Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound for Palliation of Painful Skeletal Metastases: A Pilot Study

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Bone Malignancies-20 Years of History

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is the only non-invasive method for percutaneous thermal ablation of tissue, with treatments typically performed either under magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound guidance. Since this method allows efficient heating of bony structures, it has found not only early use in treatment of bone pain, but also in local treatment of malignant bone tumors. This review of 20 years of published studies shows that HIFU is a very efficient method for rapid pain relief, can provide local tumor control and has a very patient-friendly safety profile.

Tissue specific considerations in implementing high intensity focussed ultrasound under magnetic resonance imaging guidance

High-intensity focused ultrasound can ablate a target permanently, leaving tissues through which it passes thermally unaffected. When delivered under magnetic resonance (MR) imaging guidance, the change in tissue relaxivity on heating is used to monitor the temperatures achieved. Different tissue types in the pre-focal beam path result in energy loss defined by their individual attenuation coefficients. Furthermore, at interfaces with different acoustic impedances the beam will be both reflected and refracted, changing the position of the focus. For complex interfaces this effect is exacerbated. Moreover, blood vessels proximal to the focal region can dissipate heat, altering the expected region of damage. In the target volume, the temperature distribution depends on the thermal conductivity (or diffusivity) of the tissue and its heat capacity. These are different for vascular tissues, water and fat containing tissues and bone. Therefore, documenting the characteristics of the pre-focal and target tissues is critical for effective delivery of HIFU. MR imaging provides excellent anatomic detail and characterization of soft tissue components. It is an ideal modality for real-time planning and monitoring of HIFU ablation, and provides non-invasive temperature maps. Clinical applications involve soft-tissue (abdomino-pelvic applications) or bone (brain applications) pre-focally and at the target (soft-tissue tumors and bone metastases respectively). This article addresses the technical difficulties of delivering HIFU effectively when vascular tissues, densely cellular tissues, fat or bone are traversed pre-focally, and the clinical applications that target these tissues. The strengths and limitations of MR techniques used for monitoring ablation in these tissues are also discussed.

A new versatile MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) device for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors

Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging-guided High Intensity focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU) is a non-invasive, non-ionizing thermal ablation therapy that is particularly interesting for the palliative or curative treatment of musculoskeletal tumors. We introduce a new modular MRgHIFU device that allows the ultrasound transducer to be positioned precisely and interactively over the body part to be treated. A flexible, MR-compatible supporting structure allows free positioning of the transducer under MRI/optical fusion imaging guidance. The same structure can be rigidified using pneumatic depression, holding the transducer rigidly in place. Targeting accuracy was first evaluated in vitro. The average targeting error of the complete process was found to be equal to 5.4 ± 2.2 mm in terms of focus position, and 4.7° ± 2° in terms of transducer orientation. First-in-man feasibility is demonstrated on a patient suffering from important, uncontrolled pain from a bone metastasis located in the forearm. The 81 × 47 × 34 mm³ lesion was successfully treated using five successive positions of the transducer, under real-time monitoring by MR Thermometry. Significant pain palliation was observed 3 days after the intervention. The system described and characterized in this study is a particularly interesting modular, low-cost MRgHIFU device for musculoskeletal tumor therapy.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Thermal Ablation of Bone Tumours

Background

Percutaneous thermal ablation is an effective, minimally invasive means of treating a variety of focal benign and malignant osseous lesions. To determine the role of ablation in individual cases, multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion is required to assess the suitability and feasibility of a thermal ablative approach, to select the most appropriate technique and to set the goals of treatment i.e. curative or palliative.

Purpose

This document will presume the indication for treatment is clear and approved by the MDT and will define the standards required for the performance of each modality. CIRSE Standards of Practice documents are not intended to impose a standard of clinical patient care, but recommend a reasonable approach to, and best practices for, the performance of thermal ablation of bone tumours.

Methods

The writing group was established by the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee and consisted of five clinicians with internationally recognised expertise in thermal ablation of bone tumours. The writing group reviewed the existing literature on thermal ablation of bone tumours, performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to search for publications in English and relating to human subjects from 2009 to 2019. Selected studies published in 2020 and 2021 during the course of writing these standards were subsequently included. The final recommendations were formulated through consensus.

Results

Recommendations were produced for the performance of thermal ablation of bone tumours taking into account the biologic behaviour of the tumour and the therapeutic intent of the procedure. Recommendations are provided based on lesion characteristics and thermal modality, for the use of tissue monitoring and protection, and for the appropriately timed application of adjunctive procedures such as osseus consolidation and transarterial embolisation.

Results

Percutaneous thermal ablation has an established role in the successful management of bone lesions, with both curative and palliative intent. This Standards of Practice document provides up-to-date recommendations for the safe performance of thermal ablation of bone tumours.

3-T magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (3 T-MR-HIFU) for the treatment of pain from bone metastases of solid tumors

INTRODUCTION

Bone metastases (BM) are still the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, not only because of their complications, defined as skeletal-related events (SREs), but also because of the negative impact bone pain has on quality of life (QoL) and survival, especially when opioid analgesics and locoregional treatments fail.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center prospective study was carried out on 12 patients with symptomatic BM treated with MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU). The primary endpoint was the effectiveness of MR-HIFU in reducing current and breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP) scores. The main secondary aims were the evaluation of circulating markers at different time-points and their relation to pain and procedure efficacy. Other secondary objectives included temporal evolution of pain response, evaluation of QoL, and side effects of the treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate primary and secondary endpoints. Questionnaires on pain and QoL completed at baseline and at 30 days were compared using appropriate statistical tests with exploratory intent.

RESULTS

MR-HIFU was successfully completed in all 12 patients enrolled between September 2015 and December 2018. On day 30, 6 (50.0%) patients showed a complete response of current pain and 6 a partial response, while 5 (41.7%) obtained a complete BTCP response. A partial response of BM evaluated by MD Anderson criteria was obtained in 9 (81.8%) patients. Only one patient progressed in the target lesion after MR-HIFU. No treatment-related adverse events were recorded. Bone turnover markers CTX/RANK-L (P) do not demonstrate any significant change with the pain or BM response.

CONCLUSION

In our patients, targeted therapy of painful BM with MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation was safe and showed encouraging early-onset and functional results.

Efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) in the treatment of painful bone metastases through a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain scores before and after MRgFUS treatment and post-treatment adverse events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed for studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of MRgFUS. The mean difference of pain scores (10-point visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale) between baseline and 1-month/3-month pain scores was collected and analyzed in a pooled meta-analysis. Post-treatment adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading were recorded and the pooled prevalence was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies published between 2007 and 2019 were collected, resulting in a total sample size of 1082 patients. The majority of the studies were prospective with a reported follow-up period of 3 months. The pooled proportion of patients that achieved pain relief from MRgFUS (complete response or partial response [≥ 2-point improvement of pain score]) was 79% (95% CI 73-83%). The pooled 1-month and 3-month mean difference in pain score were - 3.8 (95% CI - 4.3; - 3.3) and - 4.4 (95% CI - 5.0; - 3.7), respectively. The overall rate of high-grade (CTCAE grade 3 or higher) and low-grade (CTCAE grade 2 or lower) MRgFUS-related adverse events were 0.9% and 5.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRgFUS is an effective procedure that is able to provide significant pain palliation for patients with symptomatic bone metastases with a favorable safety profile.

The Roles of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Pain Relief in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Cancer pain, the most common skeleton-related event of bone metastases, significantly disturbs patients' life. MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a therapeutic option to relieve pain; however, its efficacy and safety have not been fully explored. Therefore, we aim to conduct a meta-analysis on studies reporting MRgFUS for patients with bone metastases.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-RCTs on MRgFUS treatment for patients with bone metastases were collected using PubMed, MEDLINE In-Process (US National Library of Medicine), National Institutes of Health (US National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library between August 2007 and September 2019. Data on quantitative pain assessment before/after MRgFUS, response rate, and complication were extracted and analyzed.

Results

Fifteen eligible studies with 362 patients were selected in this meta-analysis. The average pain score was 6.74 (95% CI: 6.30-7.18) at baseline, 4.15 (95% CI: 3.31-4.99) at 0-1 week, 3.09 (95% CI: 2.46-3.72) at 1-5 weeks, and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.37-3.19) at 5-14 weeks. Compared with baseline, the pain improvement at 0-1 week was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.92-3.16, p < 0.01), at 1-5 weeks was 3.56 (95% CI: 3.11-4.02, p < 0.01), and at 5-14 weeks was 4.22 (95% CI: 3.68-4.76, p < 0.01). Change from baseline in OMEDD at 2 weeks after treatment was -15.11 (95% CI: -34.73, 4.50), at 1 month after treatment was -10.87 (95% CI: -26.32, 4.58), and at 3 months after treatment was -5.53 (95% CI: -20.44, 9.38). The overall CR rate was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.24-0.48), PR rate was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.36-0.58), and NR rate was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13-0.34). Among 14 studies including 352 patients, 93 (26.4%) patients with minor complications and 5 (1.42%) patients with major complications were recorded.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis identifies MRgFUS as a reliable therapeutic option to relieve cancer pain for patients with metastatic bone tumors with controllable related complications.

Focused Ultrasound (FUS) for Chronic Pain Management: Approved and Potential Applications

Chronic pain is one of the leading causes of disability and disease burden worldwide, accounting for a prevalence between 6.9% and 10% in the general population. Pharmacotherapy alone results ineffective in about 70-60% of patients in terms of a satisfactory degree of pain relief. Focused ultrasound is a promising tool for chronic pain management, being approved for thalamotomy in chronic neuropathic pain and for bone metastases-related pain treatment. FUS is a noninvasive technique for neuromodulation and for tissue ablation that can be applied to several tissues. Transcranial FUS (tFUS) can lead to opposite biological effects, depending on stimulation parameters: from reversible neural activity facilitation or suppression (low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound, LILFUS) to irreversible tissue ablation (high-intensity focused ultrasounds, HIFU). HIFU is approved for thalamotomy in neuropathic pain at the central nervous system level and for the treatment of facet joint osteoarthritis at the peripheral level. Potential applications include HIFU at the spinal cord level for selected cases of refractory chronic neuropathic pain, knee osteoarthritis, sacroiliac joint disease, intervertebral disc nucleolysis, phantom limb, and ablation of peripheral nerves. FUS at nonablative dosage, LILFUS, has potential reversible and tissue-selective effects. FUS applications at nonablative doses currently are at a research stage. The main potential applications include targeted drug and gene delivery through the Blood-Brain Barrier, assessment of pain thresholds and study of pain, and reversible peripheral nerve conduction block. The aim of the present review is to describe the approved and potential applications of the focused ultrasound technology in the field of chronic pain management.

Technique Success, Technique Efficacy and Complications of HIFU Ablation for Palliation of Pain in Patients With Bone Lesions: A Meta-Analysis of 28 Feasibility Studies

Several feasibility studies have reported that high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation can be applied to ease patients' bone pain. However, the effect of HIFU ablation to palliate bone pain remains unclear. To evaluate the technique's success, efficacy, minor complication and major complication on patients suffering from bone pain, we searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from January 1998 to March 2019. Clinical studies that have assessed the association between bone pain and HIFU ablation were involved. We filtered out 28 feasibility studies, which reported the association between HIFU ablation and bone pain, including a total of 717 patients and 736 bone lesions. Overall, our results indicate that the rate of technique success of HIFU ablation was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89%-96%) for patients with bone lesions. The technique efficacy rate of HIFU ablation for palliation of pain from bone lesions was 80% (95% CI 74%-87%) in all the patients, 96% (91%-100%) in the subgroup of retrospective studies and 77% (69%-85%) in the subgroup of prospective studies. In regard to HIFU ablation treatment safety, the hazard ratio for minor complication was 12% (95% CI 7%-17%), and the hazard ratio for major complication was 2% (95% CI 1%-3%). In conclusion, the summary rates for various considerations of using HIFU ablation for the palliation of bone pain are as follows: technique success is 93%, technique efficacy is 77%, minor complication is 12% and major complication is 2%. Our results suggest that extracorporeal HIFU ablation is a promising method for palliation of pain in bone lesions, with high technique success and efficacy, but low adverse events.

Proton Resonance Frequency Shift Thermometry: A Review of Modern Clinical Practices

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a popular modality in guiding minimally invasive thermal therapies, due to its advanced, nonionizing, imaging capabilities and its ability to record changes in temperature. A variety of MR thermometry techniques have been developed over the years, and proton resonance frequency (PRF) shift thermometry is the current clinical gold standard to treat a variety of cancers. It is used extensively to guide hyperthermic thermal ablation techniques such as high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT). Essential attributes of PRF shift thermometry include excellent linearity with temperature, good sensitivity, and independence from tissue type. This noninvasive temperature mapping method gives accurate quantitative measures of the temperature evolution inside biological tissues. In this review, the current status and new developments in the fields of MR-guided HIFU and LITT are presented with an emphasis on breast, prostate, bone, uterine, and brain treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Ultrasound-Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatment for Painful Bone Metastases: A Pilot Study

Focused ultrasound (FUS) for palliation of bone metastases has typically been performed under magnetic resonance guidance. To address limitations of this approach, this pilot study evaluated a stand-alone, portable FUS device guided by diagnostic ultrasound alone (ultrasound [US]-guided FUS). Nine patients were treated; safety and efficacy were assessed for 10 d after the procedure, and medical charts were evaluated to assess durability of pain response. The procedure was safe and tolerable, with four patients reporting minor skin-related irritations. Average pain score decreased from 6.9 at baseline to 3.2 at day 10; analgesic use on average also decreased from baseline to day 10. Six patients had durable pain relief as assessed after the follow-up period. Our study provides evidence that US-guided FUS is a safe, tolerable and versatile procedure. It appears to be effective in achieving durable pain response in patients with painful bone metastases. Further research is required to refine the technology and optimize its efficacy.

Emerging clinical applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a minimally-invasive and non-ionizing promising technology and has been assessed for its role in the treatment of not only primary tumors but also metastatic lesions under the guidance of ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Its performance is notably effective in neurologic, genitourinary, hepato-pancreato-biliary, musculoskeletal, oncologic, and other miscellaneous applications. In this article, we reviewed the emerging technology of HIFU and its clinical applications.

Use of percutaneous microwave ablation for the treatment of bone tumors: a retrospective study of clinical outcomes in 47 patients

Objective

The present study aimed to evaluate the short-term clinical performance and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) techniques for the treatment of bone tumors.

Methods

This single-institution retrospective study investigated 47 cases of bone tumors treated by MWA from June 2015 to June 2018. The study included 26 patients (55.3%) with benign bone tumors and 21 patients (44.7%) with malignant bone tumors. The tumors were located in the spine or sacrum (15, 31.9%), the upper extremities (6, 12.8%), the lower extremities (17, 36.2%) and the pelvis (9, 19.1%). Outcomes regarding clinical efficacy, including pain relief, quality of life, and intervention-related complications, were evaluated before and after MWA using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scoring system.

Results

Of the 47 patients included in this study, all of them completed follow-up examinations, with a mean follow-up duration of 4.8 ± 1.6 months (range, 2–9 months). Significantly improved VAS and SF-36 scores were recorded after the initial treatment (P<0.001), suggesting that almost 100% of patients experienced pain relief and an improved quality of life following surgery. No major intervention-related complications (e.g., serious neurovascular injury or infection) occurred during or after the treatment. We recorded only three minor posttreatment complications (6.4%, 3/47), which were related to thermal injury that caused myofasciitis and affected wound healing.

Conclusion

In our study, the short-term efficacy of MWA was considerably favorable, with a relatively low rate of complications. Our results also showed that MWA was effective for pain relief and improved patients’ quality of life, making it a feasible treatment alternative for bone tumors.

Thermal Therapy With a Fully Electronically Steerable HIFU Phased Array Using Ultrasound Guidance and Local Harmonic Motion Monitoring

The method of localized harmonic motion (LHM) monitoring has been proposed as an ultrasound-based monitoring technique for in vivo real-time ultrasound-guidance during thermal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The focus of this paper is to study the performance of LHM monitoring in vivo in order to assess the tissue coagulation during ultrasound surgery of bone metastases. This is done through a pre-clinical study on large scale animals (pigs) as well as a first-in-human pilot study, using a hand held ultrasound-guided HIFU phased array.

METHODS

A flat, fully steerable HIFU phased array system (1024 elements, 100 mm diameter, 516 kHz), in combination with a co-aligned 64 element imaging system, is used to perform thermal surgery and monitor tissue coagulation using the LHM technique. The in vivo experiments are conducted using thirteen animals, followed by a first-in-human pilot study in which nine patients are enrolled.

RESULTS

The pre-clinical results show that the LHM monitoring method is able to detect about 80% of the observed coagulated tissue volumes visible in dissection. In the pilot study, six out of nine patients have durable pain reduction with good correlation observed from LHM detections.

CONCLUSION

In general, the results suggest that the LHM monitoring performance is promising in detecting thermal tissue coagulation during focused ultrasound surgery in tissues close to the bone.

SIGNIFICANCE

The LHM technique can offer a very accessible and cost-efficient monitoring solution during ultrasound surgery within a clinical setting.

Modeling the interference between shear and longitudinal waves under high intensity focused ultrasound propagation in bone

Magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is a noninvasive thermal technique that enables rapid heating of a specific area in the human body. Its clinical relevance has been proven for the treatments of soft tissue tumors, like uterine fibroids, and for the treatments of solid tumors in bone. In MR-HIFU treatment, MR-thermometry is used to monitor the temperature evolution in soft tissue. However, this technique is currently unavailable for bone tissue. Computer models can play a key role in the accurate prediction and monitoring of temperature. Here, we present a computer ray tracing model that calculates the heat production density in the focal region. This model accounts for both the propagation of shear waves and the interference between longitudinal and shear waves. The model was first compared with a finite element approach which solves the Helmholtz equation in soft tissue and the frequency-domain wave equation in bone. To obtain the temperature evolution in the focal region, the heat equation was solved using the heat production density generated by the raytracer as a heat source. Then, we investigated the role of the interaction between shear and longitudinal waves in terms of dissipated power and temperature output. The results of our model were in agreement with the results obtained by solving the Helmholtz equation and the frequency-domain wave equation, both in soft tissue and bone. Our results suggest that it is imperative to include both shear waves and their interference with longitudinal waves in the model when simulating high intensity focused ultrasound propagation in solids. In fact, when modeling HIFU treatments, omitting the interference between shear and longitudinal waves leads to an over-estimation of the temperature increase in the tissues.

Focused ultrasound for the treatment of bone metastases: effectiveness and feasibility

Background

To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of bone metastases.

Methods

A single-center prospective study was made involving 17 consecutive patients with symptomatic bone metastases. Patients were treated by Focused Ultrasound (FUs) performed with magnetic resonance (MR) guidance. Surgical treatment or radiotherapy treatment was not indicated for patients who underwent FUs. Lesions were located in the appendicular and axial skeleton and consisted of secondary symptomatic lesions. The clinical course of pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment, at 1 week, and at 1 month after treatment and the Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (OMEDD) was also recorded. We used Wilcoxon signed rank test to assess change in patient pain (R CRAN software V 3.1.1).

Results

We observed a significant decrease in the pain felt by patients between pre- procedure and 1 week post-procedure (p = 2.9.10-4), and pre-procedure and 1 month post-procedure (p = 3.10-4). The proportion of responders according to the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party was: Partial Response 50% (8/16) and Complete Response 37.5% (6/16).

Conclusions

HIFU under MR-guidance seems to be an effective and safe procedure in the treatment of symptomatic bone lesions for patients suffering from metastatic disease. A significant decrease of patient pain was observed.

Trial registration

NCT01091883. Registered 24 March 2010. Level of evidence: Level 3.

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Pain Management in Patients with Cancer

Cancer-related pain affects up to 80% of patients with malignancies. Pain is an important distressing symptom that diminishes the quality of life and negatively affects the survival of patients. Opioid analgesics are generally the primary therapy for cancer-related pain, with surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and other interventions used in cases of treatment-resistant pain. These treatments, which can be associated with substantial side effects and systemic toxicity, may not be effective. High-intensity focused ultrasound is an entirely noninvasive technique that is approved for treatment of uterine fibroids, bone metastases, and essential tremors. With magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonographic guidance, high-intensity ultrasound waves are focused on a small well-demarcated region to result in precise localized ablation. This treatment may represent a multimodality approach to treating patients with malignant diseases-facilitating pain palliation, enhanced local drug delivery and radiation therapy effects, and stimulation of anticancer specific immune responses, and potentially facilitating local tumor control. Focused ultrasound can be used to achieve pain palliation by producing several effects, including tissue denervation, tumor mass reduction, and neuromodulation, that can influence different pathways at the origin of the pain. This technology has several key advantages compared with other analgesic therapies: It is completely noninvasive, might be used to achieve rapid pain control, can be safely repeated, and can be used in combination with chemotherapy and radiation therapy to enhance their effects. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2018.

A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and potential toxicity of gemcitabine combined with microbubbles under sonication in inoperable pancreatic cancer patients. The secondary aim was to evaluate a novel image-guided microbubble-based therapy, based on commercially available technology, towards improving chemotherapeutic efficacy, preserving patient performance status, and prolonging survival.

METHODS

Ten patients were enrolled and treated in this Phase I clinical trial. Gemcitabine was infused intravenously over 30min. Subsequently, patients were treated using a commercial clinical ultrasound scanner for 31.5min. SonoVue® was injected intravenously (0.5ml followed by 5ml saline every 3.5min) during the ultrasound treatment with the aim of inducing sonoporation, thus enhancing therapeutic efficacy.

RESULTS

The combined therapeutic regimen did not induce any additional toxicity or increased frequency of side effects when compared to gemcitabine chemotherapy alone (historical controls). Combination treated patients (n=10) tolerated an increased number of gemcitabine cycles compared with historical controls (n=63 patients; average of 8.3±6.0cycles, versus 13.8±5.6cycles, p=0.008, unpaired t-test). In five patients, the maximum tumour diameter was decreased from the first to last treatment. The median survival in our patients (n=10) was also increased from 8.9months to 17.6months (p=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to combine ultrasound, microbubbles, and chemotherapy in a clinical setting using commercially available equipment with no additional toxicities. This combined treatment may improve the clinical efficacy of gemcitabine, prolong the quality of life, and extend survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.