Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons in the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions (AcoArt II–BTK)

A Bibliometric Analysis on Adherence to Reporting Standards for Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

The treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) involves a broad spectrum of therapies including many new and emerging techniques. To standardize the results of studies examining this pathology and to allow critical analysis and comparison between studies, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) recommended reporting standard guidelines for the endovascular management of CLTI in 2016. Research studies that do not adhere to complete reporting standards are often more ambiguous in impact and external validity, leading to bias and misinformation that has potentially damaging effects on clinical decision-making. We thus sought to examine adherence to and factors associated with noncompliance with these recommended guidelines.

METHODS

A literature database search was conducted to include all clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and retrospective comparative studies written in English examining the endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD)/CLTI from January 2020 to August 2022. Systematic reviews, case reports, and meta-analysis were excluded. The manuscripts were reviewed for adherence with the SVS guidelines (overall and by guideline subcategories based on demographics, treatment methods, and outcomes), and factors associated with this adherence were determined. These data were used to calculate descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-four manuscripts were identified from this time frame. On average, articles reviewed reported on 42.0% of the SVS reporting standards (range, 25.0-65.2%, Fig 1) with 74.1% of articles (n = 40) not adhering to at least 50.0% of the standards. Manuscripts most completely followed guidelines regarding "patient factors" and were least likely to demonstrate adherence to the description of CLTI and study complications. Within the guideline subcategories, complete adherence to guidelines was not demonstrated in any manuscript in stent trials, disease outcome measures, technical outcome measures, patient factors and critical limb ischemia description, and complete adherence rates within the other subcategories was low (range, 5.6-18.6%). Studies conducted within the United States and those with industry sponsorship were more likely to adhere to >50% of the reporting standards (P < 0.05). Journal impact factor, year of publication, and number of authors had no correlation to the percent adherence to guidelines in specific categories or adherence overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to reporting standard guidelines for endovascular treatment of lower extremity PAD specifically outlined by the SVS is suboptimal regardless of the quality of the journal the research is published in. Increasing adherence to reporting standards to provide a framework for comparison of studies across techniques used should be prioritized by authors, journal editors, and vascular societies.

Compensating for Angiographic Underestimation With Oversized Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Occluded Below-the-Knee Vessels

PURPOSE

Our study aims to determine optimal sizing of below-the-knee (BTK) artery angioplasty without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), compensating for conventional angiography underestimation by selecting a balloon size one size larger than the 1-to-1 angiographic sizing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study is a retrospective, single-center study. Patients were separated into 2 groups as over and angiographic reference group which the over group is larger balloon diameter selection (0.5-mm larger balloon diameter selection), and angiographic reference group is 1-to-1 balloon diameter selection by angiographic images. Primary end point was the target vessel reocclusion, whereas major and minor amputation was the secondary end point.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients with occluded BTK lesions treated with balloon angioplasty (Opt=43, Over=41). Primary patency was 62.8% at 12 months in angiographic reference group and 82.9% in over group (p=0.039). Amputation rate at 1-year follow-up was 9.8% in angiographic reference group and 16.3% in over group (p=0.382). TLR rate is 4.9% in over group versus 20.9% in angiographic reference group (20.9%) at 1-year follow-up (p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that oversizing the balloon diameter by one size larger in BTK artery angioplasty, guided by conventional angiography, results in a higher patency rate and a lower target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, while amputation rate remains statistically similar between the 2 groups.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Our study highlights the importance of compensating for conventional angiography's underestimation in BTK artery angioplasty by using a balloon size one size larger than the 1-to-1 angiographic sizing. Our findings demonstrate that oversizing the balloon leads to significantly higher patency rates and lower TLR rates, with no increase in amputation risk. This approach provides a practical, cost-effective solution for clinicians performing angioplasty without IVUS, allowing for better vessel treatment and outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Clinicians can implement this strategy to optimize long-term results in BTK interventions.

Drug-eluting devices for lower limb peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease is the third leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity after coronary artery disease and stroke. Lower limb peripheral arterial disease commonly involves infrainguinal arteries, may impair walking ability (intermittent claudication) and may confer a significant risk of limb loss (chronic limb-threatening ischaemia), depending on the severity of ischaemia. Endovascular treatment has become the mainstay revascularisation option in both the femoropopliteal and the below-the-knee arterial segments. After crossing and preparing the lesion, treatment results in these arterial segments can be enhanced by using drug-coated devices (drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons) that mitigate the occurrence of restenosis. As for other medical devices, the use of drug-eluting devices is based on their demonstrated safety and efficacy profiles when applied in the distinct segments of the lower limb vasculature. In this state-of-the-art narrative review we provide an overview of the safety and efficacy of drug-coated devices when used in the femoropopliteal and below-the-knee arterial segments.

Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing the Outcomes of Different Endovascular Revascularisation Treatments for Infra-inguinal Peripheral Arterial Disease Causing Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different endovascular revascularisation procedures for treating chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) using network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

The databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were searched on 14 March 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

A NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy of different endovascular revascularisation techniques for treating CLTI was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary and secondary outcomes were major amputation and death, respectively. Random effects models were developed and the results were presented using surface under the cumulative ranking curve plots and forest plots. A p value of ≤ .050 was considered statistically significant. The Cochrane collaborative tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 2 655 participants of whom 94.8% had CLTI were included. Eleven trials compared plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) vs. drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty (n = 1 771), five trials compared bare metal stent (BMS) vs. drug coated stent (DCS) (n = 466), three trials compared atherectomy vs. DCB (n = 194), two trials compared PBA vs. BMS (n = 70), one trial compared PBA vs. atherectomy (n = 50), and one trial compared BMS vs. DCB (n = 104). None of the revascularisation strategies significantly reduced the risk of major amputation or death compared with PBA. Using the network estimates, GRADE certainty of evidence for improvement in major amputation outcomes for DCB was moderate, for atherectomy and BMS was low, and for DCS was very low compared with PBA. Risk of bias was low in 16 trials, of some concerns in six trials, and high in one trial, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no current evidence from RCTs to reliably conclude that BMS, DCB, DCS, or atherectomy are superior to PBA in preventing major amputation and death in patients with CLTI. Larger comparative RCTs are needed to identify the best endovascular revascularisation strategy.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Fistulae: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated balloons (AcoArt Orchid) in treating dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae.

METHODS

The drug-eluting balloon for arteriovenous (AV) fistula in China trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study. Patients who had ≥50% venous stenosis of the AV fistula and symptoms indicating significant hemodynamic changes were included. After successful predilation with a high-pressure balloon (residual stenosis ≤30%), patients were randomized 1:1 to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon or an uncoated control balloon. The primary efficacy outcome was assessed at 6 months, and safety assessment was conducted within 30 days of the procedure. The 12-month results were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 244 patients, equally distributed between the two groups. The primary target lesion patency was 91% (106/116) for the drug-coated balloon (DCB) group and 67% (79/118) for the plain balloon catheter group, representing a difference of 24.63% (95% confidence interval, 14.68 to 34.58; P < 0.001). The secondary efficacy end point was primary target lesion patency at 12 months, which was 66% (74/112) for the DCB group and 46% (52/112) for the plain balloon catheter group (95% confidence interval, 6.57 to 32.08; P = 0.004). The mean number of reinterventions per patient to maintain target lesion patency during the 12 months after the index procedure was 0.39 (48/122) in the DCB group and 0.77 (94/122) in the plain balloon catheter group ( P = 0.001). The primary safety end point did not differ between groups ( P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

AcoArt Orchid DCB showed better primary patency rates compared with plain balloon angioplasty for treating stenotic lesions in dysfunctional hemodialysis AV fistulae at 6 and 12 months. It required fewer repeated interventions and had comparable safety in 1 year.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

AcoArt III/Arterio-venous Fistula in China, NCT03366727 .

Diversity in randomized clinical trials for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Significant race and sex disparities exist in the prevalence, diagnosis, and outcomes of peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, clinical trials evaluating treatments for PAD often lack representative patient populations. This systematic review aims to summarize the demographic representation and enrollment strategies in clinical trials of lower-extremity endovascular interventions for PAD.

METHODS

Following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched multiple sources (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov, WHO clinical trial registry) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT protocols, and peer-reviewed journal publications of RCTs conducted between January 2012 and December 2022. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize trial characteristics, publication or study protocol characteristics, and the reporting of demographic characteristics. Meta-regression was used to explore associations between demographic characteristics and certain trial characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 2,374 records were identified. Of these, 59 met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 35 trials, 14 publications, and 10 protocols. Information regarding demographic representation was frequently missing. While all 14 trial publications reported age and sex, only 4 reported race/ethnicity, and none reported socioeconomic or marital status. Additionally, only 4 publications reported clinical outcomes by demographic characteristics. Meta-regression analysis revealed that 6% more women were enrolled in non-European trials (36%) than in European trials (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review highlight potential issues that may compromise the reliability and external validity of study findings in lower-extremity PAD RCTs when applied to the real-world population. Addressing these issues is crucial to enhance the generalizability and impact of clinical trial results in the field of PAD, ultimately leading to improved clinical outcomes for patients in underrepresented populations.

REGISTRATION

The systematic review methodology was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022378304).

The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Revascularization: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) to standard endovascular techniques like percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare metal stent (BMS) for treating infrapopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

Including 8 DCB trials and 4 DES trials, this meta-analysis of 12 recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is comprehensive. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science of Web, Cochrane, and PubMed for this meta-analysis. We searched these databases for papers from their inception to February 2023. We also analyzed the references given in the listed studies and any future study that cited them. No language or publication date restrictions were applied to the 12 RCTs. The experimental group includes 8 DCB studies and 4 DES investigations, the DCB group is primarily concerned with the paclitaxel devices, whereas the DES group is preoccupied with the "-limus" devices. Key clinical outcomes in this study were primary patency and binary restenosis rates. This study's secondary outcomes are late lumen loss (LLL), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. The evidence quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023462038.

FINDINGS

Only 108 of 1152 publications found satisfied qualifying criteria and contained data. All 13 RCTs have low to moderate bias. Drug-coated balloons and DESs were compared in the excluded study. The analysis comprised 2055 participants from 12 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, including 1417 DCB patients and 638 DES patients. Drug-coated balloons outperform traditional methods in short-term monitoring of primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR. The benefits fade over time, and the 2 techniques had similar major amputation rates, mortality rates, and LLL. Drug-eluting stents outperform conventional procedures in primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR during medium-term to short-term follow-up. Comparing the 2 methods, major and minor amputations, death rate, and LLL were similar.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of DES and DCB with PTA or BMS shows that DES had better follow-up results. DCB has positive short-term results, but long-term effects differ, however, more research is needed to determine when DES and DCB should be used in medical procedures.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The provision of additional evidence to substantiate the advancement of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in the treatment of lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans, particularly in the below-the-knee area characterized by high calcium load and significant occlusion, is comparable in efficacy to conventional procedures. This finding is advantageous for the progress of interventional revascularization. The advancement and efficacy of DCB have resulted in improved treatment outcomes for medical practitioners in clinical settings. Our research incorporates the most recent randomized experiments.

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Primary Patency and Binary Restenosis Rates

PURPOSE

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remains the mainstay of endovascular therapy for infrapopliteal chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), but outcomes have not been well characterized using high-quality data. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide an updated benchmark for rates of primary patency and binary restenosis after PTA using prospectively collected, predominantly core-lab adjudicated randomized controlled trial (RCT) data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried for RCTs published through November 2022 using PTA as a control arm and including patients with infrapopliteal CLTI. Studies were excluded if >25% of patients had intermittent claudication, other vessels were included, or primary patency or binary restenosis were not outcomes. Outcomes were analyzed using random effects models. This analysis was publicly registered (PROSPERO ID#394543). No funding was utilized.

RESULTS

Seventeen RCTs were included (1048 patients, 1279 lesions). Pooled primary patency rates using data from 6 RCTs were 68% at 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=45%-84%) and 66% at 12 months (95% CI=51%-79%). Pooled binary restenosis rates using data from 11 RCTs were 54% at 6 months (95% CI=33%-73%) and 60% at 9 to 12 months (95% CI=39%-78%). Significant heterogeneity was present in all outcomes (I2>50%, p<0.0001). Publication bias was not observed (Egger's p>0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides estimates for binary restenosis and primary patency following PTA utilizing prospectively collected, predominantly core-lab adjudicated data. Results demonstrate 1-year primary patency rates that are 10% to 20% higher than what has been historically used in power calculations. These new estimates will help facilitate more accurate power analysis for future RCTs.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Rates of primary patency and binary restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) have not been well-described using high-quality data, and investigators have been utilizing estimates of 40% to 50% and 45% to 65%, respectively, when performing power calculations for trials. This meta-analysis demonstrates using high-quality, prospectively collected, and predominantly core-lab adjudicated randomized controlled trial data that actual rates of primary patency are closer to 60% up to 1 year following PTA and provides the first meta-analysis estimate of binary restenosis rates up to 1 year after PTA. These estimates will help facilitate more accurate power calculations for future RCTs in this space.

An H2 S-BMP6 Dual-Loading System with Regulating Yap/Taz and Jun Pathway for Synergistic Critical Limb Ischemia Salvaging Therapy

Critical limb ischemia, the final course of peripheral artery disease, is characterized by an insufficient supply of blood flow and excessive oxidative stress. H2 S molecular therapy possesses huge potential for accelerating revascularization and scavenging intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Moreover, it is found that BMP6 is the most significantly up-expressed secreted protein-related gene in HUVECs treated with GYY4137, a H2 S donor, based on the transcriptome analysis. Herein, a UIO-66-NH2 @GYY4137@BMP6 co-delivery nanoplatform to strengthen the therapeutic effects of limb ischemia is developed. The established UIO-66-NH2 @GYY4137@BMP6 nanoplatform exerts its proangiogenic and anti-oxidation functions by regulating key pathways. The underlying molecular mechanisms of UIO-66-NH2 @GYY4137@BMP6 dual-loading system lie in the upregulation of phosphorylated YAP/TAZ and Jun to promote HUVECs proliferation and downregulation of phosphorylated p53/p21 to scavenge excessive ROS. Meanwhile, laser-doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI), injury severity evaluation, and histological analysis confirm the excellent therapeutic effects of UIO-66-NH2 @GYY4137@BMP6 in vivo. This work may shed light on the treatment of critical limb ischemia by regulating YAP, Jun, and p53 signaling pathways based on gas-protein synergistic therapy.

[Angioplasty with Sirolimus-coated Balloon: the New Standard in the Treatment of PAD?]

Endovascular revascularisation with paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of peripheral artery disease has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option in the femoropopliteal segment. The antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel prevents restenosis. In contrast, in the infra-popliteal segment, the evidence is currently conflicting. However, there is evidence of an increased risk of amputation and mortality from the second year after angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons. This may be due to a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect of paclitaxel. Sirolimus-coated balloons might therefore be an alternative because sirolimus is cytostatic rather than cytotoxic and thus has a wide therapeutic window.Three single-arm pilot studies (50, 25, and 50 patients, respectively) show that angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloons leads to comparable results to those reported from paclitaxel-coated balloons (late lumen loss at 6 months: 0.29 mm; primary patency at 12 months: femoropopliteal 79%-82%, infra-popliteal 59%; freedom from target lesion revascularization at 12 months: femoropopliteal 83%-94%, infra-popliteal 86%). Randomised controlled trials comparing standard balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of intermittent claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischaemia are active and are expected to provide efficacy and safety results from mid 2024.This review presents the results of pilot studies on angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloons for the treatment of peripheral artery disease and reviews currently ongoing randomised controlled trials.

Evaluation of an Infrapopliteal Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold: Design Methodology for the LIFE-BTK Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a severe condition characterized by rest pain and ischemic tissue loss that affects 5% to 10% of people with peripheral artery disease. In the United States, there are few Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for the primary treatment of arteries below-the-knee (BTK). Unfortunately, all suffer from high restenosis rates due to intimal hyperplasia, elastic recoil, and untreated dissection because of a lack of scaffolding. The Esprit BTK system is a resorbable, drug-eluting scaffold device with the potential to address an unmet need in people suffering from CLTI because of infrapopliteal atherosclerosis. The LIFE-BTK (pivotaL Investigation of saFety and Efficacy of drug-eluting resorbable scaffold treatment-Below The Knee) randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a prospectively designed premarket evaluation of the Esprit BTK drug-eluting resorbable scaffold used in the treatment of those patients.

Methods

The LIFE-BTK trial enrolled 261 subjects with CLTI for the RCT and a further 7 subjects for a pharmacokinetic substudy. The objective of the RCT was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esprit BTK scaffold compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of limb salvage and primary patency at 12 months. The primary safety end point is freedom from major adverse limb events and peri-operative death at 6 months and 30 days, respectively. Clinical follow-up care is planned for 5 years.

Conclusions

Novel devices must be tested in RCTs to evaluate their safety and efficacy compared to the standard of care if we are to improve outcomes for this challenging group of patients.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of below-the-knee arterial disease

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in the treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) arterial disease.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted from inception to July 24, 2021. Retrospective, prospective, and randomized studies that had used SESs to treat BTK arterial disease and had reported the primary patency, technical success, target lesion revascularization, and/or mortality were included. Meta-analyses of the proportions were conducted to derive pooled summary statistics of the outcomes. Where Kaplan-Meier curves were provided for primary patency, a meta-analysis of the individual patient data was conducted via a graphic reconstruction tool to estimate primary patency at various follow-up points. For studies comparing SESs and bare metal stents (BMSs), a two-stage meta-analysis was performed to compare the 6-month primary patency of SESs vs BMSs.

RESULTS

Ten studies across 13 publications, including 995 patients, were retrieved for analysis. In the meta-analysis of proportions, across six studies (n = 339 patients), the pooled 6-month primary patency was 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.6%-92.1%). Across seven studies (n = 283 patients), the pooled 6-month mortality was 5.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-11.2%). An individual patient data analysis of three studies (n = 282 patients) yielded a primary patency rate of 95.2% (95% CI, 92.7%-97.8%), 82.8% (95% CI, 78.3%-87.6%), 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%), and 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. The 12-month target lesion revascularization rate across four studies (n = 324 patients) was 9.6% (95% CI, 6.4%-13.4%). In the two-stage meta-analysis of 6-month primary patency across three studies (n = 168 patients), the use of SESs was significantly favored over BMSs (risk ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall evidence suggests that the use of SESs appears to be safe and offers favorable outcomes for BTK arterial disease compared with BMSs.

Effectiveness and Safety of Atherectomy versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Limb Salvage in Tibioperoneal Arterial Disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of atherectomy versus plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) for treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to tibioperoneal arterial disease (TPAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry who had CLI (Rutherford Class 4-6) and underwent atherectomy versus POBA alone for isolated TPAD were retrospectively identified. Of eligible patients, a cohort of 2,908 patients was propensity matched 1:1 by clinical and angiographic characteristics. The atherectomy group comprised 1,454 patients with 2,183 arteries treated, and the POBA group comprised 1,454 patients with 2,141 arteries treated. The primary study endpoint was major ipsilateral limb amputation. Secondary endpoints were minor ipsilateral amputations, any ipsilateral amputation, primary patency, target vessel reintervention (TVR), and wound healing at 12 months.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 507 days, the mean patient age was 69 years ± 11.7, and the mean occluded length was 6.9 cm ± 6.5. There was a trend toward higher technical success rates with atherectomy than with POBA (92.9% vs 91.0%, respectively; P = .06). The rates of major adverse events during the procedure were not significantly different. The 12-month major amputation rate was similar in the atherectomy and POBA groups (4.5% vs 4.6%, respectively; P = .92; odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.68-1.37). There was no difference in 12-month TVR (17.9% vs 17.8%; P = .97) or primary patency (56.4% vs 54.5%; P = .64) between the atherectomy and POBA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large national registry, treatment of CLI from TPAD using atherectomy versus POBA showed no significant differences in procedural adverse events, major amputations, TVR, or vessel patency at 12 months.

The efficacy and safety of different endovascular modalities for infrapopliteal arteries lesions: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Endovascular treatment has become the first-line therapy for infrapopliteal artery occlusive disease (IPOD), while the optimal endovascular method remains to be determined. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to simultaneously compare the outcomes of different endovascular modalities for IPOD.

Methods and results

The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were used as data sources. The NWM approach used random-effects models based on the frequentist framework. In total, 22 eligible RCTs (44 study arms; 1,348 patients) involving nine endovascular modalities or combinations [balloon angioplasty (BA), drug-coated balloon (DCB), drug-eluting stent (DES), atherectomy device + BA (AD + BA), AD + DCB, balloon-expandable bare metal stent (BMS), self-expanding stent (SES), absorbable metal stents (AMS), and inorganics-coated stent (ICS)] were included. BA had a lower 12-month primary patency rate than DCB (RR 0.50, CI 0.27, 0.93) and AD + DCB (RR 0.34, CI 0.12, 0.93). AD + DCB decreased 6-month TLR compared with AMS (RR 0.15, CI 0.03, 0.90), and DES decreased it compared with BMS (RR 0.25, CI 0.09, 0.71). DCB had a lower 6-month TLR rate than AMS (RR 0.26, CI 0.08, 0.86) and BA (RR 0.51, CI 0.30, 0.89). BA had a higher 12-month TLR rate than DCB (RR 1.76, CI 1.07, 2.90). According to the value of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), AD + DCB was considered the best treatment in terms of primary patency at 6 months (SUCRA = 87.5) and 12 months (SURCA = 91). AD + BA was considered the best treatment in terms of 6-month TLR (SUCRA = 83.1), 12-month TLR (SURCA = 75.8), and 12-month all-cause mortality (SUCRA = 92.5). In terms of 12-month major amputation, DES was considered the best treatment (SUCRA = 78.6), while AD + DCB was considered the worst treatment (SUCRA = 28.8). Moreover, AD + BA always ranks higher than AD + DCB in the comparison including these two combinations. Subgroup analyses of modalities without stenting did not significantly change the primary outcomes.

Conclusion

ADs showed noteworthy advantages in multiple terms for IPOD except for 12-month major amputation. AD + BA may be a better method for IPOD than AD + DCB. The efficacy and safety of ADs are worthy of further investigation.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022331626].

Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Angioplasty of Infra-popliteal Lesions for the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Study Protocol for the Randomized Controlled LIMES Study

PURPOSE

Evidence on efficacy and long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices is still conflicting. Therefore, this study aims to assess whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for the treatment of infra-popliteal occlusions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

STUDY DESIGN

The randomized controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, investigator-initiated study aims to enrol 230 participants with CLTI and infra-popliteal occlusions at up to 25 centres. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty or to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Bailout stenting in case of flow-limiting dissection or ≥ 50% residual diameter stenosis is permitted.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome is the Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 6 months, defined as the absence of target lesion occlusion with restoration of in-line flow to the ankle. Key secondary outcome is non-inferiority in the proportionate occurrence of major adverse limb events and perioperative all-cause death at 30 days. Overall, participants will be followed for 36 months to assess further secondary efficacy and safety outcomes.

ASSUMED GAIN OF KNOWLEDGE

If sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty turns out to be superior to uncoated-balloon angioplasty regarding patency of infra-popliteal lesions without safety signals, it could become a welcome treatment option for patients with CLTI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04772300, German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024629. Level of Evidence Level 2a, randomized controlled trial.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Drug-Coated Balloons and Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Artery Disease

Limited data is available regarding the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of critical limb ischemia because of infrapopliteal peripheral arterial disease. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of DCB in the treatment of infrapopliteal disease. A database search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed by 2 reviewers from inception through November 15, 2021. Randomized trials that compared DCB with conventional PTA in treating infrapopliteal arterial disease were included. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. A total of 9 trials were included (1,501 participants) in the study. The mean age was 71.1 ± 10.2 years. Regarding the primary end points, treating infrapopliteal arterial disease with DCB had a lower incidence of re-stenosis (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.70, p = 0.0001) with no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.69, p = 0.61), compared with conventional PTA. With regards to the secondary end points, DCB usage was associated with a significant reduction in clinically driven target lesion revascularization (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84, p = 0.006) with no significant difference with regards to major target limb amputation and major adverse cardiovascular events (p ≥0.05). In conclusion, among patients with critical limb ischemia secondary to infrapopliteal artery disease, DCB usage was associated with a significantly lower number of restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization compared with conventional PTA. There was no increase in all-cause mortality or major target limb amputation with the use of DCB.

Medikamentenbeschichtete Ballons bei PAVK

Paclitaxel-beschichtete Ballons bei femoropoplitealen Läsionen Für die Behandlung femoropoplitealer Gefäßläsionen, bei Verschlusslängen unter 25 cm sowie bei längeren Verschlüssen (wenn kein Venenmaterial vorliegt und/oder das Operationsrisiko hoch ist), wird die endovaskuläre Therapie empfohlen. Um Restenosierungen und Reinterventionen zu vermeiden, wird dabei die Verwendung von medikamentenbeschichteten Ballons empfohlen. Durch die Weiterentwicklung des Ballondesigns kann die Effektivität noch gesteigert werden.

Paclitaxel-beschichtete Ballons bei infrapoplitealen Läsionen Im Stadium der kritischen Extremitäten-Ischämie wird bei infrapoplitealen Gefäßläsionen primär ebenfalls ein endovaskulärer Therapieansatz empfohlen. Aufgrund von inkonsistenten, teilweise widersprüchlichen Ergebnissen verschiedener klinischer Studien, kann der Vorteil medikamentenbeschichteter Ballons bei der Angioplastie infrapoplitealer Arterien bislang nicht ausreichend beurteilt werden.

Sicherheitsaspekt Paclitaxel-beschichteter Ballons Zahlreiche Real-World-Studien und Nachauswertungen prospektiver Studien konnten den in einer früheren Metaanalyse postulierten Zusammenhang einer höheren Mortalität nach Anwendung Paclitaxel-beschichteter Devices weder bestätigen noch einen möglichen Pathomechanismus oder eine Dosis-Wirkungs-Beziehung aufzeigen. Dennoch wurden die Empfehlungen des Bundesinstituts für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM) zur sorgfältigen Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägung und Aufklärungspflicht noch nicht angepasst.

Sirolimus-beschichtete Ballons Mit dem Zytostatikum Sirolimus steht eine weitere antiproliferativ und zusätzlich antientzündlich wirkende Substanz zur Vermeidung von Restenosierungen bei femoropoplitealen und infrapoplitealen Läsionen zur Verfügung. Die therapeutische Breite von Sirolimus ist zwar größer als die von Paclitaxel, dennoch ist die Gewebeabsorption und -retention von Sirolimus deutlich schwieriger. Erste Ergebnisse aus kleineren Studien, die die Sicherheit und Effektivität Sirolimus-beschichteter Ballons untersuchten, sind vielversprechend, müssen allerdings noch in großen, prospektiven, randomisierten Studien bewiesen werden.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Below-The-Knee Artery: A Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic limb threat ischemia is associated with cardiovascular events, resulting in high amputation, morbidity and mortality rates. This study aims to accomplish a comprehensive summary of randomized controlled trials and single-center trials related to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) artery disease, and to provide a recommendation for the application of DCBs in BTK artery disease.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were used to retrieve relevant articles on the safety and effectiveness of DCBs in the treatment of BTK artery disease. A random-effects model was applied to calculate the standard mean deviation, odds ratio (OR) and their 95% of confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

As of April 8, 2021, a total of 241 articles were retrieved, but only 13 articles were finally included for meta-analysis. The 12 mo follow-up study found that major adverse events , all-cause mortality, major amputation ,and target lesion revascularization had no statistically significant difference between the DCBs group and the control group (target lesion revascularization: OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.36, 1.31; all-cause mortality: OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.69, 2.46; major amputation: OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.64, 2.79; target lesion revascularization: OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis results of randomized controlled trials focusing on comparing DCBs and other treatments suggest that DCBs do not have significant advantages in the treatment of BTK artery disease when compare with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), but better than control intervention except PTA in both safety and efficacy end points. However, the results of meta-analysis of single-arm trial reported DCBs in treating BTK artery lesions are significantly improved compared with the meta-analysis concentrating on PTA.

Endovaskuläre Behandlung der Unterschenkel-PAVK bei kritischer Ischämie und diabetischem Fußsyndrom

Die kritische Ischämie der unteren Extremität aufgrund einer PAVK, bei der häufig eine Mitbeteiligung der Unterschenkelarterien besteht, ist ohne Revaskularisation mit einer schlechten Prognose vergesellschaftet. Für Patienten mit diabetischem Fußsyndrom trifft dies in besonderem Maße zu. Auch finden sich bei diesen Patienten nicht selten PAVK-Läsionen ausschließlich infrapopliteal. Die endovaskuläre Rekanalisation wird in diesem Bereich zunehmend als Therapie der ersten Wahl betrachtet. Der retrograde Zugang, spezielle Ballontechniken sowie Atherektomiesysteme haben die technischen Erfolgsraten verbessern können. Drug-eluting Stents und neue Drug-coated Ballons führen zu einer Verbesserung der Offenheitsrate. Bei schwerer distaler PAVK ist allerdings eine Revaskularisation häufig nicht möglich. Bei diesen sogenannten „no-option“-Patienten könnte eventuell die Arterialisierung des tiefen Venensystems in der Zukunft eine Rolle spielen.

Treatment of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal artery disease with Supera interwoven nitinol stent: a real-world study in China

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the outcomes of Supera stent deployment in Chinese patients with atherosclerotic femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study collected and analyzed the medical records of 246 consecutive patients who received Supera stents for FPA disease at the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital between February 2017 and December 2019. All study patients underwent balloon angioplasty and were treated with Supera stents (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The primary outcome was the rate of primary patency 12 months after discharge.

RESULTS

The analyses included 246 consecutive patients and 260 lesions. The mean ± SD age was 73.2±9.9 years and most patients (60.2%) were male. Of the 260 treated lesions, Supera stents were deployed in eight (3.1%) cases after previous stent fracture. Critical limb ischemia was diagnosed in 87.3% of the limbs, and 84 (32.3%) and 83 (31.5%) cases were classified as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D, respectively. The majority of the lesions was in situ (80.8%) and located in the superficial femoral artery (45.0%) or the femoropopliteal artery (45.8%). The mean lesion length was 147.7 mm. Nominal deployment (-10% to 10% compression) was the most common deployment scenario (84.1%). The 1-year primary patency rate was 80.6%. Lesions that occurred as restenosis (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 1.03-10.85, P = 0.045) or in-stent restenosis (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.03-8.07, P = 0.045) were independently associated with occlusion or stenosis after stent deployment. No stent fracture was observed in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that the use of Supera stents is feasible for treatment of Chinese patients with FPA disease. The long-term results reveal high primary patency.

Cost-Effectiveness of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Treating Below-the-Knee Arteries in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: The SINGA-PACLI Trial

PURPOSE

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) has been studied as a potentially superior option compared to conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in treating below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The aim of this study is to examine the cost-effectiveness of DCBA versus PTA in BTK arteries based on a randomized controlled trial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective economic study was embedded in a randomized controlled trial of 138 patients with CLTI. Resource use and health outcomes were assessed at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-intervention. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective and health outcomes measured using quality-adjusted life years with probabilistic sensitivity analysis performed to account for subject heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Compared with participants randomized to receive PTA, participants randomized to DCBA gained an average baseline-adjusted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of .012 while average total costs were USD$1854 higher; this translates to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$154,500 additional cost per QALY gained. However, the estimate of ICER had substantial variance with only 48% of bootstrap ICERs meeting a benchmark threshold of US$57,705 (the average gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of Singapore).

CONCLUSION

The use of DCBA in BTK arteries in CLTI patients was not cost-effective compared with PTA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2, Randomized trial.

Editor's Choice - Risk of Major Amputation Following Application of Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in the Lower Limb Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

There have been concerns about the long term safety of paclitaxel coated devices in the lower limbs. A formal systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to examine the long term risk of major amputation using paclitaxel coated balloons in peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHOD

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (ID 227761). A broad bibliographic search was performed for RCTs investigating paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries (femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal) for treatment of intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The literature search was last updated on 20 February 2021 without any restrictions on publication language, date, or status. Major amputations were analysed with time to event methods employing one and two stage models. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, combinatorial meta-analysis, and a multivariable dose response meta-analysis to examine presence of a biological gradient were also performed.

RESULTS

In all, 21 RCTs with 3 760 lower limbs were analysed (52% intermittent claudication and 48% CLI; median follow up two years). There were 87 major amputations of 2 216 limbs in the paclitaxel arms (4.0% crude risk) compared with 41 major amputations in 1 544 limbs in the control arms (2.7% crude risk). The risk of major amputation was significantly higher for paclitaxel coated balloons with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.66 (95% CI 1.14 - 2.42; p = .008, one stage stratified Cox model). The prediction interval was 95% CI 1.10 - 2.46 (two stage model). The observed amputation risk was consistent for both femoropopliteal (p = .055) and infrapopliteal (p = .055) vessels. Number needed to harm was 35 for CLI. There was good evidence of a significant non-linear dose response relationship with accelerated risk per cumulative paclitaxel dose (chi square model p = .007). There was no evidence of publication bias (p = .80) and no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%, p = .77). Results were stable across sensitivity analyses (different models and subgroups based on anatomy and clinical indication and excluding unpublished trials). There were no influential single trials. Level of certainty in evidence was downrated from high to moderate because of sparse events in some studies.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be heightened risk of major amputation after use of paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries. Further investigations are warranted urgently.

MagicTouch PTA Sirolimus Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal and Below the Knee Disease: Results From XTOSI Pilot Study Up To 12 Months

INTRODUCTION

Sirolimus coated balloon (SCB) is a promising treatment option to prevent restenosis for peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). This is a pilot first-in-human study of MagicTouch percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) SCB for treatment of PAOD for both femoropopliteal and below the knee arteries (BTK).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Xtreme Touch-Neo [MagicTouch PTA] Sirolimus Coated Balloon (XTOSI) pilot study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, single-center trial evaluating MagicTouch PTA SCB for symptomatic PAOD. Primary endpoint was defined as primary patency at 6 months (duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.4). Secondary endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), amputation free survival (AFS), all-cause mortality, and limb salvage success.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were recruited. The mean age was 67 (n=31 [62%] males). SCB was applied to femoropopliteal in 20 patients (40%) and BTK in 30 patients (60%). Majority of treatments (94%) were performed for limb salvage indications (Rutherford scores 5 or 6). This was a high risk cohort, in which 90% had diabetes, 36% had coronary artery disease, 20% had end stage renal failure, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3 or more in 80%. Mean lesion length treated was 227±81 mm, of which 36% were total occlusions. Technical and device success were both 100%. At 30 days, mortality was 2% and major limb amputation was also 2%. Six-month primary patency was 80% (88.2% for femoropopliteal; 74% for BTK). At 12 months, freedom from CD-TLR was 89.7% (94.1% for femoropopliteal; 86.3% for BTK), AFS was 81.6% (90.0% for femoropopliteal; 75.9% for BTK), all-cause mortality was 14.3% (10.0% for femoropopliteal; 17.2% for BTK), and limb salvage success was 92.9% (94.4% for femoropopliteal; 91.7% for BTK). There was a statistically significant increase between baseline and 6-month toe pressures for both femoropopliteal (57.3±23.3 mm Hg vs 82.5±37.8 mm Hg; p<.001) and BTK lesions (52.8±19.2 mm Hg vs 70.7±37 mm Hg; p<.037). At 12 months, wound healing rate was 33/39 (84.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

MagicTouch PTA SCB in the XTOSI study showed promising 6-month primary patency and encouraging 12-month freedom from CD-TLR, AFS, and limb salvage rates. No early safety concerns were raised. Randomized trials are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of SCB for treatment of PAOD.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Below-the-Knee Revascularisation

The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group that was tasked with producing up-to-date recommendations for performing below-the-knee revascularisation, taking into account data on novel techniques, devices, and long-term outcomes that have emerged over the last decade. CIRSE Standards of Practice documents are not clinical practice guidelines or systematic reviews of the literature. This document is not intended to impose a standard of clinical patient care but recommends a reasonable approach to and best practices for performing below-the-knee revascularisation.

An Update on Drug-eluting Technology in Peripheral Arteries to Treat Peripheral Arterial Disease

Collapse