First Randomized Study of Epilepsy Surgery: 20 Years Later What Has Changed?

Understanding the problems with recruitment in surgical randomized trials: A lesson from landmark trials on temporal lobe epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Surgical randomized trials are difficult to accomplish. One major problem is recruitment of a sufficient number of patients to address the clinical problem.

METHODS

We review the various ways patient recruitment in surgical RCTs can be promoted. We examine two landmark trials on the surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), one that was successful, and one which did not attain the target number of participants.

DISCUSSION

Both designs of the Canadian and American trials of surgery for TLE included a benefit to participants: the Canadian trial gave a chance to have immediate access to investigation and treatment, as compared to a 1 year delay (considered 'standard care' in that center), while the American trial offered free surgical management to both arms. Patients were recruited and treatments randomly allocated prior to knowing for certain whether they were surgical candidates or not. This design choice may have helped circumvent the 'equipoise problem'. The Canadian trial offered participation to drug-resistant patients that were already routinely referred to surgical centers, while the success of the American trial which limited recruitment to the early period of drug resistance was dependent on a change of practice of referring clinicians which did not materialize.

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy has been validated using RCT methods. Ways to promote participation in surgical trials should be further investigated.

The effect of epilepsy surgery on productivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

An important but understudied benefit of resective epilepsy surgery is improvement in productivity; that is, people's ability to contribute to society through participation in the workforce and in unpaid roles such as carer duties. Here, we aimed to evaluate productivity in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) pre- and post-resective epilepsy surgery, and to explore the factors that positively influence productivity outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Library. All studies over the past 30 years reporting on pre- and post-resective epilepsy surgical outcomes in adults with DRE were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the post-surgery change in employment outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1005 titles and abstracts were reviewed. Seventeen studies, comprising 2056 unique patients, were suitable for the final quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. Resective epilepsy surgery resulted in a 22% improvement in overall productivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.40). The factors associated with increased post-surgery employment risk ratios were lower pre-surgical employment in the workforce (relative risk ratio [RRR] =0.34; 95% CI: 0.15-0.74), shorter follow-up duration (RRR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-0.99), and lower mean age at time of surgery (RRR= 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions and was low for most variables except "measurement of exposure."

SIGNIFICANCE

There is clear evidence that resective surgery in eligible surgical DRE patients results in improved productivity. Future work may include implementing a standardized method for collecting and reporting productivity in epilepsy cohorts and focusing on ways to reprioritize health care resource allocation to allow suitable candidates to access surgery earlier. This will ultimately benefit individuals with DRE, their families, our communities, and the wider health care system.