Clinical and radiographic outcomes of Image-Based Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Evidence-based Evaluation

Computer-Navigated versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes from Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials

The main purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis comparing functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using either computer navigation (NAV-TKA) or conventional methods (CON-TKA) from the latest assemblage of evidence. This study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. All Level I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane that compared functional outcomes after NAV- and CON-TKA were included in the review. Selected end points for random effects, pairwise meta-analysis included Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), KS Function Score (KSFS), KS Total Score (KSTS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion at three arbitrary follow-up times. A total of 24 prospective RCTs comprising 3,778 knees were included from the initial search. At long-term follow-up (>5 years), NAV-TKA exhibited significantly better raw KSKS (p = 0.001) (low-quality evidence), contrary to CON-TKA, which reflected significantly better raw KSTS (p = 0.004) (high-quality evidence). While change scores (KSKS, WOMAC) from preoperative values favor CON-TKA at short-term (<6 months) and medium-term follow-up (6-60 months), long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest the superiority of NAV-TKA over CON-TKA (p = 0.02) (very low-quality evidence). Overall, sizeable dispersion of nonstatistically significant functional outcomes in the medium term was observed to eventually converge in the long term, with less differences in functional outcome scores between the two treatment methods in short- and long-term follow-up. While raw functional outcome scores reflect no differences between NAV and CON-TKA, long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest superiority of NAV-TKA over its conventional counterpart. Prospective studies with larger power are required to support the pattern of diminishing differences in functional outcome scores from medium- to long-term follow-up between the two modalities.

Comparative Analysis of Diaphyseal versus Metaphyseal tracker Placement in Imageless Navigation Systems for Total Knee Arthroplasty

This work was designed to compare the intraoperative parameters and clinical and radiologic outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during a minimum follow-up period of 2 years and to discuss the pros and cons of two different tracker placement (diaphyseal and metaphyseal) navigation systems. The null hypothesis was that there would be no clinical or radiologic difference between the two different systems. Primary TKA was performed in a total of 100 knees using the two different image-free navigation systems (group 1: diaphyseal tracker placement and group 2: metaphyseal tracker placement) with the strict gap balancing technique. Symptom severity was assessed at preoperative and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Possible adverse issues (major and minor) associated with TKA procedure were observed. Careful assessments were also made of the screw insertion site for infection, stress fractures, and any other related adverse effects. The follow-up periods for groups 1 and 2 were 38 ± 8 months and 38 ± 7 months, respectively. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. The mechanical alignment improved to 0.1 (valgus) ± 2.2 (group 1) and 0.2 (valgus) ± 2.1 (group 2). There were no radiologic differences between the groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, the KSS and WOMAC improved from before surgery to 24 months after surgery (p < 0.0001). However, the total operation time was 50 ± 5 minutes for group 1, compared to 65 ± 13 minutes for group 2 (p < 0.0001). The metaphyseal tracker navigation system resulted in increased operation time.

Does patient-specific instrumentation increase the risk of notching in the anterior femoral cortex in total knee arthroplasty? A comparative prospective trial

PURPOSE

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was usually applied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to acquire a favourable alignment. We hypothesized that using PSI had a potential risk of notching in the anterior femoral cortex, because the femoral component may be placed in an overextension position due to the distal femoral sagittal anteversion. The aim of this study was to figure out the relationship between the notch and the distal femoral sagittal anteversion in PSI-assisted TKA.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-one patients who were to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly divided into conventional instrumentation (CI) group and PSI group. The computed tomography (CT) data of lower extremities was collected and imported to the Mimics software to reconstruct the three-dimensional (3D) bone image of the femur. The angle between distal femoral anatomic axis (DFAA) and femoral mechanical axis (FMA) on sagittal plane was defined as distal femoral sagittal anteverted angle (DFSAA) and measured. The number of notch intra-operative and post-operative was recorded. Then, we calculated the incidence of the notch and analyzed its relationship with DFSAA.

RESULTS

The average DFSAA of 262 femurs is 2.5° ± 1.5° (range, 0.0°-5.7°). When DFSAA ≥ 3°, the incidence of notch was 7.10% in CI group and 33.30% in PSI group, respectively, which shows significant statistical difference in the two groups (P = 0.016 < 0.05). When DFSAA < 3°, the incidence of notch was 6.50% in CI group and 5.30% in PSI group, respectively, which shows no significant statistical difference in the two groups (P = 0.667 > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DFSAA could be taken as an indicator to predict the notch when performing TKA assisted with PSI. Especially when the DFSAA ≥ 3°, the risk of notch could be markedly increased.

An umbrella review comparing computer-assisted and conventional total joint arthroplasty: quality assessment and summary of evidence

Background

Systematic reviews (SRs) of computer-assisted (CA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) report conflicting evidence on its superiority over conventional surgery. Little is known about the quality of these SRs; variability in their methodological quality may be a contributing factor. We evaluated the methodological quality of all published SRs to date, summarized and examined the consistency of the evidence generated by these SRs.

Methods

We searched four databases through December 31, 2018. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was applied to assess the methodological quality. Evidence from included meta-analyses on functional, radiological and patient-safety outcomes was summarized. The corrected covered area was calculated to assess the overlap between SRs in including the primary studies.

Results

Based on AMSTAR 2, confidence was critically low in 39 of the 42 included SRs and low in 3 SRs. Low rating was mainly due to failure in developing a review protocol (90.5%); providing a list of excluded studies (81%); accounting for risk of bias when discussing the results (67%); using a comprehensive search strategy (50%); and investigating publication bias (50%). Despite inconsistency between SR findings comparing functional, radiological and patient safety outcomes for CA and conventional procedures, most TKA meta-analyses favored CA TKA, whereas most THA meta-analyses showed no difference. Moderate overlap was observed among TKA SRs and high overlap among THA SRs.

Conclusions

Despite conclusions of meta-analyses favoring CA arthroplasty, decision makers adopting this technology should be aware of the low confidence in the results of the included SRs. To improve confidence in future SRs, journals should consider using a methodological assessment tool to evaluate the SRs prior to making a publication decision.

Satisfactory Short-Term Results of Navigation-Assisted Gap-Balancing Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Ultracongruent Insert

BACKGROUND

The use of highly conforming ultracongruent (UC) polyethylene insert is bone-preserving and became a relatively common alternative to the conventional posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design. The purpose of this study was to analyze the short-term clinical and radiologic results of UC insert TKA using the navigation-assisted gap-balancing technique.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-three knees were operated with a mean follow-up period of 8.1 years (minimum of 5 years). Radiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed before operation and at latest follow-up using the Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. For statistical analysis, paired sample t-test and analysis of variance were used. Significance was considered as P < .05.

RESULTS

According to the preoperative deformities (valgus, mild varus, and moderate varus), there were 23 cases (9.9%) of valgus deformity, 180 cases (77.3%) of mild varus deformity, and 30 cases (12.9%) of moderate varus deformity. Overall, the results at mean 8.1 years revealed an improvement in mean Knee Society Score (54 ± 12 to 92 ± 3) and mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores (62 ± 14 to 17 ± 3). Overall, 220 of 233 cases (94.4%) were in neutral alignment (between -3° and +3°) at latest follow-up. There were no migrating or shifting prosthesis that should be considered as possible failure. There was 0% component revision rate.

CONCLUSION

Navigation-assisted gap-balancing technique using UC insert TKA had satisfactory short-term outcome. Strict gap-balancing technique using the offset-type-force-controlled-spreader-system aided in the satisfactory results.

Assessment of knee alignment with varus and valgus force through the range of flexion with non-invasive navigation

In image-free total knee arthroplasty (TKA) navigation, infra-red markers are attached to bony landmarks to provide kinematic data intra-operatively, with the aim of improving the precision of implant placement. In non-invasive navigation, infra-red markers are attached to the skin surface, with recent evidence suggesting that this can give repeatable measurements of lower limb mechanical alignment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of a non-invasive navigation system in the assessment of mechanical alignment with applied coronal force through the range of flexion. A previously validated non-invasive system (Physiopilot™) was tested on 23 volunteers with healthy knees. Two users performed two registrations of the software workflow on each participant's right and left knees. A force was manually applied to the end-point of varus and valgus knee laxity and the measured change in mechanical alignment was recorded. Force was applied with the knee positioned in increments of flexion from 0 to 90°. In keeping with previous studies, satisfactory values of coefficient of repeatability (CR) of 1.55 and 1.33 were found for intra-observer repeatability in measurement of supine mechanical femoro-tibial angle (MFTA) in extension, with a good inter-observer correlation of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) .72. However, when flexion was introduced, intra-observer and inter-observer reliability fell out with acceptable limits. Therefore, the trial did not support use of the Physiopilot™ system as a measure of MFTA when flexion is introduced. It was felt that learning-curve, soft tissue artefacts and lack of force standardisation equipment may have accounted for significant levels of error, with further studies required to address these issues.

Intraoperative Measurements of Joint Line Changes Using Computer Navigation Do Not Correlate With Postoperative Radiographic Measurements in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The adverse effects of joint line (JL) changes on kinematics and outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been studied. Some authors have quantified JL changes using intraoperative data from computer navigation, despite no studies validating these measurements to date. We designed a prospective study to determine whether intraoperative measurements of JL changes using computer navigation correlate with measurements obtained on weight-bearing radiographs postoperatively.

METHODS

A total of 195 consecutive patients (195 knees) underwent computer-navigated cruciate-retaining TKA by the senior author. Twenty-four patients had missing radiographic data and were excluded from the study. The final JL change was calculated intraoperatively from the verified bony cuts and planned JL change as determined by the computer. JL position was also measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs using an anteroposterior method.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one knees were evaluated. Using computer-navigated and radiographic measurements, the mean JL change was 1.95 ± 1.5 mm (0-8.0 mm) and 4.05 ± 2.9 mm (0-17.3 mm), respectively. One hundred fourteen (67%) vs 129 (75%) had JL elevation, 44 (26%) vs 30 (18%) had JL depression, and 13 (7%) vs 12 (7%) had no JL change, respectively. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability of radiographic measurements was excellent. We found a poor correlation between computer-navigated and radiographic measurements (r = 0.303).

CONCLUSION

There is a poor correlation between computer-aided and radiographic measurements of JL changes post-TKA. Elevation/depression of the JL needs to be considered in patients who remain symptomatic despite TKA, although the optimal method of assessment remains uncertain.

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty marketing and patient education: an evaluation of quality, content and accuracy of related websites

BACKGROUND

The internet is increasingly being used as a resource for health-related information by the general public. We sought to establish the authorship, content and accuracy of the information available online regarding computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CA-TKA).

METHODS

One hundred fifty search results from three leading search engines available online (Google, Yahoo!, Bing) from ten different countries worldwide were reviewed.

RESULTS

While private physicians/groups authored 50.7 % of the websites, only 17.3 % were authored by a hospital/university. As compared to traditional TKA, 59.3 % of the websites claimed that navigated TKA offers better longevity, 46.6 % claimed accelerated recovery and 26 % claimed fewer complications. Only 11.3 % mentioned the prolonged operating room time required, and only 15.3 % noted the current lack of long-term evidence in support of this technology.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients seeking information regarding CA-TKA through the major search engines are likely to encounter websites presenting a narrow, unscientific, viewpoint of the present technology, putting emphasis on unsubstantiated benefits while disregarding potential drawbacks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Survey of Materials-Internet.

Are joint line changes after primary navigated total knee arthroplasty predictable?

BACKGROUND

Navigation systems have been successful in reducing the outlier of leg alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Less is known about the restoration of the anatomical joint line with computer-assisted knee replacement. The aim of this study was to determine whether joint line changes <3 or ≥3 mm are predictable with several pre- and intraoperative parameters.

METHODS

The study included a total of 180 cases of primary computer-assisted TKA performed using the gap-balancing/tibia-first technique. The final shift of the joint line was calculated using computer verification of proximal tibial and distal femoral cuts. In consideration of the clinical relevance of a 3-mm joint line shift, patients were stratified into two groups: Group I, with joint line change <3 mm, and Group II, with joint line change ≥3 mm. Between groups, variables such as demographics, Kellgren & Lawrence degree of osteoarthritis, preoperative flexion contracture, pre-/intraoperative mechanical leg alignment, flexion/extension gaps, and implant design/sizes were compared statistically.

RESULTS

The absolute joint line shift averaged 1.6 ± 1.3 mm (range 0-6 mm). A joint line shift ≥3 mm was observed in 28 cases (15 %). A statistically significant difference between groups was not identified for any of the parameters. Shift of the joint line did not correlate with the analyzed variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Joint line was adequately restored when computer navigation was carefully applied as a measuring tool for primary TKA. Knee joint deformity, leg alignment, gap balance, and implant type did not aid in predicting the joint line shift.

Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) versus standard instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with regard to coronal and sagittal alignment, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and cost. A systematic query in search of relevant studies was performed, and the data published in these studies were extracted and aggregated. In regard to coronal alignment, PSI demonstrated improved accuracy in femorotibial angle (FTA) (P=0.0003), while standard instrumentation demonstrated improved accuracy in hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) (P=0.02). Importantly, there were no differences between treatment groups in the percentages of FTA or HKA outliers (>3 degrees from target alignment) (P=0.7). Sagittal alignment, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and cost were also similar between groups (P>0.1 for all comparisons).

Evaluation of a CT-based technique to measure the transfer accuracy of a virtually planned osteotomy

Accurate transfer of a preoperatively planned osteotomy plane to the bone is of significance for corrective surgery, tumor resection, implant positioning and evaluation of new osteotomy techniques. Methods for comparing a preoperatively planned osteotomy plane with a surgical cut exist but the accuracy of these techniques are either limited or unknown. This paper proposes and evaluates a CT-based technique that enables comparing virtual with actual osteotomy planes. The methodological accuracy and reproducibility of the technique is evaluated using CT-derived volume data of a cadaver limb, which serves to plan TKA osteotomies in 3-D space and to simulate perfect osteotomies not hampered by surgical errors. The methodological variability of the technique is further investigated with repeated CT scans after actual osteotomy surgery of the same cadaver specimen. Plane displacement (derr) and angulation errors in the sagittal and coronal plane (βerr, γerr) are measured with high accuracy and reproducibility (derr=-0.11±0.06mm; βerr=0.08±0.04°, γerr=-0.03±0.03°). The proposed method for evaluating an osteotomy plane position and orientation has a high intrinsic accuracy and reproducibility. The method can be of great value for measuring the transfer accuracy of new techniques for positioning and orienting a surgical cut in 3-D space.

[Update on navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Where are we today and what lies in the future?]

BACKGROUND

The implantation of an artificial knee is one of the most common operative interventions in German hospitals. Navigation procedures have developed into an integral component of such interventions in the operating theatres of many clinics.

METHODS

For orthopedic surgeons who want to implement an as exact as possible reconstruction of the mechanical leg axis and require intraoperative control of the three dimensional positioning of components and/or the capsular ligament situation, navigation is a well-proven intraoperative tool. The immediate intraoperative control possibility of bone resection and capsular ligament soft tissue balancing means that navigation is a valuable instrument for the biomechanical fundamental understanding in training operations for further education of orthopedic surgeons in training.

DEVELOPMENTS

The greater precision obtained by the implementation of the procedure has not yet been conclusively reflected in an improved postoperative knee function or an increased durability of prostheses. New developments in navigated knee prostheses are pinless navigation and navigation kinematics. In pinless navigation the conventional reference marker system fixed in the femur and shin bones is replaced by a non-invasive reference system. With the aid of navigation kinematics it is possible to image the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral movement dynamics, intraoperatively.

PERSPECTIVE

The aim of the next generation navigation systems for computer-assisted knee prosthetics is implant positioning aligned to the individual anatomy of patients with high and stable range of movement for optimum patellar guidance and kinematics of the artificial joint.

Can technology improve alignment during knee arthroplasty

Component malalignment remains a concern in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); therefore, a series of technologies have been developed to improve alignment. The authors conducted a systematic review to compare computer-assisted navigation with conventional instrumentation, and assess the current evidence for patient-matched instrumentation and robot-assisted implantation. An extensive search of the PubMed database for relevant meta-analyses, systematic reviews and original articles was performed, with each study scrutinised by two reviewers. Data on study characteristics and outcomes were extracted from each study and compared. In total 30 studies were included: 10 meta-analyses comparing computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation, 13 studies examining patient-matched instrumentation, and seven investigating robot-assisted implantation. Computer-assisted navigation showed significant and reproducible improvements in mechanical alignment over conventional instrumentation. Patient-matched instrumentation appeared to achieve a high degree of mechanical alignment, although the majority of studies were of poor quality. The data for robot-assisted surgery was less indicative. Computer-assisted navigation improves alignment during TKA over conventional instrumentation. For patient-matched instrumentation and robot-assisted implantation, alignment benefits have not been reliably demonstrated. For all three technologies, clinical benefits cannot currently be assumed, and further studies are required. Although current technologies to improve alignment during TKA appear to result in intra-operative benefits, their clinical impact remains unclear, and surgeons should take this into account when considering their adoption.

Computer navigation is a useful intra-operative tool for joint line measurement in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Restoration of the native joint line in total knee arthroplasty is important in restoring ligamentous balance and normal knee kinematics. Failure to achieve this could lead suboptimal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and functional outcome of patients who demonstrated joint line changes after computer-assisted (CAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

One hundred sixty-eight patients (168 knees) underwent CAS TKA by two surgeons at a single institution with 2 years follow-up. The final change in joint line was calculated from the verified tibial resection and distal femoral cuts. Group A patients had joint line changes of less than 4mm and Group B patients had joint line changes of more than 4mm. Post-operative Oxford scores, Knee scores, Function scores and SF-36 scores were obtained at 6 months and 2 years post TKA.

RESULTS

There was significant linear correlation between joint line changes and Oxford scores (P=0.0001), Function scores (P=0.0001) and Knee scores (P=0.0001) at 6 months and Oxford scores (P=0.0001) alone at 2 years with increasing joint line changes having poorer outcome scores. Group A compared to Group B patients demonstrated better Oxford scores (P=0.0001), Function scores (P=0.0001), Knee scores (P=0.0001) and total SF-36 scores (P=0.003) at 6 months as well as better Oxford scores (P=0.0001) and Knee scores (P=0.014) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CAS is a useful intra-operative tool for assessing the final joint line in TKA. Outliers in joint line changes of ≥4 mm are associated with poorer clinical outcome scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Study, Level II-1.

Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value

Patient specific cutting guides generated by preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the patient's extremity have been proposed as a method of improving the consistency of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) alignment and adding efficiency to the operative procedure. The cost of this option was evaluated by quantifying the savings from decreased operative time and instrument processing costs compared to the additional cost of the MRI and the guide. Coronal plane alignment was measured in an unselected consecutive series of 200 TKAs, 100 with standard instrumentation and 100 with custom cutting guides. While the cutting guides had significantly lower total operative time and instrument processing time, the estimated $322 savings was overwhelmed by the $1,500 additional cost of the MRI and the cutting guide. All measures of coronal plane alignment were equivalent between the two groups. The data does not currently support the proposition that patient specific guides add value to TKA.

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may improve coronal alignment outliers; however, it is unclear whether navigated TKA improves the long-term clinical results of TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Does the literature contain evidence of better long-term function and lower revision rates with navigated TKA compared with conventional TKA?

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted of navigated TKA reviewing articles related to coronal alignment, clinical knee and function scores, cost, patient satisfaction, component rotation, anteroposterior and mediolateral stability, complications, and longer-term reports.

RESULTS

Coronal plane alignment is improved with navigated TKA with fewer radiographic outliers. We found limited evidence of improvements in any other variable, and function was not improved. The duration of surgery is increased and there are unique complications related to navigated TKA. The long-term benefits of additional increase in accuracy of alignment are not supported by any current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in reports of navigated TKA should be interpreted with caution. There are few short- and medium- and no long-term studies demonstrating improved clinical outcomes using navigated TKA. Despite substantial research, contradictory findings coupled with reservations about the cost and efficacy of the technology have contributed to the failure of computer navigation to become the accepted standard in TKA. Longer-term studies demonstrating improved function, lower revision rates, and acceptable costs are required before navigated TKA may be widely adopted. In the future, with improvements in study design, methodology, imaging, navigation technology, newer functional outcome tools, and longer-term followup studies, we suspect that navigated TKA may demonstrate yet unrecognized benefits.

Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up

PURPOSE

Even though computer-assisted navigation systems have been shown to improve the accuracy of implantation of components into the femur and tibia, long-term results are lacking and there is little evidence yet that navigation techniques also improve functional outcomes and implant longevity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to summarize and compare the clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed using navigation-assisted and conventional techniques.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the guidelines described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statements. Methodological features were rated independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi- randomized controlled trials (qRCTs) was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of CAS versus conventional TKA. Data were pooled in fixed and random effects models and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated. Heterogeneity across studies was determined, and subgroup analyses by the type of navigation system (image-based or image-free navigation system) were conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies that included 2333 knees were collected from different countries. The surgical time was longer for CN TKA than for the conventional procedure. There was no significant difference in the Knee Society Score between the two groups at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up. The rates of postoperative complications in patients who had CN TKA were similar to those in the patients who had conventional TKA.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in short-term clinical outcomes were found following TKAs performed with and without computer navigation system. However, there is clearly a need for additional high-quality clinical trials with long-term follow-up to confirm the clinical benefits of computer-assisted surgery.

Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

PURPOSE

Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed as a technique to improve implant alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is still a debate over the accuracy of placing the femoral and tibial components using computer-assisted systems in TKA. The aim of this study is to establish whether computer-assisted surgery leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning than conventional technique in patients with primary TKA.

METHODS

Major electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies without language restriction. A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs was performed in a random effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted by type of navigation system to explore the clinical heterogeneity between these trials. The following radiographic parameters were used to compare computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique: (1) mechanical leg axis, (2) femoral component coronal alignment, (3) tibial component coronal alignment, (4) femoral component sagittal alignment, and (5) tibial component sagittal alignment.

RESULTS

For the mechanical leg axis and coronal positioning of femoral and tibial components, there are statistically significant reductions in the number of patients with malalignment in the CAS group if the outlier cutoff value is ±3 or 2° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrates that CT-free navigation systems provide better alignment than conventional techniques in the coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral components within ±3 and 2°. If the outlier cutoff value for the tibial sagittal alignment is ±2°, the outlier percentages are higher in the CT-free navigation group than in the conventional group. However, there was no significant difference in the tibial sagittal alignment at ±3°.

CONCLUSION

Computer-assisted surgery does improve mechanical leg axis and component orientation in TKAs. However, high-quality RCTs are necessary to determine whether surgeons could use computer-assisted techniques to achieve a targeted tibial slope in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study (Systematic review of Level I/II studies), Level II.

A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement

The aim of this prospective single-centre study was to assess the difference in clinical outcome between total knee replacement (TKR) using computerised navigation and that of conventional TKR. We hypothesised that navigation would give a better result at every stage within the first five years. A total of 195 patients (195 knees) with a mean age of 70.0 years (39 to 89) were allocated alternately into two treatment groups, which used either conventional instrumentation (group A, 97 knees) or a navigation system (group B, 98 knees). After five years, complete clinical scores were available for 121 patients (62%). A total of 18 patients were lost to follow-up. Compared with conventional surgery, navigated TKR resulted in a better mean Knee Society score (p = 0.008). The difference in mean Knee Society scores over time between the two groups was not constant (p = 0.006), which suggests that these groups differed in their response to surgery with time. No significant difference in the frequency of malalignment was seen between the two groups. In summary, computerised navigation resulted in a better functional outcome at five years than conventional techniques. Given the similarity in mechanical alignment between the two groups, rotational alignment may prove to be a better method of identifying differences in clinical outcome after navigated surgery.

Assessment of Knee Implant Alignment Using Coordinate Measurement on Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions

The rapid development of navigation systems designed to improve implant alignment calls for precise methods to verify positioning. One new approach to assess knee implant alignment is coordinate measurement (CM) using reference objects on 3-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomographic (CT) image sequences. The objectives of this study were to determine whether implant alignment can be accurately and precisely examined with CT-based CM, and whether correct positioning of a transversal support implant can be attained using a specially developed aiming instrument. Average deviation of CT measurements from those made with a digital caliper remained within the caliper’s range of error. This level of accuracy was observer independent. CT-based CM can be used for accurate and precise alignment verification. As well, precise alignment of transversal support can be achieved during implantation with a conventional aiming device, assuming the bony landmarks are appropriately recognized.