%, 64.3%, and 64.3% after BA+EVBT (p=0.16 by log-rank). No differences were found between BA and BA+EVBT outcomes in patients with de novo versus recurrent femoropopliteal lesions.

CONCLUSION

The seemingly beneficial short-term effects of BA+EVBT are not sustained in the longer term, with no robust clinical improvement after angioplasty of atherosclerotic de novo or recurrent femoropopliteal lesions at up to 5 years.

External Beam Radiation to Prevent Restenosis After Superficial Femoral Artery Balloon Angioplasty

Background— Femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remains limited by restenosis. Although vascular brachytherapy may be effective in reducing restenosis, external beam radiation would be more practical to administer after PTA.

Methods and Results— After femoropopliteal PTA without stent placement, 99 patients were randomly assigned to 0 Gy (placebo; n=24), 7 Gy (n=24), 10.5 Gy (n=26), or 14 Gy (n=25) of external beam radiation of the PTA site (with a 3-cm margin at both extremities) in 1 session 24 hours after PTA. The primary end point was minimum lumen diameter on quantitative angiography 1 year after PTA. One year after PTA, the mean minimum lumen diameter was 1.92, 1.64, 1.92, and 2.91 mm, respectively, for the 0-, 7-, 10.5-, and 14-Gy groups ( P =0.0072 for 0 versus 14 Gy). Mean luminal loss was 1.14, 1.27, 1.08, and 0.14 mm, respectively, for the 4 groups ( P =0.0072 for 0 versus 14 Gy). Restenosis >50% was present in 50%, 65%, 48%, and 25% of patients, respectively, for the 0-, 7-, 10.5-, and 14-Gy groups ( P =0.072). At 18 months, repeated revascularizations were required in 25% of patients in the 0-Gy group versus 12% of patients in the 14-Gy group ( P =0.24).

Conclusions— A single session of external beam radiation of 14 Gy of the femoropopliteal angioplasty site significantly reduces restenosis at 1 year.

Effects of probucol versus aspirin and versus brachytherapy on restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty: the PAB randomized multicenter trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of probucol and/or of endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of femoropopliteal arteries.

METHODS

A total of 335 patients (206 men; mean age 72+/-9 years) with intermittent claudication were randomized according to a 2x2 factorial design to 1 of the 4 groups: probucol, placebo, EVBT, and EVBT+probucol. Probucol (1 g/d) or placebo were given in double-blinded fashion 1 month before and for 6 months after PTA. Gamma irradiation (192Iridium, 14 Gy, 5-mm reference depth) was randomly applied in an unblinded manner from a noncentered endoluminal catheter. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/d). Primary endpoint was restenosis (>50% diameter reduction) detected by duplex ultrasound 6 months after PTA. Secondary endpoints included clinical and hemodynamic assessment.

RESULTS

Restenosis in patients undergoing EVBT was 17% (23/133) versus 35% (50/142) in patients without EVBT (p<0.001); in patients treated with probucol versus placebo, the rates were 23% (31/135) and 30% (43/140, p<0.001). Three quarters (77%, 102/133) of patients were free of claudication after EVBT therapy versus 61% (87/142) without EVBT (p<0.05). Need for target vessel revascularization was 6% (8/133) with EVBT versus 14% (20/142) without EVBT (p<0.01). Late thrombotic occlusions occurred in 4% (6/133), exclusively in patients treated with EVBT after stent implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular brachytherapy significantly reduces restenosis, improves symptoms, and reduces reinterventions after PTA of femoropopliteal arteries. Probucol reduces restenosis but has no additive effect when combined with brachytherapy.

Advances in vascular brachytherapy over the last 10 years: focus on femoropopliteal applications

Restenosis and the need for repeated interventions after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remain major drawbacks limiting a widespread application of this minimally invasive technique in the femoropopliteal segment. During the last decade, vascular brachytherapy (BT) emerged as a promising, novel technology with the potential to reduce the rates of restenosis. Meanwhile, several randomized controlled trials have suggested beneficial short and midterm effects of BT in the femoropopliteal arteries. However, despite substantial advances, many questions remain regarding the utility of vascular BT and its dissemination as a practical tool to prevent restenosis. The risk of complications, such as late stent thrombosis, edge effect, catch-up late restenosis, and potential aneurysm formation, as well as the logistical issues associated with the use of this technology in the catheterization laboratory, are delaying the acceptance of BT for routine use. This article reviews the developments of BT for restenosis prevention during the past decade, focusing on implications for peripheral endovascular treatment.

An update on endovascular therapy of the lower extremities

Considerable advances have been made over the last decade in percutaneous technology for treatment of atherosclerotic diseases in the iliac, femoropopliteal, and distal tibioperoneal arteries. While treatment strategies are well defined in the iliofemoral segment, where angioplasty and stenting perform well in appropriately selected lesions, the search for a durable transcatheter therapy for femoropopliteal and distal occlusive disease continues. The spectrum of treatment alternatives to angioplasty ranges from transcatheter plaque excision to laser ablation, rotational atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, and stenting. We review in this article the status of percutaneous endovascular techniques for the treatment of lower extremity vascular occlusive disease.

Effects of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Endovascular Brachytherapy on Vascular Remodeling of Human Femoropopliteal Artery by Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background— Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of severely stenotic peripheral vascular lesions is hampered by a higher restenosis rate. The effects of PTA on vascular wall as well as the effects of the antirestenotic properties of endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) remain unclear. MRI allows in vivo noninvasive assessment of the vascular effects of such treatment strategies. We sought to elucidate the vascular effect of PTA and PTA+EVBT by serial MRI.

Methods and Results— Twenty symptomatic patients with severe stenosis of the femoropopliteal artery were randomly assigned to PTA (n=10) or PTA+EVBT (n=10; 14 Gy by γ-irradiation source) and imaged by high-resolution MRI before and 24 hours and 3 months after intervention. An independent observer blinded to the procedure analyzed the MRI data. At 24 hours, cross-sectional MRI revealed that lumen area (86% and 67%) and total vessel area (47% and 34%) increased similarly in the PTA and PTA+EVBT groups, respectively. All patients showed severe splitting of the atherosclerotic plaque, resulting in an irregularly shaped lumen. At 3 months, MRI revealed a significant difference in lumen area change between the PTA and PTA+EVBT groups (40% and 106%, respectively; P =0.026) and in the total vessel area (14% and 39%, respectively; P =0.018). At 3 months, plaque disruption was still present in 50% of the patients treated with PTA+EVBT.

Conclusions— After PTA, there is deep disruption of the atherosclerotic plaques and an extensive remodeling process of the arterial wall. Luminal loss after PTA is partially due to inward vessel remodeling. Brachytherapy prevents inward remodeling and induces an increase in lumen area but partially prevents healing of disrupted vessel surface.