The Dosimetric and Temporal Effects of Respiratory-Gated, High-Dose-Rate Radiation Therapy in Patients With Lung Cancer

Development of a prediction model for target positioning by using diaphragm waveforms extracted from CBCT projection images

PURPOSE

To develop a prediction model (PM) for target positioning using diaphragm waveforms extracted from CBCT projection images.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with lung cancer underwent orthogonal rotational kV x-ray imaging lasting 70 s. IR markers placed on their abdominal surfaces and an implanted gold marker located nearest to the tumor were considered as external surrogates and the target, respectively. Four different types of regression-based PM were trained using surrogate motions and target positions for the first 60 s, as follows: Scenario A: Based on the clinical scenario, 3D target positions extracted from projection images were used as they were (PMCL ). Scenario B: The short-arc 4D-CBCT waveform exhibiting eight target positions was obtained by averaging the target positions in Scenario A. The waveform was repeated for 60 s (W4D-CBCT ) by adapting to the respiratory phase of the external surrogate. W4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PM4D-CBCT ). Scenario C: The Amsterdam Shroud (AS) signal, which depicted the diaphragm motion in the superior-inferior direction was extracted from the orthogonal projection images. The amplitude and phase of W4D-CBCT were corrected based on the AS signal. The AS-corrected W4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PMAS-4D-CBCT ). Scenario D: The AS signal was extracted from single projection images. Other processes were the same as in Scenario C. The prediction errors were calculated for the remaining 10 s.

RESULTS

The 3D prediction error within 3 mm was 77.3% for PM4D-CBCT , which was 12.8% lower than that for PMCL . Using the diaphragm waveforms, the percentage of errors within 3 mm improved by approximately 7% to 84.0%-85.3% for PMAS-4D-CBCT in Scenarios C and D, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the prediction errors of PM4D-CBCT and PMAS-4D-CBCT .

CONCLUSION

PMAS-4D-CBCT outperformed PM4D-CBCT , proving the efficacy of the AS signal-based correction. PMAS-4D-CBCT would make it possible to predict target positions from 4D-CBCT images without gold markers.

Efficacy and Optimal Pressure of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

We aimed to determine the optimal pressure of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for radiotherapy (RT) through changes in the dosimetric parameters and lung volume according to pressure. Patients with locally advanced lung cancer, who underwent CPAP during computed tomography (CT) simulation, were included. The air pressure was raised in five steps of 4, 7, 10, 14, and 17 cmH2O and a CT scan was performed at the baseline and at each pressure step, accompanied by contouring and RT planning. Paired t- and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the volumetric and dosimetric parameters according to pressure and interpressure. A total of 29 patients were selected, and 158 CT datasets were obtained. The lung volume increased significantly at all pressures (p < 0.01). The Dmean of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O (p < 0.01), the V5, V10, V15, and V20 of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O with increasing pressure, and the Dmean and V5 of the heart decreased significantly from 14 cmH2O with increasing pressure. The V50 showed no significant differences at any pressure. We recommend the use of at least 7 cmH2O with 14 cmH2O as the optimal pressure to achieve the effect of heart preservation.

Potential Morbidity Reduction for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Respiratory Gating

Simple Summary

Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for early-stage lung cancer and oligometastases. For SBRT, motion has to be considered to avoid misdosage. Respiratory phase gating, meaning to irradiate the target volume only in a predefined gating motion phase window, can be applied to mitigate motion-induced effects. The aim of this study was to exploit the clinical benefit of gating for lung SBRT. For the majority of 14 lung tumor patients and various gating windows, we could prove a reduced dose to normal tissue by gating simulation. A normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model analysis revealed a major reduction of normal tissue toxicity for moderate gating window sizes. The most beneficial effect of gating was found for those patients with the highest prior toxicity risk. The presented results are useful for personalized risk assessment prior to treatment and may help to select patients and optimal gating windows.

Abstract

We investigated the potential of respiratory gating to mitigate the motion-caused misdosage in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). For fourteen patients with lung tumors, we investigated treatment plans for a gating window (GW) including three breathing phases around the maximum exhalation phase, GW40–60. For a subset of six patients, we also assessed a preceding three-phase GW20–40 and six-phase GW20–70. We analyzed the target volume, lung, esophagus, and heart doses. Using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, we estimated radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis risks. Compared to plans without gating, GW40–60 significantly reduced doses to organs at risk without impairing the tumor doses. On average, the mean lung dose decreased by 0.6 Gy (p < 0.001), treated lung V20Gy by 2.4% (p = 0.003), esophageal dose to 5cc by 2.0 Gy (p = 0.003), and maximum heart dose by 3.2 Gy (p = 0.009). The model-estimated mean risks of 11% for pneumonitis and 12% for esophagitis without gating decreased upon GW40–60 to 7% and 9%, respectively. For the highest-risk patient, gating reduced the pneumonitis risk from 43% to 32%. Gating is most beneficial for patients with high-toxicity risks. Pre-treatment toxicity risk assessment may help optimize patient selection for gating, as well as GW selection for individual patients.

The first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking in an experimental quality assurance procedure on a standard linear accelerator

The ability to track tumour motion without implanted markers on a standard linear accelerator (linac) could enable wide access to real-time adaptive radiotherapy for cancer patients. We previously have retrospectively validated a method for 3D markerless target tracking using intra-fractional kilovoltage (kV) projections acquired on a standard linac. This paper presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and its quality assurance (QA) procedure. The workflow and the algorithm developed to track the 3D target position during volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment delivery were optimised. The linac was operated in clinical QA mode, while kV projections were streamed to a dedicated computer using a frame-grabber software. The markerless target tracking accuracy and precision were measured in a lung phantom experiment under the following conditions: static localisation of seven distinct positions, dynamic localisation of five patient-measured motion traces, and dynamic localisation with treatment interruption. The QA guidelines were developed following the AAPM Task Group 147 report with the requirement that the tracking margin components, the margins required to account for tracking errors, did not exceed 5 mm in any direction. The mean tracking error ranged from 0.0 to 0.9 mm (left-right), -0.6 to  -0.1 mm (superior-inferior) and  -0.7 to 0.1 mm (anterior-posterior) over the three tests. Larger errors were found in cases with large left-right or anterior-posterior and small superior-inferior motion. The tracking margin components did not exceed 5 mm in any direction and ranged from 0.4 to 3.2 mm (left-right), 0.7 to 1.6 mm (superior-inferior) and 0.8 to 1.5 mm (anterior-posterior). This study presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and provides a QA procedure for its safe clinical implementation, potentially enabling real-time adaptive radiotherapy for a large population of lung cancer patients.