Impact of recipient age on mortality among Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative lung transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with seropositive donors (CMV D+/R-) have the highest mortality of all CMV serostatuses. Due to immunosenescence and other factors, we hypothesized CMV D+/R- status might disproportionately impact older LTRs. Thus, we investigated whether recipient age modified the relationship between donor CMV status and mortality among CMV-seronegative LTRs.

METHODS

Adult, CMV-seronegative first-time lung-only recipients were identified through the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between May 2005 and December 2019. We used adjusted multivariable Cox regression to assess the relationship of donor CMV status and death. Interaction between recipient age and donor CMV was assessed via likelihood ratio testing of nested Cox models and by the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP) of joint effects.

RESULTS

We identified 11,136 CMV-seronegative LTRs. The median age was 59 years; 65.2% were male, with leading transplant indication of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (35.6%); and 60.8% were CMV D+/R-. In multivariable modeling, CMV D+/R- status was associated with 27% increased hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.34) compared to CMV D-/R-. Recipient age ≥60 years significantly modified the relationship between donor CMV-seropositive status and mortality on the additive scale, including RERI 0.24 and AP 11.4% (p = 0.001), that is, the interaction increased hazard of death by 0.24 and explained 11.4% of mortality in older CMV D+ recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Among CMV-seronegative LTRs, donor CMV-seropositive status confers higher risk of posttransplant mortality, which is amplified in older recipients. Future studies should define optimal strategies for CMV prevention and management in older D+/R- LTRs.

Burden of neutropenia and leukopenia among adult kidney transplant recipients: A systematic literature review of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Leukopenia and neutropenia (L/N) may affect treatment decisions, potentially resulting in poor clinical and economic outcomes among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The burden of L/N is poorly quantified systematically. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize the incidence of, risk factors for, and clinical and economic outcomes associated with L/N post-KT.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from database inception-June 14, 2021) and conferences (past 3 years) to identify observational studies examining epidemiology, risk factors, or outcomes associated with L/N among adult KTRs.

RESULTS

Of 2081 records, 82 studies met inclusion criteria. Seventy-three studies reported the epidemiology of L/N post-KT. Pooled incidence of neutropenia, defined as absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) <1000/μl, ranged from 13% to 48% within 1-year post-transplant; ANC <500/μl ranged from 15% to 20%. Leukopenia, defined as white blood cell counts <3500/μl, was 19% to 83%. Eleven studies reported independent risk factors associated with L/N post-KT. D+/R- cytomegalovirus status, mycophenolic acid (MPA), and tacrolimus use were the most consistent risk factors across studies. Fourteen studies reported L/N-associated clinical outcomes. We noted a trend toward a positive association between neutropenia and acute rejection/opportunistic infections. Mixed findings were noted on the association between L/N and graft failure or mortality. Dosage modifications of valganciclovir, MPA, cotrimoxazole, and anti-thymoglobulin and the need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use were common with L/N.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest post-transplant L/N were common and associated with frequent modifications of immunosuppressive agents, requiring G-CSF use, and rejection or opportunistic infections. Findings highlight the need for interventions to reduce risk of L/N post-KT.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without immunosuppression reduction in neutropenic kidney transplant recipients

Neutropenia post-kidney transplantation is associated with adverse graft and patient outcomes. We aimed to analyze the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use with and without immunosuppression reduction on graft outcomes in neutropenic recipients. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 120 recipients with neutropenia, within the first-year post-transplant. Of these, 45.0% underwent no intervention, 17.5% had immunosuppression reduced, 18.3% were only given G-CSF, and 19.2% had both interventions. Overall, 61 patients experienced the composite outcome of de-novo DSA, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and all-cause graft failure and the cumulative incidence of this outcome did not vary by any of the four interventions (p = 0.93). When stratifying the cohort by G-CSF use alone, those who received G-CSF were more likely to have had severe neutropenia (<500/mm³ :51.1%vs.12.0%, p<0.001), and immunosuppression reduction (51.1%vs.28.0%, p = 0.003). However, the composite outcome was not different in the G-CSF and no G-CSF cohort (53.3%vs.49.3%, p = 0.67), and in a multivariate model, G-CSF use was not associated with this outcome (aHR = 1.18, 95%CI:0.61-2.30). However, a trend towards higher DSA production was noted in the G-CSF cohort (87.5%vs.62.2%) and this observation warrants prospective evaluation. Overall, we conclude that G-CSF use with or without immunosuppression reduction was not associated with graft outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Predictors and Complications of Post Kidney Transplant Leukopenia

BACKGROUND

Leukopenia occurs frequently following kidney transplantation and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased infectious risk. In this study we sought to characterize the causes and complications of leukopenia following kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In a cohort of adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent kidney transplant from Jan 2006-Dec 2017, we used univariable Cox proportional Hazards models to identify predictors of post-transplant leukopenia (WBC < 3500 mm³). Factors associated with post-transplant leukopenia were then included in a multivariable backwards stepwise selection process to create a prediction model for the outcome of interest. Cox regression analyses were subsequently used to determine if post-transplant leukopenia was associated with complications.

RESULTS

Of 388 recipients, 152 (39%) developed posttransplant leukopenia. Factors associated with leukopenia included antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy (HR 3.32, 95% CI 2.25-4.91), valganciclovir (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.25-2.70), tacrolimus (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.08-8.55), prior blood transfusion (HR 1.17 per unit, 95% CI 1.09- 1.25), and donor age (HR 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.00-1.03). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 26 patients with leukopenia (17.1%). Other than cytomegalovirus, leukopenia was not associated with posttransplant complications.

CONCLUSION

Leukopenia commonly occurred posttransplant and was associated with modifiable and non-modifiable pretransplant factors.

Age matters: older age as a risk factor for CMV reactivation in the CMV serostatus-positive kidney transplant recipient

Evaluate risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation during the first year after kidney transplantation in the CMV-seropositive older recipient. Retrospective single-center study. Between 2011 and 2015, 91 patients ≥ 65 years received a kidney transplant; these were matched with 91 controls, aged 40-60. Risk of CMV reactivation in the CMV-seropositive recipients was analyzed. Sixty-three older and 54 younger recipients were included; 50% had received CMV-directed prophylaxis. CMV reactivation was significantly more frequent in the older group (71.4% vs 44.4%, p = 0.003) and occurred earlier (p = 0.003). A multivariate model showed that only age was associated with CMV reactivation (OR 2.48, p = 0.03). After excluding patients that received thymoglobulin, older age group remained the only risk factor of CMV reactivation (OR 3.81, p = 0.014). Recurrent event analysis showed that the older cohort had an HR of 1.94 (p = 0.01) of CMV viremia; there was significant episode-cohort interaction (p < 0.01). While the older group had a higher risk of infection (HR = 2.43), after the initial episode the relative hazards were approximately equal (HR = 1.08, at period 2). This suggests that it is key to specifically avoid the first episode of reactivation. Universal prophylaxis or a hybrid prophylaxis model should be considered in the CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipient aged ≥ 65 years.