The Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor DNA in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) application in investigation of cancer: bench to bedside

Now, genomics forms the core of the precision medicine concept. Comprehensive investigations of tumor genomes have made it possible to characterize tumors at the molecular level and, specifically, to identify the fundamental processes that cause the condition. A variety of kinds of tumors have seen better outcomes for patients as a result of the development of novel medicines to tackle these genetic-driving processes. Since therapy may exert selective pressure on cancers, non-invasive methods such as liquid biopsies can provide the opportunity for rich reservoirs of crucial and real-time genetic data. Liquid biopsies depend on the identification of circulating cells from tumors, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), RNA, proteins, lipids, and metabolites found in patient biofluids, as well as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which exists in those with cancer. Although it is theoretically possible to examine biological fluids other than plasma, such as pleural fluid, urine, saliva, stool, cerebrospinal fluid, and ascites, we will limit our discussion to blood and solely cfDNA here for the sake of conciseness. Yet, the pace of wider clinical acceptance has been gradual, partly due to the increased difficulty of choosing the best analysis for the given clinical issue, interpreting the findings, and delaying proof of value from clinical trials. Our goal in this review is to discuss the current clinical value of ctDNA in cancers and how clinical oncology systems might incorporate procedures for ctDNA testing.

A meta-analysis of circulating tumor DNA as a survival indicator in small cell lung cancer patients

A high level of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been linked to poor survival in patients with certain solid tumors. In spite of this, it is still unclear whether ctDNA is associated with poor survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To investigate the above association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane's Library, and Embase were searched for relevant cohort studies from the inception of the databases to November 28, 2022. Data collection, literature search, and statistical analysis were carried out independently by two authors. To account for heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model. In this meta-analysis, 391 patients with SCLC were identified, and the data were pooled from nine observational studies and followed for 11.4 to 25.0 months. A high ctDNA was associated with worse overall survival (OS, risk ratio [RR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.85 to 3.38, p < 0.001; I2 = 25%) and progression-free survival (PFS, RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.64, p < 0.001, I2 = 42%). Subgroup analyses retrieved consistent results in prospective and retrospective studies, in studies with ctDNA measured with polymerase chain reaction or next-generation sequencing, and in studies analyzed with univariate or multivariate regression models. Studies suggest that ctDNA may be an important factor in predicting poor OS and PFS in SCLC patients.

Tumor Markers and Their Diagnostic Significance in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is characterized by silent progression and late-stage diagnosis. It is critical to detect and accurately diagnose the disease early to improve survival rates. Tumor markers have emerged as valuable tools in the diagnosis and management of OC, offering non-invasive and cost-effective options for screening, monitoring, and prognosis.

PURPOSE

This paper explores the diagnostic importance of various tumor markers including CA-125, CA15-3, CA 19-9, HE4,hCG, inhibin, AFP, and LDH, and their impact on disease monitoring and treatment response assessment.

METHODS

Article searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Keywords used for the searching process were "Ovarian cancer", "Cancer biomarkers", "Early detection", "Cancer diagnosis", "CA-125","CA 15-3","CA 19-9", "HE4","hCG", "inhibin", "AFP", "LDH", and others.

RESULTS

HE4, when combined with CA-125, shows improved sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage detection. Additionally, hCG holds promise as a prognostic marker, aiding treatment response prediction and outcome assessment. Novel markers like microRNAs, DNA methylation patterns, and circulating tumor cells offer potential for enhanced diagnostic accuracy and personalized management. Integrating these markers into a comprehensive panel may improve sensitivity and specificity in ovarian cancer diagnosis. However, careful interpretation of tumor marker results is necessary, considering factors such as age, menopausal status, and comorbidities. Further research is needed to validate and refine diagnostic algorithms, optimizing the clinical significance of tumor markers in ovarian cancer management. In conclusion, tumor markers such as CA-125, CA15-3, CA 19-9, HE4, and hCG provide valuable insights into ovarian cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis, with the potential to enhance early detection.

Advances in application of circulating tumor DNA in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the third most common gynecologic cancer worldwide and has the highest mortality rate among gynecologic cancers. Identifying timely and effective biomarkers at different stages of the disease is the key to improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a fragment of free DNA produced by tumor cells in the blood. Current techniques for detecting ctDNA mainly include quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), and non-targeted NGS (such as whole exon or whole genome sequencing). As a non-invasive liquid biopsy technique, ctDNA has a good application prospect in the ovarian cancer diagnosis, monitoring of treatment response and efficacy evaluation, detection of reverse mutation and related medication guidance, and prognosis evaluation. This article reviews the advances in application of ctDNA in ovarian cancer.

Evaluation of the Potential Diagnostic Utility of the Determination of Selected Immunological and Molecular Parameters in Patients with Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is one of the most serious challenges in modern gynaecological oncology. Due to its non-specific symptoms and the lack of an effective screening procedure to detect the disease at an early stage, ovarian cancer is still marked by a high mortality rate among women. For this reason, a great deal of research is being carried out to find new markers that can be used in the detection of ovarian cancer to improve early diagnosis and survival rates of women with ovarian cancer. Our study focuses on presenting the currently used diagnostic markers and the latest selected immunological and molecular parameters being currently investigated for their potential use in the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Circulating Tumor DNA-A Novel Biomarker of Tumor Progression and Its Favorable Detection Techniques

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world and seriously affects the quality of life of patients. The diagnostic techniques for tumors mainly include tumor biomarker detection, instrumental examination, and tissue biopsy. In recent years, liquid technology represented by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gradually replaced traditional technology with its advantages of being non-invasive and accurate, its high specificity, and its high sensitivity. ctDNA may carry throughout the circulatory system through tumor cell necrosis, apoptosis, circulating exosome secretion, etc., carrying the characteristic changes in tumors, such as mutation, methylation, microsatellite instability, gene rearrangement, etc. In this paper, ctDNA mutation and methylation, as the objects to describe the preparation process before ctDNA analysis, and the detection methods of two gene-level changes, including a series of enrichment detection techniques derived from PCR, sequencing-based detection techniques, and comprehensive detection techniques, are combined with new materials. In addition, the role of ctDNA in various stages of cancer development is summarized, such as early screening, diagnosis, molecular typing, prognosis prediction, recurrence monitoring, and drug guidance. In summary, ctDNA is an ideal biomarker involved in the whole process of tumor development.

Molecular Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological cancer, leading to over 152,000 deaths each year. A late diagnosis is the primary factor causing a poor prognosis of ovarian cancer and often occurs due to a lack of specific symptoms and effective biomarkers for an early detection. Currently, cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is the most widely used biomarker for ovarian cancer detection, but this approach is limited by a low specificity. In recent years, multimarker panels have been developed by combining molecular biomarkers such as human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4), ultrasound results, or menopausal status to improve the diagnostic efficacy. The risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), the risk of malignancy index (RMI), and OVA1 assays have also been clinically used with improved sensitivity and specificity. Ongoing investigations into novel biomarkers such as autoantibodies, ctDNAs, miRNAs, and DNA methylation signatures continue to aim to provide earlier detection methods for ovarian cancer. This paper reviews recent advancements in molecular biomarkers for the early detection of ovarian cancer.

Advances on Prevention and Screening of Gynecologic Tumors: Are We Stepping Forward?

According to 2020 comprehensive global cancer statistics published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, gynecologic malignancies accounted overall for 16 [...].