Color Duplex Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Innominate, Subclavian, and Common Carotid Artery Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the efficiency of Doppler ultrasonography for predicting the innominate, subclavian, and common carotid artery stenosis.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study between 2013 and 2022 enrolled 636 patients who underwent carotid Doppler ultrasonography and subsequent digital subtraction angiography. And 58 innominate artery stenosis, 147 common carotid artery stenosis, and 154 subclavian artery stenosis were included. The peak systolic velocity at innominate, subclavian, and common carotid artery, and velocity ratios of innominate artery to common carotid artery, innominate artery to subclavian artery, and common carotid artery to internal carotid artery were measured or calculated. The threshold values were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The threshold values of innominate artery stenosis were peak systolic velocity >206 cm/s (sensitivity: 82.8%; specificity: 91.4%) to predict ≥50% stenosis and >285 cm/s (sensitivity: 89.2%; specificity: 94.9%) to predict ≥70% stenosis. The threshold values of common carotid artery stenosis were peak systolic velocity >175 cm/s (sensitivity: 78.2%; specificity: 91.9%) to predict ≥50% stenosis and >255 cm/s (sensitivity: 87.1%; specificity: 87.2%) to predict ≥70% stenosis. The threshold values of subclavian artery stenosis were peak systolic velocity >200 cm/s (sensitivity: 68.2%; specificity: 84.4%) to predict ≥50% stenosis and >305 cm/s (sensitivity: 57.9%; specificity: 91.4%) to predict ≥70% stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic patients with ultrasonic parameters of velocity at innominate artery ≥206 cm/s, velocity at common carotid artery ≥175 cm/s, or velocity at subclavian artery ≥200 cm/s need to be considered for further verification and whether revascularization is necessary.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcome of Different Treatments for Innominate Artery Stenosis or Occlusion

The present study reported the outcomes of different treatments for innominate artery (IA) atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion. We performed a systematic review of the literature (4 database searched; last search February 2022), including articles with ≥5 patients. We performed meta-analyses of proportions for different postoperative outcomes. Fourteen studies were included (656 patients; 396 underwent surgery, 260 endovascular procedures). IA lesions were asymptomatic in 9.6% (95% CI 4.6-14.6). Overall estimated technical success (TS) rate was 91.7% (95% CI 86.9-96.4); weighted TS rate was 86.8% (95% CI 75-98.6) in the surgical group (SG), 97.1% (95% CI 94.6-99.7) in the endovascular group (EG). Postoperative stroke in SG was 2.5% (95% CI 1-4.1) and 2.1% in EG (95% CI .3-3.8). Overall, 30-day occlusion was estimated .9% (95% CI 0-1.8) in SG and .7% (95% CI 0-1.7) in EG. Thirty-day mortality was 3.4% (95% CI .9-5.8) in SG and .7% (95% CI 0-1.7) in EG. Estimated mean follow-up after intervention was 65.5 months (95% CI 45.5-85.5) in SG and 22.4 months (95% CI 14.72-30.16) in EG. During follow-up, restenosis in SG were 2.8% (95% CI .5-5.1) and 16.6% (95% CI 5- 28.1) in EG. In conclusion, the endovascular approach seems to offer good short to mid-term outcomes, but with a higher rate of restenosis during follow-up.

[The value of revascularisation of atherosclerotic lesions of the innominate artery at the asymptomatic stage of the disease]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the natural course of asymptomatic atherosclerotic lesions of the innominate artery and to study the long-term results of surgical interventions performed at the asymptomatic stage and to compare them with similar results at the symptomatic stage of the disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The analysis of the natural course of the disease was performed in 74 asymptomatic patients who were divided into 3 groups depending on the initial degree of severity of the stenosis of the innominate artery: insignificant stenoses (less than 50%), moderate stenoses (50-69%) and haemodynamically significant lesions (70% and more). The analysis of the long-term results of surgical treatment was performed in 62 patients, in 29 of whom intrathoracic reconstructions were performed at the asymptomatic stage of the disease, in 33 - at the symptomatic stage.

RESULTS

Cumulative freedom from stroke by the 10th year of follow-up was significantly higher in patients with insignificant stenoses and amounted to 100% in the groups of moderate stenoses and hemodynamically significant lesions - 25% and 0, respectively (log-rank p=0.000). Neurological fatality in patients with hemodynamically significant (initial or developed) lesions was 26.3%, while in patients with hemodynamically insignificant lesions it was 0 (log-rank p=0.004), which is confirmed by cumulative indices (log-rank p=0.008). Asymptomatic innominate artery reconstructions were associated with a lower incidence of stroke: the long-term incidence of stroke in such patients was 3.4%, while in initially symptomatic patients it was 18.2% (p=0.038). Initial degree II or IV cerebrovascular insufficiency was a predictor of stroke in the long-term period (OR=1.71; p=0.000). The cumulative freedom from stroke in asymptomatic patients by the 20th year of follow-up was 95% compared with 74% in symptomatic patients (log-rank p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Surgical interventions in asymptomatic hemodynamically significant lesions of the innominate artery should be performed to prevent primary cerebral circulatory disorders.

Preliminary experience with new generation balloon expandable stent-graft in the treatment of innominate artery obstructive disease

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe a single center preliminary experience with the use of a specific balloon expandable stent-graft for the treatment of innominate artery (IA) obstructive lesions.

METHODS

We report our experience with four male patients treated with Gore Viabahn balloon (Gore Medical, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) expandable stent-graft for different types of IA stenosis: three patients were symptomatic for vertebrobasilar insufficiency, while one patient was asymptomatic for cerebrovascular symptoms. The stent grafts were deployed using retrograde (N.=2) or antegrade approach (N.=2), aiming to cover the entire lesions length and to slightly protrude into the aortic arch. Post-dilatation was performed with a compliant balloon. One patient presented a tandem lesion (IA and right internal carotid artery) and after the stenting of the IA he was treated also with a carotid artery stenting during the same procedure.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all patients. No perioperative or postoperative complications had been reported and the neurological disorders disappeared for the three symptomatic patients. After a mean clinical and radiological follow-up of 24±5 months, all the stents were patent and perfectly adapted to the vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary clinical experience shows that the use of the Gore Viabahn balloon (Gore Medical) expandable stent-graft seems safe and feasible for the treatment of the IA obstructive lesions, also in presence of irregular plaques and hostile anatomies for an endovascular treatment. Larger experiences and long-term data are mandatory.

Management of Innominate Artery Occlusion With Severe Left Common Carotid Artery Stenosis

Innominate artery occlusion is a rare entity, particularly when coupled with severe left common carotid artery stenosis. Innominate artery disease may present with varying degrees of symptomatology and can place patients at risk for both posterior fossa and hemispheric ischemic events. We present a symptomatic case of innominate artery occlusion with severe left common carotid disease. We reviewed the literature and current options for the treatment of innominate artery disease. The patient underwent successful hybrid repair with left carotid artery retrograde stenting and left carotid artery to right carotid artery bypass. She has been symptom and re-intervention free during her one-year follow-up. We describe a successful hybrid repair of symptomatic innominate artery occlusion with concomitant severe left carotid artery stenosis in a patient with a prohibitive open thoracic surgical risk.

Endovascular Stent Grafting for Recurrent Strokes Due to Fragile Innominate Artery Plaque: A Case Report

Here we describe a case of recurrent ischemic strokes due to fragile innominate artery plaque successfully treated using endovascular stent grafting. An 80-year-old man presented with a history of recurrent strokes that were refractory to medical treatment. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance images of the thorax revealed a gross intramural plaque in the innominate artery. He was successfully treated using endovascular stent grafting. An AFX stent graft device was used to prevent further embolic strokes. The AFX stent graft has a unique endoskeleton design with a thin-walled expanded polytetrafluoroethylene fabric—known as active sealing structure—attached to the implant. Postoperatively, the patient has experienced no recurrent strokes in over 2 years of follow-up. The stent grafting procedure could be an optimal treatment option for treating fragile innominate artery plaques.

Technique for transcarotid artery revascularization of tandem lesions

The repair of tandem carotid lesions has been described using myriad methods, often involving a hybrid approach of stenting with carotid endarterectomy. Because of the worrisome stroke rates associated with this method, we have reported an innovative technique of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) for tandem lesions in a patient with high-grade stenosis of the right common and internal carotid arteries. Technical success was achieved with TCAR via retrograde and antegrade access using dynamic flow reversal for the treatment of both lesions. The patient experienced no postoperative complications, highlighting the successful repair of tandem carotid lesions using TCAR in a patient who is too high risk for carotid endarterectomy.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of combined carotid endarterectomy with ipsilateral proximal intervention (hybrid approach) for tandem carotid artery lesions

OBJECTIVE

The safety and effectiveness of using the hybrid approach to treat tandem carotid lesions is controversial, and the clinical significance of the technical variants on the perioperative outcomes has not been evaluated. The present meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the technique, safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes of the hybrid approach.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies from January 1, 1996 to January 11, 2020. The baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, procedural details, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were collected and analyzed. A pooled overall survival curve was drawn. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the perioperative stroke risk between subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 275 patients (mean age, 66.94 years) from 15 studies were included. All the patients had presented with tandem stenosis of ≥50%, and 67.2% were symptomatic. The overall technical success rate was 99.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.0%-100.0%). The pooled perioperative complications rates were as follows: death, 1.5% (95% CI, 0.0%-2.9%); stroke, 2.6% (95% CI, 0.7%-4.4%); combined stroke/death, 3.3% (95% CI, 1.2%-5.4%); and myocardial infarction, 3.2% (95% CI, 0.7%-9.1%). The overall primary patency rates were 99.2% (95% CI, 96.0%-100.0%) and 88.2% (95% CI, 78.8%-95.4%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Reintervention was performed in 6.6% of the patients (95% CI, 3.0%-11.2%). The pooled overall survival rates were 89.9% (95% CI, 83.7%-96.7%), 83.7% (95% CI, 75.9%-92.2%), and 75.9% (95% CI, 66.5%-86.7%) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Operations in which carotid endarterectomy was performed first carried a significantly greater risk of perioperative stroke compared with those in which proximal intervention had been performed first (5.7% vs 0.0%; P = .01). No difference was found in perioperative stroke risk between the subgroups of baseline symptomatic status (asymptomatic, 5.1%; symptomatic, 1.9%; P = .32), preoperative antiplatelet therapy (dual, 3.6%; single, 5.8%; P = .79), and carotid clamping during intervention (clamping, 2.8%; unclamping, 6.3%; P = .40).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with a presumed high risk of neurologic events because of carotid tandem lesions, the hybrid approach could be considered a reasonable option with high technical success and acceptable perioperative and long-term results. Performing carotid artery stenting before carotid endarterectomy and administering perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy should be considered to promote technical success and better outcomes. Prospective and randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the results and provide recommendations on patient selection for the hybrid approach.

Aorto-innominate artery bypass for migrated stent

We report a case of a 64-year-old female who first presented with a transient ischemic attack in 2007 due to an innominate artery stenosis, which indicated an endovascular stent placement. In 2008, she presented with recurrence of symptoms and was diagnosed with in-stent restenosis alongside an unusual occurrence of retrograde migration into the ascending aortic arch. We performed an aorto-innominate bypass through a median sternotomy. The patient was discharged without any complications thereafter, and the graft has shown excellent patency. As of 2019, the patient remains well.