Characterizing proximity and transfers of deceased organ donors to donor care units in the United States

Some United States organ procurement organizations transfer deceased organ donors to donor care units (DCUs) for recovery procedures. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, from April 2017 to June 2021, to describe the proximity of adult deceased donors after brain death to DCUs and understand the impact of donor service area (DSA) boundaries on transfer efficiency. Among 19 109 donors (56.1% of the cohort) in 25 DSAs with DCUs, a majority (14 593 [76.4%]) were in hospitals within a 2-hour drive. In areas with DCUs detectable in the study data set, a minority of donors (3582 of 11 532 [31.1%]) were transferred to a DCU; transfer rates varied between DSAs (median, 27.7%, range, 4.0%-96.5%). Median hospital-to-DCU driving times were not meaningfully shorter among transferred donors (50 vs 51 minutes for not transferred, P < .001). When DSA boundaries were ignored, 3241 cohort donors (9.5%) without current DCU access were managed in hospitals within 2 hours of a DCU and thus potentially eligible for transfer. In summary, approximately half of United States deceased donors after brain death are managed in hospitals in DSAs with a DCU. Transfer of donors between DSAs may increase DCU utilization and improve system efficiency.

Developing online communication training to request donation for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA): improving performance to match new US organ donation targets

BACKGROUND

Approaching families of dying or newly deceased patients to donate organs requires specialized knowledge and a mastery of relational communication. As the transplantation field has progressed, Donation Professionals (DPs) are also leading conversations with family decision makers (FDMs) about the donation of uncommon anatomical gifts, such as face, hands, genitalia, referred to as Vascularized Composite Allotransplants (VCA) without much training or experience. To address the need for training, we adapted and beta tested an evidenced-based communication training program for donation discussions to VCA requests. The overarching goal of Communicating Effectively about Donation for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (CEaD-VCA) is to increase the number of VCA authorizations and to improve the socioemotional outcomes of FDMs.

METHODS

We developed CEaD-VCA, an online, on-demand training program based on the previously tested, evidenced-based communication skills training program designed to train DPs to have conversations about solid organ donation. The training was modified utilizing data from a national telephone survey with DPs and results of 6 focus groups conducted with members of the general public. The survey and focus groups assessed knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to VCA donation. The training was shaped by a partnership with a leading industry partner, the Gift of Life Institute.™ RESULTS: Using the results as a guide, the existing CEaD training program, consisting of interactive eLearning modules, was adapted to include technical information about VCA, foundational communication skills, and two interactive example VCA donation request scenarios to facilitate active learning. Forty-two DPs from two partner Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) participated in the beta test of CEaD-VCA. Pre- and post-test surveys assessed the impact of the training.

CONCLUSIONS

The training was scored highly by DPs in effectiveness and ease of use. This project created a standardized, accessible, and comprehensive training for DPs to communicate about VCA donation. CEaD-VCA is an example of how to develop a communication skills training for difficult conversations utilizing input from stakeholders, guided by communication theory. It also demonstrates how gaps in communication skills during medical education can be filled utilizing advanced online Learning Management Systems. The training specifically addresses new CMS rules concerning OPO performance metrics.

Messaging White and Black Next of Kin in Advance to Promote Authorization for Tissue Donation

Introduction: Organ Procurement Organizations seek authorization for tissue donation from next-of-kin of deceased patients. Best practices for achieving contact and authorization are unknown, notably, authorization rates are lower for Black compared to White patients. Research Questions: Can next-of-kin (NOK) contact and authorization rates be improved if they are texted prior to telephone contact? Is a text message containing an infographic more effective, and does an infographic culturally tailored to Black families improve contact and authorization rates in the Black population? Design: This three-armed randomized trial compared (1) telephonic contact initiation (control condition); (2) generic text messaging prior to telephonic contact; and (3) text messaging one of two versions of an infographic prior to telephonic contact: (a) a generic infographic or (b) a culturally tailored infographic (sent to Black NOK only) at one Northeastern Organ Procurement Organization. Results: Tissue Donation Professionals (N = 47) and 2399 White and 745 Black NOK were included, of which 35.6% were registered donors. Authorization rates were much higher for White than Black (40.1% v 16.3%, P < 0.0001). The generic infographic resulted in significantly lower rates of contact for White NOK compared to the control condition 83.5% v 89.5%, P = 0.002), but study arm assignments were not otherwise associated with differences in contact or authorization rates. Conclusion: Although the analysis did not find a benefit for text messaging, it is possible that training for staff making requests and refining the content of the messaging could be more effective.

Evaluation of an eLearning System to Train Health Professionals to Communicate about Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation with Donor Families

INTRODUCTION

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) donation relies on obtaining surrogate authorization. Yet, many donor professionals have limited experience discussing composite allograft donation. Using virtual and interactive elements, the eLearning program, Communicating Effectively about Donation for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (CEaD-VCA), was developed to enhance the quality of donor professionals' communication approach.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

We tested the effectiveness of the eLearning program in improving donor professionals' knowledge, preparedness, and confidence leading discussions with families.

DESIGN

Donor professionals who primarily obtain family authorization for solid organ and tissue donation were recruited from 2 regional Organ Procurement Organizations. The training was evaluated using a nonrandomized pre-post design. Participants completed an online survey with items assessing their knowledge, preparedness, and confidence for donation discussions. Pre- and post-training responses were compared using paired sample t-tests.

RESULTS

The sample included 42 donor professionals. The majority (71.4%) had at least 3 years of work experience, and over half (52.4%) had no experience discussing VCA donation with families. Post-training, significant increases in mean knowledge scores (6.4 pre to 7.0 post, P < 0.01) and mean self-reported preparation (6.6 pre to 7.9 post, P < 0.0001) were observed. There were significant increases in mean confidence scores for discussing face (6.2 pre to 7.9 post, P < 0.0001) and hand (6.2 pre to 8.0 post, P < 0.0001) transplants.

CONCLUSION

The CEaD-VCA program was effective in increasing donor professionals' knowledge, preparation, and confidence when discussing donation, and holds potential for improving donor professional communication during donation discussions.

Formal Training Improves Resident Understanding and Communication Regarding Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria

OBJECTIVE

Residents often are involved in discussions with families regarding brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC); however, they receive no standardized training on this topic. We hypothesized that residents are uncomfortable with explaining BD/DNC and that formal didactic and simulated training will improve residents' comfort and skill in discussions surrounding BD/DNC.

DESIGN

We partnered with our organ procurement organization (OPO) to create an educational program regarding BD/DNC consisting of a didactic component, and role-play scenarios with immediate individualized feedback. Residents completed pre- and post-training surveys.

SETTING

This study included participants from 16 academic and community institutions across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware that are within our OPO's region.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects were recruited using convenience sampling based on the institution and training programs' willingness to participate. A total of 1422 residents at participated in the training from 2009 to 2020.  1389 (97.7%) participants competed the pre-intervention survey, while 1361 (95.7%) completed the post-intervention survey.

RESULTS

Prior to the training, only 56% of residents correctly identified BD/DNC as synonymous with death. Additionally, 40% of residents had explained BD/DNC to families at least once, but 41% of residents reported never having been taught how to do so. The biggest fear reported in discussing BD/DNC with families was being uncomfortable in explaining BD/DNC (48%). After participating in the training, 99% of residents understood the definition of BD/DNC and 92% of residents felt comfortable discussing BD/DNC with families.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in a standardized curriculum improves residents' understanding of BD/DNC and their comfort in discussing BD/DNC with families.

Impact of Cognitive Load on Family Decision Makers' Recall and Understanding of Donation Requests for the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project

Genomic research projects that collect tissues from deceased organ and tissue donors must obtain the authorization of family decision makers under difficult circumstances that may affect the authorization process. Using a quasi-experimental design, the Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) substudy of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project compared the recall and understanding of the donation authorization process of two groups: family members who had authorized donation of tissues to the GTEx project (the comparison group) and family members who had authorized organ and tissue donations in years previous, who subsequently participated in two different mock-authorization processes that mimicked the GTEx authorization process (the intervention groups). Participants in the comparison and intervention groups were matched on key demographic characteristics. We found that participants in the intervention groups who experienced a mock-authorization process demonstrated better recall of the tissue donation request than members of the comparison group. Our data indicate that the stress associated with the loss of a loved one limited the ability of family members to recall details about the GTEx project. However, we found a similar lack of knowledge in both the comparison and the intervention group participants, suggesting lack of knowledge may be due to the complexity and unfamiliarity of the information presented to them during the authorization process. We discuss these findings in the context of everyday clinical decision making in cognitively challenging conditions.

Hepatitis C virus genotyping of organ donor samples to aid in transplantation of HCV-positive organs

Given the availability of new highly efficacious anti-HCV therapies, some clinicians have advocated for wider use of kidneys from hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) donors, including transplanting them into HCV-negative recipients. As treatment regimens for HCV are commonly guided by genotype, pretransplant HCV genotyping of tissue donors would be beneficial. To our knowledge, donor HCV genotyping has never been reported. We retrieved archived frozen plasma samples for 17 previous organ donors through a local organ procurement organization. We performed HCV genotyping using the eSensor HCVg Direct Test (GenMark Diagnostics) and also by Sanger sequencing, for confirmation (Retrogen). In addition, viral loads were measured using the COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan system (Roche Diagnostics). We found that most of the samples (n = 14) were HCV Genotype 1a with the remainder being Genotype 2b (n = 1) or Genotype 3 (n = 2). All genotyping results were concordant with Sanger sequencing. The average HCV viral load in the sample group was ~ 1.6 million IU/mL (range: ~16 000 IU/mL to 7 million IU/mL). We demonstrate that viral RNA from organ donor plasma can be successfully genotyped for HCV. This ability suggests that transplantation of HCV+ kidneys into HCV-negative recipients, followed by genotype-guided antiviral therapy, could be feasible.

An Assessment of HIV-Infected Patients Dying in Care for Deceased Organ Donation in a United States Urban Center

Organ transplantation is an acceptable option for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage kidney or liver disease. With worse outcomes on the waitlist, HIV-infected patients may actually be disproportionately affected by the organ shortage in the United States. One potential solution is the use of HIV-infected deceased donors (HIVDD), recently legalized by the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act. This is the first analysis of patient-specific data from potential HIVDD, retrospectively examining charts of HIV-infected patients dying in care at six HIV clinics in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2014. Our data suggest that there are four to five potential HIVDD dying in Philadelphia annually who might yield two to three kidneys and three to five livers for transplant. Extrapolated nationally, this would approximate 356 potential HIVDD yielding 192 kidneys and 247 livers annually. However, several donor risk indices raise concerns about the quality of kidneys that could be recovered from HIVDD as a result of older donor age and comorbidities. On the other hand, livers from these potential HIVDD are of similar quality to HIV-negative donors dying locally, although there is a high prevalence of positive hepatitis C antibody.

Potential Suitability for Transplantation of Hearts From Human Non–Heart-Beating Donors: Data Review From the Gift of Life Donor Program

BACKGROUND

Organ availability limits use of heart transplantation for treatment for end-stage heart disease. Hearts are currently obtained from donors declared brain dead (heart-beating donors [HBDs]). Although use of hearts from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) could reduce the shortage, they are considered unusable because of possible peri-mortem ischemic injury.

METHODS

To project how use of NHBD hearts could increase heart donation, we retrospectively reviewed donor databases from the Gift of Life Donor Program (GLDP), our local organ procurement organization, from 2001 through 2003. We screened the NHBD population using conservative donor criteria, assuming an acceptable hypoxic/ischemic time (time from withdrawal of care to cross-clamp) of 30 minutes.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 894 HBDs, 334 heart transplants and 119 NHBDs. NHBDs were similar to HBDs with respect to gender and ethnicity, but NHBDs were proportionately younger. Of 119 NHBDs, 55 did not meet the age criteria (< or =45 years) and 20 were eliminated because of incomplete data. Eighty-two NHBDs were cross-clamped within 30 minutes of care withdrawal. Twenty NHBDs met all cardiac donor criteria, and 14 of these 20 had hypoxic/ischemic times < or =30 minutes. Pro rata estimation for the 20 NHBDs with incomplete data suggested 7 potential additional donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our assumptions, 12% to 18% of NHBDs in the study period (14 to 21 of 119 total) were potential heart donors, representing a 4% to 6% increase over of the number of heart transplants performed during the same time interval.

Expanded-criteria donor kidneys: a single-center clinical and short-term financial analysis--cause for concern in retransplantation

BACKGROUND

Expanded-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are associated with a higher risk of posttransplant failure, but they remain a favorable alternative to dialysis. Now that a uniform definition of "expanded criteria" exists, it is more appropriate than ever to evaluate their utility compared with that seen with non-ECD kidneys.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 202 cadaveric kidney-only recipients that underwent transplantation from January 1999 to September 2001, including 45 (22%) recipients whose donors met current ECD criteria.

RESULTS

ECD and non-ECD kidney recipients had similar pretransplant characteristics except for older age and increased duration of renal failure in the ECD group. Patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival in both groups were similar in primary recipients but significantly worse in retransplant recipients of ECD kidneys. The relative risk of death-censored graft loss was 1.58 in the ECD group (P = 0.45). Overall inpatient charges (minus organ acquisition charge) for 1 year posttransplant were 76,962 US dollars (ECD) versus 71,026 US dollars (non-ECD) (P = 0.53); the same charges in retransplant recipients were 136,596 US dollars (ECD) versus 91,296 US dollars (non-ECD) (P = 0.25). ECD recipients, especially retransplant recipients, had consistently higher creatinine concentrations, although the average current value of all functioning ECD grafts remains less than 2 mg/dL. ECD recipients had a higher incidence of ureteral stricture (4.4% vs. 0%), but this never resulted in graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the widening disparity between renal allograft availability and need and the fact that ECD kidneys provide superior outcomes compared with dialysis, the authors' data encourage the continued use of ECD kidneys in primary recipients but justify caution in the retransplant setting.

Controlled non-heart-beating donor liver transplantation: a successful single center experience, with topic update

BACKGROUND

The critical shortage of transplantable organs necessitates utilization of unconventional donors. We describe a successful experience of controlled non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) liver transplantation.

METHODS

Controlled NHBDs had catastrophic head injury, prognosis for no meaningful recovery, decision to withdraw life support, and subsequent consent for donation. After stopping mechanical ventilation in the operating room, death determination by a nontransplant caregiver, and rapid aortic cannulation, liver and kidneys were recovered.

RESULTS

Controlled NHBDs contributed 5% of hepatic allografts (8/164) from August 1996 through June 1999 (9% in 1998). Sixteen NHBDs afforded 8 livers and 24 kidneys. Liver donors (n=8) were 11-66 years old; half were >50 years old. Premortem alanine aminotransferase was 25-157 U/L. Arrest occurred 3-27 min after stopping ventilation. Perfusion started 3-5 min after incision, and <22 min after hypotension (mean arterial pressure: <50 mmHg). Patient and graft survivals are 100% at 18+/-12 months follow-up. There was no intraoperative complication, reperfusion syndrome, poor graft function, primary nonfunction, arterial thrombosis, biliary complication, or serious infection. Postoperative day 2 prothrombin time was 13+/-1 sec. Peak alanine aminotransferase was 980+/-601 U/L. Intensive care unit and posttransplant lengths of stay were 2+/-2 and 10+/-7 days, respectively. Soon after transplantation there was frequent temporary hyperbilirubinemia (five of eight recipients; bilirubin peak: 7-29 mg/dl, 2-3 weeks after transplantation) and rejection (4/8 recipients, <3 weeks after transplantation).

CONCLUSIONS

NHBDs significantly and safely expanded our donor pool. NHBD surgeons must be capable of rapid procurement. Cautious liberalization of criteria for accepting livers from NHBDs with confounding risk factors is justified. Refined ethics guidelines would broaden approval of NHBDs.

Non-heart-beating organ donation: process and review

To combat the national shortage of donor organs and meet the needs of more than 60,000 patients awaiting transplant, many organ procurement organizations have reevaluated non-heart-beating organ donation (NHBD) as one solution. Non-heart-beating donation is the process by which organs are recovered from patients after the pronouncement of death by cardiopulmonary criteria. Recent media reports have misled health care providers to believe that this is a new donation procedure; however, NHBD provided the foundation for modern clinical transplantation. This article describes non-heart-beating donor evaluation criteria, the donation process, associated ethical considerations and the role of the advance practice nurse in assisting families with this end-of-life decision. A case study will be presented followed by a summary of transplant recipient patient and graft survival outcomes.