Curriculum Innovation: Teaching Neuroethics Through a Case-Based Undergraduate Medical Education Workshop: Implementation and Evaluation

Background and Problem Statement

Medical students on their clinical neurology clerkship often encounter ethically challenging situations, yet formal neuroethics training is limited. This study sought to evaluate a case-based small-group workshop that was implemented to introduce students to important neuroethics concepts and resources.

Objectives

(1) To define decision-making capacity and describe how it is assessed in neurologic illness; (2) to define the legal category of brain death and its evolution over time; (3) to describe the legal process for surrogate decision making in the state of Maryland; (4) to identify barriers to goals-of-care conversations; and (5) to reflect on how personal beliefs of patients and physicians influence delivery of care and medical decision making.

Methods and Curriculum Description

A 1.5-hour interactive curriculum for medical students on the neurology clerkship covering ethical considerations in brain death, surrogate decision making, and navigating conversations surrounding these topics (with reference to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, and others' health and health disparities) was designed and implemented over 2 years. Curriculum outcomes were measured by preworkshop and postworkshop self-assessment surveys. Learner reactions were measured by self-reported interest in ethics and perceived utility of the curriculum. Content knowledge was measured through multiple-choice questions on brain death and capacity assessment, which were scored for correctness by the study team, and self-reported confidence in ethical reasoning. Changes in these metrics were analyzed for paired precourse and postcourse responses to determine the effectiveness of the session.

Results and Assessment

The study recruited 234 of 356 rotating students (65.7% response rate). Presurvey data revealed that 36% had encountered a challenging clinical scenario before the intervention. Preintervention and postintervention paired data were available for 184 (79%) respondents. Of these, 66% reported increased confidence in their knowledge of ethics, and 42% reported increased interest in ethics. Presession performance on content questions did not differ significantly based on prior clinical ethics experience. Performance on neuroethics content questions improved significantly after the session as demonstrated by the increase in the percentage of students providing correct answers to content questions between the presurvey and postsurvey (17% increase for capacity assessment, 19% increase for brain death, and 22% increase for surrogate decision making, p < 0.0001).

Discussion and Lessons Learned

An interactive neuroethics workshop using a case-based discussion format integrates ethics and health disparity education into the clinical neurology curriculum and enhanced knowledge and confidence in medical ethics. This curriculum increases student interest in ethics, confidence in their ability to perform ethical reasoning tasks, and content knowledge of brain death and surrogate decision making.

Evaluation of Physician's Attitudes and Knowledge Regarding the Diagnosis of Brain Death in Deceased Organ Transplantation in Northern Cyprus

Introduction Increasing deceased organ transplantation rates is an important strategy to overcome the organ shortage. Prior to the pandemic in Northern Cyprus, there were more transplants from deceased donors than from living donors. However, after the pandemic, living donor organ transplants were almost equal to cadaveric organ transplants. The purpose of this study was to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of hospital-based clinicians involved in the diagnosis of brain death and donor care in order to raise the deceased organ transplantation rate. Methods The study population consisted of three departments: physicians' anesthesiology, neurology, and neurosurgeons, who signed off on the brain death report. The demographic information of the participants was recorded. A total of 31 questions in the questionnaire were about personal experiences, attitudes toward brain death, organ donation, and donor care, and the level of knowledge and expertise required for the identification and care of potential organ donors. The answers are "agree," "indecisive," and "disagree." Results A total of 29 physicians, seven (24.1%) neurologists, six (20.7%) neurosurgeons, and 16 (55.2%) anesthesiologists answered the questionnaire. Although all of the participants stated that brain death is a definite death, it was determined that they did not agree on how the process should proceed for non-donors after the diagnosis of brain death. Conclusion Physicians' attitudes towards deceased organ transplantation are positive. It is pointed out that society's insensitivity and indifference to the decrease in organ donation rates. Multidisciplinary work motivation may increase deceased organ transplant rates.

A Taxonomy of Objections to Brain Death Determination

Family objections to evaluating a patient for death by neurologic criteria, or "brain death," are challenging for the family and the medical team. In this article, we categorize brain death evaluation refusals into a taxonomy: informational objections, emotional objections, and principled objections. We offer suggested approaches for clinicians to respond to refusals on the basis of the category. The category of objection may also be important in considering when accommodation of refusals should be considered. The goal in all such situations is to promote compassionate, ethical, and equitable care for the patient and family.

Attitudes Toward and Knowledge of Brain Death and Deceased Organ Donation Among Anesthesiologists in the Northeastern Region of Poland

BACKGROUND

Because in Poland transplant of organs from deceased donors is the predominant form of transplant, anesthesiology and intensive care specialists play a key role in the process. Insight into the work organization in intensive care units, anesthesiologists' and intensivists' level of knowledge and expertise, as well as personal opinions regarding declaring brain death and critical care of potential donors may be helpful in increasing transplant rates.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The objective of this survey was to identify factors and challenges influencing donation rates in intensive care units of hospitals of various reference levels in region.

METHODS

An anonymous, 31-question survey was sent to anesthesiology and intensive care specialists working in hospitals in one of the regions of eastern Poland. The survey was completed by 133 physicians, and a quantitative analysis was conducted on the data collected from submitted answers.

RESULTS

The average age of responders was 46 years (±10.24 years). Anesthesiology and intensive care specialists made up 80.45% of respondents. A vast majority of respondents (97%) expressed positive attitude toward transplant and are willing to donate their organs after death (92.19%). Meanwhile, more than 50% of them admit their lack of sufficient knowledge when it comes to declaring brain death. More than 53% of surveyed physicians have never had the opportunity to participate in training in methodology in performing brain death provided by their hospital or know about such training taking place. A vast majority of respondents (94.76%) see the need for workshops in potential organ donor care and brain death determination and would like to attend them.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a positive outlook toward organ donation and transplant but at the same time reveals a lack of knowledge and expertise among doctors working in intensive care units. That is why implementing education tools for identification, declaration, and maintenance of brain-dead donors could be one of the keys to enhancing donation.

Healthcare Professionals' Understandings of the Definition and Determination of Death: A Scoping Review

Background

During the 1950s, advances in critical care, and organ transplantation altered the relationship between organ failure and death. There has since been a shift away from traditional cardiocirculatory based to brain-based criteria of death, with resulting academic controversy, despite the practice being largely accepted worldwide. Our objective is to develop a comprehensive description of the current understandings of healthcare professionals regarding the meaning, definition, and determination of death.

Methods

Online databases were used to identify papers published from 2003 to 2020. Additional sources were searched for conference proceedings and theses. Two reviewers screened papers using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Complementary searches and review of reference lists complemented the final study selection. A data extraction instrument was developed to iteratively chart the results of the review. A qualitative approach was conducted to thematically analyze the data.

Results

Seven thousand four hundred twenty-eight references were identified. In total, 75 papers met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen additional papers were added from complementary searches. Most were narratives (35%), quantitative investigations (21%), and reviews (18%). Identified themes included: (1) the historical evolution of brain death (BD), (2) persistent controversies about BD and death determination, (3) wide variability in healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes, (4) critical need for BD determination revision.

Conclusions

We concluded that although BD is widely accepted, there exists variation in healthcare providers' understanding of its conceptual basis. Death determination remains a divisive issue among scholars. This review identified a need for increased opportunities for formal training on BD among healthcare providers.

Formal Training Improves Resident Understanding and Communication Regarding Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria

OBJECTIVE

Residents often are involved in discussions with families regarding brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC); however, they receive no standardized training on this topic. We hypothesized that residents are uncomfortable with explaining BD/DNC and that formal didactic and simulated training will improve residents' comfort and skill in discussions surrounding BD/DNC.

DESIGN

We partnered with our organ procurement organization (OPO) to create an educational program regarding BD/DNC consisting of a didactic component, and role-play scenarios with immediate individualized feedback. Residents completed pre- and post-training surveys.

SETTING

This study included participants from 16 academic and community institutions across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware that are within our OPO's region.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects were recruited using convenience sampling based on the institution and training programs' willingness to participate. A total of 1422 residents at participated in the training from 2009 to 2020.  1389 (97.7%) participants competed the pre-intervention survey, while 1361 (95.7%) completed the post-intervention survey.

RESULTS

Prior to the training, only 56% of residents correctly identified BD/DNC as synonymous with death. Additionally, 40% of residents had explained BD/DNC to families at least once, but 41% of residents reported never having been taught how to do so. The biggest fear reported in discussing BD/DNC with families was being uncomfortable in explaining BD/DNC (48%). After participating in the training, 99% of residents understood the definition of BD/DNC and 92% of residents felt comfortable discussing BD/DNC with families.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in a standardized curriculum improves residents' understanding of BD/DNC and their comfort in discussing BD/DNC with families.

MORTE ENCEFÁLICA: VIVÊNCIA DA EQUIPE DE SAÚDE JUNTO AOS PAIS DE CRIANÇAS E ADOLESCENTES

RESUMO Objetivo: compreender a vivência da equipe de saúde junto aos pais de crianças e adolescentes durante as etapas do protocolo de morte encefálica. Método: pesquisa exploratória de abordagem qualitativa desenvolvida em duas instituições de saúde de alta complexidade e referência no atendimento a crianças e adolescentes com politrauma. Os participantes foram profissionais de saúde das unidades de pacientes críticos. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre os meses de outubro e dezembro de 2019 por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas. Para análise de conteúdo, utilizou-se como apoio o software Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires. Resultados: participaram do estudo 21 profissionais (médicos, enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem). O corpus geral foi constituído por 21 textos, separados em 123 segmentos, emergindo quatro classes. O estudo mostra sentimentos de apoio e compaixão em todas as etapas do protocolo de morte encefálica. Na etapa da abertura do protocolo, as emoções da equipe estão voltadas às ações de clarificar e transparecer informações deste processo. Além de apontar a necessidade de a equipe detalhar o passo a passo dos exames a serem realizados. Na etapa da comunicação da morte, a sensação de estar, cuidar e acolher a família se conecta com outros sentimentos experimentados por eles. Conclusão: o estudo revela que a equipe de saúde vivencia sentimentos únicos durante o protocolo de morte encefálica na realidade de crianças e adolescentes. Revela também a preocupação de a equipe em estar com a família, atentar e cuidar ante a dor da perda.

BRAIN DEATH: HEALTH TEAM’S EXPERIENCE WITH PARENTS OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

ABSTRACT Objective to understand the health team’s experience with parents of children and adolescents during the brain death protocol stages. Method a qualitative and exploratory research developed in two health institutions of high complexity and reference in the care of children and adolescents with polytrauma. Participants were health professionals from critical patient units. Data collection took place between October and December 2019 through semi-structured interviews. For content analysis, we used the software Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires as support. Results twenty-one professionals (physicians, nurses and nursing technicians) participated in the study. The general corpus consisted of 21 texts, separated into 123 segments, with the emergence of four classes. The study shows feelings of support and compassion at all brain death protocol stages. In the protocol opening stage, the team’s emotions are focused on the actions of clarifying and revealing information in this process, in addition to pointing out the need for the team to detail the step by step of the exams to be performed. In the communication of death stage, the feeling of being, caring for and welcoming the family relates to other feelings experienced by them. Conclusion the study reveals that the health team experiences unique feelings during the brain death protocol in the reality of children and adolescents, revealing the team’s concern with being with the family, paying attention and caring for the pain of loss.