1
|
Werner R, Connolly A, Bennett M, Hand CK, Burke L. Implementation of an ISO15189 accredited next-generation sequencing service with the fully automated Ion Torrent Genexus: the experience of a clinical diagnostic laboratory. J Clin Pathol 2024; 77:278-283. [PMID: 36522176 PMCID: PMC10958377 DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is integral to the delivery of personalised medicine for targeted cancer therapy. Average turnaround times (TAT) from reference laboratories with advanced expertise in sequencing are typically 2-3 weeks. Prolonged TAT for biomarker analysis can adversely affect patient outcomes. The project aim was to establish an accredited NGS service integrated within a routine clinical diagnostic laboratory, in a designated tertiary cancer centre with no previous experience in NGS or bioinformatics. METHODS Platform selected was the novel Ion Torrent Genexus Sequencer with automated onboard library preparation, templating, sequencing and data analysis, with subsequent reporting using Oncomine Reporter software.Entire workflow validation was performed with a targeted panel, the Oncomine Precision Assay, on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded clinical tumour samples. Oncomine Reporter software was used to report on variants including mutations, copy number variations and fusions across 50 key genes.Samples included surgical resections, biopsies, cytology and commercial reference material. Assessment of criteria included analytical sensitivity, specificity, limit of detection, accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility, with the establishment of performance metrics and quality parameters. RESULTS High sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility were achieved. DNA/RNA input requirements optimised to >10 ng, and sequencing performance established with a limit of detection of 5% when depth of coverage of 2500X was reached. This NGS service attained ISO15189 accreditation with no non-conformances and >56% reduction in TAT. CONCLUSION Successful implementation, clinical validation and accreditation of a novel NGS technology was achieved in this institution, with a significantly improved TAT of results to oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Réiltín Werner
- Pathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Amy Connolly
- Pathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Michael Bennett
- Pathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Collette K Hand
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Louise Burke
- Pathology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jeroch J, Riedlinger T, Schmitt C, Ebner S, Winkelmann R, Wild PJ, Demes M. A Comparison of Two Different FFPE Tissue Dissection Methods for Routine Diagnostics in Molecular Pathology: Manual Macrodissection versus Automated Microdissection Using the Roche "AVENIO Millisect" System. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3249. [PMID: 37370864 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, in routine diagnostics, most molecular testing is performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue after a histomorphological assessment. In order to find the best possible and targeted individual therapy, knowing the mutational status of the tumour is crucial. The "AVENIO Millisect" system Roche introduced an automation solution for the dissection of tissue on slides. This technology allows the precise and fully automated dissection of the tumour area without wasting limited and valuable patient material. In this study, the digitally guided microdissection was directly compared to the manual macrodissection regarding the precision and duration of the procedure, their DNA concentrations as well as DNA qualities, and the overall costs in 24 FFPE samples. In 21 of 24 cases (87.5%), the DNA yields of the manually dissected samples were higher in comparison to the automatically dissected samples. Shorter execution times and lower costs were also benefits of the manual scraping process. Nevertheless, the DNA quality achieved with both methods was comparable, which is essential for further molecular testing. Therefore, it could be used as an additional tool for precise tumour enrichment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Jeroch
- Wildlab, University Hospital Frankfurt MVZ GmbH, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Tobias Riedlinger
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christina Schmitt
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Silvana Ebner
- Wildlab, University Hospital Frankfurt MVZ GmbH, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ria Winkelmann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter J Wild
- Wildlab, University Hospital Frankfurt MVZ GmbH, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Melanie Demes
- Wildlab, University Hospital Frankfurt MVZ GmbH, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walsh EM, Halushka MK. A Comparison of Tissue Dissection Techniques for Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Theragnostic Analysis of Human Disease. Pathobiology 2022; 90:199-208. [PMID: 35952628 PMCID: PMC9918608 DOI: 10.1159/000525979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Histopathology has historically been the critical technique for the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Today, genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics from specific cells, rather than bulk tissue, have become key to understanding underlying disease mechanisms and rendering useful diagnostic information. Extraction of desired analytes, i.e., nucleic acids or proteins, from easily accessible formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues allows for clinically relevant activities, such as sequencing biomarker mutations or typing amyloidogenic proteins. Genetic profiling has become routine for cancers as varied as non-small cell lung cancer and prostatic carcinoma. The five main tissue dissection techniques that have been developed thus far include: bulk scraping, manual macrodissection, manual microdissection, laser-capture microdissection, and expression microdissection. In this review, we discuss the importance of tissue dissection in clinical practice and research, the basic methods, applications, as well as some advantages and disadvantages for each modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise M. Walsh
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marc K. Halushka
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Artificial intelligence-augmented histopathologic review using image analysis to optimize DNA yield from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1791-1803. [PMID: 36198869 PMCID: PMC9532237 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01161-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
To achieve minimum DNA input requirements for next-generation sequencing (NGS), pathologists visually estimate macrodissection and slide count decisions. Unfortunately, misestimation may cause tissue waste and increased laboratory costs. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented smart pathology review system (SmartPath) to empower pathologists with quantitative metrics for accurately determining tissue extraction parameters. SmartPath uses two deep learning architectures, a U-Net based network for cell segmentation and a multi-field-of-view convolutional network for tumor area segmentation, to extract features from digitized H&E-stained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides. From the segmented tumor area, SmartPath suggests a macrodissection area. To predict DNA yield per slide, the extracted features from within the macrodissection area are correlated with known DNA yields to fit a regularized linear model (R = 0.85). Then, a pathologist-defined target yield divided by the predicted DNA yield per slide gives the number of slides to scrape. Following model development, an internal validation trial was conducted within the Tempus Labs molecular sequencing laboratory. We evaluated our system on 501 clinical colorectal cancer slides, where half received SmartPath-augmented review and half traditional pathologist review. The SmartPath cohort had 25% more DNA yields within a desired target range of 100-2000 ng. The number of extraction attempts was statistically unchanged between cohorts. The SmartPath system recommended fewer slides to scrape for large tissue sections, saving tissue in these cases. Conversely, SmartPath recommended more slides to scrape for samples with scant tissue sections, especially those with degraded DNA, helping prevent costly re-extraction due to insufficient extraction yield. A statistical analysis was performed to measure the impact of covariates on the results, offering insights on how to improve future applications of SmartPath. With these improvements, AI-augmented histopathologic review has the potential to decrease tissue waste, sequencing time, and laboratory costs by optimizing DNA yields, especially for samples with scant tissue and/or degraded DNA.
Collapse
|
5
|
Qi P, Yang Y, Bai QM, Xue T, Ren M, Yao QL, Yang WT, Zhou XY. Concordance of the 21-gene assay between core needle biopsy and resection specimens in early breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 186:327-342. [PMID: 33439420 PMCID: PMC7804587 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06075-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy decisions may be partly based on the results of a multigene quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assay: the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) test of resection specimens. When necessary, core needle biopsy (CNB) may be considered as a surrogate. Here, we evaluated the concordance in gene expression according to results from RT-PCR-based RS testing between paired CNBs and resection specimens. METHODS CNBs and resection specimens from 50 breast cancer (BC) patients were tested to calculate RSs. First, we examined the concordance of the ER, PR and HER-2 status of tissue samples indicated by immunohistochemical (IHC) and RT-PCR analyses. Then, we compared the IHC findings of ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 staining across paired samples. Ultimately, the RS and single-gene results for ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 were explored between paired samples. RESULTS The concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 100%, 80.0% and 100% for ER, PR and HER-2, respectively, in both resection specimens and CNBs. The concordance for IHC ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 status was 100%, 94.0%, 52.0% and 82.0%, respectively, between paired samples. RS results from paired samples showed a strong correlation. The overall concordance in RS group classification between samples was 74%, 72% and 78% based on traditional cutoffs, TAILORx cutoffs and ASCO guidelines, respectively. ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 were modestly- to- strongly correlated between paired samples according to the RT-PCR results. CONCLUSION A modest- to- strong correlation of ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 gene expression and RS between CNBs and resection specimens was observed in the present study. The 21-gene RS test could be reliably performed on CNBs. ER, PR and HER-2 status showed remarkable concordance between the IHC and RT-PCR analyses. The concordance between paired samples was high for the IHC ER, PR and Ki-67 results and low for HER-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Qi
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yu Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qian-Ming Bai
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Tian Xue
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Min Ren
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qian-Lan Yao
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wen-Tao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|