1
|
Calvo-Wright MDM, Álvaro-Afonso FJ, López-Moral M, García-Álvarez Y, García-Morales E, Lázaro-Martínez JL. Is the Combination of Plain X-ray and Probe-to-Bone Test Useful for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5369. [PMID: 37629412 PMCID: PMC10455253 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of plain X-ray and probe-to-bone (PTB) test for diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (a prospective international register of systematic reviews; identification code CRD42023436757). A literature search was conducted for each test separately along with a third search for their combination. A total of 18 articles were found and divided into three groups for separate analysis and comparison. All selected studies were evaluated using STROBE guidelines to assess the quality of reporting for observational studies. Meta-DiSc software was used to analyze the collected data. Concerning the diagnostic accuracy variables for each case, the pooled sensitivity (SEN) was higher for the combination of PTB and plain X-ray [0.94 (PTB + X-ray) vs. 0.91 (PTB) vs. 0.76 (X-ray)], as was the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (82.212 (PTB + X-ray) vs. 57.444 (PTB) vs. 4.897 (X-ray)). The specificity (SPE) and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) were equally satisfactory for the diagnostic combination but somewhat lower than for PTB alone (SPE: 0.83 (PTB + X-ray) vs. 0.86 (PTB) vs. 0.76 (X-ray); LR+: 5.684 (PTB + X-ray) vs. 6.344 (PTB) vs. 1.969 (X-ray)). The combination of PTB and plain X-ray showed high diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI and histopathology diagnosis (the gold standard), so it could be considered useful for the diagnosis of DFO. In addition, this diagnostic combination is accessible and inexpensive but requires training and experience to correctly interpret the results. Therefore, recommendations for this technique should be included in the context of specialized units with a high prevalence of DFO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Clínica Universitaria de Podología, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia and Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain; (M.d.M.C.-W.); (M.L.-M.); (Y.G.-Á.); (E.G.-M.); (J.L.L.-M.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Llewellyn A, Jones-Diette J, Kraft J, Holton C, Harden M, Simmonds M. Imaging tests for the detection of osteomyelitis: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-128. [PMID: 31670644 DOI: 10.3310/hta23610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone. Medical imaging tests, such as radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are often used to diagnose osteomyelitis. OBJECTIVES To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, inter-rater reliability and implementation of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic review of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. We searched MEDLINE and other databases from inception to July 2018. REVIEW METHODS Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2 [quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (version 2)]. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using bivariate regression models. Imaging tests were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the location and nature of the suspected osteomyelitis. Studies of children, inter-rater reliability and implementation outcomes were synthesised narratively. RESULTS Eighty-one studies were included (diagnostic accuracy: 77 studies; inter-rater reliability: 11 studies; implementation: one study; some studies were included in two reviews). One-quarter of diagnostic accuracy studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias. In adults, MRI had high diagnostic accuracy [95.6% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) 92.4% to 97.5%; 80.7% specificity, 95% CI 70.8% to 87.8%]. PET also had high accuracy (85.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.5% to 92.9%; 92.8% specificity, 95% CI 83.0% to 97.1%), as did SPECT (95.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 87.8% to 98.1%; 82.0% specificity, 95% CI 61.5% to 92.8%). There was similar diagnostic performance with MRI, PET and SPECT. Scintigraphy (83.6% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.8% to 91.1%; 70.6% specificity, 57.7% to 80.8%), computed tomography (69.7% sensitivity, 95% CI 40.1% to 88.7%; 90.2% specificity, 95% CI 57.6% to 98.4%) and radiography (70.4% sensitivity, 95% CI 61.6% to 77.8%; 81.5% specificity, 95% CI 69.6% to 89.5%) all had generally inferior diagnostic accuracy. Technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime white blood cell scintigraphy (87.3% sensitivity, 95% CI 75.1% to 94.0%; 94.7% specificity, 95% CI 84.9% to 98.3%) had higher diagnostic accuracy, similar to that of PET or MRI. There was no evidence that diagnostic accuracy varied by scan location or cause of osteomyelitis, although data on many scan locations were limited. Diagnostic accuracy in diabetic foot patients was similar to the overall results. Only three studies in children were identified; results were too limited to draw any conclusions. Eleven studies evaluated inter-rater reliability. MRI had acceptable inter-rater reliability. We found only one study on test implementation and no evidence on patient preferences or cost-effectiveness of imaging tests for osteomyelitis. LIMITATIONS Most studies included < 50 participants and were poorly reported. There was limited evidence for children, ultrasonography and on clinical factors other than diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Osteomyelitis is reliably diagnosed by MRI, PET and SPECT. No clear reason to prefer one test over the other in terms of diagnostic accuracy was identified. The wider availability of MRI machines, and the fact that MRI does not expose patients to harmful ionising radiation, may mean that MRI is preferable in most cases. Diagnostic accuracy does not appear to vary with the potential cause of osteomyelitis or with the body part scanned. Considerable uncertainty remains over the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests in children. Studies of diagnostic accuracy in children, particularly using MRI and ultrasound, are needed. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017068511. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 61. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Llewellyn
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Gordon O, Mota F, Abhishek S, Tucker EW, Ordonez AA, Jain SK. Molecular Imaging of Diabetic Foot Infections: New Tools for Old Questions. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:E5984. [PMID: 31795077 PMCID: PMC6928969 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20235984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a common, complex, and costly medical problem with increasing prevalence. Diagnosing DFIs is a clinical challenge due to the poor specificity of the available methods to accurately determine the presence of infection in these patients. However, failure to perform an opportune diagnosis and provide optimal antibiotic therapy can lead to higher morbidity for the patient, unnecessary amputations, and increased healthcare costs. Novel developments in bacteria-specific molecular imaging can provide a non-invasive assessment of the infection site to support diagnosis, determine the extension and location of the infection, guide the selection of antibiotics, and monitor the response to treatment. This is a review of recent research in molecular imaging of infections in the context of DFI. We summarize different clinical and preclinical methods and the translational implications aimed to improve the care of patients with DFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo A. Ruiz-Bedoya
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.A.R.-B.); (O.G.); (F.M.); (S.A.); (E.W.T.); (A.A.O.)
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Oren Gordon
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.A.R.-B.); (O.G.); (F.M.); (S.A.); (E.W.T.); (A.A.O.)
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Filipa Mota
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.A.R.-B.); (O.G.); (F.M.); (S.A.); (E.W.T.); (A.A.O.)
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Sudhanshu Abhishek
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.A.R.-B.); (O.G.); (F.M.); (S.A.); (E.W.T.); (A.A.O.)
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Elizabeth W. Tucker
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.A.R.-B.); (O.G.); (F.M.); (S.A.); (E.W.T.); (A.A.O.)
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
| | - Alvaro A. Ordonez
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.A.R.-B.); (O.G.); (F.M.); (S.A.); (E.W.T.); (A.A.O.)
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Sanjay K. Jain
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.A.R.-B.); (O.G.); (F.M.); (S.A.); (E.W.T.); (A.A.O.)
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Álvaro-Afonso FJ, Lázaro-Martínez JL, García-Morales E, García-Álvarez Y, Sanz-Corbalán I, Molines-Barroso RJ. Cortical disruption is the most reliable and accurate plain radiographic sign in the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Diabet Med 2019; 36:258-259. [PMID: 30246491 DOI: 10.1111/dme.13824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F J Álvaro-Afonso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - J L Lázaro-Martínez
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - E García-Morales
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Y García-Álvarez
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - I Sanz-Corbalán
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R J Molines-Barroso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Álvaro Afonso FJ, García-Morales E, Molines-Barroso RJ, García-Álvarez Y, Sanz-Corbalán I, Lázaro-Martínez JL. Respond to the letter on 'Interobserver reliability of the ankle brachial index, toe-brachial index and distal pulse palpation in patients with diabetes: a methodological issue'. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2018; 15:578-579. [PMID: 30136860 DOI: 10.1177/1479164118794901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We respond to the letter of Nadery and Shahsavari regarding our paper entitled 'Interobserver reliability of the ankle brachial index, toe -brachial index and distal pulse palpation in patients with diabetes. In this letter, we concluded that despite some limitations, the kappa coefficient is an informative measure of agreement in most circumstances that we can use in this type of clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Javier Álvaro Afonso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther García-Morales
- Diabetic Foot Unit, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raúl J Molines-Barroso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda García-Álvarez
- Diabetic Foot Unit, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Sanz-Corbalán
- Diabetic Foot Unit, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
- Diabetic Foot Unit, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aragón-Sánchez J, Lipsky BA. Modern management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The when, how and why of conservative approaches. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2017; 16:35-50. [PMID: 29231774 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1417037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) has long been considered a complex infection that is both difficult to diagnose and treat, and is associated with a high rate of relapse and limb loss. Areas covered: DFO can usually be diagnosed by a combination of clinical evaluation, serum inflammatory markers and plain X-ray. When the results of these procedures are negative or contradictory, advanced imaging tests or bone biopsy may be necessary. Staphylococcus aureus remains the most frequent microorganism isolated from bone specimens, but infection is often polymicrobial. Antibiotic therapy, preferably with oral agents guided by results of bone culture, for a duration of no more than six weeks, appears to be as safe and effective as surgery in cases of uncomplicated forefoot DFO. Surgery (which should be limb-sparing when possible) is always required for DFO accompanied by necrotizing fasciitis, deep abscess, gangrene or in cases not responding (either clinically or radiographically) to apparently appropriate antibiotic treatment. Expert commentary: Research in the past decade has improved diagnosis and treatment of DFO, and most cases can now be managed with a 'conservative' approach, defined as treatment either exclusively with antibiotics or with surgery removing as little bone and soft tissue as necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Aragón-Sánchez
- a Department of Surgery, Diabetic Foot Unit , La Paloma Hospital , Las Palmas de Gran Canaria , Spain
| | - Benjamin A Lipsky
- b Department of Medicine , University of Washington School of Medicine , Seattle , WA , USA.,c Green Templeton College , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vouillarmet J, Moret M, Morelec I, Michon P, Dubreuil J. Application of white blood cell SPECT/CT to predict remission after a 6 or 12 week course of antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Diabetologia 2017; 60:2486-2494. [PMID: 28866726 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4417-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is a major risk factor for amputation. Medical treatment allows remission in 53-82% of cases. However, the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy remains controversial as a validated marker of osteomyelitis remission is lacking. The aim of this cohort study was to assess prospectively the remission rate of diabetic foot osteomyelitis medically treated using white blood cell (WBC)-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) as a predictive marker of remission. METHODS Individuals with diabetic foot osteomyelitis that was non-surgically treated between April 2014 and December 2015 were included. All participants were treated with antibiotics alone. WBC-SPECT/CT was performed at 6 weeks and antibiotic treatment discontinued if the clinical signs of soft-tissue infection had resolved and there was no abnormal uptake of labelled WBCs. Treatment was otherwise continued for a total of 12 weeks and then discontinued. For these individuals, another WBC-SPECT/CT was performed at 12 weeks. Remission was defined as the absence of recurrence of osteomyelitis at the same location at 1 year. RESULTS Forty-five individuals were included; overall remission rate was 84% at 1 year. A 6 week course of antibiotics was used in 23 participants, 22 of whom were in remission at 1 year (96%); a 12 week course was used for 22 participants, 16 of whom were in remission at 1 year (73%). Sensitivity of WBC-SPECT/CT at 12 weeks was 100%, specificity 56%, positive predictive value 46% and negative predictive value 100%. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION The study suggests that WBC-SPECT/CT could predict remission at the end of antibiotic treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02927678.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Vouillarmet
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Obésité, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.
| | - Myriam Moret
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Endocrinologie et Diabète, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - Isabelle Morelec
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Paul Michon
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Obésité, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Julien Dubreuil
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Diagnostic and therapeutic update on diabetic foot osteomyelitis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 64:100-108. [PMID: 28440774 DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2016.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2016] [Revised: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is the most common infection associated to diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). This review is designed to provide an update on the diagnosis and treatment of DFO based on an analysis of MEDLINE through PubMed using as search criterion "Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis". Authors have included in this review the most relevant manuscripts regarding diagnosis and treatment of DFO. After review and critical analysis of publications, it may be concluded that diagnosis of DFO is not simple because of its heterogeneous presentation. Clinical inflammatory signs, probe-to-bone test, and plain X-rays are postulated as the basic tests for clinical diagnosis when DFO is suspected. Diagnosis should be supported by laboratory tests, of which ESR (>70mm/h) has been shown to be most precise. MRI is the most accurate imaging test, especially for differential diagnosis with Charcot foot. Pathogen isolation by bone culture is essential when the patient is treated with ATB only. Medical or surgical treatment should be based on the clinical characteristics of the patient and the lesion. Surgery should always be an option if medical treatment fails.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wukich DK, Hobizal KB, Sambenedetto TL, Kirby K, Rosario BL. Outcomes of Osteomyelitis in Patients Hospitalized With Diabetic Foot Infections. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37:1285-1291. [PMID: 27553085 PMCID: PMC5672907 DOI: 10.1177/1071100716664364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) compared to diabetic foot soft tissue infections (STIs). METHODS 229 patients who were hospitalized with foot infections were retrospectively reviewed, identifying 155 patients with DFO and 74 patients with STI. Primary outcomes evaluated were the rates of amputations and length of hospital stay. DFO was confirmed by the presence of positive bone culture and/or histopathology. RESULTS Patients with DFO had a 5.6 times higher likelihood of overall amputation (P < .0001), a 3.4 times higher likelihood of major amputation (P = .027) and a 4.2 times higher likelihood of minor amputation (P < .0001) compared to patients without DFO. Major amputation was performed in 16.7% patients diagnosed with DFO and 5.3% of patients diagnosed with STI. Patients with DFO complicated by Charcot neuroarthropathy had a 7 times higher likelihood of undergoing major amputation (odds ratio 6.78, 95% confidence interval 2.70-17.01, P < .0001). The mean hospital stay was 7 days in DFO and 6 days in patients with DFI (P = .0082). Patients with DFO had a higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (85 vs 71, P = .02) than patients with STI, however the differences in C-reactive protein (13.4 vs 11.8, P = .29) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION In this study of moderate and severe DFIs, the presence of osteomyelitis resulted in a higher likelihood of amputation and longer hospital stay. Readers should recognize that the findings of this study may not be applicable to less severe cases of DFO that can be effectively managed in an outpatient setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane K Wukich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Mercy Amputation Prevention Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Tresa L Sambenedetto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- UPMC Mercy Amputation Prevention Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Bedda L Rosario
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tamir E, Finestone AS, Avisar E, Agar G. Toe-Sparing Surgery for Neuropathic Toe Ulcers With Exposed Bone or Joint in an Outpatient Setting. INT J LOW EXTR WOUND 2016; 15:142-147. [DOI: 10.1177/1534734616636311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to review the results of aggressive surgical debridement of neuropathic toe ulcers with exposed bone or joint. We identified patients with a single toe ulcer with exposed bone or joint that had been operated on in an outpatient setting. The surgery had included aggressive debridement and was performed using a small curette and rongeur, followed by oral antibiotic treatment at home. Success was defined as complete healing with no recurrence 6 months after full wound closure and epitheliazation was achieved. Twenty-five patients with neuropathic toe ulcers (72% male) had a total of 26 primary operations. Their mean age was 60 ± 12 years. In 22 patients, the neuropathy resulted from diabetes mellitus of 17 ± 9 years’ duration. The mean ulcer duration was 6 weeks (range 1-24). The mean number of visits per patient was 6.5 (range 3-20). The ulcers closed in a median of 5 weeks (8 ± 6 weeks, range 3-24 weeks, Q1-Q3 4-10 weeks). At 6 months, 3 (11.5%) patients had needed a toe amputation for infection or necrosis that could not be controlled. None needed a major amputation or hospitalization related to the ulcer. Toe-sparing surgery is feasible and in a select population can have a high success rate (88%), even though it does dictate more dedicated patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eran Tamir
- Assaf HaRofeh Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Zerrifin, Israel
- Maccabi Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Aharon S. Finestone
- Assaf HaRofeh Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Zerrifin, Israel
- Maccabi Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Erez Avisar
- Assaf HaRofeh Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Zerrifin, Israel
| | - Gabriel Agar
- Assaf HaRofeh Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Zerrifin, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Diabetic foot infections: what have we learned in the last 30 years? Int J Infect Dis 2015; 40:81-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Revised: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
12
|
Álvaro-Afonso FJ, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Aragón-Sánchez J, García-Morales E, García-Álvarez Y, Molines-Barroso RJ. Inter-observer reproducibility of diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis based on a combination of probe-to-bone test and simple radiography. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 105:e3-5. [PMID: 24857262 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 04/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Probe-to-bone test and simple X-rays are both standard tests for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. This study demonstrates the importance of considering jointly clinical information (probe-to-bone test) and diagnostic tests (simple radiography) to increase agreement among clinicians on diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University Clinic, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
| | - José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University Clinic, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Esther García-Morales
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University Clinic, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda García-Álvarez
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University Clinic, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raúl J Molines-Barroso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University Clinic, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Uçkay I, Gariani K, Pataky Z, Lipsky BA. Diabetic foot infections: state-of-the-art. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014; 16:305-16. [PMID: 23911085 DOI: 10.1111/dom.12190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Revised: 07/05/2013] [Accepted: 07/11/2013] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Foot infections are frequent and potentially devastating complications of diabetes. Unchecked, infection can progress contiguously to involve the deeper soft tissues and ultimately the bone. Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are most often the consequence of one or more of the following: peripheral sensory neuropathy, motor neuropathy and gait disorders, peripheral arterial insufficiency or immunological impairments. Infection develops in over half of foot ulcers and is the factor that most often leads to lower extremity amputation. These amputations are associated with substantial morbidity, reduced quality of life and major financial costs. Most infections can be successfully treated with optimal wound care, antibiotic therapy and surgical procedures. Employing evidence-based guidelines, multidisciplinary teams and institution-specific clinical pathways provides the best approach to guide clinicians through this multifaceted problem. All clinicians regularly seeing people with diabetes should have an understanding of how to prevent, diagnose and treat foot infections, which requires familiarity with the pathophysiology of the problem and the literature supporting currently recommended care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Uçkay
- Service of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Álvaro-Afonso FJ, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Aragón-Sánchez FJ, García-Morales E, Carabantes-Alarcón D, Molines-Barroso RJ. Does the location of the ulcer affect the interpretation of the probe-to-bone test in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot ulcers? Diabet Med 2014; 31:112-3. [PMID: 23865848 DOI: 10.1111/dme.12280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Revised: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 07/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F J Álvaro-Afonso
- Diabetic Foot Unit, University Podiatric Clinic, Complutense University of Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|