Immune regulation effect of lienal polypeptides extract in Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing mice treated with cyclophosphamide

Strategies for mapping protein hydrolysate profiles and pharmacokinetics based on non-targeted proteomics combining skyline-aided quantitative techniques

Numerous works have been focused on the bioactivities of protein hydrolysates (PHs) and their application in food or drug formulations, but their composition and pharmacokinetics have never been addressed due to their complex constitutes, short half-life, extremely low concentrations and lack of authentic standards. The present study aims to develop systematic analytical strategy and technical platform with optimized sample preparation, separation and detection protocols for PHs. Lineal peptides (LPs), extraction of the spleen of healthy pigs or calves, were used as cases. First, solvents with polarity gradients were used to globally extract peptides of LP from biological matrix. Non-targeted proteomics based on a high-resolution MS system was used to establish a reliable qualitative analysis workflow for PHs. Based on the developed approach, 247 unique peptides were identified using NanoLC-Orbitrap-MS/MS, and then further verified on the MicroLC-Q-TOF/MS system. In the quantitative analysis workflow, Skyline software was used to predict and optimize the LC-MS/MS detection parameters of LPs followed by investigating the linearity and precision of the developed analytical assay. Note worthily, we innovatively prepared calibration curves by sequential dilution of LP solution to overcome the bottleneck of lacking authentic standards and complex PH composition. All the peptides exhibited good linearity and precision in biological matrix. The established qualitative and quantitative assays were successfully applied to study the distribution characteristics of LPs in mice, and would be conductive to systematically map the profile and pharmacokinetics of peptides in various PHs in vivo and in vitro.

Are cachexia-associated tumors transmitTERS of ER stress?

Cancer cachexia is associated with deficient response to chemotherapy. On the other hand, the tumors of cachectic patients remarkably express more chemokines and have higher immune infiltration. For immunogenicity, a strong induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) is necessary. UPR followed by cell surface exposure of calreticulin on the dying tumor cell is essential for its engulfment by macrophages and dendritic cells. However, some tumor cells upon endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can release factors that induce ER stress to other cells, in the so-called transmissible ER stress (TERS). The cells that received TERS produce more interleukin 6 (IL-6) and chemokines and acquire resistance to subsequent ER stress, nutrient deprivation, and genotoxic stress. Since ER stress enhances the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs), we suggest they can mediate TERS. It was found that ER stressed cachexia-inducing tumor cells transmit factors that trigger ER stress in other cells. Therefore, considering the role of EVs in cancer cachexia, the release of exosomes can possibly play a role in the process of blunting the immunogenicity of the cachexia-associated tumors. We propose that TERS can cause an inflammatory and immunosuppressive phenotype in cachexia-inducing tumors.

The effectiveness and safety of lienal polypeptide combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients in real world

Chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy are still the fundamental treatment for advanced lung cancers. To reduce side effects and improve life quality, lienal polypeptide (LP) could be used in combine with chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, LP could regulate immune system and possibly reduce the side effects of chemotherapy drugs.In our study, 1658 lung cancer patients from 10 hospitals were retrospectively analyzed and divided into LP group and non-LP group by whether using LP during their treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test was used to detect the difference of progression-free survival and overall-survival between the 2 groups. Two-sided P-values of less than .05 indicated statistical significance. All analyses were performed with SAS software (version 9.4 SAS Institute, Cary, NC).Results showed that the number of patients who had progressed diseases in LP group and control group were 532 (64.2%) and 507 (61.2%). Log Rank test showed that median progression-free survival for LP group was 12.1 months and 11.4 months for control group (P = .3478). Statistical analyses revealed significantly difference in overall-survival between LP group and control group (23.6 months vs 18.9 months, P = .0177). The overall adverse effect rates were non-significantly different with 9.9% in the LP group and 9.3% in the non-LP group (P = .6767).In conclusion, our research results indicated that LP used in combination with chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy was a safe and effective treatment for patients of advanced lung cancer. LP could also reduce the adverse effects of chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, thereby improving patients' life qualities, and potentially improving prognosis.

Experimental Study and Clinical Observation on the Improvement Effect of Lienal Polypeptide on Blood Toxicity and Immune Injury Induced by Radiotherapy

Aims: To investigate the immune and gastrointestinal functional effects of lienal polypeptide (LP) treatment in tumor-bearing mice and carcinoma patients receiving radiotherapy (RT), and to detect hematological indicators and T lymphocyte subsets. Methods: Tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into five groups: the control group, the RT group, the RT+LP-L (1.7 mg/kg, low dosage of LP) group, the RT+LP-M (5.2 mg/kg, middle dosage of LP) group, and the RT+LP-H (10.4 mg/kg, high dosage of LP) group. In addition, carcinoma patients were randomly divided into two groups. The observation group was given LP during RT, and the control group was only treated with RT. We then compared the myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and clinical efficacy among groups. Results: In the animal experiments, compared with the control group, the number of leukocytes and lymphocytes of the mice in the "RT" group decreased (p < 0.05). Animals receiving LP evidenced a dose-response curve with regard to the number of leukocytes and lymphocytes that was proportional to the LP dose, increased (p < 0.05). Flow cytometric analyses showed that LP treatment of the mice increased the numbers of CD3⁺, and CD4⁺ T cells and theCD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio. In our clinical study, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria were used for measuring myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions. The RTOG/EORTC grade 3 or 4 inhibition rate of leukocytes, granulocytes, hemoglobin, platelets, and gastrointestinal toxic effects in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: LP can improve the hematopoietic and immune function of RT-treated mice and reduce the hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity of patients treated with RT and improve the quality of life.